2024
Optimization criteria for ordering myeloid neoplasm next‐generation sequencing
Gisriel S, Howe J, Tormey C, Torres R, Hager K, Rinder H, Siddon A. Optimization criteria for ordering myeloid neoplasm next‐generation sequencing. EJHaem 2024 DOI: 10.1002/jha2.1036.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNext-generation sequencingNext-generation sequencing testMyeloid neoplasmsDiagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemiaAltering treatment plansEnd-of-inductionFluorescence in situ hybridizationRecurrence post-transplantChronic myeloid leukemiaSuspicion of progressionPathogenic mutationsClinical suspicionMutation statusMN diagnosisMyeloid leukemiaPost-transplantRisk stratificationWorsening diseaseTreatment planningCancellation criteriaSuspicionDiagnosisSequenceCenters for MedicareB test
2021
Laboratory evaluation and prognostication among adults and children with CEBPA‐mutant acute myeloid leukemia
Mendoza H, Podoltsev NA, Siddon AJ. Laboratory evaluation and prognostication among adults and children with CEBPA‐mutant acute myeloid leukemia. International Journal Of Laboratory Hematology 2021, 43: 86-95. PMID: 34288448, DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.13517.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsCEBPA mutant acute myeloid leukemiaAcute myeloid leukemiaCEBPA mutationsMyeloid leukemiaLeukemogenic mutationsPositive prognostic impactSingle CEBPA mutationsSimilar survival outcomesNegative prognostic effectFLT3-ITD mutationLaboratory evaluationWild-type CEBPAMultiparameter flow cytometryGermline CEBPA mutationsFavorable prognosisPrognostic impactMutation presencePrognostic effectRisk stratificationSurvival outcomesGATA2 mutationsDistinct subtypesMolecular findingsCEBPA geneFlow cytometry