2019
Diminished ovarian reserve versus ovarian aging: overlaps and differences.
Ata B, Seyhan A, Seli E. Diminished ovarian reserve versus ovarian aging: overlaps and differences. Current Opinion In Obstetrics & Gynecology 2019, 31: 139-147. PMID: 30870184, DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000536.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNormal ovarian reserveOvarian reservePregnancy lossOocyte qualityReproductive technology cyclesAge-matched womenDiminished ovarian reserveLow ovarian reserveFetal chromosomal abnormalitiesQuantitative declineFecundity of womenOvarian stimulationNatural conceptionOvarian agingPoor responseART treatmentAged womenYoung womenChromosomal abnormalitiesAvailable evidenceDecreased numberQualitative declineOocyte poolWomenBlastocyst development
2018
DNA methylation-based age prediction and telomere length in white blood cells and cumulus cells of infertile women with normal or poor response to ovarian stimulation
Morin SJ, Tao X, Marin D, Zhan Y, Landis J, Bedard J, Scott RT, Seli E. DNA methylation-based age prediction and telomere length in white blood cells and cumulus cells of infertile women with normal or poor response to ovarian stimulation. Aging 2018, 10: 3761-3773. PMID: 30530921, PMCID: PMC6326671, DOI: 10.18632/aging.101670.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsChronologic agePremature reproductive agingReproductive-age womenWhite blood cellsOvarian stimulationInfertile womenOvarian responsePatient ageInfertile patientsAge womenPoor responseFollicular somatic cellsReproductive agingFertility treatmentCumulus cellsBlood cellsTelomere lengthAgeWomenPatientsStimulationWBCFemale ageRiskReproductive senescenceDiminished ovarian reserve and poor response to stimulation in patients <38 years old: a quantitative but not qualitative reduction in performance
Morin SJ, Patounakis G, Juneau CR, Neal SA, Scott RT, Seli E. Diminished ovarian reserve and poor response to stimulation in patients <38 years old: a quantitative but not qualitative reduction in performance. Human Reproduction 2018, 33: 1489-1498. PMID: 30010882, DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey238.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAge FactorsAneuploidyBlastomeresDatabases, FactualEmbryo Culture TechniquesEmbryo TransferFemaleFertility Agents, FemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInfertility, FemaleLive BirthOvarian ReserveOvaryOvulationOvulation InductionPregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeConceptsPoor oocyte qualityOvarian reserveLive birth rateDiminished ovarian reserveOocyte yieldOocyte qualityBlastulation rateAMH levelsPoor respondersPoor responseFollicular depletionBirth rateEmbryo transferAneuploidy rateLower live birth ratesYoung womenSTUDY FUNDING/COMPETINGGood prognosis patientsOvarian reserve parametersOvarian reserve testingYoung poor respondersPoor ovarian responseRetrospective cohort studyLower oocyte yieldInterquartile range
2010
Identification and in Vitro Characterization of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Receptor Variants Associated with Abnormal Ovarian Response to FSH
Gerasimova T, Thanasoula MN, Zattas D, Seli E, Sakkas D, Lalioti MD. Identification and in Vitro Characterization of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Receptor Variants Associated with Abnormal Ovarian Response to FSH. The Journal Of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2010, 95: 529-536. PMID: 20061434, PMCID: PMC2840851, DOI: 10.1210/jc.2009-1304.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsOvarian responseFSH receptorFSHR mRNAAbnormal ovarian responseOvarian stimulation protocolsForms of infertilityOocytes of womenExtracellular ligand-binding portionHormone receptor variantsOvarian hyperstimulationOvarian stimulationFSHR variantsPoor responseInfertility treatmentT cellsStimulation protocolFollicle growthFSHFertility clinicsCAMP activationCumulus cellsReceptor variantsGenetic causeRT-PCRWomen