Skip to Main Content

Exploring Environmental Health: Insights from the Yale Superfund Research Center on the Emerging Contaminant-Induced Cancers

November 13, 2023

Yale Cancer Center Grand Rounds | November 10, 2023

Presented by: Dr. Vasilis Vasiliou

ID
10968

Transcript

  • 00:00I'm Melinda Irwin.
  • 00:01I'm a professor in the School of
  • 00:04Public Health with Vasilis and also
  • 00:06deputy Director for the Cancer Center,
  • 00:09overseeing population sciences research,
  • 00:12which focuses on lifestyle,
  • 00:14genetic and environmental risk factors
  • 00:17for cancer etiology and outcomes.
  • 00:20So we're delighted today to have
  • 00:23the Yale and National International
  • 00:25expert in environmental carcinogens
  • 00:28and cancer speak to us.
  • 00:30Doctor Vasilis Vasilu,
  • 00:31who is also he's the Susan Dwight
  • 00:34Bliss Professor of Environmental
  • 00:35Health Sciences as well as Chair of
  • 00:38our Department of Environmental Health
  • 00:40Sciences in the Yale School of Public Health.
  • 00:43He received his PhD in Biochemical
  • 00:46Pharmacology from the University
  • 00:48of Ion Ionina in Greece.
  • 00:51He then trained in gene
  • 00:53environment interactions,
  • 00:55molecular toxicology and pharmacogenetics
  • 00:58at the Department of Environmental
  • 01:00Health and the College of Medicine
  • 01:03at University of Cincinnati.
  • 01:04He joined Yale 10 almost 10 years
  • 01:07ago in 2014 from the University
  • 01:09of Colorado School of Pharmacy,
  • 01:12where he rose to the ranks to
  • 01:14become professor and director of the
  • 01:16toxicology graduate program and was
  • 01:18professor also of ophthalmology.
  • 01:20He's established an internationally
  • 01:23recognized research program that's been
  • 01:26continuously funded by NIH since 1997,
  • 01:28and his research interests include
  • 01:31the etiology and molecular mechanisms
  • 01:33of environmentally induced human
  • 01:35disease such as liver disease,
  • 01:37obesity and diabetes, cancer,
  • 01:40and neurodegenerative diseases.
  • 01:43Vasilis is the director of the N i.e.
  • 01:46HS funded P 42,
  • 01:48Yale Superfund Research Center
  • 01:50and also the director of the NI
  • 01:53AAA funded R24 Resource Center for
  • 01:55Mouse Models and Metabolomics tools
  • 01:58to investigate alcohol metabolism
  • 02:01and tissue injury.
  • 02:03This is really does translational
  • 02:05research from preclinical work
  • 02:07to clinical to community engaged
  • 02:09research focusing on environmental
  • 02:11risk factors in cancer.
  • 02:13Thank you.
  • 02:14Thank
  • 02:16you very much, Melinda.
  • 02:17Thank you for the invitation.
  • 02:18And Melinda, thank you very much
  • 02:20for the impressive introduction.
  • 02:21I don't know if I
  • 02:26anyway, so I wish.
  • 02:32Let me start.
  • 02:33Actually the talk of today's lecture
  • 02:36is exploring environmental health,
  • 02:39the insights through our P42
  • 02:43Centre Research Centre on emerging
  • 02:46contaminants and their their,
  • 02:48their effects on cancer.
  • 02:52So one of the concerns that we have is,
  • 02:55you know that 50% or maybe more than
  • 03:01more than 50% of the cancers might
  • 03:04not be due to the genetic effects,
  • 03:06might not be to mutations,
  • 03:08might not be to polymorphisms
  • 03:10or things like that.
  • 03:11So they have an environmental impact.
  • 03:13One of the things that has triggered
  • 03:16my attention the last five or you know
  • 03:206-7 years is the early onsets of cancer,
  • 03:24which actually there was a very
  • 03:27nice review in Natural Nature
  • 03:30Reviews in clinical oncology,
  • 03:33which posed the question if the early onset
  • 03:36of cancer is an emerging global epidemic.
  • 03:39And it has.
  • 03:40As you can see, the incidence of of
  • 03:43cancers in various organs in ages less
  • 03:47than 50 and actually less than 40,
  • 03:50has been rising in many parts
  • 03:52of the world since the 80s.
  • 03:54The evidence suggests an ideological risk
  • 03:57of risk factor exposures in early life.
  • 04:00Young, under hood,
  • 04:01and all those specific individual
  • 04:04exposures remain to be largely unknown.
  • 04:06So this is what my interests are,
  • 04:09how this environmental exposures
  • 04:11could lead not only to cancers but
  • 04:14also to early onsets of cancers.
  • 04:16And we can go from liver cancer
  • 04:19to colorectal cancer with
  • 04:21associations to alcohol,
  • 04:22which I could give you
  • 04:24another lecture on that.
  • 04:25But anyway,
  • 04:25the early onset cancer epidemic
  • 04:27might be 1 manifestation of
  • 04:29increasing the trends of the in the
  • 04:31development of many chronic disease
  • 04:33in the young and future generation.
  • 04:35So what we come here is the
  • 04:39early life exposure,
  • 04:40it's the exposures of the of the mother.
  • 04:44And actually now it's also exposure
  • 04:47preconceptionally for both mother
  • 04:49and father what they have been
  • 04:51into it and how this would affect
  • 04:53the development of the embryon,
  • 04:55the later studies.
  • 04:56So the exposome includes
  • 04:58environmental exposure,
  • 04:59Melinda talked about diet,
  • 05:01lifestyle,
  • 05:01obesity and microbiome and this
  • 05:04this exposome has changed completely
  • 05:07in the last 40 or 50 years.
  • 05:10So a lot of people looking into how this
  • 05:13Eddy life exposures could have an effect.
  • 05:16Of course we should not ignore the
  • 05:18exposure we have on daily basis and
  • 05:21talking about that one of the most
  • 05:24important thing is drinking water.
  • 05:26You drink your water and in most
  • 05:28of the cases especially when you
  • 05:30come to emerging contaminants,
  • 05:32you don't you have no idea what
  • 05:34what the water contains.
  • 05:36So it's it's a lot of aspects in here.
  • 05:39So talking about drinking water
  • 05:42and protecting the environment.
  • 05:44So the federal government has the
  • 05:46Superfund Act and what that is refers
  • 05:49to a comprehensive environmental response.
  • 05:52Compensation and liability are
  • 05:54known as CLEFCLA since the 80s.
  • 05:56So what the federal government did
  • 05:59is they put a law that provides a
  • 06:02legal framework for clean up sites of
  • 06:04contaminate and hazardous substances.
  • 06:07Especially,
  • 06:07you know there are some states,
  • 06:09Connecticut is a heavily industrialized,
  • 06:14actually it's a retired,
  • 06:16it's a retired state of heavily
  • 06:20industrialized area.
