Does urinary cytology have a role in haematuria investigations?
Tan W, Sarpong R, Khetrapal P, Rodney S, Mostafid H, Cresswell J, Watson D, Rane A, Hicks J, Hellawell G, Davies M, Srirangam S, Dawson L, Payne D, Williams N, Brew‐Graves C, Feber A, Kelly J, Sridhar A, Lamb B, Ocampo F, McBain H, Baillie K, Middleton K, Knight H, Maher S, Pathmanathan B, Harmathova A, Pelluri S, Pati J, Cossons A, Scott C, Madaan S, Bradfield S, Wakeford N, Dann, Cook J, Cornwell M, Mills R, Thomas, Reyner S, Vallejera G, Adeniran P, Masood S, Whotton N, Dent K, Pearson S, Hatton J, Newton M, Hheeney E, Green K, Evans S, Rogers M, Gupwell K, ley S, Brown A, McGrath J, Lunt N, Hill P, inclair A, Paredes‐Guerra A, Holbrook B, Ong E, Wardle H, Wilson D, Bayles A, Fennelly R, Tribbeck M, Ames K, Taylor J, Edmunds E, Moore J, Mckinley S, Nolan T, peed A, Tunnicliff A, Fossey G, Williams A, George M, Hutchins I, Einosas R, Richards A, Henderson A, Appleby B, Kehoe L, Gladwell L, Drakeley S, Davies J, Krishnan R, Roberts H, Main C, Jain S, Dumville J, Wilkinson N, Taylor J, Thomas F, Goulden K, Vinod C, Green E, Waymont C, Rogers J, Grant A, Carter V, Heap H, Lomas C, Cooke P, Scarratt L, Hodgkiss T, Johnstone D, Johnson J, Allsop J, Rothwell J, Connolly K, Cherian J, Ridgway S, Coulding M, Savill H, Mccormick J, Clark M, Collins G, Jewers K, Keith S, Bowen G, Hargreaves J, Riley K, Rees A, Williams S, Dukes S, Goffe A, Mistry R, Chadwick J, Cocks S, Hull R, oftus A, Baird Y, Moore S, Greenslade S, Margalef J, Chadbourn I, Harris M, Clitheroe P, Connolly S, Hodgkinson S, Haydock H, Storr E, Cogley L, Natale S, Lovegrove W, Slack K, Nash D, Smith K, Walsh J, Guerdette A, Hill M, Taylor B, Sinclair E, Perry M, Debbarma M, Hewitt D, Sriram R, Power A, Cannon J, Devereaux L, Thompson A, Atkinson K, Royle L, Madine J, MacLean K. Does urinary cytology have a role in haematuria investigations? BJU International 2018, 123: 74-81. PMID: 30003675, PMCID: PMC6334509, DOI: 10.1111/bju.14459.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedCarcinoma, Transitional CellFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHematuriaHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyUreteral NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrineUrographyConceptsUpper tract urothelial cancerPositive urine cytologyAccuracy of urinary cytologyDiagnosis of bladder cancerUrine cytologyHigh-risk cancerNegative predictive valuePositive predictive valueBladder cancerHaematuria investigationsUrinary cytologyInvasive testingDiagnostic accuracy of urinary cytologyMuscle-invasive bladder cancerProspective observational study of patientsMulticentre prospective observational studyObservational study of patientsPredictive valueEndoscopic tumor resectionPositive cytology resultsUpper tract imagingHigh-risk diseaseOutcomes of patientsDiagnosed bladder cancerStudy of patientsWho Should Be Investigated for Haematuria? Results of a Contemporary Prospective Observational Study of 3556 Patients
Tan W, Feber A, Sarpong R, Khetrapal P, Rodney S, Jalil R, Mostafid H, Cresswell J, Hicks J, Rane A, Henderson A, Watson D, Cherian J, Williams N, Brew-Graves C, Kelly J, collaborators O. Who Should Be Investigated for Haematuria? Results of a Contemporary Prospective Observational Study of 3556 Patients. European Urology 2018, 74: 10-14. PMID: 29653885, DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.008.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsUrinary tract cancerIncidence of urinary tract cancerInvestigation of haematuriaRisk of urinary tract cancerClinically significant cancerDiagnosis of urinary tract cancerHigh-risk cancerProspective observational studyIncidence of cancerSignificant cancerAge thresholdBladder cancerSmoking historyVisible bloodOlder patientsHaematuriaMale genderConsensus recommendationsPatientsObservational studyCancerPatient preferencesCancer diagnosisLack of consensusAge