2024
Luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): primary analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial
Della Porta M, Garcia-Manero G, Santini V, Zeidan A, Komrokji R, Shortt J, Valcárcel D, Jonasova A, Dimicoli-Salazar S, Tiong I, Lin C, Li J, Zhang J, Pilot R, Kreitz S, Pozharskaya V, Keeperman K, Rose S, Prebet T, Lai Y, Degulys A, Paolini S, Cluzeau T, Fenaux P, Platzbecker U. Luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): primary analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet Haematology 2024, 11: e646-e658. PMID: 39038479, DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(24)00203-5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesRed blood cell transfusion independenceTreatment-emergent adverse eventsMedian follow-upEpoetin alfa groupMyelodysplastic syndromeLuspatercept groupTransfusion-dependentSerum erythropoietin concentrationPrimary endpointEpoetin alfaTransfusion independenceOpen-labelAlfa groupAdverse eventsFollow-upRed blood cell transfusion burdenErythropoietin concentrationIntention-to-treat populationControlled trialsCommon grade 3Epoetin alfa recipientsMean haemoglobin increasePrimary analysisProportion of patientsEFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LUSPATERCEPT VERSUS EPOETIN ALFA IN ERYTHROPOIESIS-STIMULATING AGENT (ESA)-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH TRANSFUSION-DEPENDENT LOWER-RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (LR-MDS): FULL ANALYSIS OF THE COMMANDS TRIAL
Garcia-Manero G, Platzbecker U, Santini V, Zeidan A, Fenaux P, Komrokji R, Shortt J, Valcarcel D, Jonasova A, Dimicoli-Salazar S, Tiong I, Lin C, Li J, Zhang J, Giuseppi A, Kreitz S, Pozharskaya V, Keeperman K, Rose S, Prebet T, Degulys A, Paolini S, Cluzeau T, Della Porta M. EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LUSPATERCEPT VERSUS EPOETIN ALFA IN ERYTHROPOIESIS-STIMULATING AGENT (ESA)-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH TRANSFUSION-DEPENDENT LOWER-RISK MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES (LR-MDS): FULL ANALYSIS OF THE COMMANDS TRIAL. Leukemia Research Reports 2024, 21: 100447. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrr.2024.100447.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesTreatment-emergent adverse eventsEA-treated patientsRBC-TIPrimary endpointHI-ERed blood cell transfusion independenceHematological improvement-erythroidTransfusion independenceErythroid responseMyelodysplastic syndromeSecondary endpointsAdverse eventsFull analysisLuspaterceptAssessed efficacySafety resultsEpoetin alfaTreatment durationPatientsEndpointEfficacyDurationPost-treatmentAML
2023
Imetelstat in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who have relapsed or are refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (IMerge): a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
Platzbecker U, Santini V, Fenaux P, Sekeres M, Savona M, Madanat Y, Díez-Campelo M, Valcárcel D, Illmer T, Jonášová A, Bělohlávková P, Sherman L, Berry T, Dougherty S, Shah S, Xia Q, Sun L, Wan Y, Huang F, Ikin A, Navada S, Feller F, Komrokji R, Zeidan A. Imetelstat in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who have relapsed or are refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (IMerge): a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet 2023, 403: 249-260. PMID: 38048786, DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01724-5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsPlacebo groupAdverse eventsMyelodysplastic syndromeGrade 3Subsequent anti-cancer therapyTreatment-emergent adverse eventsTreatment-emergent grade 3Days of randomisationIPSS risk groupRBC transfusion burdenTransfusion independence rateTreatment-related deathsUnacceptable toxic effectsPlacebo-controlled trialDisease-modifying activityPhase 2 trialPhase 3 trialPrimary efficacy analysisProportion of patientsWithdrawal of consentUnmet medical needComputer-generated scheduleAnti-cancer therapyLong-Term Evaluation of Luspatercept in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA)-Intolerant/Refractory Patients (pts) with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) in the Phase 3 MEDALIST Study
