2019
Validation of the DNA Damage Immune Response Signature in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer From the SWOG 9313c Trial.
Sharma P, Barlow WE, Godwin AK, Parkes EE, Knight LA, Walker SM, Kennedy RD, Harkin DP, Logan GE, Steele CJ, Lambe SM, Badve S, Gökmen-Polar Y, Pathak HB, Isakova K, Linden HM, Porter P, Pusztai L, Thompson AM, Tripathy D, Hortobagyi GN, Hayes DF. Validation of the DNA Damage Immune Response Signature in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer From the SWOG 9313c Trial. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2019, 37: 3484-3492. PMID: 31657982, PMCID: PMC7194448, DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00693.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytesTriple-negative breast cancerDisease-free survivalOverall survivalImmune response signaturesBreast cancerEarly-stage triple-negative breast cancerThree-year disease-free survivalParaffin-embedded tumor tissueThird of patientsTumor-infiltrating lymphocytesSubgroup of patientsCox regression modelResponse signatureAdjuvant ACAdjuvant doxorubicinSTIL densityT2N0 diseaseAC chemotherapyNodal statusPrognostic roleImproved prognosisPrognostic valueTumor sizePrognostic marker
2014
TP53 mutation‐correlated genes predict the risk of tumor relapse and identify MPS1 as a potential therapeutic kinase in TP53‐mutated breast cancers
Győrffy B, Bottai G, Lehmann-Che J, Kéri G, Őrfi L, Iwamoto T, Desmedt C, Bianchini G, Turner NC, de Thè H, André F, Sotiriou C, Hortobagyi GN, Di Leo A, Pusztai L, Santarpia L. TP53 mutation‐correlated genes predict the risk of tumor relapse and identify MPS1 as a potential therapeutic kinase in TP53‐mutated breast cancers. Molecular Oncology 2014, 8: 508-519. PMID: 24462521, PMCID: PMC5528634, DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2013.12.018.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBreast cancerTP53 mutation statusPrognostic valueBC cellsMutation statusER-negative breast cancerDifferent BC cell linesFuture clinical trialsSignificant prognostic markerPotential therapeutic targetBC cell linesType of treatmentNeoadjuvant chemotherapyBC patientsClinical behaviorPrognostic markerClinical trialsConventional chemotherapyEstrogen receptorPotent small molecule inhibitorsTumor relapseSmall molecule inhibitorsTherapeutic targetClinical relevanceTP53 status
2012
DNA repair metagene signature as a prognostic and predictive factor in molecular breast cancer subtypes.
Santarpia L, Iwamoto T, Di Leo A, Hayashi N, Stampfer M, Guarducci C, Symmans W, Hortobagyi G, Pusztai L, Giampaolo B. DNA repair metagene signature as a prognostic and predictive factor in molecular breast cancer subtypes. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2012, 30: 1012-1012. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.1012.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPathological complete responseHigher pathological complete responseBreast cancer molecular subtypesTaxane-based regimensTaxane-containing regimensCisplatin-containing regimensMolecular breast cancer subtypesTaxane-based chemotherapyPotential predictive markerBreast cancer subtypesCancer molecular subtypesBC cell linesFalse discovery correctionDistant relapseComplete responseBetter prognosisPoor prognosisPredictive factorsPrognostic valueBC subtypesER-/HER2Predictive markerN patientsPrognostic markerMolecular subtypesCentromere protein-A, an essential centromere protein, is a prognostic marker for relapse in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
McGovern SL, Qi Y, Pusztai L, Symmans WF, Buchholz TA. Centromere protein-A, an essential centromere protein, is a prognostic marker for relapse in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research 2012, 14: r72. PMID: 22559056, PMCID: PMC3446334, DOI: 10.1186/bcr3181.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAutoantigensBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCentromere Protein ACentromere Protein BChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKi-67 AntigenMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReceptors, EstrogenRNA, MessengerTamoxifenConceptsER-positive diseaseDistant relapse-free survivalSystemic therapyER-negative tumorsIndependent prognostic markerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPrognostic markerBreast cancerChemotherapy responseKi-67Estrogen receptor-positive breast cancerReceptor-positive breast cancerER-positive breast cancerSignificant independent prognostic markerER-positive tumorsRelapse-free survivalBreast cancer patientsHigh-grade cancerSignificant independent predictorsKi-67 expressionFree survivalHazard ratioIndependent predictorsPrognostic factorsNegative tumors
2011
First generation prognostic gene signatures for breast cancer predict both survival and chemotherapy sensitivity and identify overlapping patient populations
Iwamoto T, Lee JS, Bianchini G, Hubbard RE, Young E, Matsuoka J, Kim SB, Symmans WF, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L. First generation prognostic gene signatures for breast cancer predict both survival and chemotherapy sensitivity and identify overlapping patient populations. Breast Cancer Research And Treatment 2011, 130: 155. PMID: 21833625, DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1706-9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLong-term survivalPrognostic gene signatureClinical variablesChemotherapy responseGenomic prognostic markersPrognostic markerPredictive valueKaplan-Meir survival curvesSignificant independent predictive valuePathologic complete responseProgression-free survivalLong-term followIndependent predictive valueSame patient cohortReceiver operator characteristic curveOperator characteristic curveOverall survivalPreoperative chemotherapyComplete responseNodal statusIndependent prognosticClinicopathological variablesPatient populationHER2 statusPatient cohortDistinct p53 Gene Signatures Are Needed to Predict Prognosis and Response to Chemotherapy in ER-Positive and ER-Negative Breast Cancers
Coutant C, Rouzier R, Qi Y, Lehmann-Che J, Bianchini G, Iwamoto T, Hortobagyi GN, Symmans WF, Uzan S, Andre F, de Thé H, Pusztai L. Distinct p53 Gene Signatures Are Needed to Predict Prognosis and Response to Chemotherapy in ER-Positive and ER-Negative Breast Cancers. Clinical Cancer Research 2011, 17: 2591-2601. PMID: 21248301, DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-1045.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsER- cancersPredictive valueBreast cancerP53 signatureWorse distant metastasis-free survivalDistant metastasis-free survivalER-negative breast cancerAdjuvant tamoxifen therapyDifferent molecular subsetsMetastasis-free survivalDifferent prognostic valueNegative breast cancerHigher chemotherapy sensitivityTamoxifen therapyFree survivalBetter prognosisER-positivePoor prognosisPrognostic valuePrognostic markerMolecular subsetsChemotherapy sensitivityMutation statusP53 mutationsMultivariate analysisA clinically relevant gene signature in triple negative and basal-like breast cancer
Rody A, Karn T, Liedtke C, Pusztai L, Ruckhaeberle E, Hanker L, Gaetje R, Solbach C, Ahr A, Metzler D, Schmidt M, Müller V, Holtrich U, Kaufmann M. A clinically relevant gene signature in triple negative and basal-like breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research 2011, 13: r97. PMID: 21978456, PMCID: PMC3262210, DOI: 10.1186/bcr3035.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTriple-negative breast cancerBasal-like triple-negative breast cancerBreast cancerPrognostic markerMolecular subtypesMultivariate analysisBasal-like molecular subtypeClaudin-low molecular subtypeBasal-like breast cancerAttractive novel therapeutic targetB cell presenceHigh expressionER-positive cancersHigh histological gradeHigher B cellsIL-8 pathwayIL-8 activityNegative breast cancerNew prognostic markerNovel therapeutic targetBiology-based therapiesNon-neoplastic cell populationsRelevant gene signaturesRoutine clinicopathological variablesResultsSeventy-three percent