2024
MDS-156 Efficacy of Imetelstat on Red Blood Cell (RBC)-Transfusion Independence (TI) in the Absence of Platelet Transfusions or Myeloid Growth Factors (MGF) in IMerge
Zeidan A, Santini V, Platzbecker U, Sekeres M, Savona M, Fenaux P, Madanat Y, Raza A, Xia Q, Sun L, Riggs J, Shah S, Navada S, Berry T, Komrokji R. MDS-156 Efficacy of Imetelstat on Red Blood Cell (RBC)-Transfusion Independence (TI) in the Absence of Platelet Transfusions or Myeloid Growth Factors (MGF) in IMerge. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2024, 24: s386. DOI: 10.1016/s2152-2650(24)01344-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesMyeloid growth factorsErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsRBC-TIPlatelet transfusionsTransfusion-dependentHb levelsLong-term respondersPercentage of patientsHb riseRBC-TDPlacebo patientsNon-del(5qMyelodysplastic syndromePlacebo groupPrimary endpointSecondary endpointsInvestigator's discretionClinical benefitPlaceboAnalysis cutoffImetelstatDisease progressionTransfusionSupportive careMDS-157 Overall Survival (OS), Clinical Benefit, and Durable Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence (TI) With Imetelstat in the IMerge Phase 3 Trial of RBC-Transfusion Dependent (TD) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS)
Santini V, Komrokji R, Sekeres M, Savona M, Fenaux P, Madanat Y, Oliva E, Buckstein R, Annaášová A, Germing U, Mittelman M, Thepot S, Riggs J, Dougherty S, Berry T, Navada S, Xia Q, Sun L, Zeidan A, Platzbecker U. MDS-157 Overall Survival (OS), Clinical Benefit, and Durable Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence (TI) With Imetelstat in the IMerge Phase 3 Trial of RBC-Transfusion Dependent (TD) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS). Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2024, 24: s386-s387. DOI: 10.1016/s2152-2650(24)01345-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesNon-del(5q) lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsRBC-TIOverall survivalRBC-TDNon-del(5qClinical benefitRed blood cellsHemoglobin increaseRBC transfusion dependenceStratified log-rank testMedian follow-upKaplan-Meier methodLog-rank testWithdrawal of consentMedian OSOS ratesHemoglobin riseMyelodysplastic syndromeOS analysisHemoglobin levelsAssess OSPlaceboImetelstatOverall Survival (OS), Clinical Benefit, and Durable Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence (TI) With Imetelstat in the IMerge Phase 3 Trial of RBC-Transfusion Dependent (TD) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS)
Santini V, Komrokji R, Sekeres M, Savona M, Fenaux P, Madanat Y, Oliva E, Buckstein R, Jonášová A, Germing U, Mittelman M, Thepot S, Riggs J, Dougherty S, Berry T, Navada S, Xia Q, Sun L, Zeidan A, Platzbecker U. Overall Survival (OS), Clinical Benefit, and Durable Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence (TI) With Imetelstat in the IMerge Phase 3 Trial of RBC-Transfusion Dependent (TD) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS). Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2024, 24: s192. DOI: 10.1016/s2152-2650(24)00647-5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesOverall survivalRed blood cellsRBC transfusion dependenceMyelodysplastic syndromeClinical benefitBlood cellsOverall Survival (OS), Clinical Benefit, and Durable Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence (TI) With Imetelstat in the IMerge Phase 3 Trial of RBC-Transfusion Dependent (TD) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS)
Santini V, Komrokji R, Sekeres M, Savona M, Fenaux P, Madanat Y, Oliva E, Buckstein R, Jonášová A, Germing U, Mittelman M, Thepot S, Riggs J, Dougherty S, Berry T, Navada S, Xia Q, Sun L, Zeidan A, Platzbecker U. Overall Survival (OS), Clinical Benefit, and Durable Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence (TI) With Imetelstat in the IMerge Phase 3 Trial of RBC-Transfusion Dependent (TD) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS). Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2024, 24: s153. DOI: 10.1016/s2152-2650(24)00388-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesOverall survivalRed blood cellsRBC transfusion dependenceMyelodysplastic syndromeClinical benefitBlood cellsLuspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): primary analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial
Della Porta M, Garcia-Manero G, Santini V, Zeidan A, Komrokji R, Shortt J, Valcárcel D, Jonasova A, Dimicoli-Salazar S, Tiong I, Lin C, Li J, Zhang J, Pilot R, Kreitz S, Pozharskaya V, Keeperman K, Rose S, Prebet T, Lai Y, Degulys A, Paolini S, Cluzeau T, Fenaux P, Platzbecker U. Luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): primary analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet Haematology 2024, 11: e646-e658. PMID: 39038479, DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(24)00203-5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesRed blood cell transfusion independenceTreatment-emergent adverse eventsMedian follow-upEpoetin alfa groupMyelodysplastic syndromeLuspatercept groupTransfusion-dependentSerum erythropoietin concentrationPrimary endpointEpoetin alfaTransfusion independenceOpen-labelAlfa groupAdverse eventsFollow-upRed blood cell transfusion burdenErythropoietin concentrationIntention-to-treat populationControlled trialsCommon grade 3Epoetin alfa recipientsMean haemoglobin increasePrimary analysisProportion of patientsPrognostic impact of 'multi-hit' <i>versus</i> 'single-hit' <i>TP53</i> alteration in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results from the Consortium on Myeloid Malignancies and Neoplastic Diseases.