Santini V, Komrokji R, Garcia-Manero G, Buckstein R, Oliva E, Keeperman K, Rose S, Giuseppi A, Vilmont V, Lai Y, Miteva D, Aggarwal B, Platzbecker U, Fenaux P, Zeidan A. Long-Term Evaluation of Luspatercept in Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA)-Intolerant/Refractory Patients (pts) with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) in the Phase 3 MEDALIST Study. Blood 2023, 142: 915. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-178546.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesTreatment-emergent adverse eventsLong-term efficacyEntire treatment periodExposure-adjusted incidence ratesMedian cumulative durationRBC-TITreatment periodCumulative durationData cutoffTreatment-related treatment-emergent adverse eventsCommon treatment-emergent adverse eventsRed blood cell transfusion independencePrevious short-term reportsLong-term safety profileAcute myeloid leukemia progressionRegular RBC transfusionsPermanent treatment discontinuationKaplan-Meier analysisErythropoiesis stimulating agentsShort-term reportsMyeloid leukemia progressionEligible ptsHR-MDSRefractory patientsCharacterization and Management of Cytopenias after Imetelstat Treatment in the IMerge Phase 3 Trial of Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS)
Zeidan A, Savona M, Madanat Y, Fenaux P, Komrokji R, Jonášová A, Illmer T, Sun L, Berry T, Feller F, Navada S, Santini V, Platzbecker U. Characterization and Management of Cytopenias after Imetelstat Treatment in the IMerge Phase 3 Trial of Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS). Blood 2023, 142: 6478. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-180962.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTreatment-emergent adverse eventsLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesPhase 3 trialManagement of cytopeniasGrade 3Placebo groupDose adjustmentMedian timeTreatment delayDose reductionInternational Prognostic Scoring System risk groupsHematologic treatment-emergent adverse eventsRed blood cell transfusion dependencyImetelstat treatmentExperienced grade 3RBC transfusion burdenRBC transfusion independenceTreatment cycles 1Grade 4 neutropeniaGrade 4 thrombocytopeniaPrimary end pointGrowth factor supportErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsCycle 1High telomerase activityEfficacy and safety of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): interim analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial
Platzbecker U, Della Porta M, Santini V, Zeidan A, Komrokji R, Shortt J, Valcarcel D, Jonasova A, Dimicoli-Salazar S, Tiong I, Lin C, Li J, Zhang J, Giuseppi A, Kreitz S, Pozharskaya V, Keeperman K, Rose S, Shetty J, Hayati S, Vodala S, Prebet T, Degulys A, Paolini S, Cluzeau T, Fenaux P, Garcia-Manero G. Efficacy and safety of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): interim analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2023, 402: 373-385. PMID: 37311468, DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00874-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesRed blood cell transfusion independenceEpoetin alfa groupErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsEpoetin alfaMyelodysplastic syndromeInterim analysisPrimary endpointAdverse eventsAlfa groupTransfusion independenceLower riskBody weightTreatment-emergent adverse eventsTreatment-related adverse eventsRed blood cell transfusionDurable clinical efficacyMean hemoglobin increaseMedian treatment exposureBlood cell transfusionCOVID-19 pneumoniaSubgroup of patientsWeeks of treatmentTreatment of anemiaAcute myeloid leukemiaPhase 1/2 Study of the Pan-PIM Kinase Inhibitor INCB053914 Alone or in Combination With Standard-of-Care Agents in Patients With Advanced Hematologic Malignancies
