2019
Implication of DNA repair genes in Lynch-like syndrome
Xicola RM, Clark JR, Carroll T, Alvikas J, Marwaha P, Regan MR, Lopez-Giraldez F, Choi J, Emmadi R, Alagiozian-Angelova V, Kupfer SS, Ellis NA, Llor X. Implication of DNA repair genes in Lynch-like syndrome. Familial Cancer 2019, 18: 331-342. PMID: 30989425, PMCID: PMC6561810, DOI: 10.1007/s10689-019-00128-6.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA MethylationDNA Mismatch RepairDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleGerm-Line MutationHeterozygoteHumansMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedMismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2MutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinSequence Analysis, DNAConceptsLLS patientsDistinct mutational signaturesGenome integrityLynch syndromeMutational signaturesMicrosatellite instabilityGermline mutationsColorectal cancerSequence analysisRepair genesSomatic MMR gene mutationsLS casesConsecutive CRC patientsMutational profileSomatic mutationsLynch-like syndromeL mutationMMR gene mutationsDNA repair genesFirst-degree relativesLikely pathogenic variantsSingle nucleotide variantsMLH1 promoter methylationTumor mutational profileExhibit microsatellite instability
2015
Mutation Spectrum and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in African American Families with Lynch Syndrome
Santa Cruz Guindalini R, Win AK, Gulden C, Lindor NM, Newcomb PA, Haile RW, Raymond V, Stoffel E, Hall M, Llor X, Ukaegbu CI, Solomon I, Weitzel J, Kalady M, Blanco A, Terdiman J, Shuttlesworth GA, Lynch PM, Hampel H, Lynch HT, Jenkins MA, Olopade OI, Kupfer SS. Mutation Spectrum and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in African American Families with Lynch Syndrome. Gastroenterology 2015, 149: 1446-1453. PMID: 26248088, PMCID: PMC4648287, DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.052.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdenosine TriphosphatasesAdultAge FactorsAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA Mismatch RepairDNA Repair EnzymesDNA-Binding ProteinsFamilyFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2MutationMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinNuclear ProteinsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSex FactorsConceptsColorectal cancerLynch syndromeCumulative riskRisk of CRCUS referral centersMMR gene mutationsMutation spectrumNongenetic risk factorsYears of ageMismatch repair genesMMR gene productsMutation-carrying familiesReferral centerRetrospective studyCRC riskRisk factorsFamily historyCancer riskHigh incidenceCRC conditionsSyndromeAbstractTextMMR genesAscertainment criteriaCancer
2014
The MLH1 c.1852_1853delinsGC (p.K618A) Variant in Colorectal Cancer: Genetic Association Study in 18,723 Individuals
Abulí A, Bujanda L, Muñoz J, Buch S, Schafmayer C, Valeria Maiorana M, Veneroni S, van Wezel T, Liu T, Westers H, Esteban-Jurado C, Ocaña T, Piqué JM, Andreu M, Jover R, Carracedo A, Xicola RM, Llor X, Castells A, , Dunlop M, Hofstra R, Lindblom A, Wijnen J, Peterlongo P, Hampe J, Ruiz-Ponte C, Castellví-Bel S. The MLH1 c.1852_1853delinsGC (p.K618A) Variant in Colorectal Cancer: Genetic Association Study in 18,723 Individuals. PLOS ONE 2014, 9: e95022. PMID: 24743384, PMCID: PMC3990597, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095022.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdenosine TriphosphatasesAmino Acid SubstitutionCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Repair EnzymesDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGerm-Line MutationHumansINDEL MutationMaleMismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2Mutation, MissenseMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinNuclear ProteinsConceptsColorectal cancerPathological characteristicsLynch syndromeCase-control studyLynch syndrome tumorsFamilial adenomatous polyposisDefective DNA mismatch repairGenotype-phenotype correlationFrequent neoplasmLow-penetrance variantsFamily historyLarge cohortImportant causeAdenomatous polyposisTotal burdenGenetic susceptibilityGermline mutationsUncertain significancePathogenic consequencesSyndromeMLH1 geneCommon formDNA mismatch repairMendelian syndromesRisk variants
2011
Comparison between universal molecular screening for Lynch syndrome and revised Bethesda guidelines in a large population-based cohort of patients with colorectal cancer
Pérez-Carbonell L, Ruiz-Ponte C, Guarinos C, Alenda C, Payá A, Brea A, Egoavil CM, Castillejo A, Barberá VM, Bessa X, Xicola RM, Rodríguez-Soler M, Sánchez-Fortún C, Acame N, Castellví-Bel S, Piñol V, Balaguer F, Bujanda L, De-Castro ML, Llor X, Andreu M, Carracedo A, Soto JL, Castells A, Jover R. Comparison between universal molecular screening for Lynch syndrome and revised Bethesda guidelines in a large population-based cohort of patients with colorectal cancer. Gut 2011, 61: 865. PMID: 21868491, DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300041.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA MethylationDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinNuclear ProteinsPractice Guidelines as TopicConceptsColorectal cancerLynch syndromeBethesda criteriaGenetic testingBethesda guidelinesMSH6 expressionLarge population-based cohortSelection of patientsPopulation-based cohortMMR proteinsMMR gene mutationsMMR protein expressionLoss of MLH1Microsatellite instability analysisGermline MLH1Routine molecular screeningLoss of expressionMutation carriersMSH2 stainingPatientsMSH2 mutationsLarge seriesMSI tumorsPMS2 expressionTumor tissueValidation Microsatellite Path Score in a Population-Based Cohort of Patients With Colorectal Cancer
