Skip to Main Content

Back Home: Mechanisms of Neural Mimicry in Melanoma Brain Metastasis

March 15, 2023

Yale Cancer Center Grand Rounds | March 14, 2023

Presentation by: Dr. Eva

ID
9680

Transcript

  • 00:00Friday, and thank you so much Harriet
  • 00:03and Marcus for your kind invitation.
  • 00:05I promise I'll go back in person and
  • 00:08hopefully with less technical issues.
  • 00:11So as all of you know,
  • 00:13probably even better than me,
  • 00:15Melanoma is the fifth most common
  • 00:17cancer in men and sixteen women.
  • 00:19And can you please keep clicking?
  • 00:21I'm going to go fast through this first
  • 00:23slides because it's just background.
  • 00:24As you know, the incidence of
  • 00:26Melanoma continues to increase.
  • 00:27It double s every 20 years
  • 00:29and luckily this is like.
  • 00:31Unfortunately,
  • 00:31it's not a updated the mortality
  • 00:34associated with Melanoma is starting to
  • 00:37decrease and this is you definitely to
  • 00:40the development of better therapies.
  • 00:43For the past 15 years,
  • 00:46Melanoma has become the poster
  • 00:48child for many targeted therapies
  • 00:50as well as immunotherapy space.
  • 00:52Please keep clicking,
  • 00:54but all of you know there is still
  • 00:57despite the success of this.
  • 01:01Uh,
  • 01:01we're developing immunotherapy treatments.
  • 01:04We still can keep clicking.
  • 01:06We are still facing significant resistance
  • 01:11to some of these treatments or a.
  • 01:18Year um side effects.
  • 01:20So approximately 40% of the
  • 01:23metastatic Melanoma patients have
  • 01:24not benefited from the advances
  • 01:26that have been done over the past
  • 01:28years in the treatment of Melanoma.
  • 01:30So this takes me, can you please go on to my,
  • 01:35the, the focus of my lab.
  • 01:37Can you go back?
  • 01:39Yeah,
  • 01:39which evolves around these questions,
  • 01:43right, the fact that we still need
  • 01:45better markers for patient selection,
  • 01:47understand.
  • 01:48Where we check the patients that are
  • 01:50going to uh go on to recur after the
  • 01:52initial resection of their tumor,
  • 01:54which ones are going to metastasize.
  • 01:57And also in particular,
  • 01:59as Harriet mentioned,
  • 02:00we've developed an interest in
  • 02:02understanding the biology of CNS metastases,
  • 02:05particularly of brain metastasis
  • 02:07because they show less level responses
  • 02:10to immunotherapy and the incidence
  • 02:12is increasing as patients are living
  • 02:15longer and surviving from other systems.
  • 02:18Astasis, so my lab is focused
  • 02:21into aspects of metastasis,
  • 02:23the initial steps of early dissemination,
  • 02:25we now know that primary tumors,
  • 02:28especially in Melanoma.
  • 02:29Is that uh,
  • 02:31disseminating start sharing cells that
  • 02:33go into circulation and metastasize
  • 02:36really early on in the process.
  • 02:38So we want to understand,
  • 02:39please click uh,
  • 02:40which are the mechanisms that
  • 02:43drive the metastatic behavior of
  • 02:46certain melanomas and not others.
  • 02:49We know that unity alterations
  • 02:51don't explain this behavior because
  • 02:53none of the well characterized
  • 02:55genetic alterations of Melanoma
  • 02:56or combinations of those genetic
  • 02:58alterations can explain why.
  • 03:00And primary tumors recurred,
  • 03:02metastasized and some others don't.
  • 03:05And also we want to understand
  • 03:07what is the contribution of
  • 03:09intratumoral heterogeneity.
  • 03:10So we know now that despite the
  • 03:13fact that primary tumors can have
  • 03:15a relatively homogeneous genetic
  • 03:17profile inside those tumors,
  • 03:19we can recognize groups of cells with
  • 03:22different transcriptional programs,
  • 03:23what we call transcriptional states.
  • 03:25And there is a recent search for what
  • 03:28are the programs for their states.
  • 03:30That drive these metastatic behavior
  • 03:32and people have pointed to the neural
  • 03:35Crest like or the EMT program on the
  • 03:37other side of the equation.
  • 03:39We are also trying to understand
  • 03:40what happens at the end of the
  • 03:42process once the cancer cells,
  • 03:44in this case Melanoma cells have already
  • 03:46extravasated into those distal organs.
  • 03:48As you know Melanoma metastasis to the
  • 03:50lung delivered in the brain and we are
  • 03:53interested in understanding what are the
  • 03:55site specific adaptations in those sites,
  • 03:57where are the type of metabolic changes.
  • 04:01The cell types of the cancer
  • 04:03cells are interacting.
  • 04:04And what is this crosstalk between the
  • 04:06cancer cells and their environment?
  • 04:07How is shaping the ability of animal cells
  • 04:09to adapt and grow in those environments?
  • 04:12And I will have to stories
  • 04:15presenting today if time permits,
  • 04:17one that focuses more in just the
  • 04:20metastatic potential in general and how
  • 04:22muscles cops some of the programs of the
  • 04:24neural Crest cells from which they arise.
  • 04:26And also in the second part of the talk,
  • 04:30I will talk more specifically.
  • 04:31About to bring metastasis and how Melanoma
  • 04:35cells mimic some of the processes
  • 04:38that happen during neurodegeneration,
  • 04:40particularly to suppress new inflammation
  • 04:42and be able to grow within the brain.
  • 04:45So diving into the first story,
  • 04:47these are the four areas in which my
  • 04:49lab has been focused in recent years,
  • 04:52epigenetic alterations, noncollinear,
  • 04:54a post translational modifications
  • 04:56particularly like oscillation
  • 04:57and site specific adaptations.
  • 04:59So moving on,
  • 05:01can you please move these slides one more,
  • 05:04the first story that has been
  • 05:07recently accepted for publication
  • 05:09is the work of three people.
  • 05:12It evolve over time and we have.
  • 05:15Uh,
  • 05:15tightly muscles invoke and you like clear
  • 05:18sticky genetic program during metastasis.
  • 05:20So the genesis for this project was a very
  • 05:24simple premise and it's the fact that,
  • 05:26well,
  • 05:27we all know that neural Crest cells are
  • 05:29the cells of origin of melanocytes.
  • 05:30And these are among the most totipotent
  • 05:33and among the most invasive and migratory
  • 05:36cells of our body and is well known
  • 05:40now if you keep clicking that Melanoma
  • 05:42cells adopt programs characteristic.