Patel M, Donnellan W, Byrne M, Asch A, Zeidan A, Baer M, Fathi A, Kuykendall A, Zheng F, Walker C, Cheng L, Marando C, Savona M. Phase 1/2 Study of the Pan-PIM Kinase Inhibitor INCB053914 Alone or in Combination With Standard-of-Care Agents in Patients With Advanced Hematologic Malignancies. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2023, 23: 674-686. PMID: 37290996, DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.05.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTreatment-emergent adverse eventsDose-limiting toxicityAdvanced hematologic malignanciesAcute myeloid leukemiaMyelodysplastic syndromeHematologic malignanciesCare agentsHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeMDS/myeloproliferative neoplasmPhase 1/2 studyEffective combination strategiesAdverse eventsComplete responseLymphoproliferative neoplasmsWeek 12Multiple myelomaSpleen volumeAcute leukemiaMyeloid leukemiaPreclinical modelsPatientsMyeloproliferative neoplasmsMoloney murine leukemia virus (PIM) kinasesMyelofibrosisKinase inhibitors
2022
A phase 1b study of glasdegib + azacitidine in patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia and higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes
Sekeres MA, Schuster M, Joris M, Krauter J, Maertens J, Breems D, Gyan E, Kovacsovics T, Verma A, Vyas P, Wang ES, Ching K, O’Brien T, Gallo Stampino C, Ma WW, Kudla A, Chan G, Zeidan AM. A phase 1b study of glasdegib + azacitidine in patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia and higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Annals Of Hematology 2022, 101: 1689-1701. PMID: 35488900, DOI: 10.1007/s00277-022-04853-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute myeloid leukemiaHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromePhase 1b studyChronic myelomonocytic leukemiaMyelodysplastic syndromeExpansion cohortSafety profileMDS cohortMyeloid leukemiaTreatment-emergent adverse eventsUntreated acute myeloid leukemiaNon-hematologic gradeMedian overall survivalAcceptable safety profileOverall response rateDrug-drug interactionsSafety cohortIntensive chemotherapyAdverse eventsOverall survivalClinical benefitQT prolongationAML cohortMyelomonocytic leukemiaGlasdegibA randomized phase 2 trial of azacitidine with or without durvalumab as first-line therapy for older patients with AML
Zeidan AM, Boss I, Beach C, Copeland WB, Thompson E, Fox BA, Hasle VE, Hellmann A, Taussig D, Tormo M, Voso MT, Cavenagh J, O'Connor T, Previtali A, Rose S, Silverman LR. A randomized phase 2 trial of azacitidine with or without durvalumab as first-line therapy for older patients with AML. Blood Advances 2022, 6: 2219-2229. PMID: 34933333, PMCID: PMC9006260, DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006138.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute myeloid leukemiaFirst-line therapyOlder patientsDay 1First-line combination therapyTreatment-emergent adverse eventsRandomized phase 2 trialSafety of durvalumabNew safety signalsPD-L1 expressionPhase 2 studyPhase 2 trialDuration of responseOverall response rateDurvalumab 1500Adverse eventsOverall survivalClinical efficacyCombination therapyMyeloid leukemiaSafety signalsTreatment responseCombination treatmentAzacitidineResponse ratePhase 1 study of anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody CC-90002 in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes
Zeidan AM, DeAngelo DJ, Palmer J, Seet CS, Tallman MS, Wei X, Raymon H, Sriraman P, Kopytek S, Bewersdorf JP, Burgess MR, Hege K, Stock W. Phase 1 study of anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody CC-90002 in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Annals Of Hematology 2022, 101: 557-569. PMID: 34981142, PMCID: PMC9414073, DOI: 10.1007/s00277-021-04734-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAnti-drug antibodiesAcute myeloid leukemiaDose-limiting toxicityRefractory acute myeloid leukemiaHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeMyelodysplastic syndromeMyeloid leukemiaCommon treatment-emergent adverse eventsTreatment-emergent adverse eventsADA-positive patientsPhase 2 dosePresence/frequencyUnexpected safety findingsPhase 1 studyAnti-CD47 antibodyCD47-SIRPα interactionMacrophage-mediated killingHematological cancer cell linesFebrile neutropeniaMonotherapy activityCancer cell linesPrimary endpointSecondary endpointsAdverse eventsObjective response
