2024
Prognostic impact of 'multi-hit' versus 'single hit' TP53 alteration in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results from the Consortium on Myeloid Malignancies and Neoplastic Diseases.
Badar T, Nanaa A, Atallah E, Shallis R, Craver E, Li Z, Goldberg A, Saliba A, Patel A, Bewersdorf J, Duvall A, Burkart M, Bradshaw D, Abaza Y, Stahl M, Palmisiano N, Murthy G, Zeidan A, Kota V, Patnaik M, Litzow M. Prognostic impact of 'multi-hit' versus 'single hit' TP53 alteration in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results from the Consortium on Myeloid Malignancies and Neoplastic Diseases. Haematologica 2024 PMID: 38813716, DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2024.285000.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAcute myeloid leukemiaMyelodysplastic syndromeComplex cytogeneticsMyeloid leukemiaAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesHematopoietic stem cell transplantationHigher-risk myelodysplastic syndromesOutcomes of SHStem cell transplantationAllo-HCTTP53 alterationsPrognostic impactMyeloid malignanciesTP53 mutationsCell transplantationFLT3-ITDIDH1 mutationMultivariate analysisSupportive careUS academic institutionsNeoplastic diseasePatientsSuperior EFSPredicting outcomeEfficacy of imetelstat on red blood cell (RBC)-transfusion independence (TI) in the absence of platelet transfusions or myeloid growth factors in IMerge.
Zeidan A, Santini V, Platzbecker U, Sekeres M, Savona M, Fenaux P, Madanat Y, Raza A, Xia Q, Sun L, Riggs J, Shah S, Navada S, Berry T, Komrokji R. Efficacy of imetelstat on red blood cell (RBC)-transfusion independence (TI) in the absence of platelet transfusions or myeloid growth factors in IMerge. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2024, 42: 6566-6566. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.6566.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesRBC-TIMyeloid growth factorsPlatelet transfusionsTransfusion-dependentHb levelsGrowth factorGrowth factor supportLong-term respondersGrowth factor useErythropoiesis stimulating agentsHb riseSevere neutropeniaMyelodysplastic syndromePlacebo groupPrimary endpointSecondary endpointsFactor supportInvestigator's discretionClinical benefitAdverse eventsPlaceboAnalysis cutoffImetelstatDisease progressionClinical benefit of luspatercept treatment (tx) in transfusion-dependent (TD), erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)–naive patients (pts) with very low-, low- or intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in the COMMANDS trial.
Zeidan A, Platzbecker U, Della Porta M, Santini V, Garcia-Manero G, Li J, Kreitz S, Pozharskaya V, Rose S, Lai Y, Valcárcel D, Fenaux P, Shortt J, Komrokji R. Clinical benefit of luspatercept treatment (tx) in transfusion-dependent (TD), erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)–naive patients (pts) with very low-, low- or intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in the COMMANDS trial. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2024, 42: 6565-6565. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.6565.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRed blood cell unitsLower-risk MDSRBC-TITransfusion burdenRed blood cellsTransfusion-dependentMyelodysplastic syndromeClinical benefitRed blood cell transfusion independenceAssessment of clinical benefitIntermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromesLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesBone marrow blastsClinically meaningful responseYears of ageLuspatercept treatmentMarrow blastsTransfusion independenceMean HbRinged sideroblastsEligible ptsMean hemoglobinHb levelsCumulative medianLuspaterceptCorrection to: Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes for Older Patients: Current State of Science, Challenges, and Opportunities
Kewan T, Stahl M, Bewersdorf J, Zeidan A. Correction to: Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes for Older Patients: Current State of Science, Challenges, and Opportunities. Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports 2024, 19: 151-151. PMID: 38761360, DOI: 10.1007/s11899-024-00734-x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchClinical and Genomic-Based Decision Support System to Define the Optimal Timing of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
