2018
Should chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibition be the standard front‐line therapy for patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer?
Goldberg SB, Herbst RS. Should chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibition be the standard front‐line therapy for patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer? Cancer 2018, 124: 4592-4596. PMID: 30383887, PMCID: PMC6443243, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31681.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNon-small cell lung cancerCell lung cancerLung cancerNonsquamous non-small cell lung cancerAdvanced non-small cell lung cancerMetastatic non-small cell lung cancerCell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitorsStandard front-line therapyFirst-line settingImmune checkpoint inhibitionFront-line therapyNew treatment optionsProtein 1 inhibitorCheckpoint inhibitionTumor histologyTreatment optionsRecent trialsPatientsCancerChemotherapyTherapyHistologyMajor advancementsTrials
2010
Phase II Study of Vinorelbine and Docetaxel in the Treatment of Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer as Frontline and Second-Line Therapy
William WN, Khuri FR, Fossella FV, Glisson BS, Zinner RG, Lee JJ, Herbst RS, Lippman SM, Kim ES. Phase II Study of Vinorelbine and Docetaxel in the Treatment of Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer as Frontline and Second-Line Therapy. American Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2010, 33: 148-152. PMID: 19687727, PMCID: PMC5118944, DOI: 10.1097/coc.0b013e318199fb99.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBone NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellDocetaxelFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingSalvage TherapySurvival RateTaxoidsTreatment OutcomeVinblastineVinorelbineConceptsCell lung cancerLung cancerGrade 3Advanced non-small cell lung cancerNon-small cell lung cancerCommon grade 3Experienced febrile neutropeniaFirst-line settingMedian overall survivalNausea/vomitingSecond-line patientsSecond-line settingSecond-line therapyPhase 2 studyPhase II studySingle-agent chemotherapyUse of docetaxelCombination of docetaxelFrontline treatment optionFilgrastim supportNonplatinum agentsFebrile neutropeniaNonhematologic toxicitySalvage therapyII study
2006
A phase II, multicenter, randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with either chemotherapy (docetaxel or pemetrexed) or erlotinib hydrochloride compared with chemotherapy alone for treatment of recurrent or refractory non-small cell lung cancer
Fehrenbacher L, O’Neill V, Belani C, Bonomi P, Hart L, Melnyk O, Sandler A, Ramies D, Herbst R. A phase II, multicenter, randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with either chemotherapy (docetaxel or pemetrexed) or erlotinib hydrochloride compared with chemotherapy alone for treatment of recurrent or refractory non-small cell lung cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2006, 24: 7062-7062. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.7062.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDisease progressionArm 1Single-arm phase I/II studyRefractory non-small cell lung cancerPhase I/II studyNon-small cell lung cancerRandomized phase II trialEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitorsAnti-VEGF mAbsPlatinum-based regimenSafety of bevacizumabCombination of bevacizumabFirst-line settingNon-squamous NSCLCAdvanced stage diseaseAvailable EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitorsPhase II trialProgression-free survivalTreatment of recurrentCell lung cancerClinical disease progressionFavorable safety profileTreatment of NSCLCTyrosine kinase inhibitorsAdenocarcinoma/