2022
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
Gerds A, Gotlib J, Ali H, Bose P, Dunbar A, Elshoury A, George T, Gundabolu K, Hexner E, Hobbs G, Jain T, Jamieson C, Kaesberg P, Kuykendall A, Madanat Y, McMahon B, Mohan S, Nadiminti K, Oh S, Pardanani A, Podoltsev N, Rein L, Salit R, Stein B, Talpaz M, Vachhani P, Wadleigh M, Wall S, Ward D, Bergman M, Hochstetler C. Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Journal Of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2022, 20: 1033-1062. PMID: 36075392, DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0046.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNCCN Clinical Practice GuidelinesMyeloproliferative neoplasmsClinical practice guidelinesEssential thrombocythemiaPolycythemia veraRisk stratificationManagement of myeloproliferative neoplasmsOverproduction of blood cellsPhiladelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasmsDiagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasmsPractice guidelinesClonal blood disorderManagement of myelofibrosisCourse of treatmentSupportive care strategiesAssessment of symptomsNCCN GuidelinesDiagnostic workupCare strategiesMultidisciplinary panelBlood disordersHeterogeneous groupSymptom statusBlood cellsNCCN
2021
Laboratory evaluation and prognostication among adults and children with CEBPA‐mutant acute myeloid leukemia
Mendoza H, Podoltsev NA, Siddon AJ. Laboratory evaluation and prognostication among adults and children with CEBPA‐mutant acute myeloid leukemia. International Journal Of Laboratory Hematology 2021, 43: 86-95. PMID: 34288448, DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.13517.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsCEBPA mutant acute myeloid leukemiaAcute myeloid leukemiaCEBPA mutationsMyeloid leukemiaLeukemogenic mutationsPositive prognostic impactSingle CEBPA mutationsSimilar survival outcomesNegative prognostic effectFLT3-ITD mutationLaboratory evaluationWild-type CEBPAMultiparameter flow cytometryGermline CEBPA mutationsFavorable prognosisPrognostic impactMutation presencePrognostic effectRisk stratificationSurvival outcomesGATA2 mutationsDistinct subtypesMolecular findingsCEBPA geneFlow cytometry
2020
Cui bono? Finding the value of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes
Shallis RM, Podoltsev NA, Gowda L, Zeidan AM, Gore SD. Cui bono? Finding the value of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Expert Review Of Hematology 2020, 13: 447-460. PMID: 32182435, DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2020.1744433.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsAllogeneic stem cell transplantationStem cell transplantationAcute myeloid leukemiaMyelodysplastic syndromeMDS patientsRisk stratificationCell transplantationPrognostic toolLower-risk myelodysplastic syndromesHigh-risk myelodysplastic syndromeLow-risk MDS patientsSevere bone marrow failureLow-risk diseaseLow-risk patientsOnly curative optionPrognosis of patientsBone marrow failureAggressive therapyCurative optionPrognostic impactEtiologic roleDisease progressionMyeloid leukemiaAlloSCTPatients
2015
The evolving field of prognostication and risk stratification in MDS: Recent developments and future directions
Lee EJ, Podoltsev N, Gore SD, Zeidan AM. The evolving field of prognostication and risk stratification in MDS: Recent developments and future directions. Blood Reviews 2015, 30: 1-10. PMID: 26119927, DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2015.06.004.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus StatementsConceptsMyelodysplastic syndromeRisk stratificationRecurrent molecular mutationsRisk stratification toolRelevant clinical outcomesPrediction of outcomeRisk/benefit calculationsClinical courseClinical outcomesStratification toolMDS patientsPrognostication toolsIndividual patientsClinical practiceMolecular testingTherapeutic interventionsPatient careTherapeutic selectionPatientsMolecular mutationsIndependent impactPrognosticationBiological heterogeneityOutcomesReliable assay