2024
Association Between the Decipher Genomic Classifier and Prostate Cancer Outcome in the Real-world Setting
Leapman M, Ho J, Liu Y, Filson C, Zhao X, Hakansson A, Proudfoot J, Davicioni E, Martin D, An Y, Seibert T, Lin D, Spratt D, Cooperberg M, Sprenkle P, Ross A. Association Between the Decipher Genomic Classifier and Prostate Cancer Outcome in the Real-world Setting. European Urology Oncology 2024 PMID: 39098389, DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.07.010.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDecipher genomic classifierRisk of metastasisBiochemical recurrenceRadical prostatectomyGenomic classifierDecipher testProstate cancerProstate Risk Assessment Postsurgical ScoreRisk of biochemical recurrencePatient's prostate cancerRisk of cancer recurrencePathological risk factorsProstate cancer outcomesCox proportional hazards regressionRetrospective cohort studyElectronic health record dataReal-world settingsProportional hazards regressionHealth record dataReal-world practice settingsProstate biopsyRP specimensOncological outcomesPrognostic significanceMedian ageRisk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy
Smani S, Sundaresan V, Lokeshwar S, Choksi A, Carbonella J, Brito J, Renzulli J, Sprenkle P, Leapman M. Risk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy. Exploration Of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy 2024, 5: 981-996. DOI: 10.37349/etat.2024.00259.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGleason score upgradingProstate-specific antigenRisk factorsMagnetic resonance imagingRadical prostatectomyScore upgradingAssociated with Gleason score upgradingBiopsy to radical prostatectomyHigher-risk prostate cancerPatients treated with surgeryProstate magnetic resonance imagingClinically localized diseaseGleason grade groupLow-risk diseaseRecognition of risk factorsBody mass indexGleason upgradingFinal pathologyProstate volumeProstate biopsySource of diagnostic uncertaintyBiopsy coresLocalized diseaseProstate cancerInitial managementProstate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: Diagnostic performance, clinical thresholds, and strategies for refinement
Sundaresan V, Smani S, Rajwa P, Renzulli J, Sprenkle P, Kim I, Leapman M. Prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: Diagnostic performance, clinical thresholds, and strategies for refinement. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2024 PMID: 39019723, DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.003.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate specific antigenProstate cancerPSA-based prostate cancer screeningDiagnostic performanceProstate specific antigen densityProstate specific antigen velocityLow-grade prostate cancerProstate-specific antigen screeningFree prostate specific antigenTreatment of prostate cancerProstate cancer screeningClinical action thresholdsProstate volumeAntigen screeningMalignant cellsSpecific antigenCancer screeningScreening biomarkerProstateClinical roleTest characteristicsCancerClinical applicationClinical thresholdEarly detectionRisk Factors and Contemporary Management Options for Pain and Discomfort Experienced During a Prostate Biopsy
Diaz G, Webb L, Rabil M, Lokeshwar S, Choksi A, Leapman M, Sprenkle P. Risk Factors and Contemporary Management Options for Pain and Discomfort Experienced During a Prostate Biopsy. Current Urology Reports 2024, 25: 243-252. PMID: 38896314, DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01220-w.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate biopsyRisk factorsEffective pain management strategiesDiagnosed prostate cancerPain management strategiesIn-office proceduresModern management optionsNonadherence to treatmentContemporary management optionsEnhance patient comfortInnovative imaging modalitiesExperience of painFusion biopsyProstate volumePain intensityProstate cancerPain varyPatient ageIncreased painFollow-upIn-officeManagement optionsSurveillance adherenceBiopsyPharmacological analgesicsPD45-10 PROSTATE-SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN IMAGING FINDINGS AND SUBSEQUENT CLINICAL MANAGEMENT AMONG PATIENTS WITH BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
