2024
Association Between the Decipher Genomic Classifier and Prostate Cancer Outcome in the Real-world Setting
Leapman M, Ho J, Liu Y, Filson C, Zhao X, Hakansson A, Proudfoot J, Davicioni E, Martin D, An Y, Seibert T, Lin D, Spratt D, Cooperberg M, Sprenkle P, Ross A. Association Between the Decipher Genomic Classifier and Prostate Cancer Outcome in the Real-world Setting. European Urology Oncology 2024 PMID: 39098389, DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.07.010.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDecipher genomic classifierRisk of metastasisBiochemical recurrenceRadical prostatectomyGenomic classifierDecipher testProstate cancerProstate Risk Assessment Postsurgical ScoreRisk of biochemical recurrencePatient's prostate cancerRisk of cancer recurrencePathological risk factorsProstate cancer outcomesCox proportional hazards regressionRetrospective cohort studyElectronic health record dataReal-world settingsProportional hazards regressionHealth record dataReal-world practice settingsProstate biopsyRP specimensOncological outcomesPrognostic significanceMedian ageRisk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy
Smani S, Sundaresan V, Lokeshwar S, Choksi A, Carbonella J, Brito J, Renzulli J, Sprenkle P, Leapman M. Risk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy. Exploration Of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy 2024, 5: 981-996. DOI: 10.37349/etat.2024.00259.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGleason score upgradingProstate-specific antigenRisk factorsMagnetic resonance imagingRadical prostatectomyScore upgradingAssociated with Gleason score upgradingBiopsy to radical prostatectomyHigher-risk prostate cancerPatients treated with surgeryProstate magnetic resonance imagingClinically localized diseaseGleason grade groupLow-risk diseaseRecognition of risk factorsBody mass indexGleason upgradingFinal pathologyProstate volumeProstate biopsySource of diagnostic uncertaintyBiopsy coresLocalized diseaseProstate cancerInitial managementRisk Factors and Contemporary Management Options for Pain and Discomfort Experienced During a Prostate Biopsy
Diaz G, Webb L, Rabil M, Lokeshwar S, Choksi A, Leapman M, Sprenkle P. Risk Factors and Contemporary Management Options for Pain and Discomfort Experienced During a Prostate Biopsy. Current Urology Reports 2024, 25: 243-252. PMID: 38896314, DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01220-w.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate biopsyRisk factorsEffective pain management strategiesDiagnosed prostate cancerPain management strategiesIn-office proceduresModern management optionsNonadherence to treatmentContemporary management optionsEnhance patient comfortInnovative imaging modalitiesExperience of painFusion biopsyProstate volumePain intensityProstate cancerPain varyPatient ageIncreased painFollow-upIn-officeManagement optionsSurveillance adherenceBiopsyPharmacological analgesics‘It Just Makes Sense to Me’: A qualitative study exploring patient decision‐making and experiences with prostate MRI during active surveillance for prostate cancer
Sutherland R, Gross C, Ma X, Jeong F, Seibert T, Cooperberg M, Catalona W, Ellis S, Loeb S, Schulman‐Green D, Leapman M. ‘It Just Makes Sense to Me’: A qualitative study exploring patient decision‐making and experiences with prostate MRI during active surveillance for prostate cancer. BJUI Compass 2024, 5: 593-601. PMID: 38873351, PMCID: PMC11168777, DOI: 10.1002/bco2.351.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate magnetic resonance imagingMagnetic resonance imagingProstate cancerActive surveillanceActive surveillance of prostate cancerGleason Grade Group 1Surveillance of prostate cancerIntermediate-risk prostate cancerMonitoring of prostate cancerMRI-ultrasound fusion biopsyGrade group 1Monitoring prostate cancerGroup 2 tumorsMagnetic resonance imaging scansFusion biopsyLongitudinal follow-upProstate biopsyFollow-upProstateSemi-structured interviews of patientsMRI useQualitative studyGroup 1Interviews of patientsPatientsRISKS OF GRADE RECLASSIFICATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH GLEASON GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER AND PI-RADS 5 FINDINGS ON PROSTATE MRI
Sundaresan V, Webb L, Rabil M, Golos A, Sutherland R, Sprenkle P, Kim I, Leapman M. RISKS OF GRADE RECLASSIFICATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH GLEASON GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER AND PI-RADS 5 FINDINGS ON PROSTATE MRI. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2024, 42: s79. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.222.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGleason Grade Group 1PI-RADS 5 lesionsPI-RADSProstate biopsyProstate cancerGleason upgradingRadical prostatectomyActive surveillanceProstate MRIMultivariate logistic regressionGrade Group 1 prostate cancerConversion to active treatmentOptimal management of patientsGrade group 1PI-RADS 5Gleason grade groupProstate Imaging ReportingDied of diseaseManagement of patientsLogistic regressionPrimary study outcomeAssociated with oddsMedian PSAMetastatic diseaseGrade disease
2023
Prostate cancer risk stratification using magnetic resonance imaging–ultrasound fusion vs systematic prostate biopsy
Khajir G, Press B, Lokeshwar S, Ghabili K, Rahman S, Gardezi M, Washington S, Cooperberg M, Sprenkle P, Leapman M. Prostate cancer risk stratification using magnetic resonance imaging–ultrasound fusion vs systematic prostate biopsy. JNCI Cancer Spectrum 2023, 7: pkad099. PMID: 38085220, PMCID: PMC10733209, DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad099.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMagnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusionMRF-TBLow-risk diseaseSystematic biopsyLower riskRisk groupingProstate biopsyActive surveillanceHigh riskProstate cancer risk stratificationIntermediate-risk criteriaIntermediate-risk diseaseSystematic prostate biopsyCancer risk stratificationPrimary study objectiveNCCN guidelinesImage-guided approachLocalized cancerRisk stratificationBenign findingsProstate cancerClinical riskDiagnostic yieldRetrospective analysisBiopsy“It just makes sense to me”: Patient experiences with prostate MRI during prostate cancer active surveillance.
