2013
Diagnostic discrepancies between second-opinion and referring pathology reports of neuroendocrine tumors.
Lin H, Longacre T, Khandelwal V, Balise R, Kunz P. Diagnostic discrepancies between second-opinion and referring pathology reports of neuroendocrine tumors. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2013, 31: e15011-e15011. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e15011.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNeuroendocrine tumorsPathology reportsMitotic indexHistologic classification schemeStanford University HospitalMajority of casesHistological diagnosisUniversity HospitalAcademic hospitalTreatment planDiagnostic discrepanciesClinical diagnosisKi67Improved reportingNET casesHistological descriptionReporting guidelinesHospitalPathology expertsTumorsRelevant differencesDiagnosisReportFuture studiesGuidelinesDiagnostic discrepancies between second-opinion and referring pathology reports of neuroendocrine tumors.
Lin H, Longacre T, Khandelwal V, Balise R, Kunz P. Diagnostic discrepancies between second-opinion and referring pathology reports of neuroendocrine tumors. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2013, 31: 154-154. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.4_suppl.154.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNeuroendocrine tumorsPathology reportsMitotic indexDiagnosis of NETsHistologic classification schemeStanford University HospitalNET casesMajority of casesRare malignancyUniversity HospitalGastrointestinal tractNET diagnosisPathology guidelinesPrimary siteHistologic descriptionDiagnostic discrepanciesSmall intestineClinical diagnosisMajor discrepanciesNeuroendocrine cellsKi67DiagnosisMost reportsPathology expertsTumors
2012
Neuroendocrine tumors.
Kulke MH, Benson AB, Bergsland E, Berlin JD, Blaszkowsky LS, Choti MA, Clark OH, Doherty GM, Eason J, Emerson L, Engstrom PF, Goldner WS, Heslin MJ, Kandeel F, Kunz PL, Kuvshinoff BW, Moley JF, Pillarisetty VG, Saltz L, Schteingart DE, Shah MH, Shibata S, Strosberg JR, Vauthey JN, White R, Yao JC, Freedman-Cass DA, Dwyer MA. Neuroendocrine tumors. Journal Of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2012, 10: 724-64. PMID: 22679117, DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2012.0075.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2009
Identification of a biomarker panel using a multiplex proximity ligation assay improves accuracy of pancreatic cancer diagnosis
Chang ST, Zahn JM, Horecka J, Kunz PL, Ford JM, Fisher GA, Le QT, Chang DT, Ji H, Koong AC. Identification of a biomarker panel using a multiplex proximity ligation assay improves accuracy of pancreatic cancer diagnosis. Journal Of Translational Medicine 2009, 7: 105. PMID: 20003342, PMCID: PMC2796647, DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-7-105.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPancreatic cancer diagnosisCA19-9Pancreatic cancerBiomarker panelProximity ligation assayOptimal biomarker panelCancer diagnosisPancreatic cancer patientsPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma casesAge-matched controlsLogistic regression modelingCox survival modelsBackgroundPancreatic cancerClinical stagePrognostic significanceMultiplex proximity ligation assayCancer patientsPlasma biomarkersPlasma levelsAdenocarcinoma casesClinical cohortLigation assayDiagnosisCancerBiomarkers