  • 05:45You address the cells during the progression
  • 05:48from primary to metastatic cancer.
  • 05:50So we wanted to investigate which
  • 05:52epigenetic changes happen during
  • 05:54melanocyte differentiation from the
  • 05:55neural Crest to the melanocyte that
  • 05:58potentially could be reversed in the
  • 06:00transition from primary to metastasis.
  • 06:02And we did this by looking
  • 06:05specifically at DNA methylation.
  • 06:07There are of course many other
  • 06:09mechanisms of epigenetic regulation
  • 06:10being the enumeration one of them.
  • 06:12So if you move to the next slide.
  • 06:16This is what we did basically was
  • 06:17a comparison of four data sets.
  • 06:19So in one hand I cannot use my pointer,
  • 06:22but you can see that we have 4 columns.
  • 06:25We have neural Crest cells that were
  • 06:27obtained from a collaborator in France.
  • 06:29These are human cells.
  • 06:31We also had the human melanocytes
  • 06:33from different donors.
  • 06:35And as you can see there is
  • 06:36kind of a mirroring pattern.
  • 06:38We were looking for CPG islands that
  • 06:41were either hypomethylated in the
  • 06:43conversion from neural Crest cells.
  • 06:46To Milano sites that were progressively
  • 06:48hypermethylated from primary to
  • 06:50metastatic Melanoma or the converse,
  • 06:52if you see at the bottom,
  • 06:54we have some CPG islands.
  • 06:57If you can click again,
  • 06:58you will see there are some CPG
  • 07:00islands around the gene called NR
  • 07:0222 that are hypomethylated in the
  • 07:04neural grass cells that become
  • 07:07hypermethylated in melanocytes and
  • 07:09progressively hypomethylated from
  • 07:11primary to metastatic Melanoma.
  • 07:12And this really call our attention
  • 07:15because it really represented.
  • 07:16Example of a potential gene or or
  • 07:19candidate program to be modulated
  • 07:22during neural Crest differentiation
  • 07:24to melanocytes that was reversed
  • 07:27during the progression from primary
  • 07:29to metastatic Melanoma and what
  • 07:31is first of all an R2 of two,
  • 07:33so it's a nuclear receptor
  • 07:35is also called cooked.
  • 07:37TF2 is an orphan nuclear receptor.
  • 07:39We don't know still what
  • 07:40is the natural ligand,
  • 07:41although retinoic acid can bind
  • 07:44it at high concentrations.
  • 07:46This is the motif that it binds,
  • 07:47and as you can see the NRF 2 full
  • 07:51isoform has a DNA binding domain.
  • 07:54It has a ligand domain.
  • 07:55So it's a conventional nuclear receptor
  • 07:58that can form a **** or heterodimers.
  • 08:01It is essential if you,
  • 08:04yeah,
  • 08:05it's essential for development and
  • 08:07particularly for the formation of blood
  • 08:09vessels and it has been shown to be
  • 08:12important for neural test differentiation.
  • 08:15Now there have been already some studies
  • 08:17showing the role of NRF 2IN cancer,
  • 08:20particularly pancreatic and
  • 08:22prostate cancer metastasis,
  • 08:24whereas in breast cancer it
  • 08:25had a controversial effects.
  • 08:27So you can say well you know this,
  • 08:29this may already be known
  • 08:30that this factor is important.
  • 08:32Cancer, however,
  • 08:32if you click one more slide,
  • 08:35what really cool our attention is
  • 08:37that the CPG islands that we found
  • 08:40to be differential differentially
  • 08:42methylated in neural Crest cells
  • 08:45versus melanocytes and then later
  • 08:47on in primary versus Melanoma,
  • 08:49we're actually affecting exactly that
  • 08:53region in the transcription start
  • 08:56site that controls the expression
  • 08:58of an alternative isoform isoform 2.
  • 09:02Which is not the one that has
  • 09:04been commonly characterized.
  • 09:05So most studies have focused on
  • 09:06the full length isoform, isoform,
  • 09:08one that has the DNA binding domain,
  • 09:11the like minded domain.
  • 09:13But this methylated region or the
  • 09:16methylated region is in atss that
  • 09:18gives rise to a truncated isoform
  • 09:20that lacks the DNA binding domain.
  • 09:22So on the right you can see that as
  • 09:25we had shown before the CPG islands
  • 09:30controlling this this nuclear receptor.
  • 09:32Networks to ISO two are hypomethylated and
  • 09:36they appear in green in cells and stem cells,
  • 09:40but completely hypermethylated
  • 09:41in melanocytes,
  • 09:42and this is also described here at the
  • 09:45bottom where you can see the beta value.
  • 09:47The beta value of 1 means completely
  • 09:50methylated and a better value close to
  • 09:530 represents a hypomethylated gene.
  • 09:55This completely corresponds to gene
  • 09:57expression because you can see that
  • 10:00whereas isoform one is expressed in ESL.
  • 10:021000 monocytes isoform 2 is expressed
  • 10:04in your cells and neural Crest cells,
  • 10:07but not expressed at all in melanocytes.
  • 10:10OK.
  • 10:10So in when you look at the human samples,
  • 10:13you can see and that even though
  • 10:15it's not completely
  • 10:16black and white, what we see is that
  • 10:18there is an increased percentage of
  • 10:21hypomethylation of isotope in the metastatic
  • 10:23cases compared to the primary cases.
  • 10:26You can see there is from 30% approximately
  • 10:29to more than 50% of the samples have
  • 10:33hypomethylation for NR2ISO2 and if you
  • 10:35keep clicking you will see that you can
  • 10:38see there is a progressive increase.
  • 10:40In the better value from Levi
  • 10:43to primary and metastasis,
  • 10:45so more hypomethylated and conversely
  • 10:47increase expression from primary to
  • 10:50metastasis with a very nice correlation
  • 10:52between M RNA expression and methylation.
  • 10:55Is exactly, if you look at
  • 10:57the protein levels,
  • 10:58we were able to develop actually an
  • 11:00antibody specific for isoform 2,
  • 11:02which was challenging because
  • 11:03there are only 15 amino acid symbol
  • 11:05amino terminal that that specific.
  • 11:06But also two you can see that there is an
  • 11:08increase in the expression of isoform 2.
  • 11:10There are few cells that are positive
  • 11:13in the primary cases and this
  • 11:15population expands in the metastasis.
  • 11:17This is something that we are actually
  • 11:20trying to understand now whether
  • 11:22there is a selection for those cells
  • 11:25that expressed isoform 2 over time.
