2015
SU‐C‐BRD‐05: Non‐Invasive in Vivo Biodosimetry in Radiotherapy Patients Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Spectroscopy
Bahar N, Roberts K, Stabile F, Mongillo N, Decker R, Wilson L, Husain Z, Contessa J, Williams B, Flood, Swartz H, Carlson D. SU‐C‐BRD‐05: Non‐Invasive in Vivo Biodosimetry in Radiotherapy Patients Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Spectroscopy. Medical Physics 2015, 42: 3192-3193. DOI: 10.1118/1.4923800.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTotal body irradiationRadiotherapy patientsRadiation doseNeck radiotherapy patientsUpper central incisorsBiomedical Advanced ResearchBody irradiationFree radicalsFirst treatmentMedical interventionsEfficient triageCentral incisorsMedical countermeasuresPatientsDoseGyPreliminary dataHuman dataRetrospective biodosimetrySubsequent fractionsHuman ServicesInterventionLuminescent dosimetersMagnetic resonancePilot program
2004
Relation of clinical success in coronary brachytherapy to dose
Singh HS, Yue N, Azimi N, Nath R, Roberts KB, Pfau S. Relation of clinical success in coronary brachytherapy to dose. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2004, 94: 847-852. PMID: 15464663, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.06.016.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrachytherapyCase-Control StudiesConnecticutCoronary AngiographyCoronary RestenosisCoronary VesselsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisRadiotherapy DosageRetrospective StudiesStatistics as TopicTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, InterventionalConceptsTreatment failureExternal elastic membraneTreatment successStent restenosisIntravascular ultrasoundAdequate dose deliveryRecurrent restenosisLesion patternsPrimary treatmentCoronary brachytherapyClinical successPatientsDose prescriptionRadiation delivery systemsArteryRestenosisGyDoseBrachytherapyDose thresholdRadiation delivery devicePotential causesDose deliveryIntravascular brachytherapyTreatment