Badar T, Nanaa A, Atallah E, Shallis R, Craver E, Li Z, Goldberg A, Saliba A, Patel A, Bewersdorf J, Duvall A, Burkart M, Bradshaw D, Abaza Y, Stahl M, Palmisiano N, Murthy G, Zeidan A, Kota V, Patnaik M, Litzow M. Prognostic impact of 'multi-hit' versus 'single-hit' TP53 alteration in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results from the Consortium on Myeloid Malignancies and Neoplastic Diseases. Haematologica 2024, 109: 3533-3542. PMID: 38813716, PMCID: PMC11532685, DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2024.285000.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAcute myeloid leukemiaMyelodysplastic syndromeComplex cytogeneticsMyeloid leukemiaAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesHematopoietic stem cell transplantationHigher-risk myelodysplastic syndromesOutcomes of SHStem cell transplantationAllo-HCTTP53 alterationsPrognostic impactMyeloid malignanciesTP53 mutationsCell transplantationFLT3-ITDIDH1 mutationMultivariate analysisSupportive careUS academic institutionsNeoplastic diseasePatientsSuperior EFSPredicting outcomeEfficacy of imetelstat on red blood cell (RBC)-transfusion independence (TI) in the absence of platelet transfusions or myeloid growth factors in IMerge.
Zeidan A, Santini V, Platzbecker U, Sekeres M, Savona M, Fenaux P, Madanat Y, Raza A, Xia Q, Sun L, Riggs J, Shah S, Navada S, Berry T, Komrokji R. Efficacy of imetelstat on red blood cell (RBC)-transfusion independence (TI) in the absence of platelet transfusions or myeloid growth factors in IMerge. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2024, 42: 6566-6566. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.6566.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesRBC-TIMyeloid growth factorsPlatelet transfusionsTransfusion-dependentHb levelsGrowth factorGrowth factor supportLong-term respondersGrowth factor useErythropoiesis stimulating agentsHb riseSevere neutropeniaMyelodysplastic syndromePlacebo groupPrimary endpointSecondary endpointsFactor supportInvestigator's discretionClinical benefitAdverse eventsPlaceboAnalysis cutoffImetelstatDisease progressionClinical benefit of luspatercept treatment (tx) in transfusion-dependent (TD), erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)–naive patients (pts) with very low-, low- or intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in the COMMANDS trial.