2021
Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine in Patients with Lower Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Longer-Term Follow-up of from the Ascertain Study
Garcia-Manero G, McCloskey J, Griffiths E, Yee K, Zeidan A, Al-Kali A, Deeg H, Patel P, Sabloff M, Keating M, Dao K, Zhu N, Gabrail N, Fazal S, Maly J, Odenike O, Kantarjian H, DeZern A, O'Connell C, Roboz G, Busque L, Wells R, Amin H, Randhawa J, Leber B, Hao Y, Keer H, Azab M, Savona M. Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine in Patients with Lower Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Longer-Term Follow-up of from the Ascertain Study. Blood 2021, 138: 66. PMCID: PMC8701611, DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-144648.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesClinical Trials CommitteeMedian leukemia-free survivalMedian overall survivalRisk myelodysplastic syndromesBristol-Myers SquibbMyelodysplastic syndromeTransfusion independenceTrials CommitteeOral DECDNA methyltransferase inhibitorOverall survivalComplete responseAstex PharmaceuticalsSpeakers bureauCC-486Hematologic improvementDaiichi SankyoTreatment-emergent adverse eventsHigh-risk MDS patientsAllogeneic stem cell transplantSARS-CoV-2 infectionAdvisory CommitteeRandomized cross-over studyPandemic SARS-CoV-2 infectionVenetoclax and Azacitidine in the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Zeidan A, Borate U, Pollyea D, Brunner A, Roncolato F, Garcia J, Filshie R, Odenike O, Watson A, Krishnadasan R, Bajel A, Naqvi K, Zha J, Hogdal L, Zhou Y, Hoffman D, Kye S, Garcia-Manero G. Venetoclax and Azacitidine in the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndrome. Blood 2021, 138: 537. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-145646.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchClinical Trials CommitteeHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeMedian overall survivalAdverse eventsMyelodysplastic syndromeTrials CommitteeOverall survivalMedian timeClinical trialsFebrile neutropeniaPrior therapyComplete remissionTransfusion independenceClinical outcomesBcl-2 inhibitorsMyeloid leukemiaEastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statusGrade treatment-emergent adverse eventsInternational Working Group 2006 criteriaOverall median progression-free survivalIncomplete blood count recoveryMedian progression-free survivalOral BCL-2 inhibitorTreatment-emergent adverse eventsAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cellsAnalysis of Duration of Response, Exposure-Adjusted Safety and Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) for Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Receiving Luspatercept in the MEDALIST Study
Platzbecker U, Santini V, Komrokji R, Zeidan A, Garcia-Manero G, Buckstein R, Rose S, Fabre S, Miteva D, Zhang J, Yucel A, Hughes C, Fenaux P. Analysis of Duration of Response, Exposure-Adjusted Safety and Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) for Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) Receiving Luspatercept in the MEDALIST Study. Blood 2021, 138: 1524. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-145723.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesTreatment-emergent adverse eventsClinical Trials CommitteeAcute myeloid leukemiaErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsExposure-adjusted incidence ratesRBC-TITrials CommitteeEntire treatment periodDuration of treatmentRing sideroblastsAML progressionCurrent equity holderMedian durationTreatment optionsIncidence rateTreatment periodWk 1Only treatment-emergent adverse eventClass erythroid maturation agentMDS/myeloproliferative neoplasmAdvisory CommitteeRegular RBC transfusionsTolerable safety profileSpeakers bureauEfficacy of Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine (ASTX727) in the CMML Subgroup from the Ascertain Phase 3 Study