  • 06:21If I'll show you the sites of superfunds,
  • 06:26either federal or local,
  • 06:28we might walk away and go and
  • 06:29look for a job or another state.
  • 06:31It's everywhere and I will
  • 06:33explain you why in I'll
  • 06:34give you some of these examples.
  • 06:36Again, we have to be taking
  • 06:39everything into consideration.
  • 06:40So there is the federal law,
  • 06:42if there is a company that has a spill out,
  • 06:45so they're getting a fine and that could
  • 06:47be hundreds of millions of dollars.
  • 06:50So this amount of money,
  • 06:52some of this amount of money they
  • 06:53go to the EPA and some of them
  • 06:56they go to National Institute of
  • 06:57Environmental Health Sciences and what
  • 06:59the environmental Health Sciences does
  • 07:01takes this money and creates a centers.
  • 07:04So you have we have here the Cancer
  • 07:07Center at the same time we have
  • 07:09the the Superfund research centers
  • 07:11through around the the United States.
  • 07:14And essentially the centers focus on
  • 07:17the understanding of health effects of
  • 07:19the exposures to hazardous substances,
  • 07:21developing innovative technologies
  • 07:24to mitigate essentially size,
  • 07:27clean up and engaging communities
  • 07:30affected by this environmental issues.
  • 07:32So their research contributes to the
  • 07:36overall goal of safeguarding the public
  • 07:38health and environmental in areas
  • 07:40of hazard or waste contamination.
  • 07:42So this is what are the centers and
  • 07:44this is as I said this is where the
  • 07:47federal money from penalties from
  • 07:49those cleanups go and they're coming.
  • 07:51So how many centers that exist?
  • 07:53We have 23 funded centers in the in
  • 07:57the United States and as you can see
  • 08:00on the top left is our Connecticut,
  • 08:02it's a Yale Superfund Reset centre.
  • 08:04This is the first ever centre we've
  • 08:07got in Connecticut and the focus of as
  • 08:11I said the focus of our the focus of
  • 08:15our centre is on emerging contaminants.
  • 08:18So what are water contaminants of
  • 08:21emerging concern now these are chemicals
  • 08:23that they're detected in trace amount
  • 08:26in our drinking water within global
  • 08:30drinking supplies that their risk on
  • 08:34human health is not fully understand
  • 08:37or even not been evaluated at all.
  • 08:40OK.
  • 08:41And what are these emerging
  • 08:43concerns include that including
  • 08:45industrial chemicals such as P Fas.
  • 08:48Everybody has heard about the P Fas.
  • 08:50Everybody you know today at least you
  • 08:54will get educated on on 1.4 dioxane on
  • 08:57some volatile solvents that they exist.
  • 08:59But in addition to that we have
  • 09:01a lot of pharmaceuticals,
  • 09:03personal care products and actually
  • 09:06yesterday NIHS had a webinar about the
  • 09:09Expos on on personal care products.
  • 09:12You'll be surprised how much they
  • 09:14go down the drain and how much they
  • 09:16end up in your drinking water.
  • 09:17It's truly amazing.
  • 09:19And of course you have pesticides
  • 09:21and herbicides that come from
  • 09:23the agriculture that eventually,
  • 09:25you know they're going to end up into
  • 09:28the water table and they're going
  • 09:30to add up to our drinking water.
  • 09:32So the overall objective of our Yale
  • 09:36Superfund Research Center is to improve
  • 09:39public health from the emerging water
  • 09:41contaminants in the drinking waters.
  • 09:44And what we're trying to do with
  • 09:46trying to develop not innovative
  • 09:48research in terms of the mechanisms
  • 09:51of toxicities that they this
  • 09:54emerging contaminants 'cause and
  • 09:55also look at the ways that we can
  • 09:59mitigate that we can detect and
  • 10:01mitigate that and also
  • 10:04inform the communities,
  • 10:05talk with the communities, listen to
  • 10:07their needs and talk to us about it.
  • 10:10Our center has been focused on 1.4 dioxane.
  • 10:14We and also it's what we call,
  • 10:17I'm sorry walking around,
  • 10:20I'm Greg, I'm sorry that's it's
  • 10:23in my sense this is in my genes,
  • 10:26it's not environmental.
  • 10:28So it's 1.4 dioxin and what we call
  • 10:32its Co contaminants which is 1,
  • 10:35it's the dichloroethane,
  • 10:37trichloroethane and also trichloroethylene.
  • 10:40Those are volatile solvents that
  • 10:42they exist and I will explain you
  • 10:44why and how this has come up with.
  • 10:46But essentially,
  • 10:47this is what our center is doing
  • 10:48and this is what we're focusing now.
  • 10:50You can say why did you focus on that?
  • 10:53So when I came here, it was 2014.
  • 10:56I immediately went on,
  • 10:59I think the next year immediately
  • 11:01I met with the state authorities,
  • 11:03the Department of Public Health
  • 11:06and the Department of Energy
  • 11:07and Environmental Protection.
  • 11:08And I said I'd like to develop
  • 11:11a Superfund research program
  • 11:13for the state of Connecticut.
  • 11:15What is the issue that you have?
  • 11:18At that time?
  • 11:19PFS were not that hot and
  • 11:21actually thank God because we
  • 11:23took the direction of 1.4 dioxin.
  • 11:25Had they know anything about 1.4 dioxin?
  • 11:27No.
  • 11:28But they told me that this was the
  • 11:30major issue and the major issue was
  • 11:33because of this solvents on this
  • 11:35multiple sites in the state of Connecticut.
  • 11:37And the problem with 1.4 dioxin
  • 11:40is they could not filter it.
  • 11:43It would go through every aspect.
  • 11:47And even in public water,
  • 11:48they cannot filter it If if
  • 11:50the source is contaminated,
  • 11:52it will end up in your drinking water.
  • 11:54So that was a major issue and This is
  • 11:57why we chose to go with 1.4 dioxane.
  • 12:00So the superfan center.
  • 12:01And actually I'm really proud
  • 12:03not because I got the grant,
  • 12:05I'm really proud because I brought
  • 12:07the four schools together and that
  • 12:08is our school of public health,
  • 12:10the School of Medicine,
  • 12:11the engineering and the environment.
  • 12:13And we developed this program.
  • 12:14This program consists of,
  • 12:16as you can see,
  • 12:18four research projects and four course.
  • 12:21We have the administrative core,
  • 12:22we have the training core,
  • 12:25the DMAC which plays the it's the
  • 12:29data management and analytics.
  • 12:31We also have the community engagement
  • 12:33and of course we have the training,
  • 12:36the training core that you're going.
  • 12:37I'll go in a little bit more details
  • 12:40when we move forward on this.
  • 12:42So again,
  • 12:4311 more time it was the concern
  • 12:46of the public,
  • 12:47of the public institutions was on
  • 12:501.4 dioxin for a particular reason.
  • 12:52Because it is a possible human carcinogen.