Sutherland R, Gross C, Ma X, Jeong F, Seibert T, Cooperberg M, Catalona W, Loeb S, Schulman-Green D, Leapman M. “It just makes sense to me”: Patient experiences with prostate MRI during prostate cancer active surveillance. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2023, 41: 334-334. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.334.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchActive surveillanceProstate cancerProstate MRIPatient experienceGleason Grade Group 1Prostate cancer active surveillanceIntermediate-risk prostate cancerRisk prostate cancerGrade group 1Group 2 tumorsMRI-ultrasound fusion biopsyMean sample ageHispanics/LatinosInitial diagnosisFusion biopsyProstate biopsyConventional content analysisPatient's perspectiveClinical careGroup 1MRI resultsMRI scansProviders' explanationsCancerPatientsUse of Monitoring Tests Among Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Managed With Observation
Leapman M, Wang R, Loeb S, Seibert T, Gaylis F, Lowentritt B, Brown G, Chen R, Lin D, Witte J, Cooperberg M, Catalona W, Gross C, Ma X. Use of Monitoring Tests Among Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Managed With Observation. Journal Of Urology 2023, 209: 710-718. PMID: 36753746, DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003159.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIntermediate-risk prostate cancerMixed-effects Poisson regressionPSA testingProstate biopsyProstate cancerEffects Poisson regressionMedicare beneficiariesPoisson regressionAdditional prostate biopsyRetrospective cohort studyProstate MRILocalized prostate cancerRepeat prostate biopsyRate of biopsyRace/ethnicityCensus tract povertyMedian followCohort studyMedian ageMonitoring testsProvider factorsPSA testClinical riskBiopsySociodemographic factorsEnvironmental Impact of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy
Leapman M, Thiel C, Gordon I, Nolte A, Perecman A, Loeb S, Overcash M, Sherman J. Environmental Impact of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy. European Urology 2023, 83: 463-471. PMID: 36635108, DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.12.008.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProstate magnetic resonance imagingMagnetic resonance imagingSystematic biopsyProstate biopsyProstate biopsy procedureResonance imagingBiopsy coresTransrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate BiopsyBiopsy procedureMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingUnnecessary prostate biopsiesBiparametric magnetic resonance imagingOutpatient urology clinicNumber of biopsiesGuided Prostate BiopsyAcademic medical centerHealth care facilitiesEvidence-based approachUrology clinicClinical managementMedical CenterTriage strategiesClinical careTransrectal ultrasoundBiopsy
2016
Change in a 17-gene genomic prostate score over time in men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer managed with active surveillance.
Leapman M, Cowan J, Nguyen H, Cooperberg M, Carroll P. Change in a 17-gene genomic prostate score over time in men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer managed with active surveillance. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2016, 34: 124-124. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.124.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGenomic Prostate ScoreAdverse pathological findingsActive surveillanceProstate cancerRadical prostatectomyPathological findingsFavorable-risk prostate cancerIntermediate-risk prostate cancerIntermediate clinical riskNCCN risk classificationSerial prostate biopsyRisk prostate cancerSubsequent clinical outcomesTime of surgeryRT-PCR assaysPT3a diseaseDefinitive therapyIntermediate riskOncologic outcomesClinical outcomesAdverse pathologySerial biopsiesProstate biopsyMedian changeSerial changesTRUS Biopsy: Is There Still a Role?
Leapman M, Shinohara K. TRUS Biopsy: Is There Still a Role? 2016, 53-67. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21485-6_4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate biopsyLateral peripheral zoneTRUS prostate biopsyInitial negative biopsyBiopsy-related complicationsCancer detection rateNovel serum biomarkersNegative predictive valueTRUS-BxPower Doppler imagingClinical parametersNegative biopsySextant biopsyGleason scoreSerum biomarkersUltrasonographic parametersPrognostic informationSuspicious lesionsBiopsy strategyBiopsyDoppler imagingPredictive valueBenign tissueContrast enhancementPeripheral zone
2015
Association between a 17-gene genomic prostate score and multiparametric prostate MRI in men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa).
Leapman M, Westphalen A, Ameli N, Lawrence H, Febbo P, Cooperberg M, Carroll P. Association between a 17-gene genomic prostate score and multiparametric prostate MRI in men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2015, 33: 83-83. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.7_suppl.83.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGenomic Prostate ScoreIntermediate-risk prostate cancerLow-risk patientsRisk prostate cancerFavorable pathologyProstate cancerMean apparent diffusion coefficientRisk patientsApparent diffusion coefficientAdverse pathologyIntermediate-risk patientsSuspicious MRI findingsProstate MRISuspicion of malignancyMultiparametric prostate MRIFive-tier scaleRT-PCR assaysMRI findingsSingle institutionMulti-parametric prostate MRIProstate biopsyDominant lesionRisk groupsMR findingsMR score