2024
Healthcare Utilization and Costs Among Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Oral Azacitidine Maintenance Therapy Versus No Maintenance: A US Claims Database Study
Borate U, Seiter K, Potluri R, Mazumder D, Chevli M, Prebet T, Gaugler L, Strocchia M, Vasconcelos A, Sieluk J. Healthcare Utilization and Costs Among Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Oral Azacitidine Maintenance Therapy Versus No Maintenance: A US Claims Database Study. Advances In Therapy 2024, 41: 4049-4064. PMID: 39240504, PMCID: PMC11480148, DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02947-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAcute myeloid leukemiaHealthcare resource utilizationOral-AZAPropensity score matchingMyeloid leukemiaReal-world healthcare resource utilizationClinical practiceHematopoietic stem cell transplantationLower healthcare resource utilizationResultsAfter propensity score matchingStem cell transplantationContinuous insurance enrollmentClaims database studyOutpatient visitsOral azacitidinePost-remissionMaintenance therapyProlonged remissionCell transplantationDisease remissionDelayed relapseBaseline characteristicsTreatment patternsPatientsDatabase studyCorrigendum to “AML-068 - Survival Differences in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Treated With Oral Azacitidine (Oral-AZA) as Maintenance and Those Eligible but Not Treated in a US Electronic Health Record (EHR) Database” [Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia, 23S1 (2023) S1-S593]
Mims A, Xie Z, Vasconcelos A, Strocchia M, Heydendael W, Chevli M, Rotter D, Potluri R, Prebet T, Sieluk J. Corrigendum to “AML-068 - Survival Differences in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Treated With Oral Azacitidine (Oral-AZA) as Maintenance and Those Eligible but Not Treated in a US Electronic Health Record (EHR) Database” [Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia, 23S1 (2023) S1-S593]. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2024, 24: 203-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.11.010.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LUSPATERCEPT VERSUS EPOETIN ALFA IN ERYTHROPOIESIS-STIMULATING AGENT (ESA)-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH TRANSFUSION-DEPENDENT LOWER-RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (LR-MDS): FULL ANALYSIS OF THE COMMANDS TRIAL
Garcia-Manero G, Platzbecker U, Santini V, Zeidan A, Fenaux P, Komrokji R, Shortt J, Valcarcel D, Jonasova A, Dimicoli-Salazar S, Tiong I, Lin C, Li J, Zhang J, Giuseppi A, Kreitz S, Pozharskaya V, Keeperman K, Rose S, Prebet T, Degulys A, Paolini S, Cluzeau T, Della Porta M. EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LUSPATERCEPT VERSUS EPOETIN ALFA IN ERYTHROPOIESIS-STIMULATING AGENT (ESA)-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH TRANSFUSION-DEPENDENT LOWER-RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (LR-MDS): FULL ANALYSIS OF THE COMMANDS TRIAL. Leukemia Research Reports 2024, 21: 100447. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrr.2024.100447.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesTreatment-emergent adverse eventsEA-treated patientsRBC-TIPrimary endpointHI-ERed blood cell transfusion independenceHematological improvement-erythroidTransfusion independenceErythroid responseMyelodysplastic syndromeSecondary endpointsAdverse eventsFull analysisLuspaterceptAssessed efficacySafety resultsEpoetin alfaTreatment durationPatientsEndpointEfficacyDurationPost-treatmentAML
2023
EE86 Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) and Associated Costs Among Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Treated with Oral Azacitidine as Maintenance and Those Eligible but Not Treated Using a US Claims Database
Borate U, Seiter K, Potluri R, Mazumder D, Heydendael W, Chevli M, Prebet T, Strocchia M, Vasconcelos A, Sieluk J. EE86 Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) and Associated Costs Among Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Treated with Oral Azacitidine as Maintenance and Those Eligible but Not Treated Using a US Claims Database. Value In Health 2023, 26: s67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.09.358.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2019
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
Tallman M, Wang E, Altman J, Appelbaum F, Bhatt V, Bixby D, Coutre S, De Lima M, Fathi A, Fiorella M, Foran J, Hall A, Jacoby M, Lancet J, LeBlanc T, Mannis G, Marcucci G, Martin M, Mims A, O'Donnell M, Olin R, Peker D, Perl A, Pollyea D, Pratz K, Prebet T, Ravandi F, Shami P, Stone R, Strickland S, Wieduwilt M, Gregory K, Hammond L, Ogba N. Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Journal Of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2019, 17: 721-749. PMID: 31200351, DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0028.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAge FactorsAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorCytogenetic AnalysisDisease-Free SurvivalGraft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHistocompatibility TestingHLA AntigensHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMedical OncologyMiddle AgedRemission InductionRisk AssessmentTransplantation, HomologousUnited StatesConceptsAcute myeloid leukemiaNCCN Clinical Practice GuidelinesClinical practice guidelinesMyeloid leukemiaTreatment optionsManagement of acute myeloid leukemiaLow-intensity regimensExpansion of treatment optionsAnnual deaths due to leukemiasPractice guidelinesDeaths due to leukemiaAcute leukemiaTargeted therapyAdult patientsDiagnostic evaluationLeukemiaNCCNOptionsRegimensUnited StatesTherapyWorkupPatientsGuidelines