Bessa X, Alenda C, Paya A, Álvarez C, Iglesias M, Seoane A, Dedeu JM, Abulí A, Ilzarbe L, Navarro G, Pellise M, Balaguer F, Castellvi-Bel S, LLor X, Castells A, Jover R, Andreu M. Validation Microsatellite Path Score in a Population-Based Cohort of Patients With Colorectal Cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2011, 29: 3374-3380. PMID: 21788563, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.34.3947.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma, MucinousAgedCarcinoma, MedullaryCarcinoma, Signet Ring CellCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGerm-Line MutationHeterozygoteHumansMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinNuclear ProteinsPrognosisProspective StudiesProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSensitivity and SpecificitySpainConceptsPositive predictive valuePathologic featuresColorectal cancerLynch syndromeGermline MSH2 mutationMLH1/MSH2Cohort of patientsColorectal cancer populationSelection of patientsPopulation-based cohortBRAF mutation analysisMicrosatellite instability analysisHigher CRCGermline testingBethesda guidelinesTumor characteristicsPathological scoresTumor locationCancer populationMismatch repairMMR statusFamily historyMutation carriersPatientsMSH2 mutationsCancer Risk Assessment in Lynch Syndrome: Does the Gene Matter?
Xicola RM, Llor X. Cancer Risk Assessment in Lynch Syndrome: Does the Gene Matter? JAMA 2011, 305: 2351-2352. PMID: 21642691, DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.771.Commentaries, Editorials and Letters
2008
Comparison of predictive models, clinical criteria and molecular tumour screening for the identification of patients with Lynch syndrome in a population-based cohort of colorectal cancer patients
Balmaña J, Balaguer F, Castellví-Bel S, Steyerberg EW, Andreu M, Llor X, Jover R, Castells A, Syngal S, Association F. Comparison of predictive models, clinical criteria and molecular tumour screening for the identification of patients with Lynch syndrome in a population-based cohort of colorectal cancer patients. Journal Of Medical Genetics 2008, 45: 557. PMID: 18603628, DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2008.059311.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic TestingHeterozygoteHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, GeneticMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinNuclear ProteinsConceptsMLH1/MSH2 mutation carriersPositive predictive valueMSH2 mutation carriersMutation carriersMMR deficiencyClinical criteriaMismatch repair gene mutationsAmsterdam II criteriaColorectal cancer patientsIdentification of patientsPopulation-based cohortOverall discriminative abilityColorectal cancer cohortRepair gene mutationsGermline testingCRC patientsBethesda guidelinesCancer patientsLynch syndromeCancer cohortPredictive scorePredictive valueSimilar AUCMicrosatellite instabilityObserved prevalence
2007
Detection of Metachronous Neoplasms in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Identification of Risk Factors
Ballesté B, Bessa X, Piñol V, CastellvíBel S, Castells A, Alenda C, Paya A, Jover R, Xicola RM, Pons E, Llor X, Cordero C, FernandezBañares F, de Castro L, Reñé JM, Andreu M. Detection of Metachronous Neoplasms in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Identification of Risk Factors. Diseases Of The Colon & Rectum 2007, 50: 971-980. PMID: 17468913, DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-0237-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAgedColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsConfidence IntervalsDNA RepairDNA, NeoplasmFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansImmunohistochemistryIncidenceMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinNeoplasms, Second PrimaryNuclear ProteinsOdds RatioPrognosisProspective StudiesSpainTime FactorsConceptsMetachronous colorectal neoplasmsMetachronous neoplasmsColorectal cancerSynchronous adenomasPredictive factorsColorectal neoplasmsGeneral population-based studyPrevious colorectal cancerIndependent predictive factorsColorectal cancer patientsInflammatory bowel diseasePresence of adenomasSubgroup of patientsPopulation-based studySynchronous colorectal adenomasSpecific surveillance strategiesFamilial adenomatous polyposisDNA microsatellite instabilityBowel diseaseCancer patientsRisk factorsColorectal adenomasSpanish hospitalsFamily historyHigh riskPerformance of Different Microsatellite Marker Panels for Detection of Mismatch Repair–Deficient Colorectal Tumors
