2018
Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies
Martin DT, Ghabili K, Levi A, Humphrey PA, Sprenkle PC. Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies. Urology 2018, 125: 64-72. PMID: 30552940, DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPI-RADSv2 scoreDecipher scoreProstate Imaging ReportingDecipher testingTargeted biopsiesRadical prostatectomyData System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) scoreFavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancerIntermediate-risk prostate cancer patientsGleason Grade Group 1Imaging ReportingIntermediate-risk prostate cancerMultivariable logistic regression analysisHigh-risk diseasePI-RADS 4Grade group 1Gleason grade groupProstate cancer patientsMultiparametric magnetic resonancePI-RADS scoreVersion 2 scoreData System scoreLogistic regression analysisSignificant differencesPI-RADS category
2017
The positive predictive value of PI-RADS 4 lesions stratified by lesion number in biopsy naïve men.
Syed J, Javier-desloges J, Nguyen K, Sheridan A, Levi A, Weinreb J, Sprenkle P. The positive predictive value of PI-RADS 4 lesions stratified by lesion number in biopsy naïve men. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2017, 35: 29-29. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.6_suppl.29.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPI-RADS 4 lesionsPositive predictive valueBiopsy-naïve menNaïve menPredictive valuePI-RADS 3PI-RADS version 2PI-RADS 4Cancer detection rateChi-square testPSA densityEntire cohortMean ageFusion biopsyProstate cancerSingle lesionLesion locationGroup 2Group 1Group 3LesionsAssessment scoresLesion numberCategorical variablesFurther assessment