2023
Comparison of the Revised 4 Th (2016) and 5 Th (2022) Editions of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification in a Cohort of Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms (MDS) - a Glam Registry (REGLAM) Analysis
Iastrebner M, Zeidan A, Arbelbide J, Velloso E, Pereira T, Boada M, Crisp R, Pereyra P, Reyes J, Zappa M, perez-Jacobo F, Dela Peña Celaya J, Moreno E, Abello V, Solano M, Cuervo D, Espinosa D, Casas C, Montoya L, Enrico A, Prates V, Chavez E, Ontiveros-Austria J, Kornblihtt L, Leon A, Toledo V, Negri L, Serrano J, Sánchez A, Rodriguez-Zuñiga A, Stevenazzi M, Goldschmidt V, Grille S. Comparison of the Revised 4 Th (2016) and 5 Th (2022) Editions of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification in a Cohort of Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms (MDS) - a Glam Registry (REGLAM) Analysis. Blood 2023, 142: 5179. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-185122.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProgression-free survivalTime of diagnosisAcute myeloid leukemiaMDS-MLDOverall survivalMDS patientsMDS-RSInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemLow-risk MDS patientsWorld Health Organization classificationLR-MDS patientsMedian blast countRisk MDS patientsCohort of patientsKaplan-Meier methodPrognostic scoring systemClassification of patientsNon-Hispanic whitesMDS-EB2PFS probabilityWHO 2016Baseline characteristicsBlast countMedian ageMeier method
2020
MDS-175: Assessment of Dose-Dependent Response to Luspatercept in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) with Ring Sideroblasts (RS) in the Phase 3 MEDALIST Trial
Platzbecker U, Fenaux P, Mufti G, Garcia-Manero G, Komrokji R, Buckstein R, Diez-Campelo M, Finelli C, Sekeres M, Selleslag D, DeZern A, Quesnel B, Beyne-Rauzy O, Voso M, Greenberg P, Zeidan A, Adès L, Verma A, Savona M, Laadem A, Ito R, Zhang J, Rampersad A, Morison J, Louis C, Linde P, Santini V. MDS-175: Assessment of Dose-Dependent Response to Luspatercept in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) with Ring Sideroblasts (RS) in the Phase 3 MEDALIST Trial. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2020, 20: s318. DOI: 10.1016/s2152-2650(20)30972-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTreatment-emergent adverse eventsLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesRBC-TIRing sideroblastsDose levelsDose reductions/delaysMaximum doseLR-MDS patientsRBC transfusion independenceMajority of patientsMaintenance of responseSame dose levelFirst responseDose delaysDose-dependent responseEligible patientsDose titrationNew onsetTransfusion burdenTransfusion independenceAdverse eventsDose escalationMedian timeMyelodysplastic syndromeHemoglobin increase
2019
RBC transfusion independence among lower risk MDS patients receiving hypomethylating agents: a population-level analysis
Zeidan AM, Zhu W, Stahl M, Wang R, Huntington SF, Giri S, Podoltsev NA, Gore SD, Ma X, Davidoff AJ. RBC transfusion independence among lower risk MDS patients receiving hypomethylating agents: a population-level analysis. Leukemia & Lymphoma 2019, 60: 3181-3187. PMID: 31170846, DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1622700.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRBC transfusion independenceLR-MDS patientsTransfusion independenceHMA initiationRBC transfusionClinical effectivenessReal-life clinical effectivenessRed blood cell transfusionLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesLow-risk MDS patientsRisk MDS patientsBlood cell transfusionRisk myelodysplastic syndromesHMA therapyLR-MDSCell transfusionMost patientsDisease courseMDS patientsMedicare databaseMyelodysplastic syndromePopulation-level estimatesLower oddsTransfusionPatients
2017
Management of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes without del5q: current approach and future trends
Stahl M, Zeidan AM. Management of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes without del5q: current approach and future trends. Expert Review Of Hematology 2017, 10: 345-364. PMID: 28277851, DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2017.1297704.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsErythropoiesis stimulating agentsMyelodysplastic syndromeLR-MDSImmunosuppressive therapyTreatment modalitiesLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesTGF-β pathway inhibitorCombination treatment modalitiesLR-MDS patientsPromising investigational agentsSubset of patientsAvailable therapeutic modalitiesGoals of careStandard therapeutic optionPredictors of responseCurrent treatment modalitiesAcute myeloid leukemiaQuality of lifeBone marrow failureRisk assessment toolSymptom controlBlood cytopeniasInvestigational agentsTherapeutic optionsClinical behaviorLenalidomide use in myelodysplastic syndromes: Insights into the biologic mechanisms and clinical applications
Stahl M, Zeidan AM. Lenalidomide use in myelodysplastic syndromes: Insights into the biologic mechanisms and clinical applications. Cancer 2017, 123: 1703-1713. PMID: 28192601, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30585.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsAcute myeloid leukemiaProlong survivalLow-risk MDSLR-MDS patientsEfficacy of lenalidomideImpressive clinical activityRecent clinical dataClonal myeloid neoplasmsMechanism of actionBlood cytopeniasConventional careTransfusion independenceCytogenetic responseClinical activityMyeloid leukemiaClinical dataIneffective hematopoiesisMyeloid neoplasmsDelay progressionHigh riskLenalidomidePatientsVariable riskHeterogeneous groupProgression