2024
Feasibility of Pay for Performance and Transparency Interventions on the Selection and Quality of Observational Management for Patients with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in the Community Practice.
Gaylis F, Leapman M, Ellis S, Hu S, Cooperberg M, Loeb S, Chen R, Cohen E, Dato P, Aynehchi S, David R, Topp R, Santomauro B, Ginsburg K, Catalona W. Feasibility of Pay for Performance and Transparency Interventions on the Selection and Quality of Observational Management for Patients with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in the Community Practice. Urology Practice 2024, 101097upj0000000000000745. PMID: 39453985, DOI: 10.1097/upj.0000000000000745.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInter-reader reliability and diagnostic accuracy of PI-RADS scoring between academic and community care networks: How wide is the gap?
Smani S, Jalfon M, Sundaresan V, Lokeshwar S, Nguyen J, Halstuch D, Khajir G, Cavallo J, Sprenkle P, Leapman M, Kim I. Inter-reader reliability and diagnostic accuracy of PI-RADS scoring between academic and community care networks: How wide is the gap? Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2024 PMID: 39438211, DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchClinically significant PCaPI-RADS scoreDetect clinically significant PCaReporting of prostate cancerInter-reader reliabilityProstate cancerPI-RADSDiagnostic accuracyReceiver operating characteristicInter-readerPresence of clinically significant PCaProstate Imaging Reporting & Data SystemDetect clinically significant diseasePI-RADS 3 lesionsTertiary academic care centerMRI fusion biopsyPI-RADS 3Significant PCaProstate cancer managementClinically significant diseaseInter-reader agreementSubgroup of lesionsAcademic care centerIntraclass correlationMpMRI interpretationMolecular Correlates of Prostate Cancer Visibility on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review
Fazekas T, Pallauf M, Kufel J, Miszczyk M, Tsuboi I, Matsukawa A, Laukhtina E, Kardoust Parizi M, Mancon S, Cadenar A, Schulz R, Yanagisawa T, Baboudjian M, Szarvas T, Gandaglia G, Tilki D, Nyirády P, Rajwa P, Leapman M, Shariat S. Molecular Correlates of Prostate Cancer Visibility on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review. European Urology Oncology 2024 PMID: 39414421, DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.017.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate Imaging ReportingProstate cancerMagnetic resonance imagingMRI-invisible lesionsPI-RADSMRI visibilityImaging ReportingAssociated with oncologic outcomesBiologically aggressive prostate cancerHighest Prostate Imaging ReportingMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingProstate magnetic resonance imagingPI-RADS 4PI-RADS scoreResonance imagingData System scoreAggressive prostate cancerStage prostate cancerMolecular correlatesClinically aggressive cancerPrognostic gene panelsSystematic biopsyAssociated with featuresOncological outcomesSystemic biopsyLong-Term Outcomes of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen–PET Imaging of Recurrent Prostate Cancer
Kunst N, Long J, Westvold S, Sprenkle P, Kim I, Saperstein L, Rabil M, Ghaffar U, Karnes R, Ma X, Gross C, Wang S, Leapman M. Long-Term Outcomes of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen–PET Imaging of Recurrent Prostate Cancer. JAMA Network Open 2024, 7: e2440591. PMID: 39441595, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40591.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProstate-specific antigenProstate-specific antigen levelPSMA-PETRecurrent prostate cancerBiochemical recurrenceProstate cancerLong-term outcomesProstate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomographyEvaluation of biochemical recurrenceDetection of biochemical recurrenceLife yearsConventional imagingDefinitive local therapyPSMA PET imagingProstate cancer deathDetection of metastasesRetrospective cohort studyBase case analysisIncremental life-yearsPositron emission tomographyDecision-analytic modelLocal therapyConventional imaging strategiesDelayed treatmentDisease courseSociodemographic disparities in prostate cancer imaging
Sundaresan V, Lokeshwar S, Sutherland R, Sohoni N, Golos A, Ajjawi I, Leapman M. Sociodemographic disparities in prostate cancer imaging. Abdominal Radiology 2024, 1-9. PMID: 39325212, DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04603-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate cancer imagingProstate cancerProstate cancer diagnosisMonitoring of prostate cancerProstate multiparametric MRISociodemographic disparitiesProstate cancer treatmentEquitable cancer careBiochemical recurrenceFactors associated with disparitiesMultiparametric MRIActive surveillanceTreatment planningBlack patientsCancer outcomesTreatment workflowDiagnostic imagingCancer careDiagnosisRural settingsProstateImaging utilizationTreatmentPatientsCancer imagingAssociation Between the Decipher Genomic Classifier and Prostate Cancer Outcome in the Real-world Setting
