2021
A Clinical Decision Aid to Support Personalized Treatment Selection for Patients with Clinical T1 Renal Masses: Results from a Multi-institutional Competing-risks Analysis
Psutka SP, Gulati R, Jewett MAS, Fadaak K, Finelli A, Legere L, Morgan TM, Pierorazio PM, Allaf ME, Herrin J, Lohse CM, Thompson R, Boorjian SA, Atwell TD, Schmit GD, Costello BA, Shah ND, Leibovich BC. A Clinical Decision Aid to Support Personalized Treatment Selection for Patients with Clinical T1 Renal Masses: Results from a Multi-institutional Competing-risks Analysis. European Urology 2021, 81: 576-585. PMID: 34862099, PMCID: PMC10351331, DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.11.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultCarcinoma, Renal CellDecision Support TechniquesHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleNephrectomyPrecision MedicineRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeConceptsCancer-specific mortalityRenal cortical massesRadical nephrectomyPartial nephrectomyActive surveillancePersonalized treatment selectionClavien gradeRisk calculatorThermal ablationTreatment selectionEastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statusClinical T1 renal massesSurgeon/hospital volumeHigh-volume referral centerInitial radical nephrectomyCharlson Comorbidity IndexCompeting-risks regressionConsecutive adult patientsGlomerular filtration rateClavien grade 3Risk of deathBody mass indexT1 renal massesRisk of mortalityClinical decision aid
2019
What is the effect of a decision aid in potentially vulnerable parents? Insights from the head CT choice randomized trial
Skains RM, Kuppermann N, Homme JL, Kharbanda AB, Tzimenatos L, Louie JP, Cohen DM, Nigrovic LE, Westphal JJ, Shah ND, Inselman J, Ferrara MJ, Herrin J, Montori VM, Hess EP. What is the effect of a decision aid in potentially vulnerable parents? Insights from the head CT choice randomized trial. Health Expectations 2019, 23: 63-74. PMID: 31758633, PMCID: PMC6978876, DOI: 10.1111/hex.12965.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLow health literacyPhysician trustNon-white parentsHealth literacyDecisional conflictImportant traumatic brain injuryTraumatic brain injuryDecision aidLess decisional conflictDisadvantaged parentsGreater increaseUsual careIntermediate riskVulnerable parentsBrain injuryHigher numeracySecondary analysisSubgroup effectsArm assignmentPatient dyadsSocioeconomic statusTrialsRegression modelsParent characteristicsParents
2018
Effect of the Head Computed Tomography Choice Decision Aid in Parents of Children With Minor Head Trauma
Hess EP, Homme JL, Kharbanda AB, Tzimenatos L, Louie JP, Cohen DM, Nigrovic LE, Westphal JJ, Shah ND, Inselman J, Ferrara MJ, Herrin J, Montori VM, Kuppermann N. Effect of the Head Computed Tomography Choice Decision Aid in Parents of Children With Minor Head Trauma. JAMA Network Open 2018, 1: e182430. PMID: 30646167, PMCID: PMC6324506, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2430.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCraniocerebral TraumaDecision Support TechniquesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningParentingParentsTomography, X-Ray ComputedConceptsMinor head traumaIntermediate riskHead traumaParents of childrenComputed tomographyDecisional conflictUsual careEmergency departmentImportant traumatic brain injuryCT ratesDecision aid armPatients' mean ageUsual care armUS emergency departmentsHealth care utilizationAvailable diagnostic optionsTraumatic brain injuryDecision aidChildren ages 2Care armSecondary outcomesPrimary outcomeCare utilizationNonwhite raceEligible participants
2017
Impact of a Shared Decision Making Intervention on Health Care Utilization: A Secondary Analysis of the Chest Pain Choice Multicenter Randomized Trial
Schaffer JT, Hess EP, Hollander JE, Kline JA, Torres CA, Diercks DB, Jones R, Owen KP, Meisel ZF, Demers M, Leblanc A, Inselman J, Herrin J, Montori VM, Shah ND. Impact of a Shared Decision Making Intervention on Health Care Utilization: A Secondary Analysis of the Chest Pain Choice Multicenter Randomized Trial. Academic Emergency Medicine 2017, 25: 293-300. PMID: 29218817, DOI: 10.1111/acem.13355.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedChest PainDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRisk AssessmentConceptsHealth care utilizationLength of stayCare utilizationObservation unit admissionUnit admissionChest painED visitsIntervention armStudy armsIndex emergency department visitLow-risk chest painOverall health care utilizationSecondary analysisBilling dataIndex ED visitAcute coronary syndromeEmergency department visitsCardiac imaging testsCardiac stress testingPlanned secondary analysisHealth care systemInitial EDPragmatic multicenterCardiac testingCoronary syndromeEffectiveness of a Decision Aid in Potentially Vulnerable Patients: A Secondary Analysis of the Chest Pain Choice Multicenter Randomized Trial
