2021
O008/#785 A multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab vs treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: study 309/keynote-775
Makker V, Colombo N, Herráez A, Santin A, Colomba E, Miller D, Fujiwara K, Pignata S, Baron-Hay S, Ray-Coquard I, Shapira R, Ushijima K, Sakata J, Yonemori K, Kim Y, Guerra E, Sanli U, Mccormack M, Huang J, Smith A. O008/#785 A multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab vs treatment of physician’s choice in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: study 309/keynote-775. International Journal Of Gynecological Cancer 2021, 31: a4-a5. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-igcs.8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTreatment-emergent adverse eventsAdvanced endometrial cancerObjective response rateEndometrial cancerPhysician's choiceCommon treatment-emergent adverse eventsPrior platinum-based chemotherapy regimenPhase 3 study resultsPlatinum-based chemotherapy regimenPrior platinum-based chemotherapyDNA mismatch repair (MMR) statusBlinded independent central reviewPhase 1b/2 studySafety of lenvatinibKey secondary endpointMedian treatment durationAdvanced endometrial carcinomaPhase 3 studyPlatinum-based chemotherapyIndependent central reviewPlatinum-based therapyMismatch repair statusEligible ptsRECIST v1.1Adjuvant settingA multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with advanced endometrial cancer
Makker V, Colombo N, Herráez A, Santin A, Colomba E, Miller D, Fujiwara K, Pignata S, Baron-Hay S, Ray-Coquard I, Shapira-Frommer R, Ushijima K, Sakata J, Yonemori K, Kim Y, Guerra E, Sanli U, McCormack M, Huang J, Smith A, Keefe S, Dutta L, Orlowski R, Lorusso D. A multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 2021, 162: s4. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(21)00657-0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTreatment-emergent adverse eventsAdvanced endometrial cancerObjective response rateEndometrial cancerPhysician's choiceCommon treatment-emergent adverse eventsGrade treatment-emergent adverse eventsPrior platinum-based chemotherapy regimenPhase III study resultsPlatinum-based chemotherapy regimenPrior platinum-based chemotherapyDNA mismatch repair (MMR) statusBlinded independent central reviewPhase 1b/2 studySafety of lenvatinibKey secondary endpointMedian treatment durationAdvanced endometrial carcinomaPlatinum-based chemotherapyIndependent central reviewPlatinum-based therapyMismatch repair statusAdjuvant settingChemotherapy regimenECOG PS
2020
TROPiCS–03: A phase II open-label study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in patients with metastatic solid tumors.
Saxena A, Michel L, Hong Q, Hilsinger K, Kanwal C, Pichardo C, Goswami T, Santin A. TROPiCS–03: A phase II open-label study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in patients with metastatic solid tumors. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2020, 38: tps3648-tps3648. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.tps3648.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMetastatic solid tumorsSacituzumab govitecanTrop-2 expressionSolid tumorsPhase II open-label studyPrior platinum-based chemotherapyCell death protein 1Neck squamous cell carcinomaActive CNS metastasesClinical benefit rateOverall safety populationManageable safety profileObjective response rateOpen-label studyLow discontinuation ratePhase 2 studyProgression-free survivalPlatinum-based chemotherapyDeath protein 1Duration of responseSquamous cell carcinomaCell surface antigensBiomarker enrichment strategiesMultiple tumor typesTopoisomerase I inhibitor