2024
Integrating 4 Methods (In4M) to evaluate physical function in patients with cancer: Results of a comprehensive digital health study.
Thanarajasingam G, Dueck A, Bhatnagar V, Brown A, Cathcart-Rake E, Diamond M, Faust L, Fiero M, Huntington S, Jeffery M, Jones L, Paludo J, Power B, Ross J, Ruddy K, Schellhorn S, Tarver M, Wood W, Gross C, Kluetz P. Integrating 4 Methods (In4M) to evaluate physical function in patients with cancer: Results of a comprehensive digital health study. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2024, 42: 1564-1564. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.1564.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPhysical functionPF measuresDaily stepsClinically meaningful change scoresAverage daily stepsEvaluate physical functionDigital health studiesMeasures of PFWearable dataHealth StudyWalk testWeekend daysCore outcomeChange scoresPerformance statusTreatment toleranceDetect changesPearson correlationECOG performance statusBreast cancerEvaluate feasibilityCancer trialsSignificant declineData collectionBaseline
2004
Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials: Race-, Sex-, and Age-Based Disparities
Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials: Race-, Sex-, and Age-Based Disparities. JAMA 2004, 291: 2720-2726. PMID: 15187053, DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.22.2720.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCancer trialsCancer clinical trialsClinical trialsTrial participantsEnrollment fractionWhite patientsAge groupsCross-sectional population-based analysisProstate cancer clinical trialsCancer research participationCancer trial participantsColorectal cancer trialsPatients 75 yearsIncident cancer patientsLung cancer trialsPopulation-based analysisRelative risk ratiosAge-based disparitiesYears of ageNational Cancer InstituteLogistic regression modelsLittle recent informationTrial enrolleesYounger patientsPatient group