  • 12:57It has been found that it causes
  • 13:00cancer in animals,
  • 13:02but now there is no epidemiological
  • 13:05studies yet in humans.
  • 13:07This is why it's emerging contaminants
  • 13:10and it's found with the other Co
  • 13:12contaminants and has been prioritized
  • 13:15by US Environmental Protection
  • 13:17Agency on the on the 3rd Unregulated
  • 13:21Monitoring role for testing in
  • 13:242013 and 2015 and you will see
  • 13:26the map. It is spread
  • 13:29throughout United States.
  • 13:31So it's been also characterized
  • 13:34as forever chemical just like the
  • 13:37PFS because it cannot be filtered.
  • 13:39It's very, it's difficult to be,
  • 13:42you know metabolized by bacterial
  • 13:45species and so on and it goes there.
  • 13:49This is from the chemical Environmental
  • 13:51news saying that this is really so when
  • 13:54I put the team together, I put them,
  • 13:57we wrote a big grant that we can
  • 14:00we oversee what it was available,
  • 14:02what was the scientific evidence,
  • 14:04what was the demological studies,
  • 14:07what are the strategies to mitigate that.
  • 14:10And we we had that on a very
  • 14:13nice review that actually helped
  • 14:15us to get the team together.
  • 14:18So 1.4 dioxane of course in three isomers,
  • 14:211.41 point 2 and 1.3,
  • 14:24but the concern and the most most
  • 14:27prevalent is the 1.4 dioxane.
  • 14:30Is it a new chemical?
  • 14:31No, it's not.
  • 14:32I'm just not going to go in
  • 14:34all details of this because we
  • 14:36can talk about for a long time,
  • 14:38but it was first synthesized in 1863 and
  • 14:42initially it was used as a stabilizer.
  • 14:45It was used as a stabilizer for the
  • 14:50for the solvents, the DCATCE and DCA,
  • 14:55and what happens is this,
  • 14:57this solvents, they were covered on.
  • 15:02They were.
  • 15:03They were transferred on aluminium
  • 15:06containers and the aluminum containers,
  • 15:08you know,
  • 15:08they have a cover inside which
  • 15:10is aluminum and they protect from
  • 15:13being interacting with the metal.
  • 15:16So what happened is after a certain
  • 15:18period of time these solvents
  • 15:20interact with the metal and they
  • 15:23create even toxic products.
  • 15:24So what they did is they found
  • 15:27out 1.4 dioxane,
  • 15:28it could block the catalysis
  • 15:31of this reaction.
  • 15:32So they were using 1.4 dioxane as
  • 15:35a stabilizer of those chemicals not
  • 15:37only to protect the toxicity but
  • 15:40stabilize the solvents for their use.
  • 15:43And what we're using this everything
  • 15:45that you can imagine, I'll show you.
  • 15:47So it was used as a stabilizer to begin with,
  • 15:50but later as you can see from this,
  • 15:52it has been used in many in many areas.
  • 15:55So this is the uses,
  • 15:57I'm not going to go in great details
  • 15:59but includes from the stabilizing to medical,
  • 16:02pharmaceutical, rubber and plastic industry,
  • 16:06printing in and paints,
  • 16:07adhesives, brake fluids,
  • 16:09brake cleaning fluids and also rust
  • 16:13remover and also antifreeze and deicing.
  • 16:17The stuff that you they throwing on
  • 16:20the airplanes before we take off on
  • 16:22this it has 1.4 dioxide quite a bit
  • 16:24and what we end up with on the ground.
  • 16:28OK so pesticides and some of the
  • 16:31pesticides they have up to 50% of
  • 16:351.4 dioxide 50% anyway and also
  • 16:39the consumer products we talked
  • 16:41about before what is environmental
  • 16:43concerns first of all ground water
  • 16:46contamination resistance it's as I
  • 16:48told you it's it's there it cannot be
  • 16:51really degraded easily and can travel.
  • 16:54It can travel everywhere toxicity.
  • 16:56It's been classified,
  • 16:57as I told you,
  • 16:58as a possible human carcinogen by
  • 17:01both the USEPA and the National
  • 17:03engine for Recession.
  • 17:04Cancer. Regulatory concerns
  • 17:06are plenty of concerns.
  • 17:08There is no federal regulation.
  • 17:09Well, we don't have federal
  • 17:10regulation yet, even for PFAS.
  • 17:12And I don't know if you
  • 17:15watch the movie Dark Waters,
  • 17:17which I recommend that you do,
  • 17:19you realize what what I'm talking about?
  • 17:21About PFAS and regulatory issues.
  • 17:24So as I told you before,
  • 17:27what do you find, 1.4 Dioxane.
  • 17:29You find all the other
  • 17:31solvents or vice versa.
  • 17:32It has happened in play many
  • 17:34places in the United States
  • 17:36around the Air Force or you know,
  • 17:39army bases and everywhere.
  • 17:40And it's not only in the United States,
  • 17:43even in German Japan,
  • 17:45China they have found whatever you find
  • 17:49DC or DCA you will find 1.4 dioxin.
  • 17:53So you expect to have it also in the rivers,
  • 17:57in fish and in the drinking water.
  • 18:00Here is the map from the you CMR 3
  • 18:03and you can see there are white dots,
  • 18:08I mean dots,
  • 18:09Gray dots and red dots and
  • 18:12essentially this is above,
  • 18:14below and or around the
  • 18:17recommendation concentration which
  • 18:19is .36 micro grams per liter.
  • 18:22This is a reference dose that
  • 18:24this is the dose that it can
  • 18:26cause one cancer per million.
  • 18:28OK.
  • 18:28And again this is advisory
  • 18:31nothing regulatory.
  • 18:32The areas we have chosen as it was here,
  • 18:35you cannot believe if
  • 18:37you live in Long Island,
  • 18:39public water from Long Island
  • 18:41comes from well water.
  • 18:43And most of these areas,
  • 18:44they're really high levels of 1.4 dioxide.
  • 18:47And what happened on that?
  • 18:48Actually Governor Cuomo was very
  • 18:51strong and put the legislation and
  • 18:54there is a law in New York now
  • 18:57that prohibits the manufacturers
  • 19:00to put 1.4 dioxane in detergents
  • 19:03and household items.
  • 19:05Now there is a lawsuit from the
  • 19:07industry against the government,
  • 19:08but you know,
  • 19:08at least they put that and they
  • 19:10recognize that because everything,
  • 19:12and I don't have time to go through that,
  • 19:15your tide, your your shampoo,
  • 19:17your everything,
  • 19:17it has 1.4 dioxane and everything is
  • 19:20going to go down to the water table.
  • 19:22And especially in Long Island,
  • 19:25the public water comes from well water.
  • 19:28So it's a major concern.
  • 19:29Another area,
  • 19:31which was one of the reasons that
  • 19:35NIH had a very strong also thing
  • 19:37is NIHS locates in North Carolina,
  • 19:40major, major contamination.
