2023
Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Within and Outside Traditional Selection Criteria
Ivanics T, Claasen M, Samstein B, Emond J, Fox A, Pomfret E, Pomposelli J, Tabrizian P, Florman S, Mehta N, Roberts J, Emamaullee J, Genyk Y, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Tomiyama K, Sasaki K, Hashimoto K, Nagai S, Abouljoud M, Olthoff K, Hoteit M, Heimbach J, Taner T, Liapakis A, Mulligan D, Sapisochin G, Halazun K, Group O. Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Within and Outside Traditional Selection Criteria. Annals Of Surgery 2023, 279: 104-111. PMID: 37522174, DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006049.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsUniversity of California San FranciscoMilan criteriaDonor liver transplantationHepatocellular carcinomaOverall survivalLiver transplantationPosttransplantation survivalEvaluate long-term oncologic outcomesUniversity of California San Francisco criteriaLiving donor liver transplantationRecurrence-free survivalKaplan-Meier methodTransplant selection criteriaProportion of patientsAdult LDLT recipientsNorth American centersLong-term survivalLiver transplant waitlistCalifornia San FranciscoLDLT recipientsMulticenter cohortConsensus guidelinesTransplantationPatientsPosttransplantation
2021
Developing simultaneous liver‐kidney transplant medical eligibility criteria while providing a safety net: A 2‐year review of the OPTN's allocation policy
Wilk AR, Booker SE, Stewart DE, Wiseman A, Gauntt K, Mulligan D, Formica RN. Developing simultaneous liver‐kidney transplant medical eligibility criteria while providing a safety net: A 2‐year review of the OPTN's allocation policy. American Journal Of Transplantation 2021, 21: 3593-3607. PMID: 34254434, DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16761.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMedical Eligibility CriteriaEligibility criteriaLiver transplantPatient/graft survivalWaitlist mortality rateDeceased donor kidneysLiver recipientsSLK candidatesSLK transplantsGraft survivalRenal impairmentPosttransplant outcomesDonor kidneysTransplant ratesTransplant volumeMortality rateTransplantKidneySignificant differencesRecipientsSubsequent increaseLiver dataCriteriaImpairmentSLKAmerican Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Expert Panel Consensus Statement: Vaccines to Prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection in Patients With Liver Disease
Fix OK, Blumberg EA, Chang K, Chu J, Chung RT, Goacher EK, Hameed B, Kaul DR, Kulik LM, Kwok RM, McGuire BM, Mulligan DC, Price JC, Reau NS, Reddy KR, Reynolds A, Rosen HR, Russo MW, Schilsky ML, Verna EC, Ward JW, Fontana RJ, Group F. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Expert Panel Consensus Statement: Vaccines to Prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection in Patients With Liver Disease. Hepatology 2021, 74: 1049-1064. PMID: 33577086, PMCID: PMC8014184, DOI: 10.1002/hep.31751.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMRNA COVID-19 vaccineCOVID-19 vaccineChronic liver diseaseLiver diseaseModerna mRNA COVID-19 vaccinesCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infectionExpert panel consensus statementPrevious drug reactionsAdvanced liver diseaseLiver transplant recipientsAvailable COVID-19 vaccinesDisease 2019 infectionSevere hypersensitivity reactionsLocal site reactionsCare of patientsClinical trial participantsHealth care providersLT recipientsTransplant recipientsAdult patientsImmunosuppressed patientsSystemic reactionsHypersensitivity reactionsSite reactionsVaccine efficacyChanges in Use of Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Bridge to Transplantation With New Heart Allocation Policy
