2019
Hepatocellular carcinoma: Impact of academic setting and hospital volume on patient survival
Uhlig J, Sellers CM, Khan SA, Cha C, Kim HS. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Impact of academic setting and hospital volume on patient survival. Surgical Oncology 2019, 31: 111-118. PMID: 31654956, DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.10.009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAcademic Medical CentersAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCombined Modality TherapyDatabases, FactualFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHepatectomyHospitals, High-VolumeHospitals, Low-VolumeHumansLiver NeoplasmsLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'PrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateConceptsOverall survivalHepatocellular carcinomaAcademic centersHospital volumePatient survivalInterventional oncologyYoung African American patientsHigh-volume academic centersMultivariable Cox regressionFirst-line treatmentLow-volume centersLonger patient survivalAfrican American patientsHCC treatment modalitiesNon-academic centersLiver transplantMultivariable adjustmentPatient demographicsSurgical resectionLine treatmentCox regressionPotential confoundersVolume centersTreatment modalitiesAmerican patientsIntrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Socioeconomic Discrepancies, Contemporary Treatment Approaches and Survival Trends from the National Cancer Database
Uhlig J, Sellers CM, Cha C, Khan SA, Lacy J, Stein SM, Kim HS. Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Socioeconomic Discrepancies, Contemporary Treatment Approaches and Survival Trends from the National Cancer Database. Annals Of Surgical Oncology 2019, 26: 1993-2000. PMID: 30693451, DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07175-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNational Cancer DatabaseIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaOverall survivalMedicaid insuranceCancer DatabaseLonger survivalTreatment allocationSurvival trendsTreatment approachesInterventional oncologySocioeconomic discrepanciesHigher surgery ratesMultivariable Cox modelFirst-line treatmentCurrent treatment approachesContemporary treatment approachesLow incomeMale African AmericansEligible patientsMethodsThe 2004ICC patientsSurgery ratesMale sexTreatment predictorsCancer stage
2010
Improved Testing for Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer Using a Simplified 3-Marker Assay
Esemuede I, Forslund A, Khan SA, Qin LX, Gimbel MI, Nash GM, Zeng Z, Rosenberg S, Shia J, Barany F, Paty PB. Improved Testing for Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer Using a Simplified 3-Marker Assay. Annals Of Surgical Oncology 2010, 17: 3370-3378. PMID: 20703819, PMCID: PMC3269820, DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1147-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdenocarcinomaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiological AssayBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsComparative Genomic HybridizationDNA RepairDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMicrosatellite RepeatsMiddle AgedOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPrognosisProspective StudiesSurvival RateYoung AdultConceptsHereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancerColorectal cancerMicrosatellite instabilityMSI testingMSI tumorsMismatch repair protein lossBackgroundIn colorectal cancerDisease-specific survivalPredictive scoring systemNonpolyposis colorectal cancerMore BRAF mutationsDefective DNA mismatch repairNCI criteriaFavorable prognosisFavorable survivalKRAS mutationsBRAF mutationsMSI statusDistinct phenotypic propertiesScoring systemCancerValuable markerMSS cancersMethodsDNA samplesProtein loss