  • 11:27And again this is this is something
  • 11:30we're coming time to investigate but
  • 11:32if we can go on we we can see that
  • 11:35isoform one the one that is the full
  • 11:38length isoform is not modulated by
  • 11:40methylation is completely hypomethylated
  • 11:42in ES cells you know cells melanocytes
  • 11:45and both in primary and metastatic
  • 11:47Melanoma and there is no correlation
  • 11:50between expression and methylation.
  • 11:52So isoform one is always there,
  • 11:54but is isoform 2 the one that.
  • 11:56Is normally not expressed in melanocytes,
  • 11:58but is increasingly demethylated
  • 12:01and expressed from primary to
  • 12:03metastatic Melanoma.
  • 12:05Now of course the question is,
  • 12:06is this isoform tool doing
  • 12:08anything in Melanoma metastasis?
  • 12:10And for that we had to move to cell
  • 12:13lines and again we found this pattern
  • 12:15in which melanocytes and some melanomas
  • 12:17aliens had complete hypermethylation
  • 12:19and lack of expression as you can see
  • 12:21here on the right and you can also see.
  • 12:27Hypomethylation in some of the
  • 12:29cell lines and this corresponds
  • 12:31to expression and the same can be
  • 12:33seen at the level of protein.
  • 12:36You can see isoform 2 expressed only in
  • 12:37those cells that have hypomethylation.
  • 12:39So this represents a good model to study
  • 12:41loss of function and general function.
  • 12:43But before I go into that you can see that.
  • 12:49The methylation uh status can also
  • 12:52be seen in short term culture.
  • 12:54These are cells isolated from
  • 12:56patients and again you have some,
  • 12:59some of these short-term cultures
  • 13:01have hypomethylation and some
  • 13:03of them have hypermethylation.
  • 13:05So this is not an artifact of invitro
  • 13:08culture and it happens in cells derive
  • 13:13very shortly from from patients.
  • 13:16So if now we move into cells that.
  • 13:20Have hypermethylation like mayor cells.
  • 13:22If we treat them with editing agent
  • 13:25like 5 ASA you can see that there is
  • 13:28an induction of isoform 2 and this
  • 13:31is seen also in short term cultures
  • 13:34in which treatment with FAFSA results in
  • 13:37induction of isophorone to expression
  • 13:39with no change in isoform one.
  • 13:41Now when we silence isoform to
  • 13:43using the specific srnas against
  • 13:45these isoform that don't have
  • 13:47any impact on the other isoform.
  • 13:49Initially we did not see any
  • 13:52effect onto the proliferation,
  • 13:54but we observed a clear decrease
  • 13:56in the ability to form colonies
  • 13:59in soft Agar or to form a sphere
  • 14:02spheres upon single cells.
  • 14:03So these are properties that
  • 14:05are characteristic of metastatic
  • 14:07cells and basically measure the
  • 14:09ability of the cells to grow under
  • 14:12very stressful conditions.
  • 14:13Now if we overexpressed,
  • 14:14sorry before we go into their expression.
  • 14:17This is the experiment in in this case.
  • 14:20We injected on the cancer cells
  • 14:22intracardiac in a conventional
  • 14:24in a model of metastasis that
  • 14:25we use very often in the lab.
  • 14:27And you can see that the silencing of
  • 14:30isoform 2 between independent HR and
  • 14:32I had a very significant decrease in
  • 14:35metastatic potential in this model,
  • 14:37which is quantified here on the
  • 14:39right by bioluminescence as well
  • 14:41as fluorescence intensity when
  • 14:43we extract the organs.
  • 14:44So it seems like isoform 2 silencing
  • 14:48suppresses metastasis in these.
  • 14:50A model and now we move into
  • 14:52overexpression systems in which
  • 14:54ectopic expression of isoform 2IN
  • 14:56cells that have hypermethylation has
  • 14:59no effect again into the culture,
  • 15:01but it has a significant ability to
  • 15:04increase the number of colonies and
  • 15:06soft tagar as well as sphere formation.
  • 15:08In vivo we injected these cells
  • 15:10in the flank of the mice and then
  • 15:13we did survival surgery.
  • 15:14You can see that we cover two more
  • 15:16area because there is always a lot
  • 15:18of signal that comes even after
  • 15:19you have resected.
  • 15:20The majority of the tumor is the
  • 15:23subcutaneous tumor and you can see
  • 15:25that isotonic expression enhances
  • 15:28metastasis both by bioluminescence
  • 15:30as well as by histological analysis.
  • 15:32We did this also by intracardiac
  • 15:34injection and again we observed
  • 15:36the same effect with an increase
  • 15:38in metastasis overall.
  • 15:39So it seems like ISO two,
  • 15:42this particular truncated isoform of
  • 15:44the orphan nuclear receptor and R2F2
  • 15:47is able to promote metastasis and is.
  • 15:50There's to be required in some
  • 15:52models to in most of the models
  • 15:53that we tried in lab and the paper,
  • 15:55we have three or four different models.
  • 15:58You can see a decrease in metastasis when
  • 16:01you're silence or knockout this change.
  • 16:03So now what are the programs
  • 16:05that are modulated by isoform 2?
  • 16:07We did RNA sequencing to get to this
  • 16:10question and one of the pathways
  • 16:12that was significantly modulated was
  • 16:14EMT DPL to mesenchymal transition.
  • 16:17Now we went on to demonstrate that
  • 16:19a lot of the typical genes involved
  • 16:22in the epithelial transition where
  • 16:24silence in different cell lines
  • 16:26when we deplete isoform 2.
  • 16:29And here you can see a validation
  • 16:32for snail which is reduced both
  • 16:35transcriptionally and at the protein
  • 16:37level when we silence ice form 2.
  • 16:41Importantly, I as I mentioned
  • 16:43at the beginning of my talk,
  • 16:45now we have an understanding of
  • 16:48intratumoral heterogeneity Melanoma
  • 16:49and we have seen that most melanomas
  • 16:51both in mouse and human display
  • 16:54different transcriptional states,
  • 16:55intermediate neural Crest
  • 16:57like proliferation EMT or more
  • 17:01melanocytic or differentiated.
  • 17:04So we were curious to see whether
  • 17:06NRF 2 and particularly the signature
  • 17:08of genes modulated by isophorone.
  • 17:11Who were particularly enriched in any
  • 17:13of these transcriptional States and as
  • 17:16you can see in this heat map, the EMT,
  • 17:18in particular the transcriptional
  • 17:20state that corresponds to an
  • 17:23epithelial to mesenchymal transition
  • 17:25seems to be the one that is more
  • 17:29enriched in these two signature
  • 17:31together with the neural signature.