  • 19:41Also in North Carolina in the Cape
  • 19:45Fear River is fully contaminated
  • 19:47and you know it's still getting
  • 19:49a lot of discharges in there.
  • 19:52Is it only there?
  • 19:53No, we have the case of Michigan,
  • 19:55which I'll explain you later.
  • 19:57We're working on that.
  • 19:58Ann Arbor has a major plan of
  • 20:011.4 dioxane sitting right there
  • 20:02and there's a lot of concern.
  • 20:05New Jersey found out last couple of
  • 20:08years that the public water had 1.4 dioxane.
  • 20:13And what happened there is a lawsuit.
  • 20:14I haven't followed up the details,
  • 20:16but in March 23 of 2023.
  • 20:20The water companies shoot the
  • 20:22manufacturers for putting 1.4
  • 20:24dioxin into the river,
  • 20:25which eventually ended up into
  • 20:27the drinking water.
  • 20:28So there's a lot of things going on and this
  • 20:31is happening just right now.
  • 20:33That was again in a different area in
  • 20:35North Carolina where they found again
  • 20:401.4 dioxin 1300 times higher
  • 20:42compared to the reference level.
  • 20:45So what I'm saying is there is a lot of
  • 20:49issues in there simply because was not
  • 20:52nobody was paying attention before and
  • 20:54this is this is something that due to
  • 20:57the difficulties in determining that
  • 20:59and having the assays but eventually
  • 21:02right now there is a major concern.
  • 21:05So in terms of toxicity in general
  • 21:08most of the toxicity what we know
  • 21:10or what we knew and what we're going
  • 21:13to do is from liver and kidney OK.
  • 21:16But however they have been found that
  • 21:18there is some effects also in nasal
  • 21:21and eye liver toxist is dose dependent
  • 21:25characterized by cell degeneration,
  • 21:27preneoplastic lesion development,
  • 21:30acid lobular swelling, necrosis,
  • 21:33increased DNA synthesis,
  • 21:35all the prenea plastic damages that
  • 21:38you can see in chromosomal damage
  • 21:41and and and enzyme leakage.
  • 21:43The kidney toxicity manifests as a
  • 21:46generation of the cortical tube cells,
  • 21:48tubular tubular neclosis and
  • 21:52chloro nephritis.
  • 21:54So the other thing that we have
  • 21:56discovered in our and which I think
  • 21:59it could be very disturbing but is
  • 22:01that we found out that there is
  • 22:03a potential disruption of glucose
  • 22:06homeostasis at least in our mice.
  • 22:09But again, it's not published.
  • 22:11We have it here.
  • 22:14So the studies and I'm not going to go,
  • 22:16I can bypass because time is running.
  • 22:19There are a lot of,
  • 22:20a lot of experiments both in mice
  • 22:23and rats in over the two years that
  • 22:26it is a proven liver carcinogen.
  • 22:28And you know it has been shown
  • 22:32that you know it is occurring in
  • 22:35various labs throughout the year,
  • 22:37throughout the globe and they
  • 22:39found the same thing.
  • 22:40So one of the thing though that it was
  • 22:43a little bit puzzling is when they took,
  • 22:46they did the genotoxicity.
  • 22:47In other words they did the aims test
  • 22:50or sister comma the exchange test.
  • 22:52They couldn't find any genotoxicity
  • 22:55for this 1.4 dioxin.
  • 22:56So they said well it's not the mutagen,
  • 22:58maybe it's a promoter.
  • 22:59As you can see on the 4th bullet,
  • 23:02well,
  • 23:02there is a published study published
  • 23:05last year by a Japanese group
  • 23:07that indicates that 1.4 dioxin can
  • 23:10induce DNA adducts as well.
  • 23:13OK, and they're going on that.
  • 23:16But what really triggered my interest
  • 23:18and this is what really reflects
  • 23:21essentially the mode of action of
  • 23:241.4 dioxane is what they did is
  • 23:28they took genotoxic carcinogens
  • 23:31not genotoxic carcinogens in 1.4
  • 23:34dioxane and they did the studies
  • 23:36in both mice and rats.
  • 23:37They measured the RNA sick and
  • 23:40they try to make sense if 1.4
  • 23:43dioxin belongs to one or the other
  • 23:46group based on gene expression.
  • 23:49And what they found as you can
  • 23:50see from the from the slides
  • 23:521.4 dioxin is a distinct form.
  • 23:55So in other words it's it's does not
  • 23:58belong to any of these two models
  • 24:00which I thought it was very interesting
  • 24:03and it was worth of exploring.
  • 24:05So let's go and see what we're doing.
  • 24:09So our Project 1 briefly goes
  • 24:11on liver cancer and biomarkers.
  • 24:14So essentially we're trying to use mouse
  • 24:18models, human cells and organization,
  • 24:21also zebra fish to dissect the
  • 24:25molecular mechanisms of causing cancer.
  • 24:27That's what the Project one does.
  • 24:30The project Two, as I told you,
  • 24:32there is no epidemiological study on,
  • 24:35you know, on on 1.4 dioxin.
  • 24:38And this was the major obstacle
  • 24:40that I had to go through for the
  • 24:43resubmission because everybody,
  • 24:44when I was putting the stuff about
  • 24:47carcinogenist, they said, well,
  • 24:48we don't have epidemiological status.
  • 24:50Well, somebody has to do it anyway.
  • 24:53To make a Long story short,
  • 24:54the budget of this project, it's not huge.
  • 24:57So we did not have money to do
  • 25:00the epidemiological studies.
  • 25:02However, the NIHS said we do want
  • 25:04you to do something about it.
  • 25:06So what we decided was exposure assessment.
  • 25:10So in other words epidemiological
  • 25:13studies in much less number of samples.
  • 25:17So the Project 3 is something
  • 25:19that we're trying to detect the
  • 25:221.4 dioxin and Co contaminants
  • 25:24in areas that they're there.
  • 25:26My whole idea in here is can we
  • 25:29develop a system that it can be
  • 25:32online that you can monitor the area,
  • 25:35do the bio monitoring from your computer
  • 25:38or the EPA can you know get the information.
  • 25:42It's a difficult task.
  • 25:45Many eliminated Jordan patio
  • 25:46that when I talked to them about
  • 25:48they said I cannot be done.
  • 25:50Anyway, to make a Long story short,
  • 25:52I'll show you what we're doing
  • 25:53and we're trying to develop that,
  • 25:54but the the idea of having those
  • 25:57sensors is really hot right now in
  • 26:00all the aspects that you can do.
  • 26:02Finally, the project for as I told you,
  • 26:04and this is another very important project,
  • 26:07is how we can degrade.
  • 26:10So you're well watered,
  • 26:12most likely might have 1.4 dioxide.
  • 26:15I'm not saying it does,
  • 26:16but if it does, how you can purify it?
  • 26:19Well, you can purify it with reverse osmosis,
  • 26:22but do you have $15,000 to?
  • 26:24So it's just for reduce versus
  • 26:26Moses on your water.
