2024
Multimodality Imaging of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Techniques, Complications, and Tumor Recurrence.
Thai J, Sodagari F, Colwell A, Winograd J, Revzin M, Mahmoud H, Mozayan S, Chou S, Destounis S, Butler R. Multimodality Imaging of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Techniques, Complications, and Tumor Recurrence. Radio Graphics 2024, 44: e230070. PMID: 38573814, DOI: 10.1148/rg.230070.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTumor recurrencePostoperative evaluation of patientsFlap reconstruction methodsImplant-based reconstructionMultimodal imagingBreast reconstruction techniquesFat graft placementBreast cancer recurrenceTissue flap reconstructionEvaluation of patientsNipple-sparing techniquesTissue donor sitesFlap-based reconstructionNipple-areolar complex reconstructionDiagnostic breast imagingUnique patient populationAutologous tissue flapsAbnormal imaging appearancesBreast cancer screeningMastectomy optionLocal recurrenceOncoplastic surgeryDisease recurrenceFlap reconstructionReconstructed breast
2023
Editorial Comment: Artificial Intelligence May Help Define Screening Strategies in Patients With Dense Breasts.
Butler R. Editorial Comment: Artificial Intelligence May Help Define Screening Strategies in Patients With Dense Breasts. American Journal Of Roentgenology 2023, 222: e2330042. PMID: 37556603, DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.30042.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPACS-integrated machine learning breast density classifier: clinical validation
Lewin J, Schoenherr S, Seebass M, Lin M, Philpotts L, Etesami M, Butler R, Durand M, Heller S, Heacock L, Moy L, Tocino I, Westerhoff M. PACS-integrated machine learning breast density classifier: clinical validation. Clinical Imaging 2023, 101: 200-205. PMID: 37421715, DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.06.023.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchModern Challenges in Assessing Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: A Call for Added Resources.
Hooley R, Butler R. Modern Challenges in Assessing Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: A Call for Added Resources. Radiology 2023, 306: e230145. PMID: 36749216, DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230145.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2022
Optoacoustic Imaging With Decision Support for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A 15-Reader Retrospective Study.
Seiler S, Neuschler E, Butler R, Lavin P, Dogan B. Optoacoustic Imaging With Decision Support for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A 15-Reader Retrospective Study. American Journal Of Roentgenology 2022, 220: 646-658. PMID: 36475811, DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.28470.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2021
Transitioning From Training to Breast Imaging Practice: Building an Academic Career
Butler R, Lee J, Hooley R. Transitioning From Training to Breast Imaging Practice: Building an Academic Career. Journal Of Breast Imaging 2021, 4: 70-77. PMID: 38422416, DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbab092.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAcademic careerCareer successClinician-educator trackEducational scholarshipFaculty goalsMedical educationAcademic departmentsProgram developmentProfessional satisfactionEducationPersonal strengthsCareerBreast imaging practicesStrategic planSuch resourcesLeadershipClinical program developmentOriginal researchWork-life integrationOpportunitiesPracticeBroad fieldTraditional areasMentorshipSuccess
2020
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis May Not Provide Optimal Surveillance of Breast Cancer Survivors.
Hooley R, Butler R. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis May Not Provide Optimal Surveillance of Breast Cancer Survivors. Radiology 2020, 298: 317-318. PMID: 33355509, DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020204219.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEditorial Comment on "Synthetic 2D Mammography Versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".
Butler RS. Editorial Comment on "Synthetic 2D Mammography Versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". American Journal Of Roentgenology 2020, 217: 325. PMID: 32966116, DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.24762.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInvited Commentary: Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening Strategies-What's New?
Butler R. Invited Commentary: Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening Strategies-What's New? Radio Graphics 2020, 40: 937-940. PMID: 32478602, DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020190218.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchScreening Breast Ultrasound: Update After 10 Years of Breast Density Notification Laws.
Butler RS, Hooley RJ. Screening Breast Ultrasound: Update After 10 Years of Breast Density Notification Laws. American Journal Of Roentgenology 2020, 214: 1424-1435. PMID: 32182096, DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.22275.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMammographic Screening in Older Women: When Is It Time to Stop?
Butler R, Philpotts L. Mammographic Screening in Older Women: When Is It Time to Stop? Journal Of Breast Imaging 2020, 2: 92-100. PMID: 38424896, DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaa007.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIndividual risk profileOlder womenAge groupsBreast cancer mortalityBenefits of screeningDigital breast tomosynthesisHealth care providersYears of ageYounger age groupsQuality of lifeFavorable cancersSevere comorbiditiesSurvival benefitAnnual mammographyComorbid conditionsRegular screeningCancer mortalityMammographic screeningCare providersPersonalized careRisk profileEarly detectionWomenMedical communityLife expectancy
2019
Optoacoustic Imaging and Gray-Scale US Features of Breast Cancers: Correlation with Molecular Subtypes.
