2016
Testing Violations of the Exponential Assumption in Cancer Clinical Trials with Survival Endpoints
Han G, Schell MJ, Zhang H, Zelterman D, Pusztai L, Adelson K, Hatzis C. Testing Violations of the Exponential Assumption in Cancer Clinical Trials with Survival Endpoints. Biometrics 2016, 73: 687-695. PMID: 27669414, PMCID: PMC6093291, DOI: 10.1111/biom.12590.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2011
Homogeneous Datasets of Triple Negative Breast Cancers Enable the Identification of Novel Prognostic and Predictive Signatures
Karn T, Pusztai L, Holtrich U, Iwamoto T, Shiang CY, Schmidt M, Müller V, Solbach C, Gaetje R, Hanker L, Ahr A, Liedtke C, Ruckhäberle E, Kaufmann M, Rody A. Homogeneous Datasets of Triple Negative Breast Cancers Enable the Identification of Novel Prognostic and Predictive Signatures. PLOS ONE 2011, 6: e28403. PMID: 22220191, PMCID: PMC3248403, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028403.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesDatabases, GeneticFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, NeoplasmHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateNeoadjuvant TherapyPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReceptor, ErbB-2Receptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneReproducibility of ResultsConceptsPrognostic signatureValidation cohortBreast cancerPredictive valueTriple-negative breast cancerEvent-free survivalTriple-negative cancersHigh-risk groupIndependent validation cohortNegative breast cancerModest predictive valuePrognostic gene signaturePrognostic gene setsTNBC cohortNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPrognostic predictorPoor prognosisRisk groupsMultivariate analysisPredictive signatureNovel prognosticGene signatureSmall sample sizeCohortCancer