  • 26:28And some people may afford it,
  • 26:30but how about the people that they cannot?
  • 26:31We're talking about environmental
  • 26:33justice as well.
  • 26:34So there's a lot of issues that
  • 26:36need to be discussing there.
  • 26:37So that's Project 4.
  • 26:40And the Project 4,
  • 26:42essentially what it tries to
  • 26:43do is trying to use what we
  • 26:46call advanced oxidation,
  • 26:47which is essentially oxidative stress.
  • 26:49And I have more slides to show you,
  • 26:51but I want to give you the big picture.
  • 26:53So you try to utilize hydrogen peroxide,
  • 26:56you break the hydrogen peroxide,
  • 26:58you create reactive oxygen species
  • 27:00and then the reactive oxygen species
  • 27:03that can degrade your chemical.
  • 27:05And this is also we're trying to do
  • 27:08something similar with PFS as well.
  • 27:10But anyway, this is of the record.
  • 27:11Let's go for
  • 27:15project One.
  • 27:15This is the theme that we have.
  • 27:17Essentially Yin Chen leads that I'm
  • 27:20a Co leader, but I'm following her.
  • 27:23That's her project.
  • 27:25And we have of course Georgia from
  • 27:27from and other people in the lab.
  • 27:30And this is in collaboration
  • 27:31with the National Toxicology
  • 27:33Program with Stephen Ferguson,
  • 27:35who is doing the human
  • 27:38Hepatocytes and also the human,
  • 27:41the 3D structures of the of
  • 27:43the of the human cells that we
  • 27:45can do the organoids and we
  • 27:47can test 1.4 dioxin in there.
  • 27:49So what we do here at the
  • 27:51Yale and I'll show you is,
  • 27:53is we're doing the mouse work.
  • 27:55So NTP,
  • 27:56National Toxicology Program is helping
  • 27:58us with determining the effects on cells.
  • 28:02And Robin Tanway from Ohio State University,
  • 28:05which I was there 10 days ago,
  • 28:07they're evaluating our 1.4 dioxin but
  • 28:11most importantly the mixtures with the
  • 28:14other Co contaminants on zebrafish.
  • 28:16Why we do that because to do that
  • 28:19in mice you need you know about
  • 28:2320 fold budget and much more
  • 28:27time to evaluate that in mice.
  • 28:30So zebrafish in an is an amazing
  • 28:33tool and actually his here facility
  • 28:37up in Oregon State for the zebra
  • 28:39fish screening and especially the
  • 28:41exposomic studies is truly amazing.
  • 28:43So we take advantage of that and
  • 28:46actually we're not restricting the
  • 28:48science only to carcinogenicity,
  • 28:50but we're also doing a lot of stuff
  • 28:53for behavioral stuff and also
  • 28:55for that could have an effect on
  • 28:58mental issues of this compound.
  • 29:00So what we really know again
  • 29:03this is I'm going to pass,
  • 29:05I have covered that quite a bit.
  • 29:07We know that causes cancer.
  • 29:08We don't know the mechanism 1.4
  • 29:11dioxin is a carcinogen in mice.
  • 29:14We don't know what what is
  • 29:16doing and what is going on.
  • 29:17So what we're doing,
  • 29:19so we're doing animal study,
  • 29:21we're not just repeating what
  • 29:23it has been done before,
  • 29:25but we're trying to use knockout animal
  • 29:27models that will have an effect on on this.
  • 29:31So we're using models on oxidative stress
  • 29:35and I will give you the examples in here.
  • 29:37But essentially the first part is we're
  • 29:40using mice and we do high dose and low dose.
  • 29:44For the high dose is to get the effect,
  • 29:46low dose is to mimic the human exposures.
  • 29:49And from there we're doing the
  • 29:52Omics based system approach,
  • 29:53we're doing the RNA transcriptome,
  • 29:56the metabolomics and also the
  • 29:58phenotyping of this mice and we
  • 30:01have quite a bit of data so far.
  • 30:03So then we'll combine this on using
  • 30:06deep learning, doing the RNA 6,
  • 30:09the metabolomics and you know
  • 30:11also the clinical,
  • 30:12the not clinical,
  • 30:13the phenotyping things and we're trying
  • 30:15to determine the mode of action,
  • 30:17the MOA and also the exposure and
  • 30:20toxicity biomarkers which we're
  • 30:21going to feed the project to when
  • 30:23they do the exposure analysis.
  • 30:25I told you before that we also
  • 30:28using the the HEPA RG cells with
  • 30:32NTP and the zebra fish for the AM 3.
  • 30:36Here is a little bit of
  • 30:38of the what we know and what
  • 30:41we're currently know regarding the
  • 30:43the metabolism of 1.4 dioxane.
  • 30:45One of the thing I want to take your
  • 30:48I want to have your attention to it.
  • 30:50It is metabolized by cytochrome P452U1.
  • 30:53Why this is important?
  • 30:55Because cytochrome P452U1 is the
  • 30:59activator of many carcinogens,
  • 31:01many what we call precarcinogens to
  • 31:06very active intermediates that they can
  • 31:08cause cancer that can interact with DNA.
  • 31:10So as you can see on the right
  • 31:12hand side you can see also you
  • 31:15have the TCe and the PCE which have
  • 31:17the solvents which can also be
  • 31:20metabolized by cytochrome P452.
  • 31:21I want you to keep that in mind
  • 31:24because what we have found,
  • 31:26it's something that I think we have
  • 31:28explained some of these effects.
  • 31:30So we've we've already
  • 31:31published quite a few papers.
  • 31:33In terms of the mechanism,
  • 31:35I wish I had too much time to show you,
  • 31:37but one of the major findings that
  • 31:39we did and nobody has shown that
  • 31:43before is we found that 1.4 dioxane
  • 31:46induced the cytochrome P452E1.
  • 31:50And why this is important?
  • 31:52Because if you have a Co exposure of
  • 31:56cytochrome P452E1 and trichloroethylene
  • 31:58or diethyl nitrozamine in your
  • 32:01cigarette smoke or in, you know,
  • 32:03in the smoke food that you eat,
  • 32:05then you have higher chances of
  • 32:07metabolizing the procarcinosis to
  • 32:09carcinosis and they can cause liver cancer.
  • 32:12So in other words,
  • 32:13it can act as a promoter by
  • 32:16inducing the cytochrome P452E1 in
  • 32:19addition to the cytochrome P452E1.
  • 32:21And you can see it in your left.
  • 32:23We find that there is increased
  • 32:25oxidative stress as indicated with
  • 32:27four hydroxynone anal and also with the
  • 32:30increase of the quinone oxidoridactase,
  • 32:32which is a gene involved in
  • 32:35the antioxidant response.
  • 32:39So I apologize this happens again.
  • 32:43You know the the image becomes a little
  • 32:46bit but what the highlights of our
  • 32:49research are this and this happens to me.
  • 32:51I don't know why this but I have
  • 32:54another one that I can show you.