Savona M, McCloskey J, Griffiths E, Yee K, Zeidan A, Al-Kali A, Deeg H, Patel P, Sabloff M, Keating M, Dao K, Zhu N, Gabrail N, Fazal S, Maly J, Odenike O, Kantarjian H, DeZern A, O'Connell C, Roboz G, Busque L, Wells R, Amin H, Randhawa J, Leber B, Hao Y, Keer H, Azab M, Garcia-Manero G. Efficacy of Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine (ASTX727) in the CMML Subgroup from the Ascertain Phase 3 Study. Blood 2021, 138: 3682. PMCID: PMC8701430, DOI: 10.1182/blood-2021-154179.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchChronic myelomonocytic leukemiaMedian overall survivalAdverse eventsComplete responseOverall survivalMyelodysplastic syndromeDNA methyltransferase inhibitorTreatment of CMMLDiagnosis of CMMLTreatment-emergent adverse eventsRandomized cross-over studyMarrow complete responseCommon Terminology CriteriaCycles of therapyIntermediate-risk cytogeneticsMDS/MPN overlap syndromesOlder cancer patientsCTCAE grade 3Subpopulation of patientsCross-over studyStandard of careEntire study populationPandemic SARS-CoV-2SARS-CoV-2Intra-patient comparison
2020
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine in 133 Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML)
Savona M, McCloskey J, Griffiths E, Yee K, Al-Kali A, Zeidan A, Deeg H, Patel P, Sabloff M, Keating M, Dao K, Zhu N, Gabrail N, Fazal S, Maly J, Odenike O, Kantarjian H, DeZern A, O'Connell C, Roboz G, Busque L, Wells R, Amin H, Randhawa J, Leber B, Hao Y, Keer H, Azab M, Garcia-Manero G. Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine in 133 Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML). Blood 2020, 136: 37-38. PMCID: PMC8330281, DOI: 10.1182/blood-2020-133855.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchChronic myelomonocytic leukemiaRed blood cellsMyelodysplastic syndromeComplete responseHematological improvementAdverse eventsAstex PharmaceuticalsHypomethylating agentConsecutive weeksSpeakers bureauMedian durationClinical efficacyDaiichi SankyoDNA methyltransferase inhibitorCommon treatment-emergent adverse eventsAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantTreatment-emergent adverse eventsTreatment of MDSBoehringer IngelheimAdvisory CommitteeRandomized cross-over studySeattle GeneticsDose combination drugsOral hypomethylating agentOverall objective responsePhase 1 dose escalation trial of volasertib in combination with decitabine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia
Cortes J, Podoltsev N, Kantarjian H, Borthakur G, Zeidan AM, Stahl M, Taube T, Fagan N, Rajeswari S, Uy GL. Phase 1 dose escalation trial of volasertib in combination with decitabine in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. International Journal Of Hematology 2020, 113: 92-99. PMID: 32951163, DOI: 10.1007/s12185-020-02994-8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell Cycle ProteinsDecitabineDose-Response Relationship, DrugFebrile NeutropeniaFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleGene ExpressionHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMolecular Targeted TherapyProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsPteridinesTreatment OutcomeConceptsAcute myeloid leukemiaMyeloid leukemiaCommon treatment-emergent adverse eventsPhase 1 dose-escalation trialTreatment-emergent adverse eventsMTD of volasertibObjective response rateAdverse event profileDose-escalation trialPhase 1 trialAnti-leukemic activityPolo-like kinase 1Febrile neutropeniaEscalation trialAdverse eventsCell cycle kinase inhibitorsAML patientsEvent profilePoor prognosisResponse ratePatientsVolasertibDecitabineKinase inhibitorsNumerous cancersMDS-179: Clinical Benefit of Luspatercept in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) and High Transfusion Burden (HTB) in the Phase 3 MEDALIST Study