Leapman M, Rabil M, Ghaffar U, Long J, Westvold S, Sprenkle P, Kim I, Saperstein L, Fallah J, Suzman D, Lerro C, Xu J, Kluetz P, Kunst N, Wang S, Ma X, Gross C, Karnes R. PD45-10 PROSTATE-SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN IMAGING FINDINGS AND SUBSEQUENT CLINICAL MANAGEMENT AMONG PATIENTS WITH BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY. Journal Of Urology 2024, 211: e971. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0001008792.09108.b4.10.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPD08-10 EFFECTIVENESS OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY AMONG PATIENTS WITH BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS OF DECISION ANALYTIC MODELING
Kunst N, Long J, Westvold S, Sprenkle P, Rabil M, Ghaffar U, Kim I, Saperstein L, Wang S, Ma X, Gross C, Leapman M. PD08-10 EFFECTIVENESS OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY AMONG PATIENTS WITH BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS OF DECISION ANALYTIC MODELING. Journal Of Urology 2024, 211: e177. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0001008576.33217.96.10.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate cancerPatientsMP57-08 COST EFFECTIVENESS OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (PSMA-PET) FOR THE EVALUATION OF BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER IN THE UNITED STATES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM
Kunst N, Long J, Westvold S, Sprenkle P, Rabil M, Ghaffar U, Kim I, Saperstein L, Wang S, Ma X, Gross C, Leapman M. MP57-08 COST EFFECTIVENESS OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (PSMA-PET) FOR THE EVALUATION OF BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER IN THE UNITED STATES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM. Journal Of Urology 2024, 211: e940. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0001009420.83948.eb.08.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRISKS OF GRADE RECLASSIFICATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH GLEASON GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER AND PI-RADS 5 FINDINGS ON PROSTATE MRI
Sundaresan V, Webb L, Rabil M, Golos A, Sutherland R, Sprenkle P, Kim I, Leapman M. RISKS OF GRADE RECLASSIFICATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH GLEASON GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER AND PI-RADS 5 FINDINGS ON PROSTATE MRI. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2024, 42: s79. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.222.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGleason Grade Group 1PI-RADS 5 lesionsPI-RADSProstate biopsyProstate cancerGleason upgradingRadical prostatectomyActive surveillanceProstate MRIMultivariate logistic regressionGrade Group 1 prostate cancerConversion to active treatmentOptimal management of patientsGrade group 1PI-RADS 5Gleason grade groupProstate Imaging ReportingDied of diseaseManagement of patientsLogistic regressionPrimary study outcomeAssociated with oddsMedian PSAMetastatic diseaseGrade diseaseAssociation between pelvic lymph node dissection and survival among patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy
Kim I, Wang A, Corpuz G, Sprenkle P, Leapman M, Brito J, Renzulli J, Kim I. Association between pelvic lymph node dissection and survival among patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Prostate International 2024, 12: 70-78. PMID: 39036758, PMCID: PMC11255894, DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.01.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPelvic lymph node dissectionBenefit of pelvic lymph node dissectionGleason grade groupLymph node dissectionProstate cancer patientsRadical prostatectomyNode dissectionProstate cancer treated with radical prostatectomyCancer patientsAssociated with improved OSTime of radical prostatectomyGrade groupSurvival of prostate cancer patientsMedian PSA valuePre-operative characteristicsProstate cancer-specificTime of RPLog-rank testKaplan-Meier curvesPSA valuesSurvival benefitProstate cancerMedian ageClinical benefitCancer-specificTemporal and regional patterns of prostate cancer positron emission tomography imaging among commercial insurance beneficiaries in the United States.