  • 32:56But we have find out so far that there
  • 32:58is a direct xenotoxic effect for
  • 33:01dioxin that includes oxidative stress.
  • 33:03We already published that in 2022.
  • 33:05There is a dominant role of two one
  • 33:08in the metabolism as we have found by
  • 33:11metabolomics and also for the liver toxicity.
  • 33:15But also we have not only
  • 33:20the induction of 2 E one,
  • 33:22we have found the 2nd mechanism which is
  • 33:26completely independent of Cytochrome B452E1.
  • 33:28How do we do that?
  • 33:30We're using knockouts that they have not
  • 33:33Cytochrome B451 and we determined that.
  • 33:36So this is what we're doing.
  • 33:38Specific aim one and specific aim 2
  • 33:41is we're using knockout mice and again
  • 33:45remember we have the metabolism here.
  • 33:47As you can see Cytochrome B450 is
  • 33:50metabolized the first two animal models,
  • 33:53the GCLM knockout is a model of
  • 33:57mice that has low glutathione
  • 33:59levels so that animal model,
  • 34:02it has low antioxidant capacity.
  • 34:04Nerf 2 knockout model is the Nerf two
  • 34:07is a transcription factor involved
  • 34:10in all the genes involving
  • 34:12done dioxidant response.
  • 34:13So if the nerve 2 gets activated,
  • 34:16your cell becomes really active.
  • 34:20Against the insults and we try we
  • 34:22you we're currently using that,
  • 34:24we're doing the experiments and to do that.
  • 34:27So we're also using the cytochrome P4
  • 34:30phase E2E1 As I said we completed those
  • 34:33studies actually and we're using the NQ
  • 34:36one and also the aldehydehydrogenase 2.
  • 34:38As you can see the Ald H2 could
  • 34:41be involved in the last steps
  • 34:43of the metabolism of that.
  • 34:44And you know the Ald H2 is a gene that
  • 34:48has it's highly polymorphic in a lot
  • 34:51of individuals especially those in from
  • 34:56the from Asian population quite a bit.
  • 35:00So Project 2 is the exposure
  • 35:03assessment team led by Co led by
  • 35:06Nicole Diesel and Brian Litter.
  • 35:09And we have also most of our people from
  • 35:11our department in exposures Crystal,
  • 35:13Pollet, Zhai and Lu.
  • 35:15And also we have collaborators
  • 35:17in North Carolina State,
  • 35:19Joe Hoppin and and death of Nappy.
  • 35:22And this as I told you is going
  • 35:26to be an exposure model,
  • 35:27exposure assessment model here
  • 35:29in Long Island and we have
  • 35:32already going through that.
  • 35:34So the aims again is you go you
  • 35:36collect the water you collect the
  • 35:38blood from these people and then
  • 35:41you're trying to also make much the
  • 35:45the medical records and you're trying
  • 35:47to do the exposure assessment and
  • 35:49we're trying to interact all this this
  • 35:52project as I told you as we're using
  • 35:54metabolomics in this in this project
  • 35:56and the metabolomics here will be
  • 35:59coordinated with a metabolomics for
  • 36:01the first program which is on the
  • 36:041st specific aim which is in mice.
  • 36:06The third project is led by many
  • 36:11Elimelech from the school of the the
  • 36:15Department of Chemical Environmental
  • 36:17Engineering and also you know is Jordan
  • 36:20Petia and true Gender are from this,
  • 36:23from this group.
  • 36:24And again what we're they're
  • 36:26trying to do is they're trying to
  • 36:28develop this kind of molecules,
  • 36:30the eptomers or all this idea that it
  • 36:33can bind to that and then it can be
  • 36:37detected and then they can transmit that.
  • 36:40It's stuff we're not going to
  • 36:41accomplish in the first five years,
  • 36:43but at least we can develop the sensors
  • 36:46to develop and then we can try to find
  • 36:48out how we can develop the network.
  • 36:514th project,
  • 36:51and I apologize,
  • 36:52I'm trying to give to finish so we
  • 36:54can have some time for discussion.
  • 36:564th project is by Jai Hong Kim
  • 36:58and John Faulkner.
  • 36:59And as I told you this is relating
  • 37:02to develop small devices that
  • 37:04you can use in your house to get
  • 37:07rid of 1.4 dioxide and they're
  • 37:09using the advanced oxidation.
  • 37:11It will take me about a lecture to
  • 37:13explain you that but essentially I think
  • 37:16I told you the principle is hydrogen
  • 37:18peroxide generate hydroxy radical and
  • 37:20this hydroxy radical will hit that.
  • 37:22They are using actually two kind
  • 37:24of approaches in there and I think
  • 37:26I have they they are developing
  • 37:29some nice some nice things and
  • 37:32I'm going to tell put there share
  • 37:34some that you can that
  • 37:35we have made.
  • 37:37We successfully synthesized the catalyst,
  • 37:40the boron doped carbon catalyst
  • 37:42shown here and fabricated
  • 37:44hydrogen peroxide synthesis cell.
  • 37:47We quickly discover that maintaining
  • 37:49the performance in the real water
  • 37:52metrics would be the key for success
  • 37:54of this research to provide a
  • 37:57system that can perform for a long
  • 37:59period for a household application.
  • 38:01We therefore developed a framework on
  • 38:04how to optimize post electrolysis to
  • 38:07enhance catalytic tolerance against
  • 38:10impurities present in water and in to
  • 38:13improve overall lifetime of the cell.
  • 38:16We discovered that optimized pulsing
  • 38:19sequence enabled improved long term
  • 38:22hydrogen peroxide performance to
  • 38:24nearly 300 hours and 35 times better
  • 38:27than conventional electrolysis even
  • 38:29in the presence of most detrimental
  • 38:32impurities such as nickel and zinc.
  • 38:35These findings make this cell closer
  • 38:38to real world implementation for
  • 38:41prolonged hydrogen peroxide synthesis and
  • 38:44subsequent one for dioxane destruction.
  • 38:48Let me share some recent progress.
  • 38:50This is the second we have made
  • 38:51we successfully synthesized the
  • 38:56I'm sorry it was I thought it was
  • 38:59as an. This is the second method
  • 39:01destroy one for dioxane in specific
  • 39:04aim too we explore the use of
  • 39:07engineered gas phase nano bubbles.
  • 39:10We perform extensive characterization
  • 39:12of nano bubbles in solution with a
  • 39:15focus on hydro thoradical generation
  • 39:18and by performing a number of different
  • 39:22characterization using degradation of hydro
  • 39:24thoradical specific target compounds,
  • 39:26electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy
  • 39:29and a fluorescence based indicator.
  • 39:32Through this phase of research we
  • 39:35concluded that nano bubble induced or hydro
  • 39:38thoradical generation is minimal if not all.
  • 39:41But we will continue to study if there
  • 39:43is an alternative way to enhance the
  • 39:46non local enabled advanced workstation.