Tentori C, Gregorio C, Robin M, Gagelmann N, Gurnari C, Ball S, Caballero Berrocal J, Lanino L, D'Amico S, Spreafico M, Maggioni G, Travaglino E, Sauta E, Meggendorfer M, Zhao L, Campagna A, Savevski V, Santoro A, Al Ali N, Sallman D, Sole F, Garcia-Manero G, Germing U, Kroger N, Kordasti S, Santini V, Sanz G, Kern W, Platzbecker U, Diez-Campelo M, Maciejewski J, Ades L, Fenaux P, Haferlach T, Zeidan A, Castellani G, Komrokji R, Ieva F, Della Porta M, Bernardi M, Di Grazia C, Vago L, Rivoli G, Borin L, Chiusolo P, Giaccone L, Voso M, Bewersdorf J, Nibourel O, Beyá M, Jerez A, Hernández F, Kennedy K, Xicoy B, Ubezio M, Russo A, Todisco G, Mannina D, Bramanti S, Zampini M, Riva E, Bicchieri M, Asti G, Viviani F, Buizza A, Tinterri B, Kubasch A, Bacigalupo A, Raiola A, Rambaldi A, Passamonti F, Ciceri F. Clinical and Genomic-Based Decision Support System to Define the Optimal Timing of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2024, jco2302175. PMID: 38723212, DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02175.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHematopoietic stem-cell transplantationAllogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantationStem-cell transplantationMyelodysplastic syndromeIPSS-MMolecular International Prognostic Scoring SystemInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemPrognostic Scoring SystemTime of transplantationProportion of patientsHigh-risk categoryOptimal timingProlonged life expectancyRevised IPSSIPSS-RRetrospective populationValidation cohortCurative treatmentClinical relevanceTransplantationPatientsModerately high-Scoring systemAverage survivalLife expectancyCLO24-079: Results From Phase 3 Trial of Imetelstat, a First-in-Class Telomerase Inhibitor, in Patients With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Dependent (RBC-TD) Non-del(5q) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Relapsed/Refractory to/Ineligible for Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESAs)
Madanat Y, Savona M, Sekeres M, Platzbecker U, Santini V, Fenaux P, Diez-Campelo M, Valcárcel D, Berry T, Dougherty S, Shah S, Sun L, Wan Y, Huang F, Navada S, Komrokji R, Zeidan A. CLO24-079: Results From Phase 3 Trial of Imetelstat, a First-in-Class Telomerase Inhibitor, in Patients With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Dependent (RBC-TD) Non-del(5q) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Relapsed/Refractory to/Ineligible for Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESAs). Journal Of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2024, 22 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7228.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMyelodysplastic Syndromes and Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Real-World Experience From a Developing Country
Awidi A, Alzu'bi M, Odeh N, Alrawabdeh J, Al Zyoud M, Hamadneh Y, Bawa'neh H, Magableh A, Alshorman A, Al-Fararjeh F, Aladily T, Zeidan A. Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Real-World Experience From a Developing Country. JCO Global Oncology 2024, 10: e2300281. PMID: 38422464, PMCID: PMC10914245, DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00281.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMyelodysplastic syndromeAML transformationMDS/myeloproliferative neoplasmRevised International Prognostic Scoring SystemClonal bone marrow disordersRisk of AML transformationInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemBaseline serum ferritin levelsMultivariate Cox regression modelMale to female ratioMyelodysplastic syndromes/myeloproliferative neoplasmsPrimary myelodysplastic syndromesPrognostic Scoring SystemSerum ferritin levelsMyelodysplastic syndrome subtypesBaseline serum ferritinBone marrow disordersLactate dehydrogenase levelsCox regression modelsJordan University HospitalRetrospective registry dataRisk of deathPeripheral cytopeniasBaseline ferritinIneffective hematopoiesisOral decitabine–cedazuridine versus intravenous decitabine for myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (ASCERTAIN): a registrational, randomised, crossover, pharmacokinetics, phase 3 study