Mullan CW, Chouairi F, Sen S, Mori M, Clark KAA, Reinhardt SW, Miller PE, Fuery MA, Jacoby D, Maulion C, Anwer M, Geirsson A, Mulligan D, Formica R, Rogers JG, Desai NR, Ahmad T. Changes in Use of Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Bridge to Transplantation With New Heart Allocation Policy. JACC Heart Failure 2021, 9: 420-429. PMID: 33714748, DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.01.010.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDonor heart allocation systemNumber of patientsHeart allocation systemVentricular assist deviceWaitlist survivalAssist deviceNew heart allocation policyLeft ventricular assist deviceAllocation system changePost-transplant mortalityOrgan Sharing databaseOutcomes of patientsPost-transplantation outcomesProportion of patientsTime of transplantContinuous-flow LVADPost-transplantation survivalHeart allocation policyNew allocation systemBaseline recipientStatus 1AHeart transplantationIschemic timeLVAD implantationTransplant listImpact of the new heart allocation policy on patients with restrictive, hypertrophic, or congenital cardiomyopathies
Chouairi F, Mullan CW, Sen S, Mori M, Fuery M, Elder RW, Lesse J, Norton K, Clark KA, Miller PE, Mulligan D, Formica R, Rogers JG, Jacoby D, Maulion C, Anwer M, Geirsson A, Desai NR, Ahmad T. Impact of the new heart allocation policy on patients with restrictive, hypertrophic, or congenital cardiomyopathies. PLOS ONE 2021, 16: e0247789. PMID: 33651802, PMCID: PMC7924739, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247789.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCongenital heart diseaseAllocation system changeHeart allocation systemNew heart allocation policyNew heart allocation systemTransplantation of patientsOrgan Sharing databasePost-transplantation outcomesPost-transplant survivalTime of transplantationMechanical circulatory supportRate of transplantationNumber of patientsHeart allocation policyNew allocation systemStatus 1ACardiac transplantAdult patientsSharing databaseWaitlist survivalCirculatory supportClinical benefitCongenital cardiomyopathyUnited NetworkCHD patients
2019
Frequency of whole-organ in lieu of split-liver transplantation over the last decade: Children experienced increased wait time and death
Valentino PL, Emre S, Geliang G, Li L, Deng Y, Mulligan D, Rodriguez-Davalos M. Frequency of whole-organ in lieu of split-liver transplantation over the last decade: Children experienced increased wait time and death. American Journal Of Transplantation 2019, 19: 3114-3123. PMID: 31152483, DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15481.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdult recipientsTransplantation Network/United NetworkNumber of allograftsOrgan Sharing dataSplit-liver transplantationCareful patient selectionDeceased donor liversNumber of LTLT graftSLT recipientsUnderwent LTWLT recipientsPediatric candidatesPatient selectionDonor liversOrgan utilizationUnited NetworkOrgan shortageOrgan procurementSmall childrenRecipientsTransplantation
2017
Allograft transmission of hepatitis C during the window period: Weighing the new risks and costs in the era of donor shortage
Choe J, Merola J, Kulkarni S, Mulligan DC. Allograft transmission of hepatitis C during the window period: Weighing the new risks and costs in the era of donor shortage. Clinical Transplantation 2017, 31 PMID: 28643333, DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13022.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInequity in organ allocation for patients awaiting liver transplantation: Rationale for uncapping the model for end-stage liver disease
Nadim MK, DiNorcia J, Ji L, Groshen S, Levitsky J, Sung RS, Kim WR, Andreoni K, Mulligan D, Genyk YS. Inequity in organ allocation for patients awaiting liver transplantation: Rationale for uncapping the model for end-stage liver disease. Journal Of Hepatology 2017, 67: 517-525. PMID: 28483678, PMCID: PMC7735955, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.04.022.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEnd-stage liver diseaseLiver transplantMELD scoreLiver diseaseSick patientsLiver transplantationOrgan allocationEquitable organ distributionGreater MELD scoresPost-transplant outcomesOrgan Sharing dataPost-transplant survivalUnderwent liver transplantObjective scoring systemWaitlist registrationWaitlist mortalityHazard ratioSurvival benefitWaitlist candidatesUnited NetworkPatientsTransplantScoring systemMELDOrgan distribution
