Skip to Main Content

Interventional Therapies for Cancer Related Pain

December 04, 2024

Yale Cancer Center Grand Rounds | December 3, 2024

Presenters: Drs. Zion Zibly and Kanishka Rajput

ID
12437

Transcript

  • 00:00Years now.
  • 00:02Most of my practice is
  • 00:04interventional pain.
  • 00:06My house is Long Wharf
  • 00:07Spine Center, and we do
  • 00:09have a Smito Cancer Pain
  • 00:10Clinic that we staff once
  • 00:11a week.
  • 00:12My passion is, in cancer
  • 00:14related pain.
  • 00:16I think it's a huge
  • 00:17unmet need,
  • 00:19that we can do a
  • 00:20lot more for.
  • 00:22So before further ado, I
  • 00:24will get started.
  • 00:27I have nothing to disclose.
  • 00:30These are the learning objectives.
  • 00:32We'll brush up on the
  • 00:33WHO ladder to initiate analgesia
  • 00:35for cancer related pain,
  • 00:37and we'll learn a little
  • 00:38bit about some common basic
  • 00:40interventional pain procedures that we
  • 00:41can offer cancer related,
  • 00:43cancer pain patients.
  • 00:45We'll also go over indications
  • 00:47and contraindications,
  • 00:48and then I will
  • 00:50introduce intrathecal pumps or intrathecal
  • 00:52drug delivery systems,
  • 00:54just a basic introduction,
  • 00:56because of the limited amount
  • 00:58of time that I have.
  • 01:00Cancer associated pain may present
  • 01:02at any time during the
  • 01:03disease course.
  • 01:05Overall prevalence of cancer related
  • 01:07pain is believed to be
  • 01:08around forty four percent,
  • 01:10with thirty percent patients experiencing
  • 01:12at least moderate to severe
  • 01:13pain. The prevalence increases as
  • 01:16a stage,
  • 01:17of cancer or metastases,
  • 01:19occur, and it is, assumed
  • 01:22about two thirds of patients
  • 01:23with advanced cancer will have
  • 01:25pain. About a third of
  • 01:26them will complain of, very
  • 01:28severe pain.
  • 01:29Despite these numbers, inadequate analgesia
  • 01:32is prevalent in about forty
  • 01:33percent of patients, which is,
  • 01:35unfortunate reasons often cited,
  • 01:38for that huge,
  • 01:40gap in care versus symptoms,
  • 01:42is cited to be,
  • 01:44pain being often a second
  • 01:46afterthought or a lower down
  • 01:48on the priority list for
  • 01:49both patients, their families, and
  • 01:51their clinicians.
  • 01:52Although we know that if
  • 01:53we assess pain
  • 01:56appropriately and are able to
  • 01:57manage it appropriately, about seventy
  • 01:59to eighty percent patients, even
  • 02:00with advanced or metastatic cancer,
  • 02:02can be,
  • 02:04treated,
  • 02:05with some, analgesia.
  • 02:08Not only that, we now
  • 02:09have a novel cancer survivor
  • 02:10group with the advances in
  • 02:12oncologic treatments.
  • 02:14Forty per forty seven percent
  • 02:15of cancer survivors
  • 02:17will end up with some
  • 02:18kind of chronic pain syndrome,
  • 02:19either related to the chemotherapeutic
  • 02:21agents that they've
  • 02:23had to,
  • 02:24endure or surgeries or interventions
  • 02:26that they've endured.
  • 02:29Cancer pain syndromes broadly may
  • 02:31be related to either the
  • 02:33cancer itself
  • 02:34or as a result of
  • 02:36interventions and surgeries that are
  • 02:37performed,
  • 02:39for,
  • 02:40oncologic treatment.
  • 02:42It could be acute or
  • 02:43chronic,
  • 02:44could be nociceptive or neuropathic.
  • 02:46It is important to delineate
  • 02:48characteristics of nociceptive versus neuropathic
  • 02:51pain so as to be
  • 02:51able to tailor our, analgesic
  • 02:53treatments towards the specific underlying
  • 02:55cause. Nociceptive pain, is believed
  • 02:58to be perceived as a
  • 02:59result of constant afferent nociceptive
  • 03:02input as a result of
  • 03:03ongoing tissue injury. It could
  • 03:05further be subdivided as somatic
  • 03:06or visceral.
  • 03:07Somatic pain is often described
  • 03:09as sharp, aching, throbbing,
  • 03:11comes from somatic structures, including
  • 03:13bones, scared, musculus
  • 03:15muscular skeletal system,
  • 03:17ligaments, injury, ligaments,
  • 03:20tendons, and muscles,
  • 03:21while visceral pain, originates more
  • 03:23from visceral structures, and it's,
  • 03:25less well defined, diffuse, cramping,
  • 03:27and knowing. Neuropathic pain, by
  • 03:28definition,
  • 03:29arises from damage to the
  • 03:31central or peripheral nervous system.
  • 03:32The descriptors often used by
  • 03:34patients are burning electric shock,
  • 03:37sharp shooting kind of pains,
  • 03:38allodynia, hyperalgesia.
  • 03:40It's important to distinguish the
  • 03:41characteristics of pain since treatment,
  • 03:44for nociceptal neuropathic pain could
  • 03:46be very different.
  • 03:48In addition,
  • 03:49the cancer pain patients will
  • 03:51often have
  • 03:52prominent
  • 03:55underlying neuropathic pain, which can
  • 03:56be extremely severe to treat
  • 03:57and really affects their quality
  • 03:59of life.
  • 04:01You've all seen the numerical
  • 04:03rating scale and the visual
  • 04:04analog scale.
  • 04:06Commonly used scales,
  • 04:08such as these help
  • 04:09eliminate cultural and linguistic barriers,
  • 04:12and the data is more
  • 04:13reliable.
  • 04:14In addition, we also have
  • 04:16the McGill and,
  • 04:18McGill Malzac pain questionnaire and
  • 04:20the brief pain inventory, which
  • 04:22we often use in cancer
  • 04:23pain patients to further hone
  • 04:25down on the characteristics of
  • 04:26pain.
  • 04:28This is the traditional WHO
  • 04:30step ladder, which was introduced
  • 04:31in nineteen eighty six.
  • 04:34It basically
  • 04:37it basically,
  • 04:39wants wants us to manage
  • 04:40pain based on, the severity
  • 04:42of pain symptoms.
  • 04:44Use step one, step two,
  • 04:45or step three medications
  • 04:47for mild, moderate, or severe
  • 04:49pain. Step one medications include
  • 04:50Tylenol and NSAIDs. Step two
  • 04:52medications are weak opiates. Step
  • 04:53three medications are stronger opiates.
  • 04:55Quaenogestics and adjuvant such as
  • 04:57muscle relaxants and neuropathics could
  • 04:59be used at any step
  • 05:00of, the ladder.
  • 05:02The overarching principle of the
  • 05:04WHO ladder is by the
  • 05:05patient, appropriate dose is one
  • 05:07that relieves pain in a
  • 05:08particular patient, so individualized treatment.
  • 05:11By the mouth, oral route
  • 05:12is preferred. By the schedule,
  • 05:14instead of PRN, try to
  • 05:16do scheduled dosing.
  • 05:18And by the ladder, meaning
  • 05:20if pain is not relieved
  • 05:21with step one,
  • 05:24don't go drug to drug
  • 05:26along the ladder. Go up
  • 05:27the ladder.
  • 05:28This is the most recent
  • 05:30iteration of the WHO ladder
  • 05:32where a fourth step, that
  • 05:33is the interventional pain options,
  • 05:36has been added, and that's
  • 05:36where we come in as
  • 05:37interventional pain specialists.
