2024
Sociodemographic disparities in prostate cancer imaging
Sundaresan V, Lokeshwar S, Sutherland R, Sohoni N, Golos A, Ajjawi I, Leapman M. Sociodemographic disparities in prostate cancer imaging. Abdominal Radiology 2024, 1-9. PMID: 39325212, DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04603-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate cancer imagingProstate cancerProstate cancer diagnosisMonitoring of prostate cancerProstate multiparametric MRISociodemographic disparitiesProstate cancer treatmentEquitable cancer careBiochemical recurrenceFactors associated with disparitiesMultiparametric MRIActive surveillanceTreatment planningBlack patientsCancer outcomesTreatment workflowDiagnostic imagingCancer careDiagnosisRural settingsProstateImaging utilizationTreatmentPatientsCancer imagingDevelopment of a Longitudinal Prostate Cancer Transcriptomic and Clinical Data Linkage
Leapman M, Ho J, Liu Y, Filson C, Zhao X, Hakansson A, Proudfoot J, Davicioni E, Martin D, An Y, Seibert T, Lin D, Spratt D, Cooperberg M, Ross A, Sprenkle P. Development of a Longitudinal Prostate Cancer Transcriptomic and Clinical Data Linkage. JAMA Network Open 2024, 7: e2417274. PMID: 38874922, PMCID: PMC11179136, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17274.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsElectronic health recordsCancer diagnosisClinical data linkageMedicine Clinical TermsPatterns of careProstate cancer diagnosisRadical prostatectomyCancer risk stratificationData linkageHealth recordsClinical dataMain OutcomesCancer outcomesClinical juncturesClinical careCommon Procedural Terminology codesAdministrative dataDiagnosis codesLongitudinal clinical dataCohort studyPharmacy recordsGenomic classifierProcedural Terminology codesDevelopment of prostate cancer metastasisLinkage data
2017
Impact of histologic subtype on bladder cancer outcome.
Washington S, Sanford T, Leapman M, Meng M, Porten S. Impact of histologic subtype on bladder cancer outcome. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2017, 35: 391-391. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.6_suppl.391.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNational Cancer DatabaseVariant histologySmall cell carcinomaSquamous cell carcinomaBladder cancer outcomesCell carcinomaUrothelial carcinomaHazard ratioOverall survivalIndependent predictorsRadical cystectomyCancer outcomesBlack ethnicityBladder cancerMean age 67 yearsU.S. population-based cohortCommon variant histologyNon-urothelial histologyMultivariable Cox regressionSurgical margin statusAge 67 yearsPathologic T stageWorse overall survivalHistory of chemotherapyPopulation-based cohort
2016
Application of a Prognostic Gleason Grade Grouping System to Assess Distant Prostate Cancer Outcomes
Leapman MS, Cowan JE, Simko J, Roberge G, Stohr BA, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR. Application of a Prognostic Gleason Grade Grouping System to Assess Distant Prostate Cancer Outcomes. European Urology 2016, 71: 750-759. PMID: 27940155, DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.032.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRisk of PCSMGleason grade groupBone metastasesProstate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) registryGroup ICox proportional hazards modelGrade groupBone metastatic progressionGrade group IPrimary androgen deprivationPrognostic grade groupingKaplan-Meier methodProstate cancer outcomesProportional hazards modelGroup VProstate cancer pathologyNondefinitive therapyDefinitive therapyConservative managementUnadjusted riskAndrogen deprivationGleason sumGleason scoreCancer outcomesGrouping system