Leapman M, Ho J, Liu Y, Filson C, Zhao X, Hakansson A, Proudfoot J, Davicioni E, Martin D, An Y, Seibert T, Lin D, Spratt D, Cooperberg M, Sprenkle P, Ross A. Association Between the Decipher Genomic Classifier and Prostate Cancer Outcome in the Real-world Setting. European Urology Oncology 2024 PMID: 39098389, DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.07.010.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDecipher genomic classifierRisk of metastasisBiochemical recurrenceRadical prostatectomyGenomic classifierDecipher testProstate cancerProstate Risk Assessment Postsurgical ScoreRisk of biochemical recurrencePatient's prostate cancerRisk of cancer recurrencePathological risk factorsProstate cancer outcomesCox proportional hazards regressionRetrospective cohort studyElectronic health record dataReal-world settingsProportional hazards regressionHealth record dataReal-world practice settingsProstate biopsyRP specimensOncological outcomesPrognostic significanceMedian ageRisk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy
Smani S, Sundaresan V, Lokeshwar S, Choksi A, Carbonella J, Brito J, Renzulli J, Sprenkle P, Leapman M. Risk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy. Exploration Of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy 2024, 5: 981-996. PMID: 39280242, PMCID: PMC11390291, DOI: 10.37349/etat.2024.00259.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGleason score upgradingProstate-specific antigenRisk factorsMagnetic resonance imagingRadical prostatectomyScore upgradingAssociated with Gleason score upgradingBiopsy to radical prostatectomyHigher-risk prostate cancerPatients treated with surgeryProstate magnetic resonance imagingClinically localized diseaseGleason grade groupLow-risk diseaseRecognition of risk factorsBody mass indexGleason upgradingFinal pathologyProstate volumeProstate biopsySource of diagnostic uncertaintyBiopsy coresLocalized diseaseProstate cancerInitial managementAssociations Between Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Genomic Testing, and Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer
Sundaresan V, Wang R, Long J, Sprenkle P, Seibert T, Loeb S, Cooperberg M, Catalona W, Ma X, Gross C, Leapman M. Associations Between Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Genomic Testing, and Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer. Urology Practice 2024, 11: 965-973. PMID: 39196719, DOI: 10.1097/upj.0000000000000679.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLocalized prostate cancerClinically localized prostate cancerHigh-risk diseaseProstate MRIProstate cancerTreatment intensificationIntensified treatmentGenomic testingTreated patientsProstate magnetic resonance imagingEnd Results databaseLong-term patient outcomesProstate cancer prognosisRetrospective cohort studyAssociated with decreased oddsRisk stratification toolPrimary study outcomeAssociated with increased oddsMagnetic resonance imagingResults databaseStratification toolTreatment patientsCohort studyRisk strataCancer prognosisProstate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: Diagnostic performance, clinical thresholds, and strategies for refinement
Sundaresan V, Smani S, Rajwa P, Renzulli J, Sprenkle P, Kim I, Leapman M. Prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: Diagnostic performance, clinical thresholds, and strategies for refinement. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2024 PMID: 39019723, DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.003.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate specific antigenProstate cancerPSA-based prostate cancer screeningDiagnostic performanceProstate specific antigen densityProstate specific antigen velocityLow-grade prostate cancerProstate-specific antigen screeningFree prostate specific antigenTreatment of prostate cancerProstate cancer screeningClinical action thresholdsProstate volumeAntigen screeningMalignant cellsSpecific antigenCancer screeningScreening biomarkerProstateClinical roleTest characteristicsCancerClinical applicationClinical thresholdEarly detectionRisk Factors and Contemporary Management Options for Pain and Discomfort Experienced During a Prostate Biopsy