  • 05:40So what are some common
  • 05:41scenarios that we get consults
  • 05:42for? Somebody with pancreatic cancer
  • 05:44with meds to the liver
  • 05:45experiencing worsening abdominal pain despite
  • 05:47escalating opiates,
  • 05:49somebody with locally advanced cervical
  • 05:50cancer experiencing perennial and rectal
  • 05:53pain not well controlled in
  • 05:54opiates,
  • 05:55somebody who has pleural based
  • 05:56meds and now has chest
  • 05:57wall pain also on poorly
  • 05:59also on high doses, opiates
  • 06:01and pain is, worsening with
  • 06:03adverse effects related to opiates.
  • 06:06This is obviously not an
  • 06:07exhaustive list, of all the
  • 06:09procedures we can offer,
  • 06:11but I'll try to touch
  • 06:12upon,
  • 06:13procedures that have the most
  • 06:14robust evidence.
  • 06:18So one of the procedures,
  • 06:20that we perform quite often
  • 06:21and get consults for is
  • 06:23a celiac plexus block.
  • 06:25It is used for treatment
  • 06:26of cancer pain originating from
  • 06:28upper abdominal viscera.
  • 06:31Just a review of anatomy,
  • 06:32celiac plexus is the largest
  • 06:34plexus of the sympathetic nervous
  • 06:35system, provides sensory innovation,
  • 06:38to four gut structures, including
  • 06:40the stomach,
  • 06:41small bowel, all the way
  • 06:42up to the mid transverse
  • 06:43colon, as well as liver,
  • 06:44pancreas, spleen, and gallbladder.
  • 06:46It contains both preganglionic sympathetic
  • 06:48fibers from the greater and
  • 06:50lesser splanchnic nerves
  • 06:52as well as postganglionic sympathetic
  • 06:54fibers and preganglionic
  • 06:55parasympathetic fibers. The plexus itself
  • 06:58is located
  • 06:59anterior to the aorta behind
  • 07:00the cilia artery takeoff just
  • 07:02at the l one level.
  • 07:05This is where we access
  • 07:06it.
  • 07:07There are several different techniques
  • 07:09that have been described
  • 07:10for cilia plexus block, percutaneous
  • 07:12versus endoscopic ultrasound guided blocks,
  • 07:15the latter performed by GI
  • 07:17doctors. Percutaneous blocks can be
  • 07:19performed by CT guidance,
  • 07:21or fluoroscopic guidance. We typically
  • 07:22do them with fluoro guidance.
  • 07:25If you look at the
  • 07:25literature,
  • 07:26there is no significant
  • 07:28difference in outcomes as to
  • 07:30how you do these blocks,
  • 07:32as long as it's done
  • 07:33safely.
  • 07:37There is percutaneously,
  • 07:39you could either do this
  • 07:40retrocrual technique versus transaortic.
  • 07:43Transaortic is what I was
  • 07:44trained with, although it has
  • 07:46fallen out of distribute because
  • 07:47of some case reports,
  • 07:49of complications.
  • 07:51Retrocrual versus transaortic basically means
  • 07:54where the needle tip ends
  • 07:56up being parked. Is it
  • 07:57going through the aorta,
  • 07:59right after the cilia plexus,
  • 08:00or you're really blocking the
  • 08:02splanchnic nerves?
  • 08:05Not to belabor,
  • 08:06everyone with procedural
  • 08:08details, but this is how
  • 08:10we perform a fluoroguided cilia
  • 08:11plexus block.
  • 08:13The left image is, an
  • 08:15oblique image of the needle
  • 08:16being advanced.
  • 08:18Under lateral, you place a
  • 08:20right and a left sided
  • 08:21needle. Under lateral, you'll see
  • 08:22these two needles, and the
  • 08:23needle tip would be parked
  • 08:24right at the anterior edge
  • 08:26of the l one vertical
  • 08:27body. This is a little
  • 08:28bit low needle placement. We
  • 08:30really would prefer the needles
  • 08:31to be placed at t
  • 08:32twelve l one,
  • 08:34disk space or right underneath
  • 08:35there.
  • 08:36Most common side effects of
  • 08:38this block are diarrhea and
  • 08:40hypotension, and that's because the
  • 08:41medication that we use for
  • 08:42the neulysis is either ninety
  • 08:44eight percent alcohol or six
  • 08:45percent phenol.
  • 08:47Honestly, it's one of the
  • 08:48most gratifying,
  • 08:49blocks to do. Patients have
  • 08:50a pretty immediate pain relief,
  • 08:52and the side effects are
  • 08:53usually self limited.
  • 08:54Diarrhea is reported in about
  • 08:56forty four to sixty percent
  • 08:57of patients, so quite common.
  • 09:00But usually patients don't mind,
  • 09:02the diarrhea. It's, often a
  • 09:03welcome change from the constipation
  • 09:05that they've been experiencing,
  • 09:07due to the high doses
  • 09:08of opiates.
  • 09:09And it is usually transient.
  • 09:11Although if you look at
  • 09:12literature, there'll be case reports
  • 09:13of more prolonged diarrhea, usually
  • 09:15lasts about two, three days.
  • 09:17Hypertension is the second most
  • 09:18common side effect,
  • 09:20reported in about ten to
  • 09:22fifty percent of patients. Also,
  • 09:24transient, lasting one to five
  • 09:25days. Often, patients are dehydrated.
  • 09:27We try to avoid this,
  • 09:29side effect by preloading with
  • 09:31fluids.
  • 09:35So what's the evidence?
  • 09:38This was a systematic review
  • 09:39that was published in twenty
  • 09:40fifteen that looked at sympathetic
  • 09:42blocks for visceral cancer pain.
  • 09:44It clubbed all celiac plexus
  • 09:46and superior hypogastric block studies
  • 09:48that compared these blocks with
  • 09:50conventional analgesics.
  • 09:51There were fourteen studies for
  • 09:53celiac plexus block.
  • 09:54Although twelve of the fourteen
  • 09:56were very low quality, two
  • 09:58studies were extremely high quality,
  • 10:00randomized controlled trials, and I'll
  • 10:02discuss one of them in
  • 10:03this, doc.
  • 10:05The overall conclusion of the
  • 10:07systematic review was celiac plexus
  • 10:09blocks
  • 10:11have strong evidence in in
  • 10:12their favor
  • 10:13for analgesia,
  • 10:14for reducing opioid consumption.
  • 10:16Some studies also touched upon
  • 10:18quality of life and survival.
  • 10:21The timing of the block
  • 10:22has been,
  • 10:23evaluated.
  • 10:24When should we do this
  • 10:25block? Should we do it
  • 10:26at diagnosis? Should we do
  • 10:27it when patients, are not
  • 10:29in high doses of opiates?
  • 10:30So this study actually randomized
  • 10:32sixty patients to three groups.
  • 10:34One group received a neurolytic,
  • 10:36celiac texas block when the
  • 10:37MME,
  • 10:38average morphine milligram equivalent for
  • 10:40the patient was less than
  • 10:41ninety.
  • 10:42The second group,
  • 10:44received blocks when their MMA
  • 10:45was already above ninety, and
  • 10:46the third block third group
  • 10:48received no blocks.
  • 10:49These authors found that the
  • 10:51first two groups had significant
  • 10:53pain relief and reduced opioid
  • 10:54consumption as well as a
  • 10:55better quality of life compared
  • 10:57to the third group, but
  • 10:58there was no significant difference
  • 10:59between the first or the
  • 11:00second group. So these authors
  • 11:02concluded that irrespective of the
  • 11:04amount of MMA that they're
  • 11:05consuming,
  • 11:06patients',
  • 11:07anagenic response is similar. So
  • 11:09celiac plexus block should be
  • 11:11offered.
  • 11:12Then there's another school of
  • 11:13thought that,
  • 11:14feel that MME is not
  • 11:16necessarily an indication of stage.