Zeidan A, Platzbecker U, Della Porta M, Santini V, Garcia-Manero G, Li J, Kreitz S, Pozharskaya V, Rose S, Lai Y, Valcárcel D, Fenaux P, Shortt J, Komrokji R. Clinical benefit of luspatercept treatment (tx) in transfusion-dependent (TD), erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)–naive patients (pts) with very low-, low- or intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in the COMMANDS trial. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2024, 42: 6565-6565. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.6565.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRed blood cell unitsLower-risk MDSRBC-TITransfusion burdenRed blood cellsTransfusion-dependentMyelodysplastic syndromeClinical benefitRed blood cell transfusion independenceAssessment of clinical benefitIntermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromesLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesBone marrow blastsClinically meaningful responseYears of ageLuspatercept treatmentMarrow blastsTransfusion independenceMean HbRinged sideroblastsEligible ptsMean hemoglobinHb levelsCumulative medianLuspaterceptCLO24-079: Results From Phase 3 Trial of Imetelstat, a First-in-Class Telomerase Inhibitor, in Patients With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Dependent (RBC-TD) Non-del(5q) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Relapsed/Refractory to/Ineligible for Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESAs)
Madanat Y, Savona M, Sekeres M, Platzbecker U, Santini V, Fenaux P, Diez-Campelo M, Valcárcel D, Berry T, Dougherty S, Shah S, Sun L, Wan Y, Huang F, Navada S, Komrokji R, Zeidan A. CLO24-079: Results From Phase 3 Trial of Imetelstat, a First-in-Class Telomerase Inhibitor, in Patients With Red Blood Cell Transfusion Dependent (RBC-TD) Non-del(5q) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Relapsed/Refractory to/Ineligible for Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESAs). Journal Of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2024, 22 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7228.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LUSPATERCEPT VERSUS EPOETIN ALFA IN ERYTHROPOIESIS-STIMULATING AGENT (ESA)-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH TRANSFUSION-DEPENDENT LOWER-RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (LR-MDS): FULL ANALYSIS OF THE COMMANDS TRIAL
Garcia-Manero G, Platzbecker U, Santini V, Zeidan A, Fenaux P, Komrokji R, Shortt J, Valcarcel D, Jonasova A, Dimicoli-Salazar S, Tiong I, Lin C, Li J, Zhang J, Giuseppi A, Kreitz S, Pozharskaya V, Keeperman K, Rose S, Prebet T, Degulys A, Paolini S, Cluzeau T, Della Porta M. EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LUSPATERCEPT VERSUS EPOETIN ALFA IN ERYTHROPOIESIS-STIMULATING AGENT (ESA)-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH TRANSFUSION-DEPENDENT LOWER-RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (LR-MDS): FULL ANALYSIS OF THE COMMANDS TRIAL. Leukemia Research Reports 2024, 21: 100447. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrr.2024.100447.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesTreatment-emergent adverse eventsEA-treated patientsRBC-TIPrimary endpointHI-ERed blood cell transfusion independenceHematological improvement-erythroidTransfusion independenceErythroid responseMyelodysplastic syndromeSecondary endpointsAdverse eventsFull analysisLuspaterceptAssessed efficacySafety resultsEpoetin alfaTreatment durationPatientsEndpointEfficacyDurationPost-treatmentAML
2023
Imetelstat in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who have relapsed or are refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (IMerge): a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
Platzbecker U, Santini V, Fenaux P, Sekeres M, Savona M, Madanat Y, Díez-Campelo M, Valcárcel D, Illmer T, Jonášová A, Bělohlávková P, Sherman L, Berry T, Dougherty S, Shah S, Xia Q, Sun L, Wan Y, Huang F, Ikin A, Navada S, Feller F, Komrokji R, Zeidan A. Imetelstat in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who have relapsed or are refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (IMerge): a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet 2023, 403: 249-260. PMID: 38048786, DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01724-5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsPlacebo groupAdverse eventsMyelodysplastic syndromeGrade 3Subsequent anti-cancer therapyTreatment-emergent adverse eventsTreatment-emergent grade 3Days of randomisationIPSS risk groupRBC transfusion burdenTransfusion independence rateTreatment-related deathsUnacceptable toxic effectsPlacebo-controlled trialDisease-modifying activityPhase 2 trialPhase 3 trialPrimary efficacy analysisProportion of patientsWithdrawal of consentUnmet medical needComputer-generated scheduleAnti-cancer therapyThe ELEMENT-MDS Trial: A Phase 3 Randomized Study Evaluating Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent-Naive, Non-Transfusion-Dependent, Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Zeidan A, Komrokji R, Buckstein R, Santini V, Rose S, Malini P, Lew G, Aggarwal D, Keeperman K, Jiang H, Giuseppi A, Zhang J, Cluzeau T, Shortt J, Platzbecker U. The ELEMENT-MDS Trial: A Phase 3 Randomized Study Evaluating Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent-Naive, Non-Transfusion-Dependent, Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Blood 2023, 142: 6503. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-178635.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRBC transfusion dependenceErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsLR-MDSEpoetin alfaMyelodysplastic syndromeTransfusion dependenceSecondary endpointsStarting doseOverall survivalTransfusion independenceWeek 1Baseline serum erythropoietin levelsIntermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromesIPSS-R risk categoryLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesRed blood cell transfusionHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemAdditional secondary endpointsRBC transfusion independenceTransfusion-free survivalKey secondary endpointBlood cell transfusionPatient Global ImpressionPhase 3 studyEfficacy of Imetelstat in Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) across Different Risk Subgroups in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) in IMerge Phase 3 Study
Komrokji R, Santini V, Fenaux P, Savona M, Madanat Y, Berry T, Sherman L, Navada S, Feller F, Sun L, Xia Q, Wan Y, Huang F, Zeidan A, Platzbecker U. Efficacy of Imetelstat in Achieving Red Blood Cell Transfusion Independence (RBC-TI) across Different Risk Subgroups in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) in IMerge Phase 3 Study. Blood 2023, 142: 194. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-181237.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesDifferent risk subgroupsErythropoiesis stimulating agentsLow-risk subgroupsRisk groupsRisk subgroupsResponse rateTI ratesRBC-TIClinical efficacyRisk categoriesHigh riskLower riskRed blood cell transfusion independenceIPSS risk groupPhase 3 portionIntermediate-risk groupCytogenetic risk groupHigh-risk patientsPhase 3 studyPrognostic scoring systemIntermediate-risk subgroupsHigh-risk subgroupsHigh-risk groupLong-Term Evaluation of Luspatercept in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA)-Intolerant/Refractory Patients (pts) with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) in the Phase 3 MEDALIST Study
Santini V, Komrokji R, Garcia-Manero G, Buckstein R, Oliva E, Keeperman K, Rose S, Giuseppi A, Vilmont V, Lai Y, Miteva D, Aggarwal B, Platzbecker U, Fenaux P, Zeidan A. Long-Term Evaluation of Luspatercept in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA)-Intolerant/Refractory Patients (pts) with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) in the Phase 3 MEDALIST Study. Blood 2023, 142: 915. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-178546.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesTreatment-emergent adverse eventsLong-term efficacyEntire treatment periodExposure-adjusted incidence ratesMedian cumulative durationRBC-TITreatment periodCumulative durationData cutoffTreatment-related treatment-emergent adverse eventsCommon treatment-emergent adverse eventsRed blood cell transfusion independencePrevious short-term reportsLong-term safety profileAcute myeloid leukemia progressionRegular RBC transfusionsPermanent treatment discontinuationKaplan-Meier analysisErythropoiesis stimulating agentsShort-term reportsMyeloid leukemia progressionEligible ptsHR-MDSRefractory patientsCharacterization and Management of Cytopenias after Imetelstat Treatment in the IMerge Phase 3 Trial of Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS)
Zeidan A, Savona M, Madanat Y, Fenaux P, Komrokji R, Jonášová A, Illmer T, Sun L, Berry T, Feller F, Navada S, Santini V, Platzbecker U. Characterization and Management of Cytopenias after Imetelstat Treatment in the IMerge Phase 3 Trial of Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS). Blood 2023, 142: 6478. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-180962.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTreatment-emergent adverse eventsLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesPhase 3 trialManagement of cytopeniasGrade 3Placebo groupDose adjustmentMedian timeTreatment delayDose reductionInternational Prognostic Scoring System risk groupsHematologic treatment-emergent adverse eventsRed blood cell transfusion dependencyImetelstat treatmentExperienced grade 3RBC transfusion burdenRBC transfusion independenceTreatment cycles 1Grade 4 neutropeniaGrade 4 thrombocytopeniaPrimary end pointGrowth factor supportErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsCycle 1High telomerase activityImpact of Mutational Status on Clinical Response to Imetelstat in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the IMerge Phase 3 Study
Santini V, Zeidan A, Fenaux P, Madanat Y, Berry T, Feller F, Sun L, Xia Q, Wan Y, Huang F, Savona M, Platzbecker U. Impact of Mutational Status on Clinical Response to Imetelstat in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the IMerge Phase 3 Study. Blood 2023, 142: 4603. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-179378.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesPlacebo groupTransfusion independenceTI ratesHot spot mutationsPoor prognosisMyelodysplastic syndromeRed blood cell transfusion independenceASXL1 mutationsErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsPhase 3 studyStudy of patientsTI responsesPresence of mutationsSpecific mutationsClinical responseStudy entryClinical efficacyClinical benefitPeripheral bloodMutation subgroupsDNMT3A mutationsEpigenetic modifiersPatientsRUNX1 mutationsImprovement of Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Heavily Pretreated Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and High Transfusion Burden Treated with Imetelstat on the IMerge Phase 3 Trial