Rising K, Hollander J, Schaffer J, Kline J, Torres C, Diercks D, Jones R, Owen K, Meisel Z, Demers M, Leblanc A, Shah N, Inselman J, Herrin J, Montori V, Hess E. Effectiveness of a Decision Aid in Potentially Vulnerable Patients: A Secondary Analysis of the Chest Pain Choice Multicenter Randomized Trial. Medical Decision Making 2017, 38: 69-78. PMID: 28525723, DOI: 10.1177/0272989x17706363.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsUsual careHealth literacySecondary analysisAcute coronary syndromeDecision aidOne-thirdChest painCoronary syndromePatient characteristicsSDM interventionsIntervention groupVulnerable patientsHigh school educationPatientsControl groupPhysician trustPatient trustSubgroup effectsArm assignmentVulnerable subgroupsSociodemographic groupsMulticenterTrialsSimilar extentPhysicians
2016
Shared decision making in patients with low risk chest pain: prospective randomized pragmatic trial
Hess EP, Hollander JE, Schaffer JT, Kline JA, Torres CA, Diercks DB, Jones R, Owen KP, Meisel ZF, Demers M, Leblanc A, Shah ND, Inselman J, Herrin J, Castaneda-Guarderas A, Montori VM. Shared decision making in patients with low risk chest pain: prospective randomized pragmatic trial. The BMJ 2016, 355: i6165. PMID: 27919865, PMCID: PMC5152707, DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i6165.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAcute Coronary SyndromeAdultAftercareAmbulatory CareAttitude of Health PersonnelChest PainChoice BehaviorConflict, PsychologicalDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHospital UnitsHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionObservationPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionRisk AssessmentTrustConceptsAcute coronary syndromeMajor adverse cardiac eventsAdverse cardiac eventsCardiac testingCoronary syndromeChest painUsual careCardiac eventsPatient knowledgeLow-risk chest painPossible acute coronary syndromeDecision aid armFurther cardiac testingRandomized pragmatic trialRisk chest painUsual care armObservation unitProportion of patientsRate of admissionCare armSecondary outcomesPrimary outcomePrimary complaintTRIAL REGISTRATIONEmergency cliniciansDevelopment and validation of a simple risk score to predict 30‐day readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort of medicare patients
Minges KE, Herrin J, Fiorilli PN, Curtis JP. Development and validation of a simple risk score to predict 30‐day readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort of medicare patients. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2016, 89: 955-963. PMID: 27515069, PMCID: PMC5397364, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26701.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMedicareMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioPatient ReadmissionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsRegistriesReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsRisk of readmissionPCI patientsRisk scoreMultivariable logistic regression modelRisk score developmentDays of dischargeSimple risk scoreTime of dischargeModel c-statisticLogistic regression modelsStepwise selection modelCathPCI RegistryHospital dischargeReadmission ratesClinical factorsRevascularization proceduresValidation cohortC-statisticReadmissionHigh riskMedicare feeLower riskService claimsPatientsCohort
2015
Shared Decision Making for Antidepressants in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Trial
LeBlanc A, Herrin J, Williams MD, Inselman JW, Branda ME, Shah ND, Heim EM, Dick SR, Linzer M, Boehm DH, Dall-Winther KM, Matthews MR, Yost KJ, Shepel KK, Montori VM. Shared Decision Making for Antidepressants in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Trial. JAMA Internal Medicine 2015, 175: 1761-1770. PMID: 26414670, PMCID: PMC4754973, DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5214.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAntidepressive AgentsChoice BehaviorCluster AnalysisComparative Effectiveness ResearchDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedMinnesotaOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient ParticipationPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CarePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesWisconsinConceptsPrimary care practicesDecisional comfortMedication adherenceUsual careDepression outcomesPrimary careSevere depressionCare practicesComparative effectivenessUrban primary care practicesEncounter decision aidsTrials of adultsPrimary care cliniciansPatient Health QuestionnaireTreatment of depressionPatient-centered careQuality of careTranslation of evidenceCluster Randomized TrialDecision aidEffects of DMCUse of DMCAvailable antidepressantsCare cliniciansMedication choice