  • 11:19So there was another study
  • 11:20that,
  • 11:21decided to
  • 11:22compare patients who received the
  • 11:24block at the time of
  • 11:25diagnosis before
  • 11:27opioid analgesics have reached, high
  • 11:29doses
  • 11:30versus,
  • 11:32bring the pain down to
  • 11:33a level four with some
  • 11:34opioid analgesics and then do
  • 11:35the block. The latter group
  • 11:37actually performed better as far
  • 11:39as the
  • 11:40duration of pain relief from
  • 11:42the block itself for unknown
  • 11:43reasons.
  • 11:45This was one of the
  • 11:46high quality randomized control trials
  • 11:48out of Mayo Clinic that
  • 11:49was cited in the systematic
  • 11:51review.
  • 11:52This was a long study
  • 11:53where they randomized,
  • 11:55forty nine page ninety
  • 11:57ninety eight patients, I believe.
  • 11:59One half to see neurallytic
  • 12:01cilia plexus block, the other
  • 12:02half to opioid only.
  • 12:05These authors showed that cilia
  • 12:06plexus block afforded better pain
  • 12:08relief, reduced opioid consumption, reduced
  • 12:10adverse effects.
  • 12:12Quality of life was not
  • 12:13different,
  • 12:14but what they did report
  • 12:15interestingly is that sixteen percent
  • 12:18of patients
  • 12:19were alive at twelve months
  • 12:21with a block and six
  • 12:22percent were alive with opiates
  • 12:24only.
  • 12:25The issue of survival is
  • 12:26a contentious one.
  • 12:28Previous studies have shown that
  • 12:30survival can actually be prolonged.
  • 12:32This was from the nineties,
  • 12:34where interop splanchnectomy
  • 12:36actually helped,
  • 12:37improve survival.
  • 12:40But I wanna bring to
  • 12:41your attention this study that
  • 12:42was recently published in anesthesiology.
  • 12:45This is from twenty twenty
  • 12:46one. This is a multicenter
  • 12:47randomized controlled trial
  • 12:49where the authors,
  • 12:51randomized patients to a neuroleptic
  • 12:53block with alcohol
  • 12:55versus neuroleptic block with saline.
  • 12:57Both groups were allowed as
  • 12:59much opioid as they need
  • 13:00for adequate pain relief. And
  • 13:02if you see in the
  • 13:03graph on the right hand
  • 13:04side, the neuroleptic block group
  • 13:06actually had much better pain
  • 13:08relief compared to
  • 13:09the group that had the
  • 13:11block with saline,
  • 13:12because they were also taking
  • 13:14opiates. Although this difference starts
  • 13:16to level off around
  • 13:18month three. They also had
  • 13:19reduced opioid consumption,
  • 13:22and that starts to level
  • 13:24off by
  • 13:25five months. And that is
  • 13:26more clear in this table.
  • 13:28If you notice,
  • 13:29the starting pain scores for
  • 13:30both groups are similar.
  • 13:32The pain reduction
  • 13:33is
  • 13:35present even in the control
  • 13:36group, but notice the amount
  • 13:38of opiates that the control
  • 13:39group is taking. The opioid
  • 13:41consumption is increasing in the
  • 13:43control group that received only
  • 13:45saline blocks, and it's in
  • 13:46fact decreasing in the neuroendocrine
  • 13:49plexus block group. Although it's
  • 13:51that different status disappear
  • 13:53as even neurolytic blocks,
  • 13:55patients
  • 13:56start to have an increase
  • 13:57in the opioid consumption.
  • 13:59The reason I bring this
  • 14:00study up is,
  • 14:02because there was an interesting
  • 14:04post hoc exploratory analysis performed
  • 14:06by these authors where they
  • 14:08showed a state survival discrimination
  • 14:10difference between the block and
  • 14:13the control group,
  • 14:15especially in stage four patients.
  • 14:16That is patients who are
  • 14:18receiving neurotic blocks are actually
  • 14:20living
  • 14:21shorter.
  • 14:22So
  • 14:23these authors didn't delve much
  • 14:25into what the reasons
  • 14:27might be. They did tickle
  • 14:28with the idea, maybe the
  • 14:29autonomic nervous system and the
  • 14:31sympathectomy that you're causing might
  • 14:32have something to do with
  • 14:33survival,
  • 14:34but they didn't delve much
  • 14:35into it.
  • 14:37They just reported it, as
  • 14:38a conclusion that maybe we
  • 14:40should offer patients
  • 14:42celiac plexus blocks early, not
  • 14:44necessarily at diagnosis,
  • 14:45but before they reach stage
  • 14:47four.
  • 14:49That is a good general
  • 14:50club discussion, so I will
  • 14:51move on to the next
  • 14:53block.
  • 15:01I often about the patient
  • 15:03selection
  • 15:03for celiac collections blocks.
  • 15:06And I was just curious
  • 15:07if you have any experience
  • 15:09to share or data
  • 15:11that would help us know
  • 15:12in terms of pain pattern
  • 15:14or characteristics
  • 15:16whether a patient may do
  • 15:18better or not?
  • 15:19So if every so every
  • 15:21patient is variable, which is
  • 15:22why the studies say that
  • 15:24don't depend on the MME,
  • 15:26as to when to offer
  • 15:27the block. Some patients need
  • 15:29very little MMA till the
  • 15:30end of life. Patients who
  • 15:31are on escalating doses of
  • 15:33opiates,
  • 15:35would be good candidates, especially
  • 15:36if they have visceral pain
  • 15:37in the upper abdomen,
  • 15:39referable to,
  • 15:40four gut structures. A pancreatic
  • 15:42cancer pain patient, for example,
  • 15:43who's on escalating doses of
  • 15:45opiates and is constipated. Opiates
  • 15:47work, but constipation and quality
  • 15:49of life is declining. That
  • 15:50would be a great candidate
  • 15:51for a celiac plexus block.
  • 15:54But I I wouldn't do
  • 15:55it at diagnosis.
  • 15:57Not everybody needs a celiac
  • 15:58plexus lock, and that's also
  • 15:59been shown
  • 16:00that you wanna see some
  • 16:02pain, and pain needs to
  • 16:03become brought down with some
  • 16:05opioid,
  • 16:06before you consider it. So
  • 16:07it's not a first step,
  • 16:07but it should also not
  • 16:08be a last step based
  • 16:10on the pain characteristics and
  • 16:11the patterns is what I
  • 16:12would say.
  • 16:17Mhmm.
  • 16:19Related to pancreatic cancer. So,
  • 16:21yep, any foregut structure
  • 16:23causing upper abdominal epigastric pain.
  • 16:26If it's classic, that's a
  • 16:27slam dunk, but oftentimes we've
  • 16:29done blocks,
  • 16:30for,
  • 16:31you know, cholangiocarcinomas,
  • 16:32a patient with splenomegaly having
  • 16:34upper abdominal pain. I did
  • 16:36one for renal cell carcinoma
  • 16:38patient,
  • 16:39will really depend on the
  • 16:40pain characteristics.
  • 16:43Superior hypogastric plexus blocks do
  • 16:45not have as robust an
  • 16:47evidence as celiac plexus blocks.
  • 16:49There is
  • 16:50only one randomized controlled trial
  • 16:52that I could find, although
  • 16:53it was a low quality,
  • 16:55that compared pelvic
  • 16:57that compared superior hypogastric plexus
  • 16:59block to opioid analgesia for
  • 17:01patients with gynong malignancies
  • 17:03and showed superior pain relief
  • 17:04and lesser opioid consumption.
  • 17:06The plexus itself lies anterior
  • 17:08to the l five s
  • 17:09one disc space and receives
  • 17:10l three to l five
  • 17:11sympathetics and s two to
  • 17:13s four parasympathetics.
  • 17:16The indications
  • 17:17are for
  • 17:18lower abdominal pain related to
  • 17:20distal gut or pelvic
  • 17:22cancers.