  • 17:33So this goes together with our findings
  • 17:36that if two could be regulating the EMT.
  • 17:41Um estate and in this additional
  • 17:43analysis in which we we used scenic
  • 17:46to understand the regulations the
  • 17:49the basically the epigenetic and
  • 17:51transcriptional factors that control each
  • 17:54of these states melanocytic intermediate
  • 17:56proliferative neural Crest like an EMT.
  • 17:59You can see an I think it's more
  • 18:01visible in the next slide that the
  • 18:04top regulon controlling the event
  • 18:06signature and this is a completely
  • 18:08different analysis done in our mouse.
  • 18:11Levels of Melanoma you can see that
  • 18:14inner 2F2 is at the top is a top regulon.
  • 18:18Controlling the EMT signature.
  • 18:20So it seems like these transcriptional state
  • 18:23of epithelium to mesenchymal transition
  • 18:25seems to be mostly controlled by NF2 now.
  • 18:29How this happens?
  • 18:31Like I told you at the beginning that N2I2,
  • 18:34another two ISO two is a truncated isoform.
  • 18:38It lacks the DNA binding domain.
  • 18:40So how is it possible that it has this
  • 18:43capacity to control gene expression?
  • 18:45Now when we started to work in this isoform,
  • 18:48there were only two other papers that were
  • 18:52studying alternative isoforms of two,
  • 18:54all the papers that have been put out there.
  • 18:58And study only the full length isoform.
  • 19:01So there were two papers.
  • 19:03One was suggesting that I2 acted as a
  • 19:07dominant negative and was not removing
  • 19:10or displacing isoform one from chromatin.
  • 19:13With us another paper suggested the opposite
  • 19:15that I saw two contributed to bind ISO,
  • 19:18one to the chromatin and also what
  • 19:20complicates more this interpretation
  • 19:22of the results is the fact that
  • 19:25isoform one has been or inner 2F2 has
  • 19:28been described both as a receptor
  • 19:30as a repressor of transcription as
  • 19:32well as an activator.
  • 19:33So we.
  • 19:36It tested and the possibility that
  • 19:38NRF 2 ISO two was interacting with
  • 19:41isoform one and somehow modulating
  • 19:43the ability of an artist to to bind
  • 19:46chromatin and regulate gene expression.
  • 19:47But for this to be true also from
  • 19:50two had to have the capacity to
  • 19:53bind to isoform one in the nucleus,
  • 19:55and isoform 2 lacks the nuclear
  • 19:59localization signal present in isoform one.
  • 20:02It has an alternative nuclear localization
  • 20:04signal that is much less potent.
  • 20:06Thought we first show in a A
  • 20:11fragmentation analysis that isoform
  • 20:132 is able to reach the
  • 20:16nucleus. You can see there not
  • 20:19only the cytoplasm, right?
  • 20:20So this suggests the possibility that
  • 20:23it can interact with iPhone one.
  • 20:26Then we also did IP analysis
  • 20:28where we show that isoform one
  • 20:30can pull down isoform two with two
  • 20:32independent antibodies and the
  • 20:34opposite is also true, we can use.
  • 20:36Mile a GFP pulled down because
  • 20:39they unfortunately the endogenous
  • 20:41IP for I2 doesn't work well.
  • 20:44So we use the exogenous construct
  • 20:46that has a GP fusion and so we
  • 20:49can pull down again isoform too
  • 20:51with the isoform 1 suggesting
  • 20:53that it's two isoforms interact.
  • 20:55And when we look now at Chief of
  • 20:59isoform or chromatin IP of isoform one,
  • 21:03we can see that indeed when we silence
  • 21:05isoform 2 there is a group of peaks.
  • 21:07Of isoform one that now lose
  • 21:10binding of isoform one,
  • 21:11and this is more dramatic in this
  • 21:14group of targets is a little bit
  • 21:16less prevalent in this subset of of
  • 21:19pigs that are bound by isoform one.
  • 21:22But we can also observe the opposite.
  • 21:24We can see that in a group of peaks there
  • 21:26is an increased binding of isoform one.
  • 21:28When I do is gone.
  • 21:30So definitely the interaction between
  • 21:32these two isoforms is complex.
  • 21:34We know that the chip works because.
  • 21:38Um and active two is their most
  • 21:41significantly enriched transcription
  • 21:42factor in these pics together with
  • 21:45some other transcription factors
  • 21:47which are we're also interested
  • 21:49in in looking at the potential
  • 21:51interaction of MR2 with those.
  • 21:53So we can see that N22ISO2 modulates
  • 21:57the binding capacity of the chromatin,
  • 21:59but it not only in a way seems to be
  • 22:03in a in a gene specific manner and
  • 22:05when we integrate the cheap data.
  • 22:08Our transcriptomic sequencing of cells
  • 22:11in which we have depleted ISO two,
  • 22:14we found that the majority of the genes are.
  • 22:17A significant portion of the genes that
  • 22:19are downregulated when we sell in size.
  • 22:21Or two that are targets for an R2F2
  • 22:24are genes that are involved in the EMT,
  • 22:27snail, twist, Peter two, etc.
  • 22:30So it seems like a lot of the NR2ISO1
  • 22:34targets are actually in the direct.
  • 22:38Same teachings.
  • 22:39The opposite is that when we see
  • 22:42look at the genes that are now
  • 22:45upregulated by isoform 2,
  • 22:46the majority of those genes are
  • 22:49involving differentiation and
  • 22:50pigmentation such as tyrosinase,
  • 22:52DCT, etcetera.
  • 22:53So with all of these,
  • 22:55and still with many questions still open,
  • 22:58we propose this modeling which
  • 23:00in primary tumors isoform 2 is
  • 23:02hypermethylated and silence.
  • 23:04So the dimers of isoform 1 prevail over
  • 23:07the heterodimers of isoform 2 and isoform 1,
  • 23:10whereas in metastasis we see a displacement
  • 23:13of the equilibrium towards the home,
  • 23:16the heterodimer.
  • 23:17Sorry,
  • 23:17because now isoform 2 is present
  • 23:19and is this heterodimer that allows
  • 23:21the expression of neural Crest and.
  • 23:24Empty genes such as twisted slag etcetera.
  • 23:27So what we are now in the process
  • 23:30of understanding is how these
  • 23:32heterodimer is able to activate
  • 23:34this EMT genes and we think that
  • 23:37in part could be due
  • 23:38to the interaction with third parties
  • 23:41like additional transcription factors
  • 23:43that are specifically attracted
  • 23:45to the complex like isoform.
