2024
Inter-reader reliability and diagnostic accuracy of PI-RADS scoring between academic and community care networks: How wide is the gap?
Smani S, Jalfon M, Sundaresan V, Lokeshwar S, Nguyen J, Halstuch D, Khajir G, Cavallo J, Sprenkle P, Leapman M, Kim I. Inter-reader reliability and diagnostic accuracy of PI-RADS scoring between academic and community care networks: How wide is the gap? Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2024 PMID: 39438211, DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchClinically significant PCaPI-RADS scoreDetect clinically significant PCaReporting of prostate cancerInter-reader reliabilityProstate cancerPI-RADSDiagnostic accuracyReceiver operating characteristicInter-readerPresence of clinically significant PCaProstate Imaging Reporting & Data SystemDetect clinically significant diseasePI-RADS 3 lesionsTertiary academic care centerMRI fusion biopsyPI-RADS 3Significant PCaProstate cancer managementClinically significant diseaseInter-reader agreementSubgroup of lesionsAcademic care centerIntraclass correlationMpMRI interpretation
2022
Multi‐institutional analysis of clinical and imaging risk factors for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI‐RADS 3 lesions
Fang AM, Shumaker LA, Martin KD, Jackson JC, Fan RE, Khajir G, Patel HD, Soodana‐Prakash N, Vourganti S, Filson CP, Sonn GA, Sprenkle PC, Gupta GN, Punnen S, Rais‐Bahrami S. Multi‐institutional analysis of clinical and imaging risk factors for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI‐RADS 3 lesions. Cancer 2022, 128: 3287-3296. PMID: 35819253, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34355.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPI-RADS 3 lesionsHigher prostate specific antigen densitySignificant prostate cancerProstate-specific antigen densityPrior negative biopsyNegative biopsyMagnetic resonance imagingProstate cancerPSA densityValidation cohortEquivocal lesionsAntigen densityResonance imagingMultivariable logistic regression modelData System (PI-RADS) 3 lesionsMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingElevated PSA densityMulti-institutional analysisDecision curve analysisProstate Imaging ReportingDetection of csPCaLogistic regression modelsMultivariable analysisSubsequent biopsyTraining cohortPD57-01 MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL AND IMAGING RISK FACTORS FOR DETECTING CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER IN MEN WITH PI-RADS 3 LESIONS
Fang A, Shumaker L, Martin K, Onah O, Jackson J, Khajir G, Fan R, Soodana-Prakash N, Patel H, Vourganti S, Filson C, Sprenkle P, Sonn G, Punnen S, Gupta G, Rais-Bahrami S. PD57-01 MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL AND IMAGING RISK FACTORS FOR DETECTING CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER IN MEN WITH PI-RADS 3 LESIONS. Journal Of Urology 2022, 207: e959. DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000002637.01.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2021
MP05-05 MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF RISK FACTORS FOR DETECTING CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER IN MEN WITH PI-RADS 3 LESIONS
Fang A, Shumaker L, Khajir G, Fan R, Soodana-Prakash N, Patel H, Sprenkle P, Sonn G, Punnen S, Gupta G, Rais-Bahrami S. MP05-05 MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF RISK FACTORS FOR DETECTING CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER IN MEN WITH PI-RADS 3 LESIONS. Journal Of Urology 2021, 206: e78-e78. DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001972.05.Peer-Reviewed Original Research