Xicola RM, Llor X, Pons E, Castells A, Alenda C, Piñol V, Andreu M, Castellví-Bel S, Payá A, Jover R, Bessa X, Girós A, Duque JM, Nicolás-Pérez D, Garcia AM, Rigau J, Gassull MA. Performance of Different Microsatellite Marker Panels for Detection of Mismatch Repair–Deficient Colorectal Tumors. Journal Of The National Cancer Institute 2007, 99: 244-252. PMID: 17284719, DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djk033.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdenosine TriphosphatasesAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarrier ProteinsCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mismatch RepairDNA Repair EnzymesDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMicrosatellite RepeatsMismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2MutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinNeoplasm ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificitySpain
2006
Clinical Performance of Original and Revised Bethesda Guidelines for the Identification of MSH2/MLH1 Gene Carriers in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Colorectal Cancer: Proposal of a New and Simpler Set of Recommendations
Rodríguez-Moranta F, Castells A, Andreu M, Piñol V, Castellví-Bel S, Alenda C, Llor X, Xicola RM, Jover R, Payá A, Bessa X, Balaguer F, Cubiella J, Argüello L, Morillas JD, Bujanda L. Clinical Performance of Original and Revised Bethesda Guidelines for the Identification of MSH2/MLH1 Gene Carriers in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Colorectal Cancer: Proposal of a New and Simpler Set of Recommendations. The American Journal Of Gastroenterology 2006, 101: ajg2006204. PMID: 16696788, DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00522.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAgedCarrier ProteinsColorectal NeoplasmsEpidemiologic StudiesHeterozygoteHumansMiddle AgedMutationMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinNuclear ProteinsPractice Guidelines as TopicPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySpainConceptsBethesda guidelinesColorectal cancerNegative predictive valuePredictive valueClinical performanceMLH1 germline mutationsGene mutation carriersLogistic regression analysisNational Cancer InstitutePositive predictive valueCancer genetic testingMutation carriersIdentification of individualsEpidemiology SurveysCancer InstitutePatientsGenetic testingGermline mutationsEPICOLON studyCancerOriginal guidelinesGene carriersRegression analysisGuidelinesTerms of sensitivity
2005
Differential Features of Colorectal Cancers Fulfilling Amsterdam Criteria without Involvement of the Mutator Pathway
Llor X, Pons E, Xicola RM, Castells A, Alenda C, Piñol V, Andreu M, Castellví-Bel S, Payá A, Jover R, Bessa X, Girós A, Roca A, Gassull MA, Association F. Differential Features of Colorectal Cancers Fulfilling Amsterdam Criteria without Involvement of the Mutator Pathway. Clinical Cancer Research 2005, 11: 7304-7310. PMID: 16243801, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-05-0965.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAgedAged, 80 and overCarrier ProteinsCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleGerm-Line MutationHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsMiddle AgedMutationMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinNuclear ProteinsProspective StudiesSpainConceptsHereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancerHNPCC patientsAmsterdam criteriaColorectal cancerPathway alterationsMicrosatellite instabilityMetachronous adenomatous polypsLeft-sided tumorsMismatch repair gene mutationsAmsterdam II criteriaColorectal cancer patientsNonpolyposis colorectal cancerRepair gene mutationsMismatch repair deficiencyDetailed family historyMMR alterationsEndometrial cancerLymphocytic infiltratePathologic dataCancer patientsFamily historyAdenomatous polypsHNPCC familiesPatientsTumor DNAAccuracy of Revised Bethesda Guidelines, Microsatellite Instability, and Immunohistochemistry for the Identification of Patients With Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer
Piñol V, Castells A, Andreu M, Castellví-Bel S, Alenda C, Llor X, Xicola RM, Rodríguez-Moranta F, Payá A, Jover R, Bessa X, Association F. Accuracy of Revised Bethesda Guidelines, Microsatellite Instability, and Immunohistochemistry for the Identification of Patients With Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer. JAMA 2005, 293: 1986-1994. PMID: 15855432, DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.16.1986.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAgedCarrier ProteinsChromosomal InstabilityColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisCost-Benefit AnalysisDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationGuidelines as TopicHeterozygoteHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsMiddle AgedMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinNeoplasm ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesProto-Oncogene ProteinsSensitivity and SpecificitySpainConceptsMicrosatellite instability testingBethesda guidelinesMLH1 germline mutationsInstability testingMicrosatellite instabilityGermline testingColorectal cancerGermline mutationsHereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancerRevised Bethesda GuidelinesProtein expressionIdentification of patientsLogistic regression analysisNonpolyposis colorectal cancerMismatch repair deficiencyNational Cancer InstituteCancer genetic testingTumor characteristicsClinical parametersFamily historyNationwide studyIdentification of individualsCancer InstitutePatientsGenetic testing