2020
Feasibility of deploying a U.S. simulation-based gynecological brachytherapy educational workshop to an international setting
Damast S, Felder S, Fields E, Singer L. Feasibility of deploying a U.S. simulation-based gynecological brachytherapy educational workshop to an international setting. Brachytherapy 2020, 19: 777-782. PMID: 33221261, DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.09.015.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHuman epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) in early stage uterine serous carcinoma: A multi-institutional cohort study
Erickson BK, Najjar O, Damast S, Blakaj A, Tymon-Rosario J, Shahi M, Santin A, Klein M, Dolan M, Cimino-Mathews A, Buza N, Ferriss JS, Stone RL, Khalifa M, Fader AN. Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) in early stage uterine serous carcinoma: A multi-institutional cohort study. Gynecologic Oncology 2020, 159: 17-22. PMID: 32709539, PMCID: PMC7541557, DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.016.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantCystadenocarcinoma, SerousFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHysterectomyImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalReceptor, ErbB-2Retrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentUnited StatesUterine NeoplasmsUterusConceptsHuman epidermal growth factor 2Uterine serous carcinomaHER2-positive tumorsEarly-stage diseaseOverall survivalSerous carcinomaCohort studyHER2 positivityPositive tumorsEarly stage uterine serous carcinomaLymph-vascular space invasionRecurrent uterine serous carcinomaMulti-institutional cohort studyHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2Multi-center cohort studyEpidermal growth factor receptor 2Epidermal growth factor 2HER2-positive cohortGrowth factor receptor 2HER2-negative tumorsEquivocal IHC resultsFactor receptor 2Inferior PFSAdjuvant therapyGrowth factor 2
2019
Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, Bradley K, Campos SM, Cho KR, Chon HS, Chu C, Clark R, Cohn D, Crispens MA, Damast S, Dorigo O, Eifel PJ, Fisher CM, Frederick P, Gaffney DK, Han E, Huh WK, Lurain JR, Mariani A, Mutch D, Nagel C, Nekhlyudov L, Fader AN, Remmenga SW, Reynolds RK, Tillmanns T, Ueda S, Wyse E, Yashar CM, McMillian NR, Scavone JL. Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Journal Of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2019, 17: 64-84. PMID: 30659131, DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrachytherapyCervix UteriChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFertility PreservationHumansHysterectomyMass ScreeningMedical OncologyNeoplasm StagingOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPapanicolaou TestPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsSocieties, MedicalUnited StatesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsConceptsCervical cancerHuman papilloma virus vaccinationNCCN Clinical Practice GuidelinesTreatment of recurrentAdvanced cervical cancerClinical practice guidelinesMalignant epithelial tumorsNCCN guidelinesMetastatic diseaseVirus vaccinationUterine cervixCommon cancerPrecancerous lesionsFull guidelinePractice guidelinesEpithelial tumorsRoutine screeningCancerScreening protocolTreatmentGuidelinesMost casesEarly stagesCervixVaccination
2017
Adjuvant Therapy Use and Survival in Stage II Endometrial Cancer
Lester-Coll NH, Young MR, Park HS, Ratner ES, Litkouhi B, Damast S. Adjuvant Therapy Use and Survival in Stage II Endometrial Cancer. International Journal Of Gynecological Cancer 2017, 27: 1904-1911. PMID: 28763364, DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001095.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsReceipt of chemotherapyEndometrioid endometrial carcinomaNational Cancer Data BaseImproved overall survivalRole of chemotherapyOverall survivalAdjuvant chemotherapyAdjuvant treatmentStage II endometrial cancerCox proportional hazards regressionPropensity scoreAdjuvant therapy useGrade 3 diseaseStage II patientsProportional hazards regressionWorse overall survivalMultivariable logistic regressionKaplan-Meier estimatesLog-rank testAdjuvant radiotherapyExcellent prognosisLymphovascular invasionObservational cohortEEC patientsEndometrial cancer
2016
Who benefits from chemoradiation in stage III–IVA endometrial cancer? An analysis of the National Cancer Data Base
Lester-Coll NH, Park HS, Rutter CE, Corso CD, Young MR, Ratner ES, Litkouhi B, Decker RH, Yu JB, Damast S. Who benefits from chemoradiation in stage III–IVA endometrial cancer? An analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Gynecologic Oncology 2016, 142: 54-61. PMID: 27151429, DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.04.544.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdvanced endometrial cancerImproved overall survivalNational Cancer Data BaseOverall survivalHistologic gradeEndometrial cancerCox proportional hazards regressionPropensity scoreMultivariable subgroup analysisSignificant OS benefitGrade 1 patientsProportional hazards regressionKaplan-Meier estimatesLog-rank testLack of benefitOS benefitAdjuvant therapyStage IIIAStage IVAFIGO stageAdjuvant CRTHazards regressionTumor sizeRegional radiotherapySubgroup analysis