Dogan BE, Menezes GLG, Butler RS, Neuschler EI, Aitchison R, Lavin PT, Tucker FL, Grobmyer SR, Otto PM, Stavros AT. Optoacoustic Imaging and Gray-Scale US Features of Breast Cancers: Correlation with Molecular Subtypes. Radiology 2019, 292: 564-572. PMID: 31287388, DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182071.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBreast cancer molecular subtypesHuman epidermal growth factor receptorLuminal breast cancerCancer molecular subtypesUS featuresEpidermal growth factor receptorMolecular subtypesGrowth factor receptorBreast cancerProspective multi-institutional studyFactor receptorLogistic regression analysisMulti-institutional studyLogistic regression modelsMultinomial logistic regression analysisGray-scale USMultinomial logistic regression modelsImmunohistochemistry findingsMean ageInvasive cancerPathologic diagnosisPathology reportsUS scoreKruskal-Wallis testCancer subtypesDigital Breast Tomosynthesis: What Have We Learned?
Butler R, Conant E, Philpotts L. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: What Have We Learned? Journal Of Breast Imaging 2019, 1: 9-22. PMID: 38424878, DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wby008.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2018
Optoacoustic Breast Imaging: Imaging-Pathology Correlation of Optoacoustic Features in Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.
Butler R, Lavin PT, Tucker FL, Barke LD, Böhm-Vélez M, Destounis S, Grobmyer SR, Katzen J, Kist KA, Makariou EV, Schilling KJ, Young CA, Dogan BE, Neuschler EI. Optoacoustic Breast Imaging: Imaging-Pathology Correlation of Optoacoustic Features in Benign and Malignant Breast Masses. American Journal Of Roentgenology 2018, 211: 1155-1170. PMID: 30106610, DOI: 10.2214/ajr.17.18435.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDowngrading and Upgrading Gray-Scale Ultrasound BI-RADS Categories of Benign and Malignant Masses With Optoacoustics: A Pilot Study.
Neuschler EI, Lavin PT, Tucker FL, Barke LD, Bertrand ML, Böhm-Vélez M, Destounis S, Dogan BE, Grobmyer SR, Katzen J, Kist KA, Makariou EV, Parris TM, Young CA, Butler R. Downgrading and Upgrading Gray-Scale Ultrasound BI-RADS Categories of Benign and Malignant Masses With Optoacoustics: A Pilot Study. American Journal Of Roentgenology 2018, 211: 689-700. PMID: 29975115, DOI: 10.2214/ajr.17.18436.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInvited Commentary: Handheld or Automated—Staying Focused on the Goals of Screening US, with Response from Drs van Zelst and Mann
Butler RS. Invited Commentary: Handheld or Automated—Staying Focused on the Goals of Screening US, with Response from Drs van Zelst and Mann. Radio Graphics 2018, 38: 683-687. PMID: 29757727, DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018180033.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchArchitectural Distortion (Radial Scar)
Butler R. Architectural Distortion (Radial Scar). 2018, 269-277. DOI: 10.1093/med/9780190270261.003.0030.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRadial scarsSclerosing lesionsImage-guided core needle biopsyArchitectural distortionCore needle biopsyComplex sclerosing lesionsHigh-risk lesionsRadial sclerosing lesionsScar presentationDigital breast tomosynthesisHistological confirmationBiopsy guidanceNeedle biopsyBenign lesionsDiagnostic workupDifferential diagnosisImaging evaluationLesionsBreast tomosynthesisBiopsyScarsStellate patternTomosynthesisChapter 14 Interventional Procedures
Zuley M, Thomas E, Sumkin J, Butler R. Chapter 14 Interventional Procedures. 2018, 167-180. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-35827-9.00014-9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchChapter 6 Tomosynthesis in Diagnostic Mammography
Butler R, Hooley R. Chapter 6 Tomosynthesis in Diagnostic Mammography. 2018, 39-55. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-35827-9.00006-x.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2017
A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists
Neuschler EI, Butler R, Young CA, Barke LD, Bertrand ML, Böhm-Vélez M, Destounis S, Donlan P, Grobmyer SR, Katzen J, Kist KA, Lavin PT, Makariou EV, Parris TM, Schilling KJ, Tucker FL, Dogan BE. A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists. Radiology 2017, 287: 172228. PMID: 29178816, DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017172228.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProbability of malignancyNegative likelihood ratioGrayscale ultrasonographyIndependent readersMalignant breast massesBreast massesBlinded independent readersMalignant massesBI-RADS 3Negative predictive valueData System (BI-RADS) categoryBreast Imaging ReportingBI-RADS categoryLikelihood ratioOA featuresHistologic findingsBI-RADS categoriesNegative examinationsPretest probabilityProtocol deviationsHistologic resultsOnline supplemental materialUltrasonographyDiagnostic utilityPredictive value