An Update on the Independent Plastic Surgery Match (2019–2022): Trends, Predictors, and Program Leaders’ Perspectives
Amro C, Ryan I, McGraw J, Broach R, Kovach S, Serletti J, Butler P, Janis J, Azoury S. An Update on the Independent Plastic Surgery Match (2019–2022): Trends, Predictors, and Program Leaders’ Perspectives. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open 2024, 12: e6030. PMID: 39114802, PMCID: PMC11302939, DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000006030.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchExamination scoresUS allopathic medical school graduatesMedical school graduatesPlastic surgery residency programsUnited States Medical Licensing Examination scoresSurgery residency programsGeneral surgery residentsOsteopathic graduatesLicensing Examination scoresIn-service training examination scoresProgram leadersSurgery residentsResidency programsAmerican Council of EducationProgram participantsLeaders' viewsSan Francisco MatchLeaders' perspectivesSchool graduatesInternational graduatesApplications participantsScoresTest scoresParticipantsNext yearSocioeconomic Disparities in Research Participation: Bias in Plastic Surgery Residency Match
Lin L, Huttinger A, Butler P, Gosman A, Janis J. Socioeconomic Disparities in Research Participation: Bias in Plastic Surgery Residency Match. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open 2024, 12: e5565. PMID: 38313590, PMCID: PMC10836880, DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005565.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSocioeconomic disparitiesInvestigate socioeconomic disparitiesNortheastern medical schoolCross-sectional surveyPercentage of respondentsChi-square testFinancial hardshipMedical schoolsResidency programsNonacademic settingsSocioeconomic biasSurgery residency programsDisparitiesParticipantsPlastic surgeonsResearch participantsSummary tablesPlastic surgery residency programsCareer progressionResidency matchAdvanced degreesIntegrated plastic surgery residency programsResidency applicantsRespondentsSurrogate marker