Leapman M, Long J, Westvold S, Rabil M, Sprenkle P, Kim I, Saperstein L, Fallah J, Suzman D, Lerro C, Xu J, Kluetz P, Karnes R, Kunst N, Wang S, Ma X, Gross C. Temporal and regional patterns of prostate cancer positron emission tomography imaging among commercial insurance beneficiaries in the United States. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2024, 42: 34-34. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.34.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProportion of patientsProstate cancerPSMA-PETPET imagingProstate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomographyDiagnosis of prostate cancerProstate cancer visualizationPSMA PET imagingPSMA-targeted agentsPositron emission tomography imagingCochran-Armitage testDynamic cohort studyPositron emission tomographyCommercial insurance beneficiariesEmission tomography imagingChi-square testCancer visualizationCholine tracersCohort studyProstateTreatment decisionsBlue Cross Blue Shield AxisCochran-ArmitageEmission tomographyInsurance beneficiaries
2023
Association between sociodemographic factors and diagnosis of lethal prostate cancer in early life
Smani S, Novosel M, Sutherland R, Jeong F, Jalfon M, Marks V, Rajwa P, Nolazco J, Washington S, Renzulli J, Sprenkle P, Kim I, Leapman M. Association between sociodemographic factors and diagnosis of lethal prostate cancer in early life. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2023, 42: 28.e9-28.e20. PMID: 38161105, DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.10.005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLethal prostate cancerSociodemographic factorsAdvanced CaPAdvanced diseaseYounger patientsProstate cancerHigher oddsAdvanced stageProstate-specific antigen (PSA) screeningCharacteristics of patientsNational Cancer DatabaseRetrospective cohort studySubset of patientsPatient sociodemographic factorsMultivariable logistic regressionPatients' health insuranceHighest income quartileCohort studyAdvanced cancerAntigen screeningMean ageInsurance statusCancer DatabaseCaP screeningSociodemographic disparitiesProstate cancer risk stratification using magnetic resonance imaging–ultrasound fusion vs systematic prostate biopsy
Khajir G, Press B, Lokeshwar S, Ghabili K, Rahman S, Gardezi M, Washington S, Cooperberg M, Sprenkle P, Leapman M. Prostate cancer risk stratification using magnetic resonance imaging–ultrasound fusion vs systematic prostate biopsy. JNCI Cancer Spectrum 2023, 7: pkad099. PMID: 38085220, PMCID: PMC10733209, DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad099.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMagnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusionMRF-TBLow-risk diseaseSystematic biopsyLower riskRisk groupingProstate biopsyActive surveillanceHigh riskProstate cancer risk stratificationIntermediate-risk criteriaIntermediate-risk diseaseSystematic prostate biopsyCancer risk stratificationPrimary study objectiveNCCN guidelinesImage-guided approachLocalized cancerRisk stratificationBenign findingsProstate cancerClinical riskDiagnostic yieldRetrospective analysisBiopsyPD10-01 ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN PROSTATE MRI AND GENOMIC TESTING AND TREATMENT INTENSIFICATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
Leapman M, Wang R, Long J, Sprenkle P, Ma X, Gross C. PD10-01 ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN PROSTATE MRI AND GENOMIC TESTING AND TREATMENT INTENSIFICATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER. Journal Of Urology 2023, 209: e326. DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003250.01.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMP75-01 ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS AND DIAGNOSIS OF ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER IN EARLY LIFE
Smani S, Novosel M, Marks V, Jeong F, Sprenkle P, Leapman M. MP75-01 ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS AND DIAGNOSIS OF ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER IN EARLY LIFE. Journal Of Urology 2023, 209: e1079. DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003349.01.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNCCN Guidelines® Insights: Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 1.2023.
Moses K, Sprenkle P, Bahler C, Box G, Carlsson S, Catalona W, Dahl D, Dall'Era M, Davis J, Drake B, Epstein J, Etzioni R, Farrington T, Garraway I, Jarrard D, Kauffman E, Kaye D, Kibel A, LaGrange C, Maroni P, Ponsky L, Reys B, Salami S, Sanchez A, Seibert T, Shaneyfelt T, Smaldone M, Sonn G, Tyson M, Vapiwala N, Wake R, Washington S, Yu A, Yuh B, Berardi R, Freedman-Cass D. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 1.2023. Journal Of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2023, 21: 236-246. PMID: 36898362, DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0014.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProstate cancer early detectionNCCN guidelinesCancer early detectionEarly detectionNCCN Guidelines InsightsNegative biopsy resultsEarly Detection ProgramSignificant prostate cancerIndolent diseaseBiopsy resultsAppropriate counselingProstate cancerMultiparametric MRIDetection programRecent updatesGuidelinesTesting protocolAssociations between patient sociodemographic factors and non-treatment for localized prostate cancer.
