2022
Pembrolizumab vs placebo + chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment, followed by pembrolizumab vs placebo as adjuvant treatment for early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 study
Kümmel S, Cortés J, Dent R, Pusztai L, McArthur H, Bergh J, Denkert C, Park Y, Hui R, Harbeck N, Takahashi M, Untch M, Fasching P, Cardoso F, Ding Y, Tryfonidis K, Aktan G, Karantza V, O’Shaughnessy J, Schmid P. Pembrolizumab vs placebo + chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment, followed by pembrolizumab vs placebo as adjuvant treatment for early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 study. European Journal Of Surgical Oncology 2022, 48: e30-e31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.12.430.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2013
Influence of genomics on adjuvant treatments for pre-invasive and invasive breast cancer
Abu-Khalaf M, Pusztai L. Influence of genomics on adjuvant treatments for pre-invasive and invasive breast cancer. The Breast 2013, 22: s83-s87. PMID: 24074799, DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.015.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAge FactorsAgedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBiopsy, NeedleBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCost SavingsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleForecastingGenetic TestingGenomicsHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenRisk AssessmentSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeConceptsLow-risk patientsBreast cancerRisk patientsTreatment recommendationsEarly-stage breast cancerER-positive breast cancerUse of chemotherapyInvasive breast cancerGenomic testingStage breast cancerInternational practice guidelinesMultivariate prognostic modelCost-effectiveness studiesPotential clinical valueAdjuvant treatmentBreast cancer biomarkersCurrent guidelinesPractice guidelinesClinical utilityClinical valueTumor markersStage IPrognostic modelPrognostic testClinical use
2012
12O_PR Independent Blinded Validation of the Genomic Index of Sensitivity to Endocrine Therapy (Set)
Karn T, Hatzis C, Symmans W, Pusztai L, Ruckhäberle E, Schmidt M, Müller V, Holtrich U, Rody A, Kaufmann M. 12O_PR Independent Blinded Validation of the Genomic Index of Sensitivity to Endocrine Therapy (Set). Annals Of Oncology 2012, 23: ii18. DOI: 10.1016/s0923-7534(19)65684-x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEndocrine therapyPositive patientsPrognostic valueTumor sizeER-positive primary breast cancerPositive primary breast cancerAdjuvant endocrine therapyNegative PgR statusNode-negative cohortPure prognostic valueNode-negative patientsStepwise Cox regressionER-positive patientsPrimary breast cancerBest independent predictorPgR statusAdjuvant treatmentRetrospective cohortIndependent predictorsLymph nodesNegative cohortSurvival benefitCox regressionClinical associationsHER2 statusAdjuvant therapy in stage I carcinoma of the breast
Schwartz GF, Reis‐Fihlo J, Pusztai L, Fentiman IS, Holland R, Bartelink H, Rutgers EJ, Solin LJ, Palazzo J, Committee A. Adjuvant therapy in stage I carcinoma of the breast. Cancer 2012, 118: 2031-2038. PMID: 22392361, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27431.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStage I breast cancerI breast cancerBreast cancerAdjuvant therapyConsensus conferenceStage ILymph node-negative breast cancerNode-negative breast cancerKimmel Cancer CenterAdjuvant chemotherapyAdjuvant hormonesAdjuvant treatmentCancer CenterClinical trialsThomas Jefferson UniversityTreatment criteriaTreatment decisionsIndividual tumorsCancerGenetic factorsChemotherapyMolecular phenotypingTherapyHormoneCurrent data