2023
Assessment of the Impact of Alternative Fixatives on HER2 Detection in Breast Cancer and Gastric Cancer Tumor Specimens
Feng W, Inoue R, Kuwata T, Niikura N, Fujii S, Kumaki N, Honda K, Xu L, Goetz A, Gaule P, Cogswell J, Rimm D, McGee R. Assessment of the Impact of Alternative Fixatives on HER2 Detection in Breast Cancer and Gastric Cancer Tumor Specimens. Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology 2023, 31: 339-345. PMID: 37093713, PMCID: PMC10155692, DOI: 10.1097/pai.0000000000001126.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNeutral buffered formalinNegative percentage agreementPositive percentage agreementOverall percentage agreementBreast cancerPercentage agreementHER2 statusHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) statusEpidermal growth factor receptor 2 statusTumor samplesCell linesGastric cancer tumorsGastric cancer cell linesTumor tissue samplesClinical trial sitesCancer cell linesHER2 testingTumor specimensReal-world settingTumor tissueCancer tumorsBuffered formalinSitu hybridization assaysType of fixativeCentral laboratory
2016
Non-malignant respiratory epithelial cells preferentially proliferate from resected non-small cell lung cancer specimens cultured under conditionally reprogrammed conditions
Gao B, Huang C, Kernstine K, Pelekanou V, Kluger Y, Jiang T, Peters-Hall JR, Coquelin M, Girard L, Zhang W, Huffman K, Oliver D, Kinose F, Haura E, Teer JK, Rix U, Le AT, Aisner DL, Varella-Garcia M, Doebele RC, Covington KR, Hampton OA, Doddapaneni HV, Jayaseelan JC, Hu J, Wheeler DA, Shay JW, Rimm DL, Gazdar A, Minna JD. Non-malignant respiratory epithelial cells preferentially proliferate from resected non-small cell lung cancer specimens cultured under conditionally reprogrammed conditions. Oncotarget 2016, 5: 11114-11126. PMID: 28052041, PMCID: PMC5355251, DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14366.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsA549 CellsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBase SequenceCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCoculture TechniquesDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA Mutational AnalysisEpithelial CellsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMutationRespiratory MucosaTumor Cells, CulturedConceptsNon-small cell lung cancerRespiratory epithelial cellsNon-malignant lungCell lung cancerCRC culturesLung cancerEpithelial cellsResected non-small cell lung cancerPrimary lung cancerNon-malignant samplesLung epithelial cellsRho-kinase inhibitorNon-malignant cellsPrimary NSCLCPrimary tumorDiploid patternOriginal tumorTumor specimensTumor tissueTumorsKinase inhibitorsCancerCancer cellsMRNA expression profilesSmall subpopulation
2015
Loss of antigenicity with tissue age in breast cancer
Combs SE, Han G, Mani N, Beruti S, Nerenberg M, Rimm DL. Loss of antigenicity with tissue age in breast cancer. Laboratory Investigation 2015, 96: 264-269. PMID: 26568292, DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2015.138.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHuman epidermal growth receptor 2Estrogen receptorQuantitative immunofluorescenceProtein expressionSeries of formalinRandom-effects modelHuman breast carcinomaLarge cooperative groupsParaffin-embedded tissuesKi67 expressionBreast carcinomaBreast cancerIndividual patientsTissue microarrayClinical investigationClinical questionsReceptor 2Tumor specimensPositive casesLoss of antigenicityFFPE biospecimensQuantitative protein expressionBiomarkersCooperative groupsPreservation time
2003
JAKs and STATs as Biomarkers of Disease
Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm D. JAKs and STATs as Biomarkers of Disease. 2003, 697-720. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-3000-6_44.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchClinical practice todayPathways of tumorigenesisPrecise disease classificationPrognosticate outcomesClinical trialsDisease progressionDisease outcomeLarge cohortTumor specimensBiomarkers of diseaseSmall studyNew biomarkersPredictive valueBiomarker expressionHuman malignanciesPatient samplesLevel of expressionTherapeutic agentsTumor biomarkersTherapyProtein expressionBiomarkersPatientsOutcomesDisease
1998
Expression of c‐met is a strong independent prognostic factor in breast carcinoma
Ghoussoub R, Dillon D, D'Aquila T, Rimm E, Fearon E, Rimm D. Expression of c‐met is a strong independent prognostic factor in breast carcinoma. Cancer 1998, 82: 1513-1520. PMID: 9554529, DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980415)82:8<1513::aid-cncr13>3.0.co;2-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBreast carcinomaIndependent predictorsStrong independent prognostic factorCox proportional hazards modelGrowth factorIndependent prognostic factorLymph node statusSubset of patientsInvasive ductal carcinomaUseful prognostic markerProportional hazards modelBreast tumor specimensHepatocyte growth factorNegative patientsPrognostic factorsAggressive diseaseDuctal carcinomaNode statusPrognostic valuePrognostic markerTumor specimensHazards modelPatientsPredictive valueSurvival rate