2023
Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative, Oncological, and Quality of Life Outcomes Using Randomized Controlled Trials
Khetrapal P, Wong J, Tan W, Rupasinghe T, Tan W, Williams S, Boorjian S, Wijburg C, Parekh D, Wiklund P, Vasdev N, Khan M, Guru K, Catto J, Kelly J. Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative, Oncological, and Quality of Life Outcomes Using Randomized Controlled Trials. European Urology 2023, 84: 393-405. PMID: 37169638, DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.004.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRobot-assisted radical cystectomyOpen radical cystectomyRadical cystectomyBlood lossThromboembolic eventsAssociated with better physical functionBladder cancerPositive surgical margin rateAssociated with more blood lossRisk of thromboembolic eventsHealth-related QoLQuality of life outcomesProgression-free survivalSurgical margin rateLymph node yieldRobot-assisted approachShorter operative timeShorter hospital lengthQuality of lifeRandomized controlled trialsSystematic literature searchPhysical functionWeb of ScienceNode yieldOverall survival
2019
Pathological Findings and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Concordance at Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Local Recurrence following Partial Ablation Using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound.
Thompson J, Sridhar A, Tan W, Freeman A, Haider A, Allen C, Moore C, Orczyk C, Mazzon G, Khetrapal P, Shaw G, Rajan P, Mohammed A, Briggs T, Nathan S, Kelly J, Sooriakumaran P. Pathological Findings and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Concordance at Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Local Recurrence following Partial Ablation Using High Intensity Focused Ultrasound. Journal Of Urology 2019, 201: 1134-1143. PMID: 30730409, DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000000135.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSalvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomyRobot-assisted radical prostatectomyPositive surgical marginsSalvage prostatectomyRadical prostatectomySensitivity of magnetic resonance imagingField recurrenceMagnetic resonance imagingInfield recurrenceSurgical marginsHigher risk of positive surgical marginsGleason 3+3 diseasePrimary robotic assisted radical prostatectomyRisk of positive surgical marginsMagnetic resonance imaging concordancePositive surgical margin ratePartial ablationSalvage radical prostatectomyMagnetic resonance imaging sensitivityResonance imagingSurgical margin rateRisk of recurrenceCharacteristics of recurrenceProstatectomy histopathologyHigh-intensity focused ultrasound
2016
Analysis of open and intracorporeal robotic assisted radical cystectomy shows no significant difference in recurrence patterns and oncological outcomes
Tan W, Sridhar A, Ellis G, Lamb B, Goldstraw M, Nathan S, Hines J, Cathcart P, Briggs T, Kelly J. Analysis of open and intracorporeal robotic assisted radical cystectomy shows no significant difference in recurrence patterns and oncological outcomes. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2016, 34: 257.e1-257.e9. PMID: 26968561, DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.02.010.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRecurrence free survivalCancer-specific survivalOpen radical cystectomyORC cohortOverall survivalRadical cystectomySpecific survivalNo significant differenceOncological outcomesSignificant differenceOpen radical cystectomy casesPositive surgical margin rateIntracorporeal robot-assisted radical cystectomyRobotic-assisted radical cystectomyRobot-assisted radical cystectomyEarly oncologic outcomesPreoperative chemotherapy useSurgical margin rateLymph node yieldMedian follow-upKaplan-Meir analysisCox regression analysisIntracorporeal urinary diversionRecurrence patternsPT0 status