  • 23:47So we are doing our time and other
  • 23:49techniques to understand what are the
  • 23:52complexes that are attracted in bound
  • 23:54to the chromatin where we have the
  • 23:56homodimers versus the heterodimers.
  • 23:58Now moving on into the second
  • 24:01part of my talk,
  • 24:02I don't think I have to repeat the
  • 24:04conclusions because that's basically
  • 24:06the summary that I just have provided.
  • 24:08So in the interest of time,
  • 24:10I will move to the second part of the story
  • 24:13in which we have focused on brain metastasis.
  • 24:16This was the work mostly done by.
  • 24:20I actually incorrectly stated PhD
  • 24:21is an MD PhD from our laboratory,
  • 24:24Kevin Kleffman that is now a.
  • 24:28Accident at mass general.
  • 24:31So we of course are interested in
  • 24:34brain metastasis because it's an
  • 24:36important and met clinical need.
  • 24:38And although these tumors can
  • 24:41respond to immunotherapy,
  • 24:43we know that these responses are mostly
  • 24:45seen in patients that are asymptomatic
  • 24:47and in the symptomatic patients the
  • 24:49responses are much poorer and these
  • 24:51patients have overall very poor survival.
  • 24:53So this remains very important
  • 24:56clinical question and definitely.
  • 24:58Fascinating biological, um.
  • 25:00Uh,
  • 25:01question.
  • 25:01How Melanoma cells adapt to the
  • 25:04brain microenvironment and why
  • 25:05they have such a profound tropism
  • 25:07for the brain is still something
  • 25:10that we don't entirely understand.
  • 25:12So uh in collaboration with the management,
  • 25:15the director of the Melanoma program at NYU,
  • 25:17we develop Melanoma short-term
  • 25:19cultures that in some cases are
  • 25:22derived from the same patients.
  • 25:23So we can in some of the cases we
  • 25:25were able to obtain a short-term
  • 25:27cultures derived from a brain
  • 25:29metastasis and extracranial metastasis
  • 25:31from the same patient.
  • 25:33And again this is a very
  • 25:35difficult comparison to make,
  • 25:37but we think it's very useful
  • 25:39because it reduces some of the
  • 25:41inter tumoral heterogeneity.
  • 25:42As we observe what genetically
  • 25:44and transcriptionally and what was
  • 25:47really exciting to us is that when
  • 25:49we labeled these cells with GFP
  • 25:51luciferase and inject them back into
  • 25:53mice with intracardiac injections,
  • 25:55we observed that that metastatic the
  • 25:59the the short-term culture that has
  • 26:01been derived from the brain has in
  • 26:05general more metastatic potential
  • 26:07than the one that was derived
  • 26:08from an extracranial metastasis.
  • 26:10This is represented here on the right,
  • 26:12but more specifically.
  • 26:13The one that derives from the brain
  • 26:16has more ability to metastasize to the
  • 26:18brain and this is measured here as a
  • 26:21ratio of brain to body luminescence.
  • 26:23So it seems like this is a short term.
  • 26:25Cultures retain some of the properties,
  • 26:29some of the ability that they
  • 26:31had gained in in people,
  • 26:33in the patients of colonizing the brain
  • 26:36and therefore could be a good model
  • 26:38to study brain specific adaptations.
  • 26:40So we went on to conduct.
  • 26:44For the Omega analysis of these short-term
  • 26:47cultures, in total we profile 25,
  • 26:49approximately 12 and 13 brain
  • 26:52metastasis versus second metastasis.
  • 26:54Only a few of them, of course,
  • 26:56were pair,
  • 26:56the rest were unfair and the
  • 26:58idea was to try to identify proteins that
  • 27:00were differentially expressed in the brain.
  • 27:02Metastasis input could be potential
  • 27:05drivers of the adaptation.
  • 27:07The first reply is that we found when
  • 27:09analyzing the data is that the majority
  • 27:11of the proteins found differentially
  • 27:13expressed where proteins involved.
  • 27:14Being neurodegenerative disorders
  • 27:16such as Parkinson's, Alzheimer's,
  • 27:18Oxfords and this was rewarding because
  • 27:22our collaborator in at in the Anderson,
  • 27:25Mike Davis had previously found that
  • 27:27a lot of the proteins involved in
  • 27:31different study transcript transcriptional
  • 27:33profiling of brain metastases wouldn't
  • 27:36reach in Oxford or proteins involved
  • 27:39in the respiratory chain mitochondria
  • 27:41and so this was confirmed in our.
  • 27:45Plans.
  • 27:45We found that short-term cultures of
  • 27:48brain metastasis had elongated mitochondria,
  • 27:51and they also had increased oxygen
  • 27:54consumption rate in this seahorse analysis.
  • 27:57But what we focus on was in the differential
  • 28:00expression of proteins involved in
  • 28:03Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.
  • 28:05In particular,
  • 28:06we landed for this study on AP.
  • 28:09The amyloid processing protein there
  • 28:11is a precursor for amyloid beta.
  • 28:15It was induced in pre metastasis
  • 28:17compared to metastasis,
  • 28:18but not only AP itself,
  • 28:20but the proteins that leave AP into
  • 28:23amyloid beta like beta secretase
  • 28:26or present presently.
  • 28:28So we decided to modulate the loss
  • 28:29of a P to see if it had an effect
  • 28:32on brain metastasis.
  • 28:33And initially we found that
  • 28:37sorry went too fast.
  • 28:39We found that supernatants
  • 28:41of brain metastasis, Dr.
  • 28:44short-term cultures,
  • 28:44had higher secretion of family beta
  • 28:47compared to the extracranial brain
  • 28:49metastasis not only in our own hands,
  • 28:51but also in short term cultures obtained
  • 28:55from collaborators that we study institute.
  • 28:57Silence.
  • 28:58AP Again, we found no effect
  • 29:00in proliferation in culture,
  • 29:02but when we inject these cells
  • 29:05intracardiac in immunodeficient mice,
  • 29:06we observed this reduction of
  • 29:09the brain to body ratio,
  • 29:11suggesting that the loss of AP was
  • 29:13particularly affecting brain metastasis.
  • 29:15This was confirmed by histological analysis.
  • 29:18This is entertaining of NUMA,
  • 29:20which is a human marker,
  • 29:22and therefore it can perfectly
  • 29:25mark the cells that are.
  • 29:27The deriving from the from the scenography,
  • 29:30from the implant and you can see that
  • 29:32there was a very significant reduction
  • 29:35of brain and one positive cells but no
  • 29:39effect on kidney or liver metastasis.