2016
A resilience intervention involving mindfulness training for transplant patients and their caregivers
Stonnington CM, Darby B, Santucci A, Mulligan P, Pathuis P, Cuc A, Hentz JG, Zhang N, Mulligan D, Sood A. A resilience intervention involving mindfulness training for transplant patients and their caregivers. Clinical Transplantation 2016, 30: 1466-1472. PMID: 27618687, DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12841.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTransplant patientsCell transplant patientsNegative affectNeuroscience of stressMindfulness-based stress reductionMindfulness-based interventionsStem cell transplant patientsHealth-related qualityKidney/pancreasMeasures of stressPositive affectMindfulness trainingResilience interventionsMindfulness practiceMonths postinterventionMayo ClinicCaregiver interventionsMental componentSolid organsPatientsStress reductionAffectCaregiversMost participantsAnxietyPredicting Outcomes on the Liver Transplant Waiting List in the United States
Hart A, Schladt DP, Zeglin J, Pyke J, Kim WR, Lake JR, Roberts JP, Hirose R, Mulligan DC, Kasiske BL, Snyder JJ, Israni AK. Predicting Outcomes on the Liver Transplant Waiting List in the United States. Transplantation 2016, 100: 2153-2159. PMID: 27490411, PMCID: PMC5369025, DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001384.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDonation service areaLiver transplantWaiting listEnd-stage liver disease (MELD) scoreLiver transplant waiting listTransplant Recipients databaseLiver Disease scoreMELD exception pointsTransplant waiting listAvailability of organsTransplant probabilityRecipients databasePatient characteristicsScientific RegistryTransplant programsUS adultsDisease scorePredicting OutcomeException pointsTransplantBlood typeOutcomesOngoing disparitiesCorresponding percentilesOnline calculatorAttitudes toward organ donation among waitlisted transplant patients: results of a cross‐sectional survey
Merola J, Pei K, Rodriguez‐Davalos M, Gan G, Deng Y, Mulligan DC, Davis KA. Attitudes toward organ donation among waitlisted transplant patients: results of a cross‐sectional survey. Clinical Transplantation 2016, 30: 1449-1456. PMID: 27582432, PMCID: PMC5093046, DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12839.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCross-sectional surveyOrgan donationWaitlisted candidatesMinority of patientsDonor registration ratesDonation eligibilityTransplant patientsWaitlisted patientsPatients' willingnessGeneral populationOrgan donorsOrgan shortageMedical treatmentPatientsOrgan allocationDonation ratesTransplantationRegistration ratesDonationMajor barrierPopulationDonorsWaitlistPhysiciansDemographicsPerioperative outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft in renal transplant recipients in the United States: results from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample
Tooley JE, Bohl DD, Kulkarni S, Rodriguez‐Davalos M, Mangi A, Mulligan DC, Yoo PS. Perioperative outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft in renal transplant recipients in the United States: results from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Clinical Transplantation 2016, 30: 1258-1263. PMID: 27440000, DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12816.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCoronary Artery BypassCoronary Artery DiseaseDatabases, FactualFemaleHospital CostsHospital MortalityHumansKidney TransplantationLength of StayLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRenal DialysisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesYoung AdultConceptsChronic kidney diseaseNationwide Inpatient SampleLength of stayCKD patientsCABG surgeryHospital mortalityPerioperative outcomesInpatient SampleCardiovascular diseaseCoronary artery bypass graftKidney transplant patientsRenal transplant recipientsRetrospective cohort studyArtery bypass graftRate of complicationsTotal hospital chargesBetter perioperative outcomesCause of morbidityCost of hospitalizationNumber one causeGraft lossPerioperative complicationsTransplant patientsTransplant recipientsCohort studyPostoperative delirium is associated with increased intensive care unit and hospital length of stays after liver transplantation
