2024
Cytomorphological characteristics of low‐grade papillary urothelial carcinoma in voided urine samples: Distinction from benign and high‐grade papillary urothelial carcinoma
Takeda K, Adeniran A, Levi A, Tang H, Cai G. Cytomorphological characteristics of low‐grade papillary urothelial carcinoma in voided urine samples: Distinction from benign and high‐grade papillary urothelial carcinoma. Cytopathology 2024, 35: 724-732. PMID: 38992916, DOI: 10.1111/cyt.13413.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHigh-grade papillary urothelial carcinomaLow-grade papillary urothelial carcinomaPapillary urothelial carcinomaUrothelial carcinomaVoided urine samplesCytomorphologic featuresBenign casesUrine samplesUrine specimensNuclear enlargementVoided urine specimensHigh-grade transformationNuclear-to-cytoplasmic (N/CIrregular nuclear membranesUrine cytologyRetrospective reviewHistopathological diagnosisCytomorphologic characteristicsCytomorphological distinctionFrequent recurrenceCytologic featuresCarcinomaBenign conditionsAccurate diagnosisHigh N/C ratio
2022
Significance of KRAS mutation testing in biliary brushing cytology specimens: A 10‐year retrospective review
Sun T, Zuo T, Hui P, Cai G. Significance of KRAS mutation testing in biliary brushing cytology specimens: A 10‐year retrospective review. Cancer Cytopathology 2022, 130: 558-565. PMID: 35417072, DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22579.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsExtrahepatic biliary stenosisKRAS mutation testingKRAS mutational analysisKRAS mutationsBiliary stenosisBiliary ductsInstitutional review board approvalResults of cytologyPancreatic duct adenocarcinomaBiliary brushing cytologyReview board approvalCytological diagnostic categoriesRetrospective reviewBiliary stricturesDuct adenocarcinomaAbsolute riskCytology examinationDuct brushingsBiliary brushingsBrushing cytologyMalignant conditionsCytological diagnosisBoard approvalClinical practiceCytology specimens