2023
Phase 2 study of preoperative chemotherapy with nab‐paclitaxel and gemcitabine followed by chemoradiation for borderline resectable or node‐positive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Chen E, Kardosh A, Nabavizadeh N, Foster B, Mayo S, Billingsley K, Gilbert E, Lanciault C, Grossberg A, Bensch K, Maynard E, Anderson E, Sheppard B, Thomas C, Lopez C, Vaccaro G, Group O. Phase 2 study of preoperative chemotherapy with nab‐paclitaxel and gemcitabine followed by chemoradiation for borderline resectable or node‐positive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Medicine 2023, 12: 12986-12995. PMID: 37132281, PMCID: PMC10315770, DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5971.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdenocarcinomaAlbuminsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalGemcitabineHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeutropeniaPaclitaxelPancreatic NeoplasmsProspective StudiesConceptsNab-paclitaxelNeoadjuvant treatmentDefinitive resectionResection rateAdverse eventsPancreatic adenocarcinomaOpen-label phase 2 trialNode-positive pancreatic cancerLong-course chemoradiationNab-paclitaxel 125Neoadjuvant treatment strategiesOperable pancreatic adenocarcinomaRadiographic response rateCommon adverse eventsR0 resection ratePhase 2 studyPhase 2 trialProgression-free survivalProspective interventional trialNegative surgical marginsTreatment completion ratesPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaIntensity-modulated radiationGemcitabine 1000Positive nodes
2018
Cell fusion potentiates tumor heterogeneity and reveals circulating hybrid cells that correlate with stage and survival
Gast CE, Silk AD, Zarour L, Riegler L, Burkhart JG, Gustafson KT, Parappilly MS, Roh-Johnson M, Goodman JR, Olson B, Schmidt M, Swain JR, Davies PS, Shasthri V, Iizuka S, Flynn P, Watson S, Korkola J, Courtneidge SA, Fischer JM, Jaboin J, Billingsley KG, Lopez CD, Burchard J, Gray J, Coussens LM, Sheppard BC, Wong MH. Cell fusion potentiates tumor heterogeneity and reveals circulating hybrid cells that correlate with stage and survival. Science Advances 2018, 4: eaat7828. PMID: 30214939, PMCID: PMC6135550, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aat7828.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell FusionCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalEpithelial CellsFemaleGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansHybrid CellsKaryotypingMacrophagesMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPancreatic NeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysConceptsNeoplastic cellsNumerous neoplastic cellsHuman cancer patientsUrgent medical needPotential therapeutic targetTumor-bearing miceLate-stage progressionHigh lethality rateFuels tumor progressionIdentification of biomarkersOverall survivalDisease stagePeripheral bloodCancer patientsTumor stagingMetastatic spreadNovel biomarkersTherapeutic targetBiologic mechanismsSolid tumorsMedical needMetastatic behaviorTumor progressionCancer highlightLethality rate
2011
Predicting malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: a single-center review
Cone M, Rea J, Diggs B, Douthit M, Billingsley K, Sheppard B. Predicting malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: a single-center review. The American Journal Of Surgery 2011, 201: 575-579. PMID: 21545902, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.01.003.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdenocarcinoma, MucinousAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCarcinoma, PapillaryDiagnosis, DifferentialEndosonographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTime FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedUnited StatesConceptsIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmInternational consensus guidelinesMalignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmPapillary mucinous neoplasmConsensus guidelinesMucinous neoplasmsInvasive cancerMain duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmPancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmsPercent of patientsSingle-center reviewHigh-grade dysplasiaMayo criteriaWorse survivalPatient groupFemale sexSingle institutionMayo ClinicLower riskPatientsMultivariate analysisCancerResectionMain ductNeoplasms
2010
Endoscopic ultrasound may be unnecessary in the preoperative evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm
Cone M, Rea J, Diggs B, Billingsley K, Sheppard B. Endoscopic ultrasound may be unnecessary in the preoperative evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. Hepato Pancreato Biliary 2010, 13: 112-116. PMID: 21241428, PMCID: PMC3044345, DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00254.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedBiopsy, Fine-NeedleCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCarcinoma, PapillaryChi-Square DistributionEndosonographyFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleNeoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and SerousOdds RatioOregonPancreatic NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsPreoperative CareRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedUnnecessary ProceduresConceptsIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmHigh-grade dysplasiaFine needle aspiratesPapillary mucinous neoplasmEndoscopic ultrasoundComputed tomographyCT scanMucinous neoplasmsCarcinoembryonic antigenPancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmsDuct diameterLesion diameterPancreatic duct diameterPreoperative computed tomographyHigh-resolution CT scanningPreoperative evaluationInvasive cancerMedical recordsRadiographic criteriaStudy groupPatientsLesion sizeNeedle aspiratesMultivariate analysisCT scanning