2021
Phase I study of JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib with weekly paclitaxel for the treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
Lynce F, Williams JT, Regan MM, Bunnell CA, Freedman RA, Tolaney SM, Chen WY, Mayer EL, Partridge AH, Winer EP, Overmoyer B. Phase I study of JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib with weekly paclitaxel for the treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Chemotherapy And Pharmacology 2021, 87: 673-679. PMID: 33585999, DOI: 10.1007/s00280-021-04245-x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHER2-negative metastatic breast cancerMetastatic breast cancerBreast cancerWeekly paclitaxelAdvanced diseaseHormone receptor-positive diseaseTriple-negative breast cancerGrade 4/5 toxicitiesMost frequent toxicitiesPhase 2 doseWeekly paclitaxel 80Receptor-positive diseaseDose-escalation designJAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinibCombination of ruxolitinibBreast cancer cellsOral ruxolitinibPaclitaxel 80PurposePreclinical studiesChemotherapy regimensFrequent toxicitiesProtocol therapyMethodsEligible patientsThirteen patientsVisceral disease
2004
A comparative study of exemestane versus anastrozole in post-menopausal breast cancer subjects with visceral disease
Cameron D, Winer E, Campos S, Guastalla J. A comparative study of exemestane versus anastrozole in post-menopausal breast cancer subjects with visceral disease. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2004, 22: 628-628. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.22.14_suppl.628.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchA comparative study of exemestane versus anastrozole in post-menopausal breast cancer subjects with visceral disease
Cameron D, Winer E, Campos S, Guastalla J. A comparative study of exemestane versus anastrozole in post-menopausal breast cancer subjects with visceral disease. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2004, 22: 628-628. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.628.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1999
Safety and efficacy of using a single agent or a phase II agent before instituting standard combination chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic breast cancer patients: report of a randomized study--Cancer and Leukemia Group B 8642.
Costanza M, Weiss R, Henderson I, Norton L, Berry D, Cirrincione C, Winer E, Wood W, Frei III E, McIntyre O, Schilsky R. Safety and efficacy of using a single agent or a phase II agent before instituting standard combination chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic breast cancer patients: report of a randomized study--Cancer and Leukemia Group B 8642. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 1999, 17: 1397-406. PMID: 10334524, DOI: 10.1200/jco.1999.17.5.1397.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdenineAdultAgedAminoglycosidesAnalysis of VarianceAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCarboplatinCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinFemaleFluorouracilFollow-Up StudiesHumansImidesIsoquinolinesMelphalanMiddle AgedNaphthalimidesNeoplasm StagingOrganophosphonatesProspective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTrimetrexateConceptsPhase II agentMetastatic breast cancer patientsStandard combination chemotherapyMetastatic breast cancerBreast cancer patientsSingle agentResponse rateCombination chemotherapyCancer patientsBreast cancerUntreated metastatic breast cancer patientsMeasurable metastatic breast cancerRandomized phase III trialPhase III trialsDuration of responseSingle-agent drugsTreatment of patientsCumulative response rateSuggestion of benefitLow response rateImmediate chemotherapyIII trialsMetastatic diseaseVisceral diseaseRandomized study