Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel (Cilta-cel) Vs Standard of Care (SoC) in Patients with Lenalidomide (Len)-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM) after 1-3 Lines of Therapy: Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity in the Phase 3 Cartitude-4 Trial
Popat R, Oriol A, Cavo M, Karlin L, Mazza I, Roeloffzen W, Kim S, Lipe B, Bar N, Horvath N, Spencer A, Min C, Chen D, Li Q, Li K, Slaughter A, Lonardi C, Benachour N, Ghosh A, Vogel M, Lendvai N, Lengil T, Patel N, Filho O, Florendo E, Lin Y. Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel (Cilta-cel) Vs Standard of Care (SoC) in Patients with Lenalidomide (Len)-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM) after 1-3 Lines of Therapy: Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity in the Phase 3 Cartitude-4 Trial. Blood 2024, 144: 1032. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2024-201533.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMinimal residual disease negativityMRD-negativity ratesSustained MRD negativityMinimal residual diseaseProgression-free survivalMedian progression-free survivalCilta-celMRD negativitySOC armOverall survivalMultiple myelomaInterim analysisPost-infusionFollow-upMinimal residual disease assessmentMinimal residual disease dataMinimal residual disease positivityCilta-cel infusionProlonged survival outcomesMedian follow-upOverall response rateNegative resultsStandard of careMedian OSComplete responseUpdated Comparative Efficacy of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel Versus Idecabtagene Vicleucel in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated with 2-4 Prior Lines of Therapy Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison
Lopez-Muñoz N, Bar N, Diels J, van Sanden S, Mendes J, Lee S, Hernando T, Lendvai N, Patel N, Ishida T, Er J, Harrison S, Shah U. Updated Comparative Efficacy of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel Versus Idecabtagene Vicleucel in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated with 2-4 Prior Lines of Therapy Using a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Blood 2024, 144: 3390. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2024-201568.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProgression-free survivalRelapsed/refractory multiple myelomaUnanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisonMatching-adjusted indirect comparisonCilta-celIde-celCARTITUDE-1Overall survivalMultiple myelomaCAR-TIdecabtagene vicleucelIndirect comparisonsProteasome inhibitorsKaplan-MeierChimeric antigen receptor T cellsHazard ratioPresence of extramedullary diseaseAnti-CD38 monoclonal antibodyTreatment of adult patientsB-cell maturation antigenRisk of disease progressionConfidence intervalsTreatment of multiple myelomaRefractory to lenalidomideCAR-T treatmentLong-Term Benefits in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Time to Next Anti-Myeloma Therapy of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel (Cilta-cel) Versus Standard of Care for Patients with Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results from the Phase 3 Cartitude-4 Clinical Trial
Bar N, Mina R, Mylin A, Yokoyama H, Magen H, Alsdorf W, Minnema M, Shune L, Isufi I, Harrison S, Shah U, De Champlain A, Gries K, Chen D, Li Q, Yeh T, Slaughter A, Lonardi C, Benachour N, Ghosh A, Deraedt W, Vogel M, Lendvai N, Patel N, Costa Filho O, Florendo E, Karlin L, Weisel K. Long-Term Benefits in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Time to Next Anti-Myeloma Therapy of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel (Cilta-cel) Versus Standard of Care for Patients with Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results from the Phase 3 Cartitude-4 Clinical Trial. Blood 2024, 144: 2002-2002. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2024-209232.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProgression-free survivalAnti-myeloma therapyLenalidomide-refractory multiple myelomaCilta-celMedian follow-upFollow-upMultiple myelomaStandard of careCiltacabtagene autoleucelProgressive diseaseMedian timeSOC armRefractory to lenalidomideYears of follow-upAnti-myeloma treatmentKaplan-Meier methodData cut-offCox proportional hazards modelsConfidence intervalsWorsening of symptomsRisk of deathProportional hazards modelFunctional impactEuropean Organization for ResearchMM patientsP-057 Comparative Efficacy of Cilta-Cel vs Approved Comparator Treatments for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma With 1–3 Prior Lines of Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis
Mina R, Khan A, McClune B, Bar N, Caers J, Larsen J, Mendes J, Lee S, Benachour N, Chen D, Zhao M, Lonardi C, Slaughter A, Lengil T, Burnett H, Cichewicz A, Neupane B, Filho O, Dytfeld D, Sidana S. P-057 Comparative Efficacy of Cilta-Cel vs Approved Comparator Treatments for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma With 1–3 Prior Lines of Therapy: A Network Meta-Analysis. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2024, 24: s74. DOI: 10.1016/s2152-2650(24)01960-8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchComparative efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel versus idecabtagene vicleucel in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with 2–4 prior lines of therapy: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison
Bar N, Diels J, van Sanden S, Mendes J, Hernando T, Burnett H, Cost P, Schecter J, Lendvai N, Patel N, Ishida T, Er J, Harrison S, Lopez-Muñoz N. Comparative efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel versus idecabtagene vicleucel in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with 2–4 prior lines of therapy: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Current Medical Research And Opinion 2024, 40: 1597-1603. PMID: 39129504, DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2391112.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRelapsed/refractory multiple myelomaEfficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucelIde-celProgression-free survivalCilta-celIdecabtagene vicleucelCiltacabtagene autoleucelMultiple myelomaTreated with 2Risk of disease progressionDistribution of prognostic factorsIndirect comparisonsRefractory multiple myelomaTreatment of patientsCox proportional hazards modelsMatching-adjusted indirect comparisonWeighted Cox proportional hazards modelsLogistic regression analysisProportional hazards modelCARTITUDE-1Partial responseTriple-classPrognostic factorsPatient-level dataClinical benefit