Diaz G, Webb L, Rabil M, Lokeshwar S, Choksi A, Leapman M, Sprenkle P. Risk Factors and Contemporary Management Options for Pain and Discomfort Experienced During a Prostate Biopsy. Current Urology Reports 2024, 25: 243-252. PMID: 38896314, DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01220-w.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate biopsyRisk factorsEffective pain management strategiesDiagnosed prostate cancerPain management strategiesIn-office proceduresModern management optionsNonadherence to treatmentContemporary management optionsEnhance patient comfortInnovative imaging modalitiesExperience of painFusion biopsyProstate volumePain intensityProstate cancerPain varyPatient ageIncreased painFollow-upIn-officeManagement optionsSurveillance adherenceBiopsyPharmacological analgesicsMagnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening
Fazekas T, Shim S, Basile G, Baboudjian M, Kói T, Przydacz M, Abufaraj M, Ploussard G, Kasivisvanathan V, Rivas J, Gandaglia G, Szarvas T, Schoots I, van den Bergh R, Leapman M, Nyirády P, Shariat S, Rajwa P. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening. JAMA Oncology 2024, 10: 745-754. PMID: 38576242, PMCID: PMC10998247, DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0734.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchClinically significant PCaDetection of clinically significant PcaInternational Society of Urological PathologyClinically significant PCa detectionProstate magnetic resonance imagingMagnetic resonance imagingInsignificant PCaProstate cancerProstate cancer screeningBiopsy indicationClinically significant PCa detection rateProstate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screeningMagnetic resonance imaging pathwayOdds ratioPCa detection rateSignificant PCaPI-RADS scorePSA-based screeningResonance imagingScreening pathwayTime of magnetic resonance imagingPositive predictive valuePooled odds ratioProspective cohort studyRandomized clinical trialsThe effect of a fermented soy beverage among patients with localized prostate cancer prior to radical prostatectomy
Lokeshwar S, Ali A, Weiss T, Reynolds J, Shuch B, Ferencz T, Kyriakides T, Mehal W, Brito J, Renzulli J, Leapman M. The effect of a fermented soy beverage among patients with localized prostate cancer prior to radical prostatectomy. BMC Urology 2024, 24: 102. PMID: 38702664, PMCID: PMC11067086, DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01483-y.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEnd-of-studyProstate cancerRadical prostatectomyTreatment armsDouble-blind randomized trialProstate cancer characteristicsSurgical margin statusLocalized prostate cancerFACT-P scoresBaseline to end-of-studySerum PSACAPRA scoreGleason scorePSA levelsPlacebo-controlledMedium-chain triglyceridesPrimary endpointIntermediate riskClinical stageMargin statusSerum testosteroneRandomization armFACT-PRisk strataITT analysisMP58-01 A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF A FERMENTED SOY BEVERAGE AMONG PATIENTS WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER PRIOR TO RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
Lokeshwar S, Choksi A, Ali A, Weiss T, Reynolds J, Shuch B, Ferencz T, Kyriakides T, Brito J, Renzulli J, Leapman M. MP58-01 A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF A FERMENTED SOY BEVERAGE AMONG PATIENTS WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER PRIOR TO RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY. Journal Of Urology 2024, 211: e947. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0001008852.83523.41.01.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPD13-06 IMPLEMENTATION OF PRACTICE-LEVEL INTERVENTIONS FOR LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER IN A COMMUNITY PRACTICE
Gaylis F, Leapman M, Ellis S, Hu S, Cooperberg M, Loeb S, Chen R, Cohen E, Dato P, Aynehchi S, David R, Topp R, Catalona W. PD13-06 IMPLEMENTATION OF PRACTICE-LEVEL INTERVENTIONS FOR LOW-RISK PROSTATE CANCER IN A COMMUNITY PRACTICE. Journal Of Urology 2024, 211: e264. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0001009552.62973.71.06.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPD45-10 PROSTATE-SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN IMAGING FINDINGS AND SUBSEQUENT CLINICAL MANAGEMENT AMONG PATIENTS WITH BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
Leapman M, Rabil M, Ghaffar U, Long J, Westvold S, Sprenkle P, Kim I, Saperstein L, Fallah J, Suzman D, Lerro C, Xu J, Kluetz P, Kunst N, Wang S, Ma X, Gross C, Karnes R. PD45-10 PROSTATE-SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN IMAGING FINDINGS AND SUBSEQUENT CLINICAL MANAGEMENT AMONG PATIENTS WITH BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY. Journal Of Urology 2024, 211: e971. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0001008792.09108.b4.10.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPD08-10 EFFECTIVENESS OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY AMONG PATIENTS WITH BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS OF DECISION ANALYTIC MODELING