  • 29:41We did ex vivo imaging MRI to conduct
  • 29:46volumetric analysis that show us that
  • 29:49we're not only less perimeter studies
  • 29:52but also smaller brain metastasis and
  • 29:55of course we show that this effect.
  • 29:57Happens, you know other models,
  • 29:59this is not a brain Tropic Melanoma cell
  • 30:01line type one and we use national approach,
  • 30:04in this case a crisper cast 9,
  • 30:06to show again a reduction in
  • 30:09brain metastasis.
  • 30:10But this of course open a lot of questions.
  • 30:12The first one is which step offering
  • 30:16metastasis is the one in which
  • 30:18is particularly required for the
  • 30:20adaptation and the the arrival
  • 30:22of Melanoma cells to the brain.
  • 30:24So as you know brain metas is
  • 30:26a complex process.
  • 30:27It involves multiple steps,
  • 30:31the intravasation from the tumor
  • 30:33into the first into the stroma,
  • 30:36then the intravasation into the vasculature,
  • 30:38survival in circulation,
  • 30:39and when the cells arrive to the distal site,
  • 30:41in this case the brain,
  • 30:42they have to again extravasate.
  • 30:44Many of these cells will undergo
  • 30:46cell death or become dormant,
  • 30:48but those that are able to proliferate
  • 30:51and survive in this environment will
  • 30:53form micro and macro metastasis.
  • 30:55So when was abeta required for this?
  • 30:58For this process,
  • 31:00so Kevin embark himself in really
  • 31:03a difficult task of monitoring the
  • 31:06kinetics of cancer cells injected
  • 31:08intracardiac in these mice.
  • 31:10So he did brain slice immunofluorescence
  • 31:13and a lot of confocal microscopy
  • 31:15and was tracking this GFP positive
  • 31:18cells in the brain over days.
  • 31:20So you can see that just one day after.
  • 31:24In the cardiac injection,
  • 31:25these cells are stuck in the vasculature.
  • 31:27They even have the shape
  • 31:28of the blood vessels.
  • 31:29This is a tomato, tomato,
  • 31:31lectin marking the the blood
  • 31:33vessels you can see there.
  • 31:35At day three they start extravasation,
  • 31:38they start getting out of the vasculature.
  • 31:41Some of these cells die.
  • 31:43A lot of these cells die in the
  • 31:45blood vessels or outside when they
  • 31:47are able to extravasate as sustained
  • 31:49by Clifton Space Stream and you
  • 31:51can see that later on they start
  • 31:53crawling through the blood vessels.
  • 31:55In these process called Vascular Co option,
  • 31:58they can later on form micrometastasis
  • 32:00that day 14 and finally micrometastasis.
  • 32:03So when you compare the kinetics
  • 32:06of control cells here in the
  • 32:08black line to those that lack app,
  • 32:10you can see that the first steps
  • 32:13of the kinetics are really similar.
  • 32:15There is this big crisis where most of
  • 32:17the cells that are able to extravasate
  • 32:20die either in the vessels or right
  • 32:23after extravasation but then after they 7.
  • 32:25When the control cells are able to start
  • 32:28expanding and proliferating happily,
  • 32:30the ones that lack APP can no longer
  • 32:34grow after the first or second division
  • 32:36and they eventually disappear.
  • 32:38They are they are dead.
  • 32:41So we wonder which effects were required
  • 32:45for for this role of ebata in the brain.
  • 32:49And remember that this is a very
  • 32:51complex environment where there are,
  • 32:53you know, the resident myeloid cells,
  • 32:55the microglia.
  • 32:55Macrophages in some cases will
  • 32:57matter derived macrophages that
  • 32:59attracted to the tumor and it excels
  • 33:01interfiling for sites and astrocytes.
  • 33:03So we first look at astrocytes
  • 33:05as a potential.
  • 33:09Still of interest, because of the
  • 33:11literature that had shown previously
  • 33:14that activated astrocytes can be Co
  • 33:16opted by the cancer cells to support
  • 33:18the growth in the brain environment.
  • 33:20And this is indeed the case.
  • 33:22Also in our models where we see that
  • 33:24if you look at the left panels,
  • 33:27you can see that over time,
  • 33:29as the muscles arrive to the brain,
  • 33:31these are the control cells,
  • 33:32you can see an increased presence
  • 33:35of GFP positive astrocytes.
  • 33:36So there is.
  • 33:38Some equipment of activated astrocytes
  • 33:40we cannot distinguish if it's
  • 33:42recruitment versus activation of
  • 33:45the surrounding astrocytes to the
  • 33:47point that they form this network
  • 33:49of active astrocytes that is called
  • 33:53active Astro cytosis supporting
  • 33:57the Melanoma micrometastasis.
  • 34:00So what we observe is that cells
  • 34:03that lack APP are unable to
  • 34:06trigger these reactive.
  • 34:07Cytosis around them.
  • 34:08When they arrive to the brain,
  • 34:11there is a significant reduction
  • 34:13of positive cells of GFP.
  • 34:16Positive cells around the cells
  • 34:18demand muscles that lack APP,
  • 34:20suggesting that perhaps a beta is important
  • 34:23in triggering these Astro cytosis.
  • 34:26Now, in data that I don't
  • 34:28have the time to explain,
  • 34:30we also show that Amelia better not only has
  • 34:33the capacity to activate the astrocytes,
  • 34:36but also.
  • 34:38Can suppress the phagocytosis
  • 34:40coming from the microglia.
  • 34:42So we can see that there is a
  • 34:44reduction of neural inflammation
  • 34:45in the presence of family beta.
  • 34:48So we think that Ali beta secreted
  • 34:50by cancer cells can have multiple
  • 34:52effects in the brain metastasis,
  • 34:54macular vironment, particularly on
  • 34:56the astrocytes and the microglia,
  • 34:59but also it can influence,
  • 35:01as it has been reported in Alzheimer's,
  • 35:03the interaction with the endothelial cells.
  • 35:06So of course these open,
  • 35:09these findings open some
  • 35:11possibilities and therapeutic
  • 35:13opportunities because of all the.
  • 35:16Armamentarium of drugs that have
  • 35:20been developed against America beta,
  • 35:22some of them beta secretase inhibitors and
  • 35:26more recently anti American antibodies,
  • 35:29some of which have been developed
  • 35:31for clinical use and in some
  • 35:33cases even approved by the FDA.
  • 35:35So these open the possibility of
  • 35:38repurposing some of these drugs which
  • 35:40are generally safe for brain metastasis
  • 35:42and for proof of principle we've
  • 35:44been testing some of these compounds.
