2024
Endocrine-Sensitive Disease Rate in Postmenopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor–Rich/ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Anastrozole, Fulvestrant, or Their Combination
X. C, Suman V, Sanati S, Vij K, Anurag M, Leitch A, Unzeitig G, Hoog J, Fernandez-Martinez A, Fan C, Gibbs R, Watson M, Dockter T, Hahn O, Guenther J, Caudle A, Crouch E, Tiersten A, Mita M, Razaq W, Hieken T, Wang Y, Rimawi M, Weiss A, Winer E, Hunt K, Perou C, Ellis M, Partridge A, Carey L. Endocrine-Sensitive Disease Rate in Postmenopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor–Rich/ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Anastrozole, Fulvestrant, or Their Combination. JAMA Oncology 2024, 10: 362-371. PMID: 38236590, PMCID: PMC10797521, DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6038.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNeoadjuvant endocrine therapyBreast cancerWeek 4Neoadjuvant chemotherapyPostmenopausal womenPAM50 subtypesNonluminal tumorsClinical stage II to IIIRate of pathological complete responseClinical trialsHER2)-negative breast cancerPhase 3 randomized clinical trialLuminal B tumorsPathological complete responseLuminal A tumorsEarly-stage diseaseRandomized clinical trialsStage II to IIIAnastrozole armNeoadjuvant anastrozoleTumor Ki67Postmenopausal patientsB tumorsComplete responseA tumors
2016
The Role of Proliferation in Determining Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Gene Expression–Based Meta-Analysis
Stover DG, Coloff JL, Barry WT, Brugge JS, Winer EP, Selfors LM. The Role of Proliferation in Determining Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Gene Expression–Based Meta-Analysis. Clinical Cancer Research 2016, 22: 6039-6050. PMID: 27330058, PMCID: PMC5161615, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0471.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTriple-negative breast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPathologic complete responseBreast cancerGene expression signaturesComplete responseExpression signaturesPrimary breast cancer biopsiesImmune activation signatureBreast cancer biopsiesRole of proliferationClinicopathologic characteristicsSignature scoreImmune activityCancer biopsiesPAM50 subtypesBreast tumorsProliferation differencesCancerActivation signatureNeoadjuvant chemosensitivityChemosensitivityTumorsDNA damageScores
2013
PAM50 proliferation score as a predictor of weekly paclitaxel benefit in breast cancer
Martín M, Prat A, Rodríguez-Lescure Á, Caballero R, Ebbert MT, Munárriz B, Ruiz-Borrego M, Bastien RR, Crespo C, Davis C, Rodríguez CA, López-Vega JM, Furió V, García AM, Casas M, Ellis MJ, Berry DA, Pitcher BN, Harris L, Ruiz A, Winer E, Hudis C, Stijleman IJ, Tuck DP, Carrasco E, Perou CM, Bernard PS. PAM50 proliferation score as a predictor of weekly paclitaxel benefit in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research And Treatment 2013, 138: 457-466. PMID: 23423445, PMCID: PMC3608881, DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2416-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCell ProliferationClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCyclophosphamideEpirubicinFemaleFluorouracilHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKi-67 AntigenMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicMultivariate AnalysisPaclitaxelProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeConceptsGroup of patientsWeekly paclitaxelOverall survivalPAM50 subtypesProliferation scoreBreast cancerNode-positive operable breast cancerMultivariable Cox regression analysisLow proliferation statusAnthracycline-containing chemotherapyOperable breast cancerPhase III trialsSubset of patientsCox regression analysisClinical-pathological variablesFEC armMedian followAdjuvant therapySecondary endpointsIII trialsPathological variablesHistologic gradeClinical trialsAdjuvant FECKi-67