Bhattacharya B, Maung A, Barre K, Maerz L, Rodriguez-Davalos MI, Schilsky M, Mulligan DC, Davis KA. Postoperative delirium is associated with increased intensive care unit and hospital length of stays after liver transplantation. Journal Of Surgical Research 2016, 207: 223-228. PMID: 27979481, DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.08.084.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLiver transplantationHospital lengthEnd-stage liver disease (MELD) scoreIntensive care unit LOSHigher preoperative modelImportant postoperative complicationLiver Disease scoreLiver transplant patientsImpact of deliriumTertiary care centerRetrospective case seriesUrinary tract infectionFurther prospective studiesIntensive care unitLong-term outcomesSpecific risk factorsFrequency of hospitalPaucity of dataPostoperative deliriumPostoperative hospitalPostoperative complicationsTransplant patientsVentilator daysAdult patientsDelirious patientsSimultaneous Liver–Kidney Allocation Policy: A Proposal to Optimize Appropriate Utilization of Scarce Resources
Formica R, Aeder M, Boyle G, Kucheryavaya A, Stewart D, Hirose R, Mulligan D. Simultaneous Liver–Kidney Allocation Policy: A Proposal to Optimize Appropriate Utilization of Scarce Resources. American Journal Of Transplantation 2016, 16: 758-766. PMID: 26603142, DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13631.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMayo End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scoreEnd-stage liver disease (MELD) scoreSimultaneous liver-kidney transplantKidney Donor Profile IndexConcurrent kidney transplantsLiver-kidney transplantLiver Disease scoreMedical Eligibility CriteriaLiver allocation policyOPTN Final RulePediatric recipientsKidney transplantRenal functionRenal insufficiencyUnited NetworkLiver candidatesTransplant communityDisease scoreOrgan donorsEligibility criteriaOrgan procurementTransplantation NetworkFinal ruleKidney allocationYoung adults
2014
Magnetic resonance elastography can discriminate normal vs. abnormal liver biopsy in candidates for live liver donation
Gallegos-Orozco JF, Silva AC, Batheja MJ, Chang YH, Hansen KL, Lam-Himlin D, De Petris G, Aqel BA, Byrne TJ, Carey EJ, Douglas DD, Mulligan DC, Silva AM, Rakela J, Vargas HE. Magnetic resonance elastography can discriminate normal vs. abnormal liver biopsy in candidates for live liver donation. Abdominal Radiology 2014, 40: 795-802. PMID: 25445158, DOI: 10.1007/s00261-014-0310-y.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLive liver donationLiver biopsyLiver donationMagnetic resonance elastographyHepatic steatosisOptimal cutoffExact testPotential live liver donorsAbnormal liver biopsyAbnormal liver histologyLive liver donorsDegree of steatosisDonor evaluation processLiver biopsy resultsROC curveFisher's exact testLiver shear stiffnessAbility of MREResonance elastographyLiver histologyBiopsy resultsLiver donorsLiver fibrosisSteatosisBiopsy
2013
Genetic Differences in Native Americans and Tacrolimus Dosing After Kidney Transplantation
Chakkera HA, Chang Y, Bodner JK, Behmen S, Heilman RL, Reddy KS, Mulligan DC, Moss AA, Khamash H, Katariya N, Hewitt WR, Pitta TL, Frassetto LA. Genetic Differences in Native Americans and Tacrolimus Dosing After Kidney Transplantation. Transplantation Proceedings 2013, 45: 137-141. PMID: 23375287, DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.10.023.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Cohort StudiesFemaleGenetic VariationHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsIndians, North AmericanKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPharmacogeneticsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideTacrolimusTime FactorsConceptsKidney transplant recipientsTrough levelsTacrolimus dosingTransplant recipientsSingle nucleotide polymorphismsDaily tacrolimus doseLower tacrolimus dosesTacrolimus pharmacokinetic parametersTacrolimus trough levelsCaucasian kidney transplant recipientsStable dosesTacrolimus doseKidney transplantationTacrolimus dosesTacrolimus pharmacokineticsMonths posttransplantationOral clearanceTacrolimus clearanceDrug eliminationPharmacokinetic parametersVariant single nucleotide polymorphismsTacrolimusDrug metabolismPharmacokinetic studyLow dosage