  • 35:46In collaboration with Eli Lilly,
  • 35:48so we obtain beta secretase
  • 35:51inhibitors in the diet of the mice.
  • 35:54So initially we injected a cancer cells
  • 35:57Melanoma cells in these mice and gave
  • 36:00them a better second base inhibitor
  • 36:02in the food or controlled diet.
  • 36:05And you can see how this reduces the
  • 36:07number of brain metastasis in this model.
  • 36:10This is a short term culture but
  • 36:12also in the five one Melanoma cells.
  • 36:15Now of course this is more a prophylactic.
  • 36:17Model because treatment starts
  • 36:18at the time of injection,
  • 36:20so we raise the bar a little bit
  • 36:23by allowing the cells to establish
  • 36:25metastasis first and then after 21
  • 36:28days we gave doxycycline to the food
  • 36:30and the in the water of the mice
  • 36:33to activate docs inducible SH RNA.
  • 36:36And again we saw that in this context,
  • 36:38even when the treatment is initiated,
  • 36:39once metastasis have been formed,
  • 36:41we can see a reduction in the number
  • 36:43of brain metastases and if we do
  • 36:45the same thing with the Secretary.
  • 36:47Keep in touch. We can also see again
  • 36:50after initiating the treatment.
  • 36:52Once the micrometer studies have been formed,
  • 36:55we can see a reduction in brain
  • 36:57metastasis we are currently trying to.
  • 37:02Moving to well before I go into that,
  • 37:05we are now testing the antibodies against
  • 37:10Emily Beta either as a monotherapy
  • 37:12or in combination with immunotherapy
  • 37:14to see if we can recapitulate
  • 37:17the same effects of surf here.
  • 37:19So to summarize this part of the talk,
  • 37:21we have shown the proteomic studies
  • 37:24have revealed a novel connection
  • 37:27between brain metastasis and
  • 37:29neurodegenerative pathologies.
  • 37:30This has now been confirmed by other studies.
  • 37:32We collaborated with a group of men,
  • 37:34iser, last year.
  • 37:35We got a study done in single cell
  • 37:39analysis of primate testis that also
  • 37:43recapitulated these these finding
  • 37:45that Melanoma cells mimic the.
  • 37:49A neuronal pathways in another of the
  • 37:53alterations that are seen in you know,
  • 37:55degenerative disorders once
  • 37:56they reach the brain.
  • 37:58We see that Amelia Beta is particularly
  • 38:01required for pre metastasis and
  • 38:03not other sites of metastasis is
  • 38:05acquired for steps that happen after
  • 38:07extravasation and early survival
  • 38:09in the brain parenchyma and among
  • 38:12the multiple functions of family.
  • 38:14But in this context we have seen that it
  • 38:16triggers an anti-inflammatory response
  • 38:18in the astrocytes and suppresses.
  • 38:20Your inflammation, as I mentioned,
  • 38:23we are also studying now whether
  • 38:26these effects of family beta can
  • 38:28be seen also in other models.
  • 38:29So we have done a spatial
  • 38:31transcriptomic analysis.
  • 38:32In this case,
  • 38:33it's not a Melanoma model,
  • 38:34is the 41 model which is a breast
  • 38:37cancer triple negative model
  • 38:39that also colonizes the brain
  • 38:41after intracardiac injection.
  • 38:43These are on the top is a is a brain,
  • 38:47is half of a brain of a sham
  • 38:49mouse and this is the.
  • 38:50Mouse,
  • 38:51this is a mouse that was injected
  • 38:53with the 41 cells and what I want
  • 38:55to bring to your attention is that
  • 38:58in this the next vision analysis we
  • 39:01can see that the gfap positive cells
  • 39:04around the areas where the tumors are,
  • 39:07you have to probably take me you know
  • 39:09take my my word these are the areas
  • 39:11where the tumors are circle here
  • 39:14and we see a special expression or
  • 39:16increased expression of GFP around
  • 39:18those tumor cells we also see.
  • 39:20This one is 100 which has been seen
  • 39:22it used in tumor cells in the brain
  • 39:25environment in other cancer types.
  • 39:27And interestingly we find these
  • 39:29signature that we have that has
  • 39:32been previously reported as the an
  • 39:35Alzheimer's associated microglia
  • 39:37signature that is a combination
  • 39:39of 10 markers and is again seen
  • 39:43particularly activated around the
  • 39:46brain metastasis here in here.
  • 39:49So it seems like perhaps these Alzheimer
  • 39:52like response in the microglia genes
  • 39:54around the brain metastasis cells
  • 39:56could be a more general finding and
  • 39:58not only characteristic of Melanoma.
  • 39:59As I mentioned,
  • 40:00we are now very excited by studying
  • 40:03whether app genetic and pharmacological
  • 40:06inhibition extends to other cancer
  • 40:09types and whether the combination of
  • 40:12beta secretase inhibitors or antibodies
  • 40:14can work alone or in combination
  • 40:17with checkpoint checkpoint locate.
  • 40:19In immunocompetent models,
  • 40:20I was hoping to tell you about a
  • 40:24another very exciting story in the lab,
  • 40:27but I I see the clock and we are reaching
  • 40:29the 1:00 PM. So I will stop here and.
  • 40:35This is this data I wanted to present
  • 40:38but perhaps at the second occasion
  • 40:40and just wanna thank all the members
  • 40:43of the lab for their contributions.
  • 40:46This work that I presented was
  • 40:48mostly done by the first part,
  • 40:50which are Veronica and Claudia in
  • 40:53NRF 2 and Ali and Maya in CDP one.
  • 40:57And Kevin Kleffman led the I'm a
  • 41:02little better story and I want to thank
  • 41:04of course all our funding sources.
  • 41:06And thank you all for your attention
  • 41:09and your patience with the technical
  • 41:11issues at the beginning.
  • 41:12I'll stop here and take any questions.
  • 41:14Thank you.
  • 41:17Alright, thank you so much, Eva.
  • 41:19I'm going to ask folks to
  • 41:21put questions in the chat.
  • 41:22We only got a couple of minutes,
  • 41:24but while people type in the questions,
  • 41:26maybe I don't know if Marcus
  • 41:28has any or I can ask one.
  • 41:30Go ahead Marcus, I've got plenty.
  • 41:34So either really Congrats also on the,
  • 41:37you know the nature communications paper.
  • 41:39And I was wondering with the NR2F2 story,
  • 41:42you're probably aware of Chris,
  • 41:44Marines work in Nature last fall on TCF 4.
