2024
Inter-reader reliability and diagnostic accuracy of PI-RADS scoring between academic and community care networks: How wide is the gap?
Smani S, Jalfon M, Sundaresan V, Lokeshwar S, Nguyen J, Halstuch D, Khajir G, Cavallo J, Sprenkle P, Leapman M, Kim I. Inter-reader reliability and diagnostic accuracy of PI-RADS scoring between academic and community care networks: How wide is the gap? Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2024 PMID: 39438211, DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchClinically significant PCaPI-RADS scoreDetect clinically significant PCaReporting of prostate cancerInter-reader reliabilityProstate cancerPI-RADSDiagnostic accuracyReceiver operating characteristicInter-readerPresence of clinically significant PCaProstate Imaging Reporting & Data SystemDetect clinically significant diseasePI-RADS 3 lesionsTertiary academic care centerMRI fusion biopsyPI-RADS 3Significant PCaProstate cancer managementClinically significant diseaseInter-reader agreementSubgroup of lesionsAcademic care centerIntraclass correlationMpMRI interpretation
2017
The positive predictive value of PI-RADS 4 lesions stratified by lesion number in biopsy naïve men.
Syed J, Javier-desloges J, Nguyen K, Sheridan A, Levi A, Weinreb J, Sprenkle P. The positive predictive value of PI-RADS 4 lesions stratified by lesion number in biopsy naïve men. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2017, 35: 29-29. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.6_suppl.29.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPI-RADS 4 lesionsPositive predictive valueBiopsy-naïve menNaïve menPredictive valuePI-RADS 3PI-RADS version 2PI-RADS 4Cancer detection rateChi-square testPSA densityEntire cohortMean ageFusion biopsyProstate cancerSingle lesionLesion locationGroup 2Group 1Group 3LesionsAssessment scoresLesion numberCategorical variablesFurther assessment