2018
Mixed Invasive Ductal and Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: Prognosis and the Importance of Histologic Grade
Metzger‐Filho O, Ferreira AR, Jeselsohn R, Barry WT, Dillon DA, Brock JE, Vaz‐Luis I, Hughes ME, Winer EP, Lin NU. Mixed Invasive Ductal and Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: Prognosis and the Importance of Histologic Grade. The Oncologist 2018, 24: e441-e449. PMID: 30518616, PMCID: PMC6656459, DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0363.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsInvasive lobular carcinomaDisease-free survivalHistologic gradeLobular carcinomaPostmenopausal womenSystemic therapyBetter prognosisAromatase inhibitorsPrognostic powerDisease-free survival advantageEarly-stage breast cancerFavorable disease-free survivalCox proportional hazards modelAdjuvant aromatase inhibitorsBaseline clinicopathologic characteristicsDetailed clinical databaseHER2-negative diseaseRetrospective cohort studyImportant prognostic factorKaplan-Meier methodProportional hazards modelIntermediate histologic gradeDistinct disease subtypesCohort studyOverall prognosis
2015
Molecular Phenotype of Breast Cancer According to Time Since Last Pregnancy in a Large Cohort of Young Women
Collins LC, Gelber S, Marotti JD, White S, Ruddy K, Brachtel EF, Schapira L, Come SE, Borges VF, Schedin P, Warner E, Wensley T, Tamimi RM, Winer EP, Partridge AH. Molecular Phenotype of Breast Cancer According to Time Since Last Pregnancy in a Large Cohort of Young Women. The Oncologist 2015, 20: 713-718. PMID: 26025931, PMCID: PMC4492229, DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0412.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBreast cancer molecular phenotypesBreast cancerYoung womenFamily historyPregnancy-associated breast cancerMolecular phenotypesTumor histologic gradeBreast cancer riskBreast cancer phenotypeLast pregnancyParous womenProspective cohortCentral reviewHistologic gradeLike subtypeMolecular subtypesLarge cohortCancer riskPregnancyClinical practiceStudy questionnaireBiomarker expressionCancerTumor phenotypeWomen
2013
PAM50 proliferation score as a predictor of weekly paclitaxel benefit in breast cancer
Martín M, Prat A, Rodríguez-Lescure Á, Caballero R, Ebbert MT, Munárriz B, Ruiz-Borrego M, Bastien RR, Crespo C, Davis C, Rodríguez CA, López-Vega JM, Furió V, García AM, Casas M, Ellis MJ, Berry DA, Pitcher BN, Harris L, Ruiz A, Winer E, Hudis C, Stijleman IJ, Tuck DP, Carrasco E, Perou CM, Bernard PS. PAM50 proliferation score as a predictor of weekly paclitaxel benefit in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research And Treatment 2013, 138: 457-466. PMID: 23423445, PMCID: PMC3608881, DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2416-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCell ProliferationClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCyclophosphamideEpirubicinFemaleFluorouracilHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKi-67 AntigenMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicMultivariate AnalysisPaclitaxelProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeConceptsGroup of patientsWeekly paclitaxelOverall survivalPAM50 subtypesProliferation scoreBreast cancerNode-positive operable breast cancerMultivariable Cox regression analysisLow proliferation statusAnthracycline-containing chemotherapyOperable breast cancerPhase III trialsSubset of patientsCox regression analysisClinical-pathological variablesFEC armMedian followAdjuvant therapySecondary endpointsIII trialsPathological variablesHistologic gradeClinical trialsAdjuvant FECKi-67