2012
Laparoscopic bilateral native nephrectomies with simultaneous kidney transplantation
Martin AD, Mekeel KL, Castle EP, Vaish SS, Martin GL, Moss AA, Mulligan DC, Heilman RL, Reddy KS, Andrews PE. Laparoscopic bilateral native nephrectomies with simultaneous kidney transplantation. BJU International 2012, 110: e1003-e1007. PMID: 22882539, DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11379.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBilateral laparoscopic nephrectomyAutosomal dominant polycystic kidney diseaseSimultaneous kidney transplantationShorter total hospital stayBilateral native nephrectomyTotal hospital stayNative nephrectomyHospital stayKidney transplantationGraft functionRenal transplantPerioperative outcomesKidney transplantLaparoscopic approachSingle tertiary academic centerImmediate graft functionInvasive laparoscopic approachSimultaneous renal transplantMedian hospital stayTertiary academic centerTotal operative durationPolycystic kidney diseaseRenal transplantationComparable morbidityComplication rateUreteral stricture formation in laparoscopically procured living donor kidney transplantation.
Tyson MD, Castle EP, Andrews PE, Heilman RL, Moss AA, Mulligan DC, Reddy KS. Ureteral stricture formation in laparoscopically procured living donor kidney transplantation. Canadian Journal Of Urology 2012, 19: 6188-92. PMID: 22512964.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsUreteral stricture formationDelayed graft functionDonor kidney transplantationUreteral strictureGraft functionStricture formationUreteral stentsKidney transplantationStricture diseaseMultivariable logistic regression modelUreteral stricture diseaseLogistic regression modelsStricture groupRetrospective reviewProcedural interventionRisk factorsIntraoperative placementStrictureDonor databasePatientsIncidenceStentsTransplantationDiseaseRegression models
2011
Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy
Mekeel KL, Moss AA, Reddy KS, Mulligan DC, Harold KL. Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques 2011, 21: 362-365. PMID: 22002275, DOI: 10.1097/sle.0b013e31822e0ea8.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLaparoscopic distal pancreatectomyDistal pancreatectomyLaparoscopic pancreatectomySpleen-preserving groupSpleen-preserving pancreatectomyLess blood lossShorter operative timeConcomitant splenectomyInfectious complicationsSplenectomy groupSurgical complicationsBlood lossPancreatic leakSplenic preservationOperative timeRetrospective reviewHand assistanceSplenic vesselsPancreatectomyAnatomic concernsPatientsDelicate dissectionComplicationsSplenectomySpleenPretransplant Risk Score for New-Onset Diabetes After Kidney Transplantation
Chakkera HA, Weil EJ, Swanson CM, Dueck AC, Heilman RL, Reddy KS, Hamawi K, Khamash H, Moss AA, Mulligan DC, Katariya N, Knowler WC. Pretransplant Risk Score for New-Onset Diabetes After Kidney Transplantation. Diabetes Care 2011, 34: 2141-2145. PMID: 21949218, PMCID: PMC3177751, DOI: 10.2337/dc11-0752.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRisk of NODATNew-onset diabetesRisk scoreKidney transplantationPretransplant variablesSingle-center retrospective cohort studyUnivariate logistic regression analysisMultivariate logistic regression modelRetrospective cohort studySimple risk scoreLogistic regression analysisLogistic regression modelsRelevant cut pointsYear posttransplantCohort studySerum glucoseNODATSummary scoresIntervention studiesDiabetesMultivariate modelCut pointsSum of pointsScoresRegression analysis