  • 39:50So I alternative technology
  • 39:52I wouldn't be able to tell you that. So
  • 39:57that's why I sent my daughter my
  • 39:59daughter's first year in governmental
  • 40:01engineering in Boulder, Co.
  • 40:03So the next is our the next is
  • 40:05our community engagement core,
  • 40:07which will have Iris,
  • 40:09Kaminski and Andrea and Esposito.
  • 40:11Call it Derry Woods,
  • 40:13executive director of the Citizens
  • 40:14Campaign of the Environment.
  • 40:16And we, you know, she's very big,
  • 40:19big in terms of community
  • 40:21engagement and we're doing quite
  • 40:23a bit in in community engagement.
  • 40:25We're ready and we utilize community
  • 40:28engagement actually to recruit
  • 40:30people for the project too.
  • 40:32This has been fascinating so far,
  • 40:35but we're not staying only in
  • 40:37Log Island or even Vermont.
  • 40:40We're expanding in other areas too.
  • 40:42So the other areas that I'm working
  • 40:44right now and I will tell you is
  • 40:46the New Hampshire in North Carolina,
  • 40:48Michigan,
  • 40:49and recently I have been engaged by Florida.
  • 40:53Believe it or not,
  • 40:55there is an area over there,
  • 40:56Lake Mary,
  • 40:57that has even 30,000 times higher
  • 41:01levels of 1.4 dioxin in their surface water.
  • 41:06Anyway,
  • 41:06this is some of the stuff that
  • 41:09we've already done and the publicity
  • 41:11that the centre is getting and
  • 41:12I have more and more,
  • 41:14but I'm just leaving you that we're
  • 41:16using that as a tool and we communicate,
  • 41:18you know, people calling me in the office,
  • 41:21they said we want to register
  • 41:22for this study and you,
  • 41:24they need more information.
  • 41:25And this has not been studying
  • 41:27only in Long Island.
  • 41:29And you know, newspapers have taken
  • 41:31the centre because of the importance,
  • 41:33as I told you,
  • 41:34of 1.4 dioxin discovered in many states.
  • 41:37So we're getting a lot training component.
  • 41:39I think I was smart on that.
  • 41:41I took our Jordan,
  • 41:44I mean I took Chris Judy.
  • 41:46Chris,
  • 41:47Judy is our esteemed director of
  • 41:49a graduate program at way SPH.
  • 41:51And also we have the engineer,
  • 41:53a graduate program.
  • 41:54And this too made a dream team
  • 41:57and you know it had actually the
  • 41:59best one of the best scores on the
  • 42:02components they had almost 1012 on
  • 42:05their application and Yin Chen is
  • 42:08also part Co investigator on that.
  • 42:11So the way building up training
  • 42:14education capacity going from even
  • 42:18under graduates with an R-25 that
  • 42:21they have on training undergraduate
  • 42:24students to MPH students and also
  • 42:27PhD students and post doctoral.
  • 42:29This is classic regular the schedule
  • 42:33we're doing for the training of our PhD.
  • 42:37Last but not least and I kept the
  • 42:39picture in here of Peter Petuzzi,
  • 42:42although he retired and he
  • 42:43just stepped down right now,
  • 42:45but I love Peter and that was another
  • 42:48another dream team here of Hong Yu
  • 42:51Zhao and Peter Petuzzi that they
  • 42:53that they do the data management and
  • 42:56analysis core team which essentially
  • 42:58bring all the projects together.
  • 43:00And I'm not going to go to all specific aims,
  • 43:03but essentially it's coordination
  • 43:05between projects and cores, fostering,
  • 43:08data sharing and interoperability.
  • 43:12So we're trying to develop all this
  • 43:14cloud systems and finally and most
  • 43:17importantly is data quality assurance,
  • 43:21quality control and data integration.
  • 43:23So this is huge and we get really good.
  • 43:27So I am almost at my 45 minute mark and
  • 43:33essentially what I would like to say,
  • 43:36the establishment of our Yale Superfan
  • 43:39Centre marks a significant milestone of
  • 43:42our departmental commitment to addressing
  • 43:45emerging contaminants linked to cancer.
  • 43:48Our strategic plan includes the development
  • 43:51of peripheral research project.
  • 43:53We get the budget cut of almost 50%
  • 43:55of our initial budget, not only us,
  • 43:58everybody did because they withdrew some
  • 44:00money from that project to support the
  • 44:03climate change in a number of institutes.
  • 44:06So what we're trying to do is we're
  • 44:08trying to develop peripheral research
  • 44:10projects for exposure assessment and
  • 44:12various locations across United States,
  • 44:15fostering international collaboration
  • 44:16and broadening the impact of our work.
  • 44:20We aim to strengthen the partnerships
  • 44:23of course with Cancer Center,
  • 44:25with the liver center, with diabetes Center,
  • 44:28leveraging their expertise and
  • 44:30resources for more comprehensive
  • 44:33approach to our research in vendors.
  • 44:37And as we advance,
  • 44:38our focus will extend beyond the scope of of
  • 44:43the 1.4 dioxin and the volatile compounds.
  • 44:46And we try,
  • 44:47I'm going to try to get more emerging
  • 44:50contaminant with particular emphasis to PFAS.
  • 44:54And actually PFAS is, you know,
  • 44:59because of their ability
  • 45:02to be endocrine disruptors,
  • 45:04they have been linked now
  • 45:07to obesity and diabetes.
  • 45:09And as I told you before,
  • 45:10we find something similar and
  • 45:11there are a lot of interaction.
  • 45:13Another thing about PFAS
  • 45:15induces kidney cancer, OK,
  • 45:17it's the major cancer that
  • 45:19induces is kidney cancer.
  • 45:21So what is the,
  • 45:22you know,
  • 45:22the interaction of this between them?
  • 45:24This is something that we need to explore.
  • 45:26So this expansion will involve in depth
  • 45:29exploration between links and the PFAS
  • 45:32especially as I told you kidney cancer
  • 45:34and and and obesity bringing virus
  • 45:37insight to the scientific community.
  • 45:39I'm going to stop with that and I'm
  • 45:41going to take questions and we're
  • 45:43happy to discuss anything you wish.
  • 45:51Yes, great. Thank you.
  • 45:53I the whole project began
  • 45:58with the involvement of the
  • 46:00community alerting you to 1 dioxide.
  • 46:02So at the Cancer Center,
  • 46:05liver cancer is a priority.
  • 46:06Cancer that is in the strategic
  • 46:09plan given its increased rates in
  • 46:11Connecticut as well as nationally.
  • 46:14So I'd love to think about
  • 46:16collaborations to how we can
  • 46:18do more on the epidemiologic or
  • 46:20clinical aspect and and link it,
  • 46:22you know with patients coming in
  • 46:24newly diagnosed with liver cancer.
  • 46:26Could there be a case control study
  • 46:28where water is collected from their
  • 46:31home blood questionnaires and
  • 46:32then have a a controlled sample.
  • 46:34So there's so much opportunity.