Garcia-Manero G, McCloskey J, Griffiths E, Yee K, Zeidan A, Al-Kali A, Deeg H, Patel P, Sabloff M, Keating M, Zhu N, Gabrail N, Fazal S, Maly J, Odenike O, Kantarjian H, DeZern A, O'Connell C, Roboz G, Busque L, Buckstein R, Amin H, Randhawa J, Leber B, Shastri A, Dao K, Oganesian A, Hao Y, Keer H, Azab M, Savona M. Oral decitabine–cedazuridine versus intravenous decitabine for myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (ASCERTAIN): a registrational, randomised, crossover, pharmacokinetics, phase 3 study. The Lancet Haematology 2024, 11: e15-e26. PMID: 38135371, DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00338-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsChronic myelomonocytic leukemiaIntravenous decitabineMyelodysplastic syndromeMyelomonocytic leukemiaOral therapyPrimary endpointAdverse eventsEastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0Treatment cyclesCycle 1Full treatment dosePerformance status 0Treatment-related deathsFrequent adverse eventsSerious adverse eventsPhase 3 studyPhase 3 trialPotential treatment benefitsCommunity-based clinicsAcute myeloid leukemiaNext treatment cycleTreatment of individualsOral decitabineStatus 0Treatment discontinuationEFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LUSPATERCEPT VERSUS EPOETIN ALFA IN ERYTHROPOIESIS-STIMULATING AGENT (ESA)-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH TRANSFUSION-DEPENDENT LOWER-RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (LR-MDS): FULL ANALYSIS OF THE COMMANDS TRIAL
Garcia-Manero G, Platzbecker U, Santini V, Zeidan A, Fenaux P, Komrokji R, Shortt J, Valcarcel D, Jonasova A, Dimicoli-Salazar S, Tiong I, Lin C, Li J, Zhang J, Giuseppi A, Kreitz S, Pozharskaya V, Keeperman K, Rose S, Prebet T, Degulys A, Paolini S, Cluzeau T, Della Porta M. EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LUSPATERCEPT VERSUS EPOETIN ALFA IN ERYTHROPOIESIS-STIMULATING AGENT (ESA)-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH TRANSFUSION-DEPENDENT LOWER-RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (LR-MDS): FULL ANALYSIS OF THE COMMANDS TRIAL. Leukemia Research Reports 2024, 21: 100447. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrr.2024.100447.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesTreatment-emergent adverse eventsEA-treated patientsRBC-TIPrimary endpointHI-ERed blood cell transfusion independenceHematological improvement-erythroidTransfusion independenceErythroid responseMyelodysplastic syndromeSecondary endpointsAdverse eventsFull analysisLuspaterceptAssessed efficacySafety resultsEpoetin alfaTreatment durationPatientsEndpointEfficacyDurationPost-treatmentAMLIntegrated genetic, epigenetic, and immune landscape of TP53 mutant AML and higher risk MDS treated with azacitidine
Zeidan A, Bewersdorf J, Hasle V, Shallis R, Thompson E, de Menezes D, Rose S, Boss I, Halene S, Haferlach T, Fox B. Integrated genetic, epigenetic, and immune landscape of TP53 mutant AML and higher risk MDS treated with azacitidine. Therapeutic Advances In Hematology 2024, 15: 20406207241257904. PMID: 38883163, PMCID: PMC11180421, DOI: 10.1177/20406207241257904.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHigher-risk myelodysplastic syndromesAcute myeloid leukemiaBone marrowMutation statusImmune landscapeImmunological landscapeAnti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumabHR-MDS patientsWild-type acute myeloid leukemiaTP53-mutant acute myeloid leukemiaMutant acute myeloid leukemiaAzacitidine-based therapyWild-type patientsImmune checkpoint proteinsImmune checkpoint expressionT cell populationsWild-typeStatistically significant decreaseAZA therapyImmunosuppressive microenvironmentPD-L1Mutant patientsDNA methylation arraysCheckpoint expressionMyelodysplastic syndrome
2023
Sabatolimab plus hypomethylating agents in previously untreated patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (STIMULUS-MDS1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial
Zeidan A, Ando K, Rauzy O, Turgut M, Wang M, Cairoli R, Hou H, Kwong Y, Arnan M, Meers S, Pullarkat V, Santini V, Malek K, Kiertsman F, Niolat J, Ramos P, Menssen H, Fenaux P, Miyazaki Y, Platzbecker U. Sabatolimab plus hypomethylating agents in previously untreated patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (STIMULUS-MDS1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Haematology 2023, 11: e38-e50. PMID: 38065203, DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00333-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeProgression-free survivalComplete response rateMyelodysplastic syndromePlacebo groupPrimary endpointUntreated patientsAdverse eventsComplete responseResponse rateImmune-mediated adverse eventsMedian progression-free survivalRandomised phase 3 trialT-cell immunoglobulin domainFinal data cutoffTreatment-related deathsCommon adverse eventsFull analysis setMucin domain 3Phase 2 studyPhase 2 trialPhase 3 trialLeukaemic stem cellsFebrile neutropeniaData cutoffImetelstat in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who have relapsed or are refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (IMerge): a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
Platzbecker U, Santini V, Fenaux P, Sekeres M, Savona M, Madanat Y, Díez-Campelo M, Valcárcel D, Illmer T, Jonášová A, Bělohlávková P, Sherman L, Berry T, Dougherty S, Shah S, Xia Q, Sun L, Wan Y, Huang F, Ikin A, Navada S, Feller F, Komrokji R, Zeidan A. Imetelstat in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who have relapsed or are refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (IMerge): a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet 2023, 403: 249-260. PMID: 38048786, DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01724-5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsPlacebo groupAdverse eventsMyelodysplastic syndromeGrade 3Subsequent anti-cancer therapyTreatment-emergent adverse eventsTreatment-emergent grade 3Days of randomisationIPSS risk groupRBC transfusion burdenTransfusion independence rateTreatment-related deathsUnacceptable toxic effectsPlacebo-controlled trialDisease-modifying activityPhase 2 trialPhase 3 trialPrimary efficacy analysisProportion of patientsWithdrawal of consentUnmet medical needComputer-generated scheduleAnti-cancer therapyPost Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Outcomes Following Response to Hypomethylating Agent Therapy in Myelodysplastic Syndromes Are Predicted By Persistent International Prognostic Scoring System-Molecular Risk
Frumm S, Kim H, Kelkar A, Ho V, Gooptu M, Gibson C, Koreth J, Shapiro R, Romee R, Nikiforow S, Antin J, Soiffer R, Rolles B, Shimony S, Bewersdorf J, Kewan T, Alhajahjeh A, Luskin M, Garcia J, Chen E, Lane A, Wadleigh M, Winer E, Stone R, DeAngelo D, Zeidan A, Lindsley C, Cutler C, Stahl M. Post Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Outcomes Following Response to Hypomethylating Agent Therapy in Myelodysplastic Syndromes Are Predicted By Persistent International Prognostic Scoring System-Molecular Risk. Blood 2023, 142: 3618. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-185220.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHematopoietic stem cell transplantBlood count recoveryPost-HCT outcomesComplete remissionTime of diagnosisMyelodysplastic syndromeOverall survivalHigh riskLower riskAgent therapyCount recoveryMolecular riskInternational Working Group response criteriaShorter median overall survivalResponse criteriaDana-Farber Cancer InstituteHCT comorbidity indexImportant prognostic impactTAC/sirolimusHost disease (GVHD) prophylaxisMedian overall survivalProgression-free survivalStem cell transplantBone marrow biopsyFuture prospective studiesThe ELEMENT-MDS Trial: A Phase 3 Randomized Study Evaluating Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent-Naive, Non-Transfusion-Dependent, Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Zeidan A, Komrokji R, Buckstein R, Santini V, Rose S, Malini P, Lew G, Aggarwal D, Keeperman K, Jiang H, Giuseppi A, Zhang J, Cluzeau T, Shortt J, Platzbecker U. The ELEMENT-MDS Trial: A Phase 3 Randomized Study Evaluating Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent-Naive, Non-Transfusion-Dependent, Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Blood 2023, 142: 6503. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-178635.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRBC transfusion dependenceErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsLR-MDSEpoetin alfaMyelodysplastic syndromeTransfusion dependenceSecondary endpointsStarting doseOverall survivalTransfusion independenceWeek 1Baseline serum erythropoietin levelsIntermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromesIPSS-R risk categoryLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesRed blood cell transfusionHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemAdditional secondary endpointsRBC transfusion independenceTransfusion-free survivalKey secondary endpointBlood cell transfusionPatient Global ImpressionPhase 3 studyClinical and Genomic-Based Decision Support System to Define the Optimal Timing of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)
Tentori C, Gregorio C, Robin M, Gagelmann N, Gurnari C, Ball S, Berrocal J, Lanino L, D'Amico S, Spreafico M, Maggioni G, Travaglino E, Sauta E, Meggendorfer M, Zhao L, Bernardi M, Di Grazia C, Vago L, Rivoli G, Borin L, Chiusolo P, Giaccone L, Voso M, Bewersdorf J, Nibourel O, Díaz-Beyá M, Jerez A, Hernandez F, Kennedy K, Xicoy B, Ubezio M, Campagna A, Russo A, Todisco G, Mannina D, Bramanti S, Zampini M, Riva E, Bicchieri M, Asti G, Viviani F, Buizza A, Tinterri B, Bacigalupo A, Rambaldi A, Passamonti F, Ciceri F, Savevski V, Santoro A, Al Ali N, Sallman D, Sole F, Garcia-Manero G, Germing U, Kordasti S, Santini V, Sanz G, Kern W, Kubasch A, Platzbecker U, Diez-Campelo M, Maciejewski J, Ades L, Fenaux P, Haferlach T, Zeidan A, Castellani G, Komrokji R, Ieva F, Della Porta M. Clinical and Genomic-Based Decision Support System to Define the Optimal Timing of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS). Blood 2023, 142: 197. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-182194.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHematopoietic stem cell transplantationStem cell transplantationMyelodysplastic syndromeProlonged life expectancyClinical outcomesOptimal timingCell transplantationLife expectancyValidation cohortImmediate transplantationTransplantation policyRisks of HSCTImmediate hematopoietic stem cell transplantationAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationAge groupsDiagnosis of MDSConventional prognostic scoresPost-HSCT outcomesLow-risk diseaseTiming of transplantationDisease-modifying therapiesEarly disease stagesPatient's life expectancyAverage survival timeDifferent time pointsCharacteristics and Outcomes of Younger Adult Patients (Pts) with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Abaza Y, Xie Z, Burkart M, Badar T, Desai P, Shallis R, Patel A, Cohen-Nowak A, Oh T, Walker C, Easwar N, Kewan T, Cannova J, Bell-Burdett K, Al Ali N, Sallman D, Roboz G, Carraway H, Zeidan A, Patnaik M, Altman J, Komrokji R. Characteristics and Outcomes of Younger Adult Patients (Pts) with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Blood 2023, 142: 3232. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-188328.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeMedian overall survivalMulticenter retrospective studyRisk myelodysplastic syndromesOverall survivalYA groupMyelodysplastic syndromeYounger ptsComplete remissionAllo-SCTBaseline characteristicsFrontline therapyHematologic improvementMedian ageRetrospective studyCommon subtypeBlasts-2Exact testUpfront allogeneic stem cell transplantationIntermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromesTherapy-related myelodysplastic syndromeAllogeneic stem cell transplantationDe novo myelodysplastic syndromeExcess blasts-2Marrow complete remissionReal-World Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes Initiating Oral Decitabine and Cedazuridine or Intravenous/Subcutaneous Hypomethylating Agents