  • 17:24There's two different approaches that
  • 17:25are described. This is a
  • 17:27classic approach, although a little
  • 17:28bit
  • 17:32challenging sometimes, especially in women
  • 17:34with the huge iliac crest
  • 17:35in the way. This is
  • 17:36a preferred technique. There's always
  • 17:38a risk of neurovascular injury.
  • 17:40Not the most comfortable block.
  • 17:42Patients often have to be
  • 17:43sedated since we're going through
  • 17:44the psoas muscle, which can
  • 17:45irritate their lumbar plexus.
  • 17:47Contraindications
  • 17:48are similar to celiac plexus
  • 17:49block. Any patients with bleeding
  • 17:51diathesis,
  • 17:52inability to hold blood thinners,
  • 17:54platelet count less than one
  • 17:56hundred thousand, INR more than
  • 17:57one point two,
  • 17:59infection either intra abdominal or
  • 18:01at the site of injection
  • 18:03in the back,
  • 18:05or systemic
  • 18:06infection, positive blood cultures.
  • 18:08Big one is patient refusal.
  • 18:12So that was the classic
  • 18:14approach. This is a picture
  • 18:15of the trans disco approach,
  • 18:17which in addition to the
  • 18:18risk of neurovascular injury adds
  • 18:20the risk of discitis. So
  • 18:21this is not something we
  • 18:22perform often.
  • 18:25The next few slides are
  • 18:26just pictures,
  • 18:28and names of blocks that
  • 18:29we do because we have
  • 18:30limited time. I can't delve
  • 18:32deep into every single block.
  • 18:33But this is a picture
  • 18:35of ganglion Impar block that
  • 18:36we offer for patients with
  • 18:37perineal pain with gynoc malignancies,
  • 18:40prostate cancer pain.
  • 18:41The needle is placed anterior
  • 18:43to the sacrococcygeal
  • 18:44ligament. You see contrast
  • 18:46dye spread here.
  • 18:48Pudendal nerve blocks can be
  • 18:50done for pudendal neuralgia,
  • 18:52often also,
  • 18:54as a diagnostic block prior
  • 18:55to peripheral nerve stems. We
  • 18:57place the needle medial to
  • 18:58the ischial spine under fluoro
  • 19:00guidance. Outcomes have been shown
  • 19:02to be similar. Safety has
  • 19:04been similar to ultrasound guidance,
  • 19:06although ultrasound guidance does,
  • 19:08afford the benefit
  • 19:10of,
  • 19:11seeing the pudendal artery.
  • 19:13Iliohypogastric,
  • 19:14ilioinguinal nerves, blocks can be
  • 19:16done for groin pain as
  • 19:17long as there's no lymphadenopathy
  • 19:19in the tract of the
  • 19:20needle.
  • 19:21These are pretty easy to
  • 19:22perform with ultrasound guidance.
  • 19:24So I know I'm running
  • 19:25out of time, but I
  • 19:26do wanna introduce intrathecal pump.
  • 19:30This is something,
  • 19:32one of the most advanced
  • 19:33therapies that we as international
  • 19:34pain physicians can offer.
  • 19:37The essence of intrathecal pump
  • 19:38is delivering the medication directly
  • 19:40into into the CSF via
  • 19:42a catheter in the intrathecal
  • 19:43space that is connected to,
  • 19:45a permanent pump that is
  • 19:47implanted in the anterolateral
  • 19:49abdominal on the subfascial layers.
  • 19:50The advantage of
  • 19:53putting medication right into the
  • 19:54CSF is reduce is the
  • 19:56ability to reduce the amount
  • 19:57of opioid that the patient
  • 19:59is consuming by an order
  • 20:00of ten to hundred times,
  • 20:01thereby reducing adverse effects,
  • 20:03improving functionality, quality of life,
  • 20:05appetite, etcetera.
  • 20:07There's at least one randomized
  • 20:08controlled trial in several prospective
  • 20:10observational studies that have shown,
  • 20:13benefit in favor of intrathecal
  • 20:15pumps, not necessarily a salvage
  • 20:16therapy for cancer related pain,
  • 20:18but even earlier.
  • 20:21So we go by what
  • 20:23we call the PACT guidelines,
  • 20:25to select and identify patients
  • 20:26and manage these patients later
  • 20:28on. PACT stands for polyanalgesia
  • 20:30consensus conference.
  • 20:31This is a group of,
  • 20:33international neuromodulation society members that
  • 20:35are world experts both nationally
  • 20:37and internationally
  • 20:38based on their clinical experience
  • 20:40and research,
  • 20:42contributions to the field.
  • 20:44These guidelines
  • 20:45provide us overarching principles
  • 20:47of how to select patients
  • 20:49and how to manage these
  • 20:50patients.
  • 20:51So an ideal candidate would
  • 20:52be somebody who is becoming
  • 20:54opioid tolerant with prohibitory,
  • 20:56side effects.
  • 20:58Opiates work but can't take
  • 20:59them because of the side
  • 21:00effects and someone who's failed
  • 21:02other less invasive,
  • 21:03conservative,
  • 21:04options.
  • 21:06Life expectancy used to be
  • 21:07six months, has been reduced
  • 21:09to three months.
  • 21:10Important consideration before we select
  • 21:12patients for an intrathecal pump
  • 21:14is a discussion with our
  • 21:15implanting neurosurgeon.
  • 21:17Proximity to the cans proximity
  • 21:19of the cancer to mets
  • 21:20or mets close to the
  • 21:22neuraxis or the implantation site
  • 21:25becomes tricky for our neurosurgeons
  • 21:27to implant the pump.
  • 21:28Again, our surgeons also decide
  • 21:30what size pump to place
  • 21:31twenty versus forty ml,
  • 21:33based on body habitus, the
  • 21:35amount of cachexia.
  • 21:36A forty ml pump usually
  • 21:37would last patients two to
  • 21:38three months.
  • 21:39And, of course, we have
  • 21:40to have systems in place,
  • 21:41including family and social support
  • 21:43system for these patients to
  • 21:44come in for follow ups
  • 21:45and refills.
  • 21:47As far as intrathecal trials
  • 21:48go, the guideline says it's
  • 21:50discretionary or optional and really
  • 21:52depends on patient and clinician
  • 21:55preference,
  • 21:56as well as practice pattern.
  • 21:58Some insurers need an intrathecal
  • 22:00trial before a permanent pump
  • 22:01is approved, but most times,
  • 22:03this provision is waived.
  • 22:05Other than the single cone
  • 22:07that the guideline describes
  • 22:09delay of getting a clamsopine
  • 22:11patient a permanent pump, there's
  • 22:12a lot of disadvantages to
  • 22:14doing an intrathecal trial.
  • 22:17So in our practice, we
  • 22:18typically, after selecting patients, get
  • 22:20them admitted for an inpatient
  • 22:22continuous catheter trial.
  • 22:24One, it gives the patient
  • 22:25a sneak peek as to
  • 22:26what to expect from therapy.
  • 22:28Second, we are able to
  • 22:29trial different drugs, which would
  • 22:31take weeks in an outpatient
  • 22:32setting after the permanent pump
  • 22:33already goes in. A patient
  • 22:35doesn't tolerate morphine may do
  • 22:36better with hydromorphone.
  • 22:38With the trial, we have
  • 22:39an externalized catheter connected to
  • 22:40a CAD pump, and we
  • 22:41can simply change the medications
  • 22:43every few hours. So our
  • 22:44trials usually last two to
  • 22:45five days.
  • 22:47We often end up uptitrating
  • 22:49the dose pretty rapidly because
  • 22:51we're in a monitored inpatient
  • 22:52setting. So a trial allows
  • 22:54us,
  • 22:55that benefit,
  • 22:56and we often end up
  • 22:57adding second line agents such
  • 22:58as bupivacaine
  • 23:00during the trial to figure
  • 23:01out what medication provided the
  • 23:03most analgesic relief, and that
  • 23:04would be something that would
  • 23:06go in the pump.