Kunst N, Long J, Westvold S, Sprenkle P, Rabil M, Ghaffar U, Kim I, Saperstein L, Wang S, Ma X, Gross C, Leapman M. PD08-10 EFFECTIVENESS OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY AMONG PATIENTS WITH BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS OF DECISION ANALYTIC MODELING. Journal Of Urology 2024, 211: e177. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0001008576.33217.96.10.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate cancerPatientsMP57-08 COST EFFECTIVENESS OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (PSMA-PET) FOR THE EVALUATION OF BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER IN THE UNITED STATES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM
Kunst N, Long J, Westvold S, Sprenkle P, Rabil M, Ghaffar U, Kim I, Saperstein L, Wang S, Ma X, Gross C, Leapman M. MP57-08 COST EFFECTIVENESS OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (PSMA-PET) FOR THE EVALUATION OF BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER IN THE UNITED STATES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM. Journal Of Urology 2024, 211: e940. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0001009420.83948.eb.08.Peer-Reviewed Original Research‘It Just Makes Sense to Me’: A qualitative study exploring patient decision‐making and experiences with prostate MRI during active surveillance for prostate cancer
Sutherland R, Gross C, Ma X, Jeong F, Seibert T, Cooperberg M, Catalona W, Ellis S, Loeb S, Schulman‐Green D, Leapman M. ‘It Just Makes Sense to Me’: A qualitative study exploring patient decision‐making and experiences with prostate MRI during active surveillance for prostate cancer. BJUI Compass 2024, 5: 593-601. PMID: 38873351, PMCID: PMC11168777, DOI: 10.1002/bco2.351.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate magnetic resonance imagingMagnetic resonance imagingProstate cancerActive surveillanceActive surveillance of prostate cancerGleason Grade Group 1Surveillance of prostate cancerIntermediate-risk prostate cancerMonitoring of prostate cancerMRI-ultrasound fusion biopsyGrade group 1Monitoring prostate cancerGroup 2 tumorsMagnetic resonance imaging scansFusion biopsyLongitudinal follow-upProstate biopsyFollow-upProstateSemi-structured interviews of patientsMRI useQualitative studyGroup 1Interviews of patientsPatientsRISKS OF GRADE RECLASSIFICATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH GLEASON GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER AND PI-RADS 5 FINDINGS ON PROSTATE MRI
Sundaresan V, Webb L, Rabil M, Golos A, Sutherland R, Sprenkle P, Kim I, Leapman M. RISKS OF GRADE RECLASSIFICATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH GLEASON GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER AND PI-RADS 5 FINDINGS ON PROSTATE MRI. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2024, 42: s79. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.222.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGleason Grade Group 1PI-RADS 5 lesionsPI-RADSProstate biopsyProstate cancerGleason upgradingRadical prostatectomyActive surveillanceProstate MRIMultivariate logistic regressionGrade Group 1 prostate cancerConversion to active treatmentOptimal management of patientsGrade group 1PI-RADS 5Gleason grade groupProstate Imaging ReportingDied of diseaseManagement of patientsLogistic regressionPrimary study outcomeAssociated with oddsMedian PSAMetastatic diseaseGrade diseaseAssociation between pelvic lymph node dissection and survival among patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy
Kim I, Wang A, Corpuz G, Sprenkle P, Leapman M, Brito J, Renzulli J, Kim I. Association between pelvic lymph node dissection and survival among patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Prostate International 2024, 12: 70-78. PMID: 39036758, PMCID: PMC11255894, DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.01.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPelvic lymph node dissectionBenefit of pelvic lymph node dissectionGleason grade groupLymph node dissectionProstate cancer patientsRadical prostatectomyNode dissectionProstate cancer treated with radical prostatectomyCancer patientsAssociated with improved OSTime of radical prostatectomyGrade groupSurvival of prostate cancer patientsMedian PSA valuePre-operative characteristicsProstate cancer-specificTime of RPLog-rank testKaplan-Meier curvesPSA valuesSurvival benefitProstate cancerMedian ageClinical benefitCancer-specific