2020
Cost-Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant-Adjuvant Treatment Strategies for Women With ERBB2 (HER2)–Positive Breast Cancer
Kunst N, Wang SY, Hood A, Mougalian SS, DiGiovanna MP, Adelson K, Pusztai L. Cost-Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant-Adjuvant Treatment Strategies for Women With ERBB2 (HER2)–Positive Breast Cancer. JAMA Network Open 2020, 3: e2027074. PMID: 33226431, PMCID: PMC7684449, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27074.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdo-Trastuzumab EmtansineAdultAgedAnthracyclinesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCost-Benefit AnalysisCross-Linking ReagentsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPaclitaxelQuality-Adjusted Life YearsReceptor, ErbB-2TrastuzumabTubulin ModulatorsUnited StatesConceptsErbB2-positive breast cancerAdjuvant treatment strategiesAdjuvant T-DM1Pathologic complete responseT-DM1Treatment strategiesBreast cancerKATHERINE trialResidual diseaseNeoadjuvant regimenHigher health benefitsHealth care payer perspectiveAdjuvant trastuzumab emtansineAnthracycline/cyclophosphamideDifferent adjuvant therapiesFlatiron Health databaseIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioNeoadjuvant treatment optionsHealth benefitsPositive breast cancerCare payer perspectiveCost-effectiveness ratioBase-case analysisDecision analytic modelH. Patients
2019
Examining the cost-effectiveness of baseline left ventricular function assessment among breast cancer patients undergoing anthracycline-based therapy
Abu-Khalaf MM, Safonov A, Stratton J, Wang S, Hatzis C, Park E, Pusztai L, Gross CP, Russell R. Examining the cost-effectiveness of baseline left ventricular function assessment among breast cancer patients undergoing anthracycline-based therapy. Breast Cancer Research And Treatment 2019, 176: 261-270. PMID: 31020471, DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05178-z.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioEquilibrium radionuclide angiographyCardiac risk factorsBreast cancer patientsVentricular function assessmentRisk factorsAbnormal LVEFBaseline LVEFCancer patientsBreast cancerFunction assessmentPotential cardiac risk factorsSelf-reported risk factorsAnthracycline-based therapyLeft ventricular function assessmentCoronary artery diseaseCost-effectiveness ratioArtery diseaseTrastuzumab therapyCardiac screeningPatient populationRadionuclide angiographyCardiotoxicity riskPayer perspectiveRetrospective analysis
2016
Assessing cost-utility of predictive biomarkers in oncology: a streamlined approach
Safonov A, Wang S, Gross CP, Agarwal D, Bianchini G, Pusztai L, Hatzis C. Assessing cost-utility of predictive biomarkers in oncology: a streamlined approach. Breast Cancer Research And Treatment 2016, 155: 223-234. PMID: 26749360, PMCID: PMC5990969, DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3677-3.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsQuality-adjusted life yearsCost-effectiveness analysisPredictive biomarkersBiomarker-guided treatmentIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioHealth-related qualityTreatment costsCost-effectiveness ratioClinical outcomesClinical efficacyPrognostic biomarkerTraditional cost-effectiveness analysisBiomarker useLife yearsBiomarker valuesBiomarker prevalenceClinical literatureBiomarkersTreatmentState transition modelDecision analytic approachMedical utilityDecision analytic toolsCrizotinibHER2
2015
A framework to assess the cost effectiveness of predictive biomarkers in oncology: Test Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (TICER).
Safonov A, Shi W, Platt J, Aktas B, Kurita T, Pusztai L, Hatzis C. A framework to assess the cost effectiveness of predictive biomarkers in oncology: Test Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (TICER). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2015, 33: 6621-6621. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.6621.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioCost-effectiveness ratioPredictive biomarkersEffectiveness ratioCost effectiveness