2013
3.0 Tesla vs 1.5 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients
Butler RS, Chen C, Vashi R, Hooley RJ, Philpotts LE. 3.0 Tesla vs 1.5 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. World Journal Of Radiology 2013, 5: 285-294. PMID: 24003354, PMCID: PMC3758496, DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i8.285.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPositive predictive valueHigh positive predictive valueBreast cancer patientsSuspicious lesionsT groupAdditional malignanciesT MR examinationsCancer patientsAdditional cancersBreast cancerExact testAccountability Act-compliant retrospective reviewMR examinationsInstitutional review board approvalBreast magnetic resonanceFisher's exact testMR imaging studiesReview board approvalNeoadjuvant chemotherapyIndex cancerContralateral breastRetrospective reviewT MR imagingBiopsy resultsPathologic diagnosis
2012
Screening US in Patients with Mammographically Dense Breasts: Initial Experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41
Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE. Screening US in Patients with Mammographically Dense Breasts: Initial Experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 2012, 265: 59-69. PMID: 22723501, DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12120621.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPositive predictive valueOverall positive predictive valueBI-RADS category 4BI-RADS category 3Breast ultrasonographyDense breastsBreast cancerOverall cancer detection rateHIPAA-compliant retrospective reviewData System (BI-RADS) category 1Occult breast cancerCancer detection rateWhole-breast ultrasonographyCategory 4Category 3Dense breast tissueBreast Imaging ReportingPostmenopausal patientsIntermediate riskRetrospective reviewRisk groupsUS examinationHigh riskGeneral populationLower risk