Zeidan A, Garcia-Manero G, DeZern A, Fenaux P, Greenberg P, Savona M, Jurcic J, Verma A, Mufti G, Buckstein R, Santini V, Laadem A, Zhang J, Rampersad A, Sinsimer D, Louis C, Linde P, Platzbecker U, Sekeres M. MDS-179: Clinical Benefit of Luspatercept in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) and High Transfusion Burden (HTB) in the Phase 3 MEDALIST Study. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2020, 20: s318-s319. DOI: 10.1016/s2152-2650(20)30973-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesTreatment-emergent adverse eventsHigh transfusion burdenRBC transfusion independenceRing sideroblastsTransfusion burdenTransfusion eventsClinical benefitWeek 1Serious treatment-emergent adverse eventsSignificant clinical unmet needPlacebo-treated patientsRBC transfusion burdenRegular RBC transfusionsClinical unmet needErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsOverall study populationEligible patientsPlacebo patientsAdverse eventsMedian durationPlacebo armRBC transfusionMedian timeTreatment armsMDS-175: Assessment of Dose-Dependent Response to Luspatercept in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) with Ring Sideroblasts (RS) in the Phase 3 MEDALIST Trial
Platzbecker U, Fenaux P, Mufti G, Garcia-Manero G, Komrokji R, Buckstein R, Diez-Campelo M, Finelli C, Sekeres M, Selleslag D, DeZern A, Quesnel B, Beyne-Rauzy O, Voso M, Greenberg P, Zeidan A, Adès L, Verma A, Savona M, Laadem A, Ito R, Zhang J, Rampersad A, Morison J, Louis C, Linde P, Santini V. MDS-175: Assessment of Dose-Dependent Response to Luspatercept in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR-MDS) with Ring Sideroblasts (RS) in the Phase 3 MEDALIST Trial. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia 2020, 20: s318. DOI: 10.1016/s2152-2650(20)30972-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTreatment-emergent adverse eventsLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesRBC-TIRing sideroblastsDose levelsDose reductions/delaysMaximum doseLR-MDS patientsRBC transfusion independenceMajority of patientsMaintenance of responseSame dose levelFirst responseDose delaysDose-dependent responseEligible patientsDose titrationNew onsetTransfusion burdenTransfusion independenceAdverse eventsDose escalationMedian timeMyelodysplastic syndromeHemoglobin increaseClinical benefit of luspatercept in patients (pts) with lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) and high transfusion burden in the phase III MEDALIST study.
Zeidan A, Garcia-Manero G, Dezern A, Fenaux P, Greenberg P, Savona M, Jurcic J, Verma A, Mufti G, Buckstein R, Santini V, Laadem A, Zhang J, Rampersad A, Sinsimer D, Louis C, Linde P, List A, Sekeres M. Clinical benefit of luspatercept in patients (pts) with lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) and high transfusion burden in the phase III MEDALIST study. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2020, 38: 7554-7554. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.7554.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTreatment-emergent adverse eventsLow-risk MDSRBC transfusion burdenTransfusion burdenRing sideroblastsRBC-TITransfusion eventsClinical benefitWeek 1Significant clinical unmet needPT populationHigh transfusion burdenRBC transfusion independenceRegular RBC transfusionsAcceptable safety profilePhase 3 studyClinical unmet needErythropoiesis-stimulating agentsSerious AEsMedian durationAdverse eventsMedian timeRBC transfusionSafety profileTreatment options
2019
Clinical Benefit of Glasdegib in Combination with Azacitidine or Low-Dose Cytarabine in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Zeidan A, Schuster M, Krauter J, Maertens J, Gyan E, Joris M, Menne T, Vyas P, Wendy W, O'Connell A, Zeremski M, Kudla A, Chan G, Sekeres M. Clinical Benefit of Glasdegib in Combination with Azacitidine or Low-Dose Cytarabine in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Blood 2019, 134: 3916. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-124034.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTreatment-emergent adverse eventsAcute myeloid leukemiaLow-dose cytarabineMedian treatment durationIntensive chemotherapyOverall survivalPersonal feesMyelodysplastic syndromeDose delaysSpeakers bureauMedian followMyeloid leukemiaTreatment durationSerious treatment-emergent adverse eventsRandomized phase 3 trialMonths median overall survivalNon-financial supportAdvisory CommitteeSeattle GeneticsDaiichi SankyoIncomplete hematologic recoveryOlder unfit patientsMedian overall survivalSuperior overall survivalAbsolute neutrophil count