  • 23:07And we try to work
  • 23:08with our neurosurgery colleagues to
  • 23:09get the pump implanted within
  • 23:11the week after the trial.
  • 23:14The choice of medications depends
  • 23:15on the characteristics of pain.
  • 23:17Morphine, hydromorphone are first line
  • 23:19agents,
  • 23:20usually used for nociceptive pain.
  • 23:22Ziconotide,
  • 23:23although has FDA approval as
  • 23:24a first line agent, is
  • 23:26primarily for neuropathic pain, but
  • 23:28its use is honestly limited
  • 23:29in the cancer pain population
  • 23:31because of the side effects.
  • 23:32It's an l type calcium
  • 23:33channel blocker and can cause
  • 23:35dangerous ventricular arrhythmias, so it
  • 23:37doesn't allow us to uptitrate
  • 23:38rapidly as with morphine hydromorphone.
  • 23:40So we hardly ever use
  • 23:41Iconotide.
  • 23:43Oftentimes, we'll add bupivacaine for
  • 23:44the neuropathic
  • 23:45component.
  • 23:47Another advantage of the trial
  • 23:49is that it lets us
  • 23:50know where the catheter tip
  • 23:52should be based on the
  • 23:53dermatomal pain patterns and how
  • 23:55the patient's response to the,
  • 23:58medications is. This is what
  • 24:00the pump looks like. It's
  • 24:02a titanium disc about three
  • 24:03inches wide and an inch
  • 24:05thick, and it is placed,
  • 24:08in the
  • 24:09fascial layers, usually in the
  • 24:10anti abdominal wall, sometimes,
  • 24:12in the buttock.
  • 24:15This is a pump broken
  • 24:16apart.
  • 24:17What I wanna draw your
  • 24:18attention to is the magnetic
  • 24:20rotor that actually drives the
  • 24:21medication through the catheter.
  • 24:24So if you think about
  • 24:25getting an MRI in a
  • 24:26patient with an intrathecal pump,
  • 24:28the magnetic rotor will simply
  • 24:29line with the magnetic field
  • 24:31of the MRI
  • 24:32and fail to deliver the
  • 24:34medication. In other words, it
  • 24:35stalls, but it should restart
  • 24:36right after the MRI
  • 24:38should, but there have been
  • 24:39cases of it not restarting.
  • 24:41So always a good idea
  • 24:42to reinterrogate the pump.
  • 24:44This is the reservoir fill
  • 24:46port that allows us to
  • 24:47refill medications, which I said
  • 24:49as I said before, two
  • 24:50to three months for a
  • 24:51person with a forty ml
  • 24:53pump. The catheter access port
  • 24:55is occasionally used for a
  • 24:56pump program if the pump
  • 24:58is not functioning adequately.
  • 25:00Pumps are safe, as far
  • 25:02as the study goes in
  • 25:03one and a half and
  • 25:04three Tesla,
  • 25:06MRIs.
  • 25:07Stop here. In the interest
  • 25:08of time, I'll invite doctor
  • 25:09Zipli. Yes.
  • 25:13Mhmm. Do you always do
  • 25:14bilateral or?
  • 25:17We typically wanna do bilateral.
  • 25:20Okay.
  • 25:22I'll give
  • 25:23Thank you.
  • 25:27Hey. Good afternoon.
  • 25:28I know that I'm limited
  • 25:29with time, so I'll do
  • 25:30it fast so we can
  • 25:31have lunch.
  • 25:33I'm Zaan Zilb for neurosurgery.
  • 25:34I'm the head of functional
  • 25:35neurosurgery at Yale. I joined
  • 25:37Yale,
  • 25:38almost sixteen months ago,
  • 25:41and I'll be talking about
  • 25:42the the neurosurgical approach to
  • 25:44cancer pain, basically.
  • 25:46So,
  • 25:49when we are talking about
  • 25:50cancer pain,
  • 25:51one thing that I have
  • 25:54to say again and again
  • 25:54again, it's all about multidisciplinary
  • 25:56approach. Okay? I can do
  • 25:57anything
  • 25:58without her.
  • 26:00Okay. I know.
  • 26:01And, you know, she could
  • 26:02do other things without me.
  • 26:03I can do anything without
  • 26:04her. Okay? So it's all
  • 26:06about
  • 26:07being a a multidisciplinary
  • 26:08approach,
  • 26:09seeing the patients together and
  • 26:11choose the right patients for
  • 26:12the right procedure. Okay?
  • 26:17So what are the approaches
  • 26:18that we have? We have
  • 26:19to,
  • 26:20like, three modules of, surgeries
  • 26:22we can do. We can
  • 26:22do the compression surgery.
  • 26:24We can do normal no
  • 26:25modulation surgeries, and we could
  • 26:27do no abatement procedures.
  • 26:30All of them are procedure
  • 26:32that can use for cancer
  • 26:33pain and non cancer pain.
  • 26:34Today, I'm going to talk
  • 26:35only about cancer pain because
  • 26:37of the time limitations we
  • 26:38have,
  • 26:39and we'll start with
  • 26:43is it oh, it's working.
  • 26:44Okay. So we'll start with
  • 26:47the patient selection,
  • 26:49procedure selection, and timing.
  • 26:55Kefoplasty.
  • 26:56So kefoplasty is a procedure
  • 26:57of what we do. For
  • 26:58example, this is a patient
  • 26:59who had a a compressed
  • 27:01fracture. You can see it
  • 27:02here. Whether it's trauma or
  • 27:04a tumor inside,
  • 27:05the vertebra,
  • 27:07what we do, we insert
  • 27:08a small needle
  • 27:10into the
  • 27:11compressed,
  • 27:12vertebra no matter where we
  • 27:14are. Usually, it's a thoracic
  • 27:15columbra.
  • 27:16Usually, we tend not to
  • 27:17do to cervical,
  • 27:19vertebra because of the proximity
  • 27:21to the spinal cord.
  • 27:22We inflate a small balloon
  • 27:25in the vertebra,
  • 27:27and then we
  • 27:31it's not working.
  • 27:32And then we insert cement.
  • 27:36The role of cement is
  • 27:37double.
  • 27:37First, as you can see
  • 27:39on the right corner,
  • 27:42what the cement does, it's
  • 27:44regains
  • 27:45the the level of the
  • 27:46vertebral bract from being compressed
  • 27:49to the regular side. And,
  • 27:50also, the cement, when you
  • 27:51inject the cement of the
  • 27:52vertebral, it heats up. Okay?
  • 27:55And it burns the ends
  • 27:57of the nerve roots
  • 27:58along the,
  • 28:00cortical aspect of the vertebra.
  • 28:03Usually, we do it for
  • 28:04trauma.
  • 28:05We
  • 28:06try to do it for
  • 28:07oncology pain, especially with metastatic
  • 28:09lesion. The issue with metastatic
  • 28:11lesion is that some of
  • 28:12the most of the metastatic
  • 28:13lesion
  • 28:14invade also the, foraminas that
  • 28:16we cannot insert the balloon
  • 28:17into the vertebral.
  • 28:21Normodulation.
  • 28:22When we talk about normodulation,
  • 28:24something important that you have
  • 28:25to understand that we're not
  • 28:27we're not treating the tumor
  • 28:28itself. Okay? We are treating
  • 28:29the perception of pain. Okay?
  • 28:31For example, if we do
  • 28:32spinal cord stimulation,
  • 28:34we simulate the, the spinothalamic
  • 28:36tract.
  • 28:37When you do a scingulotomy,
  • 28:38you'll see it in the
  • 28:39moment.
  • 28:40We basically we treat the
  • 28:41perception of pain. So if
  • 28:43a patient has scingulotomy,
  • 28:46when you see the patient,
  • 28:47he is having the pain.
  • 28:49When you ask him if
  • 28:50you have pain, he will
  • 28:51say yes, but he will
  • 28:52never complain about the pain.