Zeidan A, Costantino H, Modi K, Salimi T, Washington T, Epstein R. Real-World Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes Initiating Oral Decitabine and Cedazuridine or Intravenous/Subcutaneous Hypomethylating Agents. Blood 2023, 142: 548. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-188638.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeOral DECHMA therapyMedian ageTreatment patternsCCI scoreAML diagnosisMyelodysplastic syndromeSC cohortReal-world treatment patternsReal-world clinical practiceEnd of enrollmentMean CCI scorePre-index periodPrescription claims dataDiscontinuation of treatmentHalf of patientsDays of administrationStandard of careTreatment of MDSEnd of studyLongitudinal persistenceOral decitabineIndex dateTreatment cohortsImpact of Mutational Status on Clinical Response to Imetelstat in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the IMerge Phase 3 Study
Santini V, Zeidan A, Fenaux P, Madanat Y, Berry T, Feller F, Sun L, Xia Q, Wan Y, Huang F, Savona M, Platzbecker U. Impact of Mutational Status on Clinical Response to Imetelstat in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the IMerge Phase 3 Study. Blood 2023, 142: 4603. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-179378.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesPlacebo groupTransfusion independenceTI ratesHot spot mutationsPoor prognosisMyelodysplastic syndromeRed blood cell transfusion independenceASXL1 mutationsErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsPhase 3 studyStudy of patientsTI responsesPresence of mutationsSpecific mutationsClinical responseStudy entryClinical efficacyClinical benefitPeripheral bloodMutation subgroupsDNMT3A mutationsEpigenetic modifiersPatientsRUNX1 mutationsImprovement of Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Heavily Pretreated Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and High Transfusion Burden Treated with Imetelstat on the IMerge Phase 3 Trial
Sekeres M, Diez-Campelo M, Zeidan A, Platzbecker U, Regnault A, Creel K, Sengupta N, Wan Y, Sun L, Xia Q, Berry T, Dougherty S, Shah S, Navada S, Santini V, Valcárcel D. Improvement of Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Heavily Pretreated Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and High Transfusion Burden Treated with Imetelstat on the IMerge Phase 3 Trial. Blood 2023, 142: 6479. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-181103.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesPatient-reported outcomesHigh transfusion burdenTransfusion burdenPlacebo groupMyelodysplastic syndromeTreatment groupsFunctional assessmentCancer Therapy-AnemiaPatient-reported fatigueTransfusion independence rateChronic Illness TherapyPhase 3 trialInferior overall survivalTransfusion-dependent anemiaLeast square meansImprovement of patientsPRO end pointsComposite scorePositive mean changesQuality of lifeFACT-AnTreat populationDyspnea scoreOverall survivalLuspatercept Modulates Inflammation in the Bone Marrow, Restores Effective Erythropoiesis/Hematopoiesis, and Provides Sustained Clinical Benefit Versus Epoetin Alfa (EA): Biomarker Analysis from the Phase 3 COMMANDS Study
Hayati S, Zeidan A, Garcia-Manero G, Platzbecker U, Ahsan A, Verma A, Aluri S, Guerrero M, Gandhi A, Suragani R, Vodala S. Luspatercept Modulates Inflammation in the Bone Marrow, Restores Effective Erythropoiesis/Hematopoiesis, and Provides Sustained Clinical Benefit Versus Epoetin Alfa (EA): Biomarker Analysis from the Phase 3 COMMANDS Study. Blood 2023, 142: 1845. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-178674.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBM mononuclear cellsLow-risk MDSEpoetin alfaWk 48Myelodysplastic syndromeWk 24Clinical benefitPg/Bone marrowErythroid precursorsITT populationIL-1Ring sideroblastsN-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptideLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesPro-brain natriuretic peptideHematopoietic stem cellsDysplastic erythroid precursorsRBC transfusion independencePhase 3 trialSuperior clinical benefitSerum cytokine analysisAnti-inflammatory signalingIL-10 signalingComplete blood count