2024
Optimization criteria for ordering myeloid neoplasm next‐generation sequencing
Gisriel S, Howe J, Tormey C, Torres R, Hager K, Rinder H, Siddon A. Optimization criteria for ordering myeloid neoplasm next‐generation sequencing. EJHaem 2024 DOI: 10.1002/jha2.1036.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNext-generation sequencingNext-generation sequencing testMyeloid neoplasmsDiagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemiaAltering treatment plansEnd-of-inductionFluorescence in situ hybridizationRecurrence post-transplantChronic myeloid leukemiaSuspicion of progressionPathogenic mutationsClinical suspicionMutation statusMN diagnosisMyeloid leukemiaPost-transplantRisk stratificationWorsening diseaseTreatment planningCancellation criteriaSuspicionDiagnosisSequenceCenters for MedicareB test
2023
Optimizing Donor Chimerism Threshold for Next-Generation Sequencing Monitoring of Measurable Residual Disease Post-Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloid Neoplasms
Puzo C, Tormey C, Rinder H, Siddon A. Optimizing Donor Chimerism Threshold for Next-Generation Sequencing Monitoring of Measurable Residual Disease Post-Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloid Neoplasms. Transplantation And Cellular Therapy 2023, 29: 459.e1-459.e4. PMID: 37062510, DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.04.005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAllogeneic stem cell transplantationStem cell transplantationDonor chimerismCell transplantationNGS testingPost allogeneic stem cell transplantationMeasurable residual diseaseNext-generation sequencingAcute myeloid leukemiaConditioning regimenRelated donorsMyelodysplastic syndromeResidual diseaseValidation cohortMyeloid leukemiaMyeloid neoplasmsNGS panelLogistic regressionPatientsChimerismSignificant predictorsCharacteristic curveTransplantationRegimenConservative threshold
2020
Criteria for Ordering Myeloid Neoplasm Next-Generation Sequencing to Optimize Personalized Patient Care and Cost
Gisriel S, Rinder H, Siddon A. Criteria for Ordering Myeloid Neoplasm Next-Generation Sequencing to Optimize Personalized Patient Care and Cost. Blood 2020, 136: 39-40. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2020-139035.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNext-generation sequencingNGS testingNGS testsAML/MDSEvidence-based indicationsPatients' emotional distressCancellation criteriaMedicaid Services reimbursementPersonalized patient careClinical suspicionPathologic diagnosisMedical recordsClinical indicationsClinical trialsChimerism statusUnnecessary testingMDS progressionPatient carePathogenic variantsMolecular findingsUnknown significancePatientsPathogenic mutationsService reimbursementMolecular diagnostic laboratories
2015
Impact of Molecular Clonality on Survival in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Schulz W, Durant T, Rinder H, Tormey C, Torres R, Smith B, Hager K, Howe J, Siddon A. Impact of Molecular Clonality on Survival in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Blood 2015, 126: 1385. DOI: 10.1182/blood.v126.23.1385.1385.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDe novo acute myeloid leukemiaNovo acute myeloid leukemiaAcute myeloid leukemiaMolecular clonalityAML patientsTumor heterogeneityMyeloid leukemiaNext-generation sequencingNormal-risk subjectsAdverse prognostic indicatorTime of diagnosisFurther prospective studiesLong-term outcomesFLT3-ITD mutationHigh-risk groupChoice of therapyFirst prospective evidenceLimited clinical utilityHigh-risk classificationEarly survivalStudy patientsOverall survivalPatient agePatient subsetsInitial diagnosis