  • 41:49And I'm kind of wondering if you think
  • 41:53your NR 2F2 is upstream of TCF four if
  • 41:55you've seen any role there and there's
  • 41:57probably going to be a subsequent
  • 41:59story about resistance to therapies,
  • 42:01so there's.
  • 42:02Multiple parts to this question.
  • 42:05A, the upstream downstream part,
  • 42:06but then also the heterogeneity
  • 42:08because you're talking about these
  • 42:10things happening sort of uniformly.
  • 42:12But I'm imagining that the epigenetic
  • 42:14regulation is kind of cell by cell
  • 42:16and that there's going to be a
  • 42:17population of cells that have more
  • 42:19or less of that along the way.
  • 42:22All excellent questions and and
  • 42:24these are all the questions that
  • 42:25we are trying to address now.
  • 42:26So,
  • 42:26so we didn't see a total overlap
  • 42:29between our population of N2F2
  • 42:32with Chris Marines population.
  • 42:35It seems like his population is smaller
  • 42:39one inner two seems to be more broadly.
  • 42:43I expressed in both EMT and also partially
  • 42:47in the neural Crest like population.
  • 42:49So his population seems to be a more,
  • 42:51I wouldn't say minority,
  • 42:52but it's a smaller population
  • 42:54and not not directly overlap.
  • 42:58You also ask the other challenge that
  • 43:01we have is that a lot of the single
  • 43:04cell analysis that have allowed us to.
  • 43:06Distinguish this.
  • 43:07Transcriptionist states don't have,
  • 43:10don't allow us, don't don't have the
  • 43:12death to look into isoforms, right?
  • 43:14So you really have to have a different
  • 43:17library preparation and pipeline to
  • 43:19identify the different types of forms.
  • 43:22So when people look at R2,
  • 43:24they are just examining an R2 ISO one,
  • 43:27the full length and the one that
  • 43:29is really switching from the
  • 43:32the primary to the metastatic,
  • 43:34the one that is really triggering the EMT.
  • 43:36Like program is only isoform
  • 43:392 because of this.
  • 43:41Balance between home and headliners.
  • 43:45Yeah. So we we're definitely
  • 43:46trying to understand what is the
  • 43:48error key between these pathways,
  • 43:49where is upstream, it seems to be
  • 43:51one of the critical regulators.
  • 43:54So again when we do this.
  • 43:57Um, analysis is sending analysis,
  • 43:59but still we don't know which
  • 44:00one is upstream of which, right?
  • 44:02Yeah, that's a very good question.
  • 44:04And then you ask.
  • 44:05The dynamics right of this
  • 44:07of this population.
  • 44:09So we are now in the process
  • 44:11of labeling endogenously this
  • 44:12isoform to be able to trace them.
  • 44:14We want to understand whether
  • 44:17these isoforms are, you know,
  • 44:20dynamically regulated during the
  • 44:22metastatic process and we have
  • 44:24different labeling systems now
  • 44:25that allow us to sell to monitor
  • 44:28single cells during metastasis.
  • 44:30So I hope we will have soon an
  • 44:31answer for that, but we don't know.
  • 44:33I I also dissipate that it would change.
  • 44:36From the primary tumor as the
  • 44:38cells switch from the more
  • 44:40proliferative to the more invasive,
  • 44:42and then back when they arrive
  • 44:43to them at the static side.
  • 44:45But still we don't have
  • 44:46full evidence for that.
  • 44:51So, but there were a couple of
  • 44:53questions in the chat both relating to
  • 44:55Alzheimer's disease and brain metastases.
  • 44:58One is there an increased incidence
  • 45:00in brain metastases amount Alzheimer's
  • 45:02disease patients and the other one was
  • 45:05whether a postmortem you see Alzheimer's
  • 45:08clogs in patients with brain metastases.
  • 45:11Good questions.
  • 45:12So we haven't seen brain metastasis,
  • 45:15we haven't seen plaques in brain metastasis.
  • 45:18We look for for them,
  • 45:19we don't think that they get to accumulate,
  • 45:22so we don't, we don't think that the
  • 45:25processing is wrong is to simply induced.
  • 45:28So we see more soluble abeta being produced,
  • 45:31but we don't see oligomers and we don't
  • 45:33see plaques. We did that staining.
  • 45:35That conversion is done by pathologists
  • 45:37to to look at the plaques and we couldn't
  • 45:39see either in our models nor in human.
  • 45:41Examples and that's the reason why we
  • 45:45think that the antibodies that we wanna
  • 45:47try are antibodies that design against
  • 45:49the soluble and libetta and not against
  • 45:51the plaques which are the ones that
  • 45:53have been now or the oligomers which
  • 45:55have been now approved by the FDA.
  • 45:57Now you ask the other question,
  • 45:59the incidence in in Alzheimer's.
  • 46:01So we'll look into that and we didn't see
  • 46:06a epidemiological studies and association
  • 46:09between Alzheimer's and brain metastasis.
  • 46:13But normally remember that in the majority
  • 46:15of the neurodegenerative disorders,
  • 46:16there is an inverse correlation
  • 46:19between cancer incidence and
  • 46:21neurodegenerative disorders,
  • 46:22particularly Alzheimer's and Parkinson's.
  • 46:25And even though there is
  • 46:26not a positive correlation,
  • 46:27there is no negative association.
  • 46:29Now there is a reported association
  • 46:32between Parkinson's and and
  • 46:34Melanoma brain metastases.
  • 46:36And I mean I think Harry,
  • 46:39this is skeptical or not, I see you.
  • 46:43No, there's a slight increase,
  • 46:45but anyway, I don't know that it's brain
  • 46:47metastases specifically, it's just.
  • 46:50Come on. I'm sorry. Sorry.
  • 46:51Yeah, yeah, yeah. I misspoke.
  • 46:52I I meant that. I know my kid.
  • 46:53Right.
  • 46:54Yeah.
  • 46:55Yeah.
  • 46:56No,
  • 46:56but there's a really interesting
  • 46:58observation there.
  • 46:59So thank you and thank you so much
  • 47:01for this amazing presentation.
  • 47:02I have more questions,
  • 47:04but I'm going to e-mail them to you.
  • 47:06I don't believe there anymore in the chat.
  • 47:08We appreciate your patience with all
  • 47:09the technical challenges and thanks
  • 47:11for virtually visiting next time.
  • 47:12It'll be in person.
  • 47:14Thanks for wonderful talk to
  • 47:16really fascinating work.
  • 47:17Thank you,
  • 47:18Harriet.
  • 47:18Looking forward to see you
  • 47:20soon and thanks everybody.
  • 47:22Bye.