The calculation of actual or received dose intensity: a comparison of published methods.
Longo D, Duffey P, DeVita V, Wesley M, Hubbard S, Young R. The calculation of actual or received dose intensity: a comparison of published methods. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 1991, 9: 2042-51. PMID: 1941063, DOI: 10.1200/jco.1991.9.11.2042.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSouthwest Oncology GroupTreatment courseEntire treatment coursePatient's treatment coursePrognostic factorsTreatment outcomesAggressive histology lymphomaCombination chemotherapy programsClinical prognostic factorsNational Cancer Institute studyDistinct patient populationsDose-related variablesDose intensityOncology GroupChemotherapy programPrognostic significancePatient populationStudy populationInstitute studyOutcomesRecent reportsEntire populationPopulationCourseDI dataLong-term follow-up of ProMACE-CytaBOM in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas
Fisher R, Longo D, DeVita V, Hubbard S, Miller T, Young R. Long-term follow-up of ProMACE-CytaBOM in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Annals Of Oncology 1991, 2: 33-35. PMID: 1710487, DOI: 10.1093/annonc/2.suppl_1.33.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDisease-free survivalProMACE-MOPPCR rateComplete remissionProMACE-CytaBOMHodgkin's lymphomaLong-term disease-free survivalLong-term disease-free survivorsSurvival curvesStage IIDisease-free survival curvesFirst-generation regimensThird-generation regimensPhase II studyDisease-free survivorsOverall survival curvesSouthwest Oncology GroupCooperative group settingHigh-grade NHLNational Cancer InstituteSame time pointsVs 53Aggressive NHLII studyOncology Group