Novosel M, Smani S, Marks V, Jeong F, Sprenkle P, Leapman M. Associations between patient sociodemographic factors and non-treatment for localized prostate cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2023, 41: 307-307. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.307.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHigh-risk prostate cancerLocalized prostate cancerAggressive prostate cancerProstate cancerWhite patientsLower oddsDefinitive treatmentRisk strataSociodemographic factorsMean patient ageNational Cancer DatabaseHigh-risk diseasePatient sociodemographic factorsMultivariable logistic regressionClinical risk criteriaPatient ageImproved survivalBlack patientsInitial treatmentRisk diseaseAsian patientsRetrospective studyBlack raceInsurance statusPatient raceAssociation between sociodemographic factors and diagnosis of advanced prostate cancer in early life.
Smani S, Novosel M, Jeong F, Marks V, Sprenkle P, Leapman M. Association between sociodemographic factors and diagnosis of advanced prostate cancer in early life. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2023, 41: 32-32. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.32.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAdvanced prostate cancerProstate cancerProstate cancer diagnosisSociodemographic factorsAdvanced diseaseYounger patientsNational Cancer DatabaseCancer diagnosisCharacteristics of patientsRetrospective cohort studySubset of patientsLethal prostate cancerMultivariable logistic regressionEarly prostate cancerHighest income quintileCohort studyAdvanced cancerInsurance statusCancer DatabaseSociodemographic disparitiesInclusion criteriaWhite raceGreater oddsPatientsAdvanced stageManagement strategies for radio-recurrent prostate cancer: a comprehensive review
Rahman S, Kim H, Webb L, Diaz G, Leapman M, Sprenkle P, Brito J, Renzulli J, Martin T, Kenney P, Kim I. Management strategies for radio-recurrent prostate cancer: a comprehensive review. Translational Cancer Research 2023, 0: 0-0. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-24-245.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2022
Prediction of Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Biopsies Using Machine Learning.
Paulson N, Zeevi T, Papademetris M, Leapman MS, Onofrey JA, Sprenkle PC, Humphrey PA, Staib LH, Levi AW. Prediction of Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Biopsies Using Machine Learning. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics 2022, 6: e2200016. PMID: 36179281, DOI: 10.1200/cci.22.00016.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsGrade group 2Prostate biopsyRadical prostatectomyAdverse outcomesGroup 2GG-2Core prostate biopsyProstate cancer outcomesPatient's clinical riskClinical risk assessmentCore needle biopsyOngoing clinical needAdverse outcome predictionRetrospective reviewAdverse pathologyCAPRA scoreEntire cohortCancer outcomesPathologic diagnosisNeedle biopsyClinical riskDisease outcomeProstate cancerBiopsyDisease oneMulti‐institutional analysis of clinical and imaging risk factors for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI‐RADS 3 lesions
Fang AM, Shumaker LA, Martin KD, Jackson JC, Fan RE, Khajir G, Patel HD, Soodana‐Prakash N, Vourganti S, Filson CP, Sonn GA, Sprenkle PC, Gupta GN, Punnen S, Rais‐Bahrami S. Multi‐institutional analysis of clinical and imaging risk factors for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI‐RADS 3 lesions. Cancer 2022, 128: 3287-3296. PMID: 35819253, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34355.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPI-RADS 3 lesionsHigher prostate specific antigen densitySignificant prostate cancerProstate-specific antigen densityPrior negative biopsyNegative biopsyMagnetic resonance imagingProstate cancerPSA densityValidation cohortEquivocal lesionsAntigen densityResonance imagingMultivariable logistic regression modelData System (PI-RADS) 3 lesionsMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingElevated PSA densityMulti-institutional analysisDecision curve analysisProstate Imaging ReportingDetection of csPCaLogistic regression modelsMultivariable analysisSubsequent biopsyTraining cohort