  • 28:53Okay? So it's all about
  • 28:54perception. This is what neuromodulation
  • 28:56does.
  • 28:58So Krishna talked about intrathecal,
  • 29:00pumps. I'm not going to
  • 29:01spend
  • 29:02time about it.
  • 29:04And we'll talk about the
  • 29:05no ablations.
  • 29:06The procedure we can do
  • 29:08in Yale, and since I
  • 29:09came, we do only a
  • 29:10bunch of them, not a
  • 29:11lot, unfortunately.
  • 29:14We can do, rhizotomies,
  • 29:16and
  • 29:17I'll talk about how we
  • 29:18can choose the patients. So
  • 29:20do you know what rhizotomy
  • 29:21is? How it's done? Where
  • 29:22it's done?
  • 29:25No?
  • 29:26So, basically, it's a dorsal
  • 29:27root root entry zone in
  • 29:29the spine,
  • 29:30and it's usually done for
  • 29:31unilateral somatic, non receptive, or
  • 29:34neuropathic pain in cancer pain.
  • 29:39We can do myelotomy,
  • 29:41although along the, spinal cord,
  • 29:43it's a midline incision.
  • 29:45It's basically for a midline
  • 29:47subdiaphragmatic pain,
  • 29:48visceral pain, also again, especially
  • 29:50for cancer.
  • 29:52And we can do singulotomy,
  • 29:53which is basically for
  • 29:55disseminated cancer pain all over
  • 29:57the body pain or pain
  • 29:58that cannot be controlled with
  • 30:00morphine pump or or etcetera.
  • 30:06The rhizotomy
  • 30:07that we do, it's mostly,
  • 30:09a photogeminal pain. It can
  • 30:10be chemical rhizotomy. It It
  • 30:12can be,
  • 30:13a radio surgery rhizotomy. It
  • 30:14can be a balloon rhizotomy.
  • 30:16The way I do it
  • 30:17in Yale, and we are
  • 30:18the only center along the
  • 30:19East Coast who do it,
  • 30:20we insert a balloon,
  • 30:22and we'll inflate a balloon
  • 30:24in the
  • 30:30hi.
  • 30:35I I I see two
  • 30:36screens. What do you see?
  • 30:37Okay.
  • 30:39So, basically, this is how
  • 30:40do do it we do
  • 30:40the rhizotomy.
  • 30:42As you can see, we
  • 30:43insert a small needle. It
  • 30:44can be done,
  • 30:45with the CT guidance, MR
  • 30:47guidance. We do it open.
  • 30:48We do it in close.
  • 30:49We insert a small other
  • 30:50frequency needle, and we burn
  • 30:52it, the the dress, the
  • 30:53entry zone.
  • 30:54And this is how it's
  • 30:55done.
  • 30:56You can see we we
  • 30:58we move the this is
  • 30:59the root zone. This is
  • 30:59the spinal cord. We move
  • 31:00it a bit laterally and
  • 31:02we insert the needle and
  • 31:03we do the,
  • 31:04the lesion.
  • 31:05Chordotomy,
  • 31:07this is how it's done.
  • 31:08This is the spinothalamic
  • 31:09tract,
  • 31:11and we can do it
  • 31:12CT guide as as I
  • 31:13can as you can see
  • 31:14here, this is a myelography.
  • 31:15We inject some, contrast media,
  • 31:17so we can see the
  • 31:18CSF is white.
  • 31:20The code is black. Okay?
  • 31:22And we insert
  • 31:23a small
  • 31:25needle, into the oh, you
  • 31:26can see my
  • 31:28we insert a small needle
  • 31:29and then we can burn
  • 31:30the, spinothalamic
  • 31:32tract.
  • 31:33And this is how it's
  • 31:34done. This is an interpretive
  • 31:35image. You can see we
  • 31:36open the dura. We move,
  • 31:54In the past, it used
  • 31:55to be an open surgery.
  • 31:56We developed a mini invasive,
  • 31:58surgery using a small endoscope.
  • 32:01And what we did was
  • 32:02we inserted a small endoscope
  • 32:03into the, cervical thoracic spine.
  • 32:05As you can see here,
  • 32:06we opened the doors minimally
  • 32:08opening the door, we inserted
  • 32:09a small needle, and we
  • 32:11buried the spinothalamic tract. This
  • 32:12way, the patient actually can
  • 32:13go home the same day.
  • 32:15It can be done with
  • 32:16local anesthetics also, and we
  • 32:17published it.
  • 32:22Miloto me, we don't do
  • 32:24it here. So
  • 32:25wonder how much time do
  • 32:26I have?
  • 32:27Five
  • 32:28minutes?
  • 32:30Oh, plenty.
  • 32:31What about singulotomy?
  • 32:32So the single of the
  • 32:34brain,
  • 32:35as I said before, doesn't
  • 32:36really do have to do
  • 32:37anything with the pain. It
  • 32:38has only to do with
  • 32:40the perception of pain.
  • 32:42The cingulum is a part
  • 32:43of the brain that is
  • 32:44located
  • 32:46this is the axial, colon,
  • 32:47sagittal. This is a signal
  • 32:49of the brain. This is
  • 32:49actually one of the patient
  • 32:50that you referred me.
  • 32:52This is a pain who
  • 32:53had a huge tumor in
  • 32:54the pelvic, a a nonresectable
  • 32:56tumor.
  • 32:57She was treated for, I
  • 32:58think, in house for six
  • 33:00months. Right? She was in
  • 33:01house for six months. She
  • 33:01couldn't go home because she
  • 33:02was on ketamine, morphine, IV.
  • 33:05And what we did, we
  • 33:06inserted two needles, one into
  • 33:08the right single room, one
  • 33:09into the left single
  • 33:11right your fegocine needles. We
  • 33:12burned the single loom bilaterally.
  • 33:14And when the patient woke
  • 33:16up, she stopped complaining about
  • 33:17the pain, and she was
  • 33:18able actually to be discharged
  • 33:20in two weeks, I think,
  • 33:21after being in the hospital
  • 33:23for,
  • 33:24two months.
  • 33:25Again, it's usually done for
  • 33:27bilateral
  • 33:28disseminated pain.
  • 33:30This case was special because
  • 33:33as, you know, the the
  • 33:34as we we talked before,
  • 33:36siglottomies
  • 33:37are usually preserved for cancer
  • 33:39pain, for malignant cancer pain.
  • 33:41This patient has had
  • 33:44nonmalignant
  • 33:45cancer pain because the the
  • 33:46the the the the cancer
  • 33:47she had was a benign
  • 33:48tumor,
  • 33:49but it was a nonresectable
  • 33:51tumor. So we tweeted it
  • 33:52as a as a as
  • 33:53a malignant tumor,
  • 33:55and
  • 33:55she
  • 33:56she had she was pain
  • 33:57free for almost a year.
  • 33:58She came back a few
  • 33:59months ago.
  • 34:01We did the procedure again,
  • 34:02and now she's back home.
  • 34:03Hopefully,
  • 34:04I hope she's doing well.
  • 34:05I don't know. But no?
  • 34:07No?
  • 34:08I haven't seen anything since
  • 34:09I don't know. I know
  • 34:10she was doing great for
  • 34:11a year, and then she
  • 34:12came back.
  • 34:15So, basically, this is what
  • 34:16we do. The the third
  • 34:17procedure we can do in
  • 34:18in Yale, we haven't done
  • 34:19it yet, unfortunately,
  • 34:20is a hypophysectomy.
  • 34:23It's a minimally invasive procedure.
  • 34:25It's basically a gamma knife
  • 34:26procedure. We do we radiate,
  • 34:28the hypophysies.
  • 34:30As you know, the hip,
  • 34:31hiphopysy plays a crucial role
  • 34:33in, pay perception.
  • 34:35It's mostly done for hormonal
  • 34:37related cancer pain.