2014
Effectiveness of the head CT choice decision aid in parents of children with minor head trauma: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial
Hess EP, Wyatt KD, Kharbanda AB, Louie JP, Dayan PS, Tzimenatos L, Wootton-Gorges SL, Homme JL, RN L, LeBlanc A, Westphal JJ, Shepel K, Shah ND, Branda M, Herrin J, Montori VM, Kuppermann N. Effectiveness of the head CT choice decision aid in parents of children with minor head trauma: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial. Trials 2014, 15: 253. PMID: 24965659, PMCID: PMC4081461, DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-253.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTraumatic brain injuryDiverse emergency departmentsMinor head traumaCranial CT scanHead traumaEmergency departmentCT scanUsual careHealthcare utilizationParents of childrenImportant traumatic brain injuryMethods/designThisProportion of patientsBlunt head traumaHospital billing recordsPatient-centered outcomesClinical prediction ruleAvailable diagnostic optionsHead CT scanDecision aidElectronic medical recordsClinician surveyMulticenter trialMedical recordsRisk factorsEffectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial
Anderson RT, Montori VM, Shah ND, Ting HH, Pencille LJ, Demers M, Kline JA, Diercks DB, Hollander JE, Torres CA, Schaffer JT, Herrin J, Branda M, Leblanc A, Hess EP. Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial. Trials 2014, 15: 166. PMID: 24884807, PMCID: PMC4031497, DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-166.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAcute Coronary SyndromeAngina, UnstableCardiology Service, HospitalClinical ProtocolsCommunicationConflict, PsychologicalDecision Support TechniquesEmergency Service, HospitalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth ResourcesHumansMyocardial InfarctionPatient Education as TopicPhysician-Patient RelationsPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisResearch DesignRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsUnited StatesVideo RecordingConceptsAdvanced cardiac testingAcute coronary syndromeDiverse emergency departmentsEmergency departmentCardiac testingHealthcare utilizationLow-risk chest pain patientsLow-risk chest painMajor adverse cardiac eventsMethods/designThisAdverse cardiac eventsLow-risk patientsProportion of patientsChest pain patientsCommon reason patientsEmergency department patientsPatient-clinician discussionsHospital billing recordsPatient-centered outcomesElectronic medical recordsAvailable management optionsDecision aidChest painCoronary syndromeUsual care
2013
Translating comparative effectiveness of depression medications into practice by comparing the depression medication choice decision aid to usual care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
LeBlanc A, Bodde AE, Branda ME, Yost KJ, Herrin J, Williams MD, Shah ND, Houten HV, Ruud KL, Pencille LJ, Montori VM. Translating comparative effectiveness of depression medications into practice by comparing the depression medication choice decision aid to usual care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013, 14: 127. PMID: 23782672, PMCID: PMC3663744, DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-127.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAntidepressive AgentsClinical ProtocolsComparative Effectiveness ResearchDecision Support TechniquesDepressionHumansMedication AdherenceMental HealthMidwestern United StatesPatient SelectionPatient-Centered CarePrimary Health CareResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsUsual depression carePrimary care practicesDepression careInner-city primary care practiceCare practicesPractice-based trialPrimary care encountersTerms of efficacyDecision aidPatient-centered approachDesignThe objectiveAntidepressant therapyUsual careMedication choiceDepression medicationsDepression treatmentMedication adherencePatient knowledgeStudy protocolSevere depressionCare encountersImproved adherencePatient representativesPatient involvementPatients