  • 46:36I think here
  • 46:37that's what David said. That's why
  • 46:39he invited me to give the talk here.
  • 46:41We need to get this, Melinda,
  • 46:42this is a very good point.
  • 46:44If we can get more and actually, you know,
  • 46:47we can explore the possibilities and
  • 46:48if we have more blood samples of that,
  • 46:51we can do much better, much, much more.
  • 46:54And that's a very good point. Yes.
  • 46:58Going to Long Island for Thanksgiving,
  • 47:01get your water with you. Is
  • 47:04there a safe like what do you recommend?
  • 47:07What is there a brand of like bottled
  • 47:09water that doesn't that's guaranteed to
  • 47:11not be contaminated? Depends.
  • 47:13Now listen, I mean there are
  • 47:15there are areas in Long Island,
  • 47:16there is this interactive map that you can
  • 47:19find which areas they have high levels.
  • 47:21But to be on the safe side, you know,
  • 47:24I was going to say use public water,
  • 47:27but this public water over
  • 47:29there comes from well water.
  • 47:30I don't know how the late status is,
  • 47:33but it might not be a bad idea
  • 47:34to use some bottled water.
  • 47:39First of all, I want to echo on you
  • 47:41and Melinda set because there are
  • 47:44tremendous opportunities here that
  • 47:45are aligned in many ways with the
  • 47:48forthcoming Cancer Center strategic plan.
  • 47:51I'd like to add to that education because
  • 47:54you have cancer education programs running
  • 47:58that are cancer connected education
  • 48:00programs running that are complementary
  • 48:03to our other training programs.
  • 48:05The question for you though is you began with
  • 48:09a a challenge from the state of Connecticut,
  • 48:11but I noticed all the
  • 48:12collaborations are out of state.
  • 48:14Can you tell us more about how
  • 48:16this work might impact our state
  • 48:19and our catchment community?
  • 48:23It's the same thing.
  • 48:26There are
  • 48:27certain areas that they have 1.4
  • 48:29dioxane in the state of Connecticut.
  • 48:32However, the state of Connecticut has
  • 48:34taken very good care of the public water
  • 48:38and their public water is pretty safe.
  • 48:40You are as long as you are in public water,
  • 48:43they're taking good care how it's
  • 48:45going to have a major impact.
  • 48:46It's going to have a major
  • 48:48impact on on liver cancer.
  • 48:50But you know the problem,
  • 48:52it might not be completely here,
  • 48:54but it has several aspects of you know,
  • 49:00getting engaged with
  • 49:04agencies, the state agencies addressing that.
  • 49:07And as Melita said, there is an
  • 49:09increased rate of of liver cancer,
  • 49:11which brings the other point
  • 49:12you were talking about.
  • 49:13I also have AT32 program with the
  • 49:17livers with psychiatry essentially.
  • 49:20But it's my point of view is my other
  • 49:23lab that I have is alcohol and cancer and
  • 49:26I actually organized the International
  • 49:29Conference on Alcohol and Cancer.
  • 49:31So this is another area that I think
  • 49:34the increased levels of alcohol
  • 49:35consumption is a very good contributor
  • 49:38and that along with obesity.
  • 49:40So if you add another factor which is
  • 49:431.4 dioxin even if it's in low levels
  • 49:46for for example in the state of Connecticut,
  • 49:49what we saw in here there is an
  • 49:51increase of the Cytochrome P CN¥452.00.
  • 49:54So if you get get that in combination
  • 49:58with smoking nitrozamines or other
  • 50:01exposures you can increase the rate
  • 50:04of you know of of cancer in the area,
  • 50:10right. Yes,
  • 50:15well that's a good point.
  • 50:18Listen, we have done a lot of risk evaluation
  • 50:23risk for water sources in on wells water.
  • 50:27I wouldn't say that 1.4 dioxin is
  • 50:30that major concern because we know
  • 50:31what the were the areas of 1.4 dioxin.
  • 50:35My concern would have been more on the PFAS.
  • 50:39So my recommendation is test
  • 50:41your well water for PFAS,
  • 50:44that's the only suggestion.
  • 50:47I don't think in Connecticut we
  • 50:49have that major issue of 1.4 dioxin.
  • 50:59Well, if you test, that's a very good point.
  • 51:01If you test it, if you test your well
  • 51:04and it's positive for 1.4 dioxin,
  • 51:06you don't have to wait for for
  • 51:09Jihong Kim to develop these devices.
  • 51:12What you do is you use plastic water,
  • 51:14I mean plastic water from,
  • 51:16you know, from bottles.
  • 51:17Of course you can have some things
  • 51:19from there, but it's at least safer.
  • 51:22If you find that there is P fast,
  • 51:24the P fast, you can filter them
  • 51:26with charcoal and stuff like that.
  • 51:28So there are devices that
  • 51:30they're relatively cheap.
  • 51:32But one of the things that I want to tell
  • 51:34you is the importance of drinking water.
  • 51:36Because you're going to drink,
  • 51:38you may avoid drinking alcohol,
  • 51:40you may avoid smoking cigarettes,
  • 51:43but you're going to drink your water.
  • 51:44Yes,
  • 51:48you're safe,
  • 51:51you're safe,
  • 51:55You cover both of them.
  • 51:59Well, the other thing is
  • 52:01you know in terms of the,
  • 52:03the Cancer Center is the liver
  • 52:06center and also there is a high
  • 52:09incidence of alcohol induced liver
  • 52:11cancers and not only the liver
  • 52:13cancer but also colorectal cancers.
  • 52:15And the incidence of colorectal cancers
  • 52:17are really high as well throughout
  • 52:19not only the nation internationally
  • 52:22and especially the early onsets.
  • 52:32Yes,
  • 52:34I think so. Yes.
  • 52:37So thank you for the question.
  • 52:39Usually the stages are, you know,
  • 52:41you start from steatosis,
  • 52:43you go to fibrosis,
  • 52:44you go to cirrhosis and then
  • 52:46some cases you know you go to
  • 52:49a pater cellular carcinoma.
  • 52:51It is possible that you can
  • 52:53go without cirrhosis.
  • 52:54Yes, I mean in animal models
  • 52:58they go without any any
  • 52:59signs of cirrhosis at all.
  • 53:06But one of the problems, well,
  • 53:07talking about the animals and
  • 53:08humans and stuff like that,
  • 53:10you know that alcohol,
  • 53:12it is well known that causes
  • 53:15liver cirrhosis, right?
  • 53:16If you try to do the same thing in mice,
  • 53:20there is no way you can do it.
  • 53:21But you can take a mouse and you can
  • 53:24put carbon to trichlorate for 3-4 weeks,
  • 53:27you'll get cirrhosis 100%.
  • 53:29So that's that's the the challenges
  • 53:32that you have between animal models
  • 53:34and human thing and that's what we're
  • 53:36trying to to do the organoids as a
  • 53:39complementary to to the mouse studies.
  • 53:46All right. Thank you very much.