Evolution of Therapeutic Benefit Measurement Criteria in Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms
Stempel J, Xie Z, Bewersdorf J, Stahl M, Zeidan A. Evolution of Therapeutic Benefit Measurement Criteria in Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms. The Cancer Journal 2023, 29: 203-211. PMID: 37195777, DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000666.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsInternational Working Group response criteriaResponse criteriaPhase III clinical trialsIWG 2006 criteriaRisk of progressionPatient-focused outcomesClonal myeloid neoplasmsAcute myeloid leukemiaTherapeutic response assessmentPatient-centered responsesNovel drug developmentHematologic recoveryProgressive cytopeniasClinical trialsIWG criteriaLong-term benefitsMyeloid leukemiaIneffective hematopoiesisMyeloid neoplasmsResponse assessmentDisease severityWhy do we not have more drugs approved for MDS? A critical viewpoint on novel drug development in MDS
Frumm S, Shimony S, Stone R, DeAngelo D, Bewersdorf J, Zeidan A, Stahl M. Why do we not have more drugs approved for MDS? A critical viewpoint on novel drug development in MDS. Blood Reviews 2023, 60: 101056. PMID: 36805300, DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2023.101056.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsMyelodysplastic syndromeDNA methyltransferase inhibitorLow risk (LR) MDSHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeHigh transfusion needsRisk myelodysplastic syndromesCurrent treatment landscapeErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsNovel drug developmentHR-MDSTreatment landscapeTransfusion needsTargetable mutationsClinical trialsMDS pathogenesisNew agentsRing sideroblastsMore drugsUnmet needTherapy developmentDrug developmentMethyltransferase inhibitorFactor mutationsApprovalInflammation