Sekeres M, Diez-Campelo M, Zeidan A, Platzbecker U, Regnault A, Creel K, Sengupta N, Wan Y, Sun L, Xia Q, Berry T, Dougherty S, Shah S, Navada S, Santini V, Valcárcel D. Improvement of Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Heavily Pretreated Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes and High Transfusion Burden Treated with Imetelstat on the IMerge Phase 3 Trial. Blood 2023, 142: 6479. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-181103.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesPatient-reported outcomesHigh transfusion burdenTransfusion burdenPlacebo groupMyelodysplastic syndromeTreatment groupsFunctional assessmentCancer Therapy-AnemiaPatient-reported fatigueTransfusion independence rateChronic Illness TherapyPhase 3 trialInferior overall survivalTransfusion-dependent anemiaLeast square meansImprovement of patientsPRO end pointsComposite scorePositive mean changesQuality of lifeFACT-AnTreat populationDyspnea scoreOverall survivalDurable Continuous Transfusion Independence (TI) with Imetelstat in IMerge Phase 3 for Patients with Heavily Transfused Non-Del(5q) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) to or Ineligible for Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs)
Platzbecker U, Komrokji R, Zeidan A, Fenaux P, Sekeres M, Savona M, Madanat Y, Jonášová A, Illmer T, Sherman L, Berry T, Riggs J, Xia Q, Navada S, Wan Y, Huang F, Feller F, Santini V. Durable Continuous Transfusion Independence (TI) with Imetelstat in IMerge Phase 3 for Patients with Heavily Transfused Non-Del(5q) Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) to or Ineligible for Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs). Blood 2023, 142: 4605. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-181154.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesErythropoiesis stimulating agentsPhase 3 trialTransfusion independenceVariant allele frequencyEnd pointTransfusion burdenAdverse eventsRed blood cell transfusionExploratory end pointsFrequent adverse eventsPrimary end pointRBC transfusion burdenReversible grade 3Secondary end pointsBlood cell transfusionDisease-modifying activityKaplan-Meier methodDuration of responseLoss of responseAdditional baseline characteristicsHigh telomerase activityCell transfusionBaseline characteristicsClinical responseLuspatercept Modulates Inflammation in the Bone Marrow, Restores Effective Erythropoiesis/Hematopoiesis, and Provides Sustained Clinical Benefit Versus Epoetin Alfa (EA): Biomarker Analysis from the Phase 3 COMMANDS Study
Hayati S, Zeidan A, Garcia-Manero G, Platzbecker U, Ahsan A, Verma A, Aluri S, Guerrero M, Gandhi A, Suragani R, Vodala S. Luspatercept Modulates Inflammation in the Bone Marrow, Restores Effective Erythropoiesis/Hematopoiesis, and Provides Sustained Clinical Benefit Versus Epoetin Alfa (EA): Biomarker Analysis from the Phase 3 COMMANDS Study. Blood 2023, 142: 1845. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-178674.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBM mononuclear cellsLow-risk MDSEpoetin alfaWk 48Myelodysplastic syndromeWk 24Clinical benefitPg/Bone marrowErythroid precursorsITT populationIL-1Ring sideroblastsN-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptideLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesPro-brain natriuretic peptideHematopoietic stem cellsDysplastic erythroid precursorsRBC transfusion independencePhase 3 trialSuperior clinical benefitSerum cytokine analysisAnti-inflammatory signalingIL-10 signalingComplete blood countPatient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) of Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA)-Naïve, Transfusion-Dependent (TD), Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS): Results from the Phase 3 COMMANDS Study
Oliva E, Platzbecker U, Della Porta M, Garcia-Manero G, Santini V, Fenaux P, Shortt J, Komrokji R, Pelligra C, Guo S, Lord-Bessen J, Xiao H, Yucel A, Miteva D, Rose S, Kreitz S, Sekeres M, Zeidan A. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) of Luspatercept Versus Epoetin Alfa in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA)-Naïve, Transfusion-Dependent (TD), Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS): Results from the Phase 3 COMMANDS Study. Blood 2023, 142: 4596. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-174660.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesEORTC QLQ-C30Patient-reported outcomesErythropoietin-stimulating agentsEpoetin alfaQLQ-C30FACT-AnSustained improvementTreatment armsESA-naïveTransfusion-DependentTreatment tolerabilityStratified Cox proportional hazards regression modelDay 1Cox proportional hazards regression modelCancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) questionnaireLife Questionnaire Core 30Proportional hazards regression modelsMajority of patientsTreatment side effectsPost-baseline visitTransfusion-dependent patientsErythropoiesis stimulating agentsHazards regression modelsPhase 3