2018
Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of the 21-Gene Assay in Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.
Wang SY, Dang W, Richman I, Mougalian SS, Evans SB, Gross CP. Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of the 21-Gene Assay in Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2018, 36: 1619-1627. PMID: 29659329, PMCID: PMC5978470, DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.76.5941.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCost-effectiveness analysisChemotherapy useBreast cancerEarly-stage breast cancerStudy designIncremental cost-effectiveness ratioODX recurrence scoreHigh-risk patientsLow-risk patientsRisk of biasCost-effectiveness ratioCost-effectiveness estimatesIndustry fundingDistant recurrenceIndustry-funded studiesClinical characteristicsTumor characteristicsRecurrence scoreChemotherapy decisionsScore groupClinical practiceSystematic reviewODXPatientsCancer
2017
The Impact of Social Contagion on Physician Adoption of Advanced Imaging Tests in Breast Cancer
Pollack CE, Soulos PR, Herrin J, Xu X, Christakis NA, Forman HP, Yu JB, Killelea BK, Wang SY, Gross CP. The Impact of Social Contagion on Physician Adoption of Advanced Imaging Tests in Breast Cancer. Journal Of The National Cancer Institute 2017, 109: djw330. PMID: 28376191, PMCID: PMC6059114, DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djw330.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMagnetic resonance imagingBaseline usePositron emission tomography scanEnd Results-MedicareEmission tomography scanBreast cancer practiceImaging modalitiesAdvanced imaging testsHierarchical logistic regression modelsLogistic regression modelsPatient characteristicsUnproven benefitCancer practiceMRI/PETTomography scanBreast cancerMRI useImaging testsClinical practicePET useResonance imagingPET imagingPhysician peersPhysician adoptionBaseline period