2021
Targeting prostate cancer with Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin functionalized nanoparticles co-encapsulating imaging cargo enhances magnetic resonance imaging specificity
Martin DT, Lee JS, Liu Q, Galiana G, Sprenkle PC, Humphrey PA, Petrylak DP, Weinreb JC, Schulam PG, Weiss RM, Fahmy TM. Targeting prostate cancer with Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin functionalized nanoparticles co-encapsulating imaging cargo enhances magnetic resonance imaging specificity. Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology And Medicine 2021, 40: 102477. PMID: 34740868, DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2021.102477.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAnimalsEnterotoxinsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiceNanoparticlesProstatic NeoplasmsConceptsFunctionalized nanoparticlesProstate cancerTumor specificityNanoparticlesHuman prostate cancer biopsiesTumor-bearing mouse modelClaudin-3Average diameterLiver signal intensityProstate cancer biopsiesKey imaging toolContrast-enhanced MRIImaging specificityClostridium perfringens enterotoxinPotential clinical applicabilityDetection toolsMouse modelTumor localizationCancer biopsiesCancer specificityCldn-3Perfringens enterotoxinClinical applicabilityHigh expressionHigh gradeThe Prognostic Association of Prostate MRI PI-RADS™ v2 Assessment Category and Risk of Biochemical Recurrence after Definitive Local Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Rajwa P, Mori K, Huebner NA, Martin DT, Sprenkle PC, Weinreb JC, Ploussard G, Pradere B, Shariat SF, Leapman MS. The Prognostic Association of Prostate MRI PI-RADS™ v2 Assessment Category and Risk of Biochemical Recurrence after Definitive Local Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal Of Urology 2021, 206: 507-516. PMID: 33904755, DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001821.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsBrachytherapyHumansKallikreinsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProstateProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentConceptsRisk of BCRPI-RADS v2 scoreDefinitive local therapyBiochemical recurrencePrognostic significanceRadical prostatectomyProstate cancerV2 scoreLocal therapySystematic reviewMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) classificationPrimary definitive treatmentIndependent prognostic significanceRisk of biasSignificant prostate cancerProstate Imaging ReportingPI-RADS v2Prostate cancer diagnosisWeb of ScienceReliable diagnostic toolOncologic outcomesDefinitive treatmentMRI findingsPI-RADSPrognostic association
2018
Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies
Martin DT, Ghabili K, Levi A, Humphrey PA, Sprenkle PC. Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies. Urology 2018, 125: 64-72. PMID: 30552940, DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleData SystemsGenomicsHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProstatic NeoplasmsUltrasonography, InterventionalConceptsPI-RADSv2 scoreDecipher scoreProstate Imaging ReportingDecipher testingTargeted biopsiesRadical prostatectomyData System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) scoreFavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancerIntermediate-risk prostate cancer patientsGleason Grade Group 1Imaging ReportingIntermediate-risk prostate cancerMultivariable logistic regression analysisHigh-risk diseasePI-RADS 4Grade group 1Gleason grade groupProstate cancer patientsMultiparametric magnetic resonancePI-RADS scoreVersion 2 scoreData System scoreLogistic regression analysisSignificant differencesPI-RADS category