2024
Strength of evidence underlying the CMS-FDA parallel review of comprehensive genomic profiling tests in the cancer setting
Stackland S, Schnabel D, Dinan M, Presley C, Gross C. Strength of evidence underlying the CMS-FDA parallel review of comprehensive genomic profiling tests in the cancer setting. Journal Of The National Cancer Institute 2024, djae196. PMID: 39288939, DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae196.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchComprehensive genomic profilingComprehensive genomic profiling testCenter for Medical Technology PolicyClinical careClinical outcomesDiagnostic testsAssessed clinical outcomesOutcomes of patientsStrength of evidenceCourse of clinical careEfficacy of diagnostic testsNovel diagnostic testsPeer-reviewed literatureGenomic profiling testsFoundationOne CDxGenomic testingSolid tumorsStudy designGenomic alterationsGenomic profilingF1CDxCancer settingClinical utilityCancer typesCompare groups
2023
Characteristics, healthcare utilization, and outcomes of patients with HER2-low breast cancer
Check D, Jackson B, Reeder-Hayes K, Dinan M, Faherty E, Kwong J, Mehta S, Spees L, Wheeler S, Wilson L, Lam C. Characteristics, healthcare utilization, and outcomes of patients with HER2-low breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research And Treatment 2023, 203: 329-338. PMID: 37875669, DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07142-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHER2-low breast cancerBreast cancerHealthcare utilizationOutcomes of patientsRetrospective cohort studyStage IV diseaseStage IV patientsMetastatic breast cancerNew treatment guidelinesRate of hospitalizationBreast cancer patientsClinical characteristicsCohort studyHazard ratioIV patientsOverall cohortPositive diseaseTreatment guidelinesIHC 0Utilization outcomesTreatment optionsCancer patientsSurvival differencesPatientsStage IV