  • 34:39It can be done for
  • 34:40non hormonal,
  • 34:41non hormonal cancer pain
  • 34:45as long as there's no
  • 34:46bone metastases.
  • 34:48The target is basically located
  • 34:50along the stalk of the
  • 34:50epiphysis.
  • 34:51The procedure takes around an
  • 34:53hour and a half. The
  • 34:54patient is awake. It's down
  • 34:55as an outpatient procedure.
  • 34:58And if you look at
  • 34:59the data,
  • 35:00the data is is is
  • 35:02is quite good. You see
  • 35:03that most of the patient
  • 35:04are are pain free.
  • 35:07When we're talking about indications,
  • 35:08contraindication,
  • 35:09I guess the only contraindication
  • 35:11is, life expectancy, which is
  • 35:13more than six months.
  • 35:15If the life expectancy is
  • 35:16more than six months, we
  • 35:17prefer to do other procedures
  • 35:18like baclofen pump or, spinal
  • 35:20cord
  • 35:23stimulators,
  • 35:24etcetera.
  • 35:26And this is how we
  • 35:27do the planning. As you
  • 35:28can see, there's an axial,
  • 35:30coronal sagittal plane. These are
  • 35:32MR sequences.
  • 35:33We target the stock of
  • 35:34the apo physis. We give
  • 35:35it a high dose radiation,
  • 35:36single dose,
  • 35:38around an hour and twenty
  • 35:39minutes for the gamma knife,
  • 35:40and the patient can, go
  • 35:42home the same day.
  • 35:46So, again, these are the
  • 35:47procedure we can do in
  • 35:48Yale. We can do decompressive
  • 35:50procedure, no modul no modul
  • 35:52modulation procedures
  • 35:53and ablative procedures.
  • 35:56And, you know, again, it's
  • 35:58all about being,
  • 35:59in a multidisciplinary
  • 36:01approach,
  • 36:02choosing the right patient,
  • 36:05the right procedure,
  • 36:07and the right expectations
  • 36:09from the patients.
  • 36:11Thank you.
  • 36:24We don't take any questions
  • 36:26from the audience.
  • 36:32Go ahead.
  • 36:36Uh-huh.
  • 36:45So
  • 36:46with Celiac Texas Blob, the
  • 36:47question is where the bowel
  • 36:48obstruction is,
  • 36:50a contraindication. It is considered
  • 36:51a relative contraindication,
  • 36:54because once you do a
  • 36:55celiac plexus block, you're essentially
  • 36:57doing a sympathectomy,
  • 36:58and the unopposed parasympathetic
  • 37:00tone will increase your bowel
  • 37:02tone. It works similar to
  • 37:04similarly to epidurals that we
  • 37:06do for post op pain.
  • 37:07The reason epidurals do great
  • 37:09is because it doesn't cause
  • 37:10an ileus, and it improves
  • 37:11bowel motility. So it is
  • 37:13a relative contraindication.
  • 37:15If there is an ileus,
  • 37:17partial obstruction, you could still
  • 37:19consider it. The patient needs
  • 37:20to know the risks.
  • 37:21If it is,
  • 37:23you know, surgical bowel obstruction,
  • 37:24then surgery is usually the
  • 37:25mainstay. We can wait for
  • 37:27the bowel obstruction or partial
  • 37:28bowel obstruction or ilias to
  • 37:29get better before we can
  • 37:31offer the block. So it's
  • 37:32still an option,
  • 37:33but symptomatically, they have to
  • 37:34be better. The other issue
  • 37:35with bowel obstruction is that
  • 37:37these patients will need to
  • 37:39go,
  • 37:40all the way to sleep.
  • 37:42They are unable to tolerate
  • 37:43the prone positioning for the
  • 37:45procedure itself. So oftentimes, they
  • 37:46need sedation. And with the
  • 37:48bowel obstruction, they're considered a
  • 37:49full stomach. They need to
  • 37:50be either wide awake or
  • 37:52intubated with rapid sequence.
  • 37:54When you intubate,
  • 37:55the procedure becomes a little
  • 37:57bit more challenging.
  • 37:58We are using a a
  • 38:00neurolytic in the prone position.
  • 38:02We use contrast dye to
  • 38:03assess the spread of the
  • 38:04medication backwards towards the foramina.
  • 38:06So we do oftentimes on
  • 38:08the table ask the patient,
  • 38:10for any signs of numbness
  • 38:12related to the t twelve
  • 38:13l one foramen by giving
  • 38:15a small dose of local
  • 38:15anesthetic. So the patient asleep
  • 38:18makes it challenging
  • 38:19to assess whether
  • 38:21the there's going to be
  • 38:22leakage backwards.
  • 38:24So we prefer to do
  • 38:25celiac plexus blocks with sedation,
  • 38:27not all the way asleep,
  • 38:28if possible. With the bowel
  • 38:30obstruction, that's not possible. They'll
  • 38:31be either wide awake or
  • 38:33intubated.
  • 38:34So it becomes procedurally a
  • 38:35little challenging to offer a
  • 38:36neuroleptic block.
  • 38:38Hope that answers the question.
  • 38:41Any questions regarding Zibley too?
  • 38:42I'm just standing here as
  • 38:43a yes.
  • 38:45It's Doctor. Zibley. First,
  • 38:47Dion, thank you for bringing
  • 38:49your range of talents and
  • 38:51expertise to Yale. It's been
  • 38:53really remarkable.
  • 38:56I was involved with the
  • 38:57young woman that described it.
  • 38:59It was
  • 38:59really,
  • 39:00as you said, a process.
  • 39:03My question is, you know,
  • 39:05in that situation,
  • 39:07she was completely
  • 39:09bed bound and non ambulatory.
  • 39:12Are these procedures such as
  • 39:14cingulotomy
  • 39:15or myelotomy
  • 39:16equally
  • 39:18effective, and can they be
  • 39:19used in patients who still
  • 39:21wish to maintain some degree
  • 39:23of motor function? Yes.
  • 39:26So cingulotomy
  • 39:27has no effect of I
  • 39:28mean, she can do whatever
  • 39:29she motor wise, there's no
  • 39:31effect in singleotomy.
  • 39:33With chordotomy, and this is,
  • 39:34by the way, why we
  • 39:35chose singulotomy or chordotomy for
  • 39:36her because she wanted to
  • 39:38be able although she was
  • 39:39bedridden,
  • 39:41with there's more risk of
  • 39:42doing any motor damage in
  • 39:44chordotomy than singulotin. With singulotin,
  • 39:46there's almost no risk because
  • 39:47you're going so until in
  • 39:49the brain,
  • 39:50far away from any motor
  • 39:51aspect of the brain.
  • 39:53Yeah.
  • 40:04Yes. So
  • 40:06so the issue with gamma
  • 40:07knife is it takes a
  • 40:08long time to to to
  • 40:10get the effect of gamma
  • 40:11knife. Okay? Like, for example,
  • 40:12if you do gamma knife
  • 40:13today, it would take around
  • 40:14three to six weeks to
  • 40:15start and see the effects.
  • 40:16So that's why we didn't
  • 40:18do gamma knife. When you
  • 40:19do it with a retro
  • 40:20frequency, the effect is immediate.
  • 40:22Okay? It's because you do
  • 40:23the the deletion. The lesion
  • 40:24is done immediately.
  • 40:26Gamma knife, it's it's it's
  • 40:27it takes six, seven weeks
  • 40:29sometimes until we get the
  • 40:30effect.
  • 40:31With hyper hypohazectomy,
  • 40:33it will it takes around
  • 40:34three weeks. Okay? Because the
  • 40:36the hypothesis is the stock
  • 40:38is so small
  • 40:39and the dose is so
  • 40:40high that the effect take
  • 40:42around three, four weeks. But
  • 40:43if you want to do
  • 40:44singulotomies
  • 40:45with gamma knives, it can
  • 40:46takes weeks, even more, two
  • 40:47months sometimes. And it's less
  • 40:48effective than than the radiofrequency
  • 40:50needle.
  • 40:51And, again, it's done with
  • 40:52local anesthetics.
  • 40:53So the patient basically can
  • 40:55go on the same day.
  • 40:56And, you know,
  • 40:57the sooner we do it,
  • 40:59the better they do.
  • 41:01Okay?
  • 41:03I have two Zoom questions.
  • 41:06One question is how do
  • 41:07we refer patients to your
  • 41:08clinic?
  • 41:09It's,
  • 41:10easy referral, Milo
  • 41:12pain management. Right, Adrian? Milo
  • 41:14pain management,
  • 41:15order.
  • 41:16And one of our nurse,
  • 41:18managers looks through the referral
  • 41:19and refers to us, and
  • 41:20I'm sure it's easy enough.
  • 41:22Just put doctor Zivli's name.
  • 41:23It'll come to us. The
  • 41:25other question that was on
  • 41:26Zoom was how does it
  • 41:27apply to children and adolescents?
  • 41:30Again, not a lot of
  • 41:31data and literature,
  • 41:33for children and adolescents.
  • 41:36We did have,
  • 41:37one patient, a teenager,
  • 41:40who had huge thoracic,
  • 41:42METs,
  • 41:44and we
  • 41:46did offer, I think, a
  • 41:47pump. It was a few
  • 41:48years ago,
  • 41:50but, you know, the
  • 41:51family basically declined.
  • 41:54It is not very well
  • 41:55studied in kids.
  • 41:57In fact, in kids, it's
  • 41:58so hard. You won't believe
  • 41:59even pure morphine does not
  • 42:01have FDA approval.
  • 42:03In kids, we use IV
  • 42:04morphine and transition them to
  • 42:06p oxycodone because there's not
  • 42:08enough large scale studies done
  • 42:11to, assess the effectiveness,
  • 42:13the pharmacokinetics
  • 42:14and dynamics of pure morphine.
  • 42:15So pure morphine is actually
  • 42:16not even,
  • 42:18a a drug that's approved
  • 42:19by FDA to be used
  • 42:20in kids. So in children
  • 42:21in adolescents,
  • 42:23systemic opiates,
  • 42:24remains the mainstay.
  • 42:27So surgeries in kids,
  • 42:30I need a few. It's
  • 42:32off label. Mostly singleotomies,
  • 42:34not any not spinal, you
  • 42:36know, procedures. Mostly mostly singleotomies
  • 42:38and morphine pumps. This is
  • 42:40what we usually do for
  • 42:41kids, and it's effective.
  • 42:43It's effective.
  • 42:46And we don't have a
  • 42:48pediatric,
  • 42:49pain clinic yet, so we're
  • 42:50not, ready to receive outpatient
  • 42:52pediatric referrals. That was another
  • 42:54question. How can we refer
  • 42:55pediatric cancer pain? Outpatient do
  • 42:57not have that service yet.
  • 43:00Doctor. Cynthia, I was wondering
  • 43:02with the cingulotomy,
  • 43:04are there any risk
  • 43:07factors for cognition
  • 43:09in terms of long term
  • 43:10studies
  • 43:11or side effects?
  • 43:13So, you know, talking about
  • 43:15long long term survivors. Right?
  • 43:17So, unfortunately, you know, it's
  • 43:18it's a last resort. So
  • 43:20this patient are not you
  • 43:21know, she survived a year.
  • 43:22Usually, we don't do to
  • 43:23patient who has life expectancy
  • 43:25of more than six month.
  • 43:28And, you know,
  • 43:29I didn't see any reports
  • 43:33saying anything about
  • 43:34any decline, though.
  • 43:36But when you look at
  • 43:37the patient, they do have
  • 43:39some change in the way
  • 43:40the habit is. Okay? Like,
  • 43:42you have to ask them
  • 43:43questions in order to get
  • 43:44answers.
  • 43:45They don't
  • 43:46talk the way they used
  • 43:47to talk before. You know,
  • 43:48they're more quiet, more relaxed.
  • 43:52They lose some sensations. Like,
  • 43:54they lose a sensation of
  • 43:55pain.
  • 43:56So they lose some things,
  • 43:57but not cognitively others, I
  • 43:58would say. But, again, we're
  • 44:00talking about long term survival
  • 44:01and which is you know,
  • 44:02unfortunately, we don't see a
  • 44:03lot of patients with long
  • 44:04term survival.
  • 44:19Yeah.
  • 44:19So
  • 44:21when you look at the
  • 44:21literature,
  • 44:22the only I wouldn't say
  • 44:24only. Most of the cases
  • 44:25who
  • 44:26when we did a single
  • 44:27time singleotomy
  • 44:29was immediately after following the
  • 44:30first one, like, a week
  • 44:31later because the the previous
  • 44:33ones failed.
  • 44:34Okay? Again, these patients,
  • 44:37unfortunately,
  • 44:38usually don't survive more than
  • 44:40six months. Okay?
  • 44:42She survived a year.
  • 44:44So it was an off
  • 44:45label procedure to do it
  • 44:46again. Because, again, when we
  • 44:47do a second procedure, it's
  • 44:48it means that the first
  • 44:49one failed and we do
  • 44:50it a week later, even
  • 44:51less than a week because
  • 44:52something happened technically in surgery
  • 44:54or we're walking the wrong
  • 44:55place
  • 44:56or it wasn't it wasn't
  • 44:58really effective or half effective
  • 45:00or whatever.
  • 45:01So repeat synchrotomies,
  • 45:03we barely do any repeat
  • 45:04synchrotomies. There's no need to
  • 45:06do repeat synchrotomies. Again, this
  • 45:07patient, she had she has
  • 45:08a benign tumor. It looks
  • 45:09horrible,
  • 45:10but it's a benign tumor.
  • 45:12I think the only option
  • 45:13she had was to do
  • 45:14epicropectomy
  • 45:15or whatever. I cut the
  • 45:16body in half, and she
  • 45:17refused.
  • 45:18So this is what why
  • 45:19we do the why we
  • 45:20did the procedure.
  • 45:24I have a question for
  • 45:26you, doctor Zibley. On Zoom,
  • 45:27what kind of patients or
  • 45:28pain features are good candidates
  • 45:30for hypophysectomy?
  • 45:31Can you speak more to
  • 45:32how this impacts pain perception?
  • 45:35Yes. So so it's mostly
  • 45:37as as I showed you
  • 45:37in the slide, it's mostly
  • 45:39for hormone related
  • 45:41cancer like metastatic breast and
  • 45:43etcetera.
  • 45:44You know, it does affect
  • 45:46the the hypothesis
  • 45:47that that yeah. Some patient
  • 45:49can can be,
  • 45:53That? Yeah. Give me a
  • 45:54second. Yeah. So some patient
  • 45:56can develop
  • 45:57abnormalities
  • 45:58with hormones,
  • 45:59but can it be treated
  • 46:00medically?
  • 46:02We don't know exactly how
  • 46:04it works, to be honest.
  • 46:05I mean, when you look
  • 46:06at literature, how does a
  • 46:07prophasecting work? Nobody knows exactly
  • 46:09how it how it's done,
  • 46:10but it was done, like,
  • 46:11I think, thirty, forty years
  • 46:13ago.
  • 46:13Open epufystectomy
  • 46:15by Cushing or etcetera,
  • 46:17for pain, and it's mostly
  • 46:18for hormonal related cancer pain.
  • 46:21Okay? Like breast, etcetera.
  • 46:29Any other questions?
  • 46:33Thank you for having us
  • 46:34both. It was
  • 46:35a extreme honor, and
  • 46:38happy to share my email,
  • 46:40doctor Sibley,
  • 46:42and get referrals and try
  • 46:44to